User talk:HOBO KELLEY

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, HOBO KELLEY, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to John Hope Bryant seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Introduction and Getting started
Contributing to Wikipedia
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Magnolia677 (talk) 23:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in John Hope Bryant. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:44, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

John Hope Bryant

Please take a moment to read WP:EL and Help:Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:36, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:HOBO KELLEY/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:HOBO KELLEY/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PAVLOV (talk) 22:44, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at John Hope Bryant, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please stop adding external links to the text. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:13, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HOBO KELLEY. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to John Hope Bryant, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:HOBO KELLEY. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=HOBO KELLEY|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MarioGom (talk) 10:25, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to John Hope Bryant, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:HOBO KELLEY, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=HOBO KELLEY|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:12, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Morning! I am fairly new to Wikipedia and have been doing my best to understand and follow the guidelines in place. I work for Operation HOPE and part of my job is to keep certain online sources (i.e. Wikipedia, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) updated with all new developments that are factual and linkable to reliable, third-party reference sources, for John Hope Bryant.

My objective is to update information that has credible and linkable references in line with the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia. Please let me know if any additional information is required.

Thank you! HOBO KELLEY (talk) 16:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]