skip to main content
10.5555/1599936.1600031dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiclsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Supporting the use of multiple representations in multimedia learning environments

Published: 24 June 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Many learning environments contain multiple representations. Using them can lead to a deeper level of cognitive processing when learners make mental transformations between representations. However, research has revealed two problems. First, it has been shown that learners often do not make spontaneous use of such multiple options. Second, the translation process is often difficult. The papers presented in this symposium aim at supporting learners' use of multiple representations as well as their translation process. The first study provided learners with different types of representations and asked them to translate those into other representations. The second study examined the effectiveness of contextual scaffolds in computer simulations. The third study aimed at supporting hypermedia learning with multiple representations by means of metacognitive modelling and prompting of representational awareness. The fourth study investigated if sequencing dynamic representations combined with explicit instruction to relate and translate between representations has a positive effect on learning outcomes.

References

[1]
Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers and Education, 33, 131-152.
[2]
Seufert, T. (2003). Supporting coherence formation in learning from multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 13, 227-237.
[3]
Vogel, M., Girwidz, R. & Engel, J. (2006). Supplantation of Mental Operations on Graphs. Computers & Education, in press.
[4]
Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
[5]
Bruner, J. (1999). Postscript: Some reflections on education research. In E. C. Lagemann & L. S. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities (pp. 399-409). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[6]
Hawkins, J., & Pea, R. D. (1987). Tools for bridging the cultures of everyday and scientific thinking. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 24, 291-307.
[7]
Lave, J. (1987). Cognition in practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[8]
Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
[9]
Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of selfregulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 199-209.
[10]
Bannert, M. (2005). Explorationsstudie zum spontanen metakognitiven Strategie-Einsatz in hypermedialen Lernumgebungen. In C. Artelt & B. Moschner (Eds.). Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationen f��r Forschung und Praxis (pp. 127-151). M�nster: Waxmann.
[11]
Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Computers in the classroom. Mindtools for critical thinking. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
[12]
Rouet, J. F., & Levonen, J. J. (1996). Studying and learning with hypertext: Empirical studies and their implications. In J.-F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and Cognition (pp. 9-23). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[13]
Ainsworth, S. E., & Peevers, G. J. (2003). The Interaction between informational and computational properties of external representations on problem-solving and learning. Paper presented at the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
[14]
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
[15]
Petre, M., Blackwell, A. F., & Green, T. R. G. (1998). Cognitive questions in software visualization. In J. Stasko, J. Domingue, M. Brown & B. Price (Eds.), Software visualization: Programming as a multi-media experience (pp. 453-480). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
[16]
van der Meij, J., & de Jong, T. (2006). Learning with multiple representations: Supporting students' learning with multiple representations in a dynamic simulation-based learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16, 199-212.
[17]
White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1990). Causal model progressions as a foundation for intelligent learning environments. Artificial Intelligence, 42, 99-57.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image DL Hosted proceedings
ICLS'08: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on International conference for the learning sciences - Volume 3
June 2008
421 pages

Publisher

International Society of the Learning Sciences

Publication History

Published: 24 June 2008

Qualifiers

  • Article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 307 of 307 submissions, 100%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 135
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 17 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media