Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Objective

To determine the extent to which validated techniques for behavior change have been infused in commercially available fluid consumption applications (apps).

Materials and methods

Coders evaluated behavior change techniques represented in online descriptions for 50 fluid consumption apps and the latest version of each app.

Results

Apps incorporated a limited range of behavior change techniques (<20% of taxonomy). The number of techniques varied by operating system but not as a function of whether apps were free or paid. Limitations include the lack of experimental evidence establishing the efficacy of these apps.

Conclusion

Patients with urolithiasis can choose from many apps to support the recommended increase in fluid intake. Apps for iOS devices incorporate more behavior change techniques compared to apps for the Android operating system. Free apps are likely to expose patients to a similar number of techniques as paid apps. Physicians and patients should screen app descriptions for features to promote self-monitoring and provide feedback on discrepancies between behavior and a fluid consumption goal.

References 


Articles referenced by this article (29)


Show 10 more references (10 of 29)

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/12065169
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/12065169

Smart citations by scite.ai
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1016/j.urology.2016.09.015

Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
0
15
0

Article citations


Go to all (12) article citations