License: arXiv.org perpetual non-exclusive license
arXiv:2312.00403v1 [hep-ex] 01 Dec 2023

Status and prospects of exotic hadrons at Belle II ††footnotetext: *{}^{*}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT * end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTCorresponding authors. Email: [email protected] © 2023 Chinese Physical Society and IOP Publishing Ltd

Sen Jia11{}^{1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, Weitao Xiong22{}^{2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, and Chengping Shen2,3⁣*23{}^{2,3*}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 2 , 3 * end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT

11{}^{1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTSchool of Physics, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China

22{}^{2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTKey Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beam Application (MOE) and Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200443, China

33{}^{3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTSchool of Physics, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China

(Received xxx; accepted manuscript online xxx)

In the past twenty years, many new hadrons that are difficult to be explained within the conventional quark model have been discovered in the quarkonium region, which are called exotic hadrons. Belle II experiment, as the next-generation B𝐡Bitalic_B factory, provides a good platform to explore them. The charmonium-like states can be produced at Belle II in several ways, such as B𝐡Bitalic_B meson decays, initial-state radiation processes, two-photon collisions, and double charmonium productions. The bottomonium-like states can be produced directly in e+⁒eβˆ’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒e^{+}e^{-}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT colliding energies at Belle II with low continuum backgrounds. Belle II plans to perform a high-statistics energy scan from the B⁒B¯𝐡¯𝐡B\bar{B}italic_B overΒ― start_ARG italic_B end_ARG threshold up to the highest possible energy of 11.24 GeV to search for new Ybsubscriptπ‘Œπ‘Y_{b}italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT states with JP⁒Csuperscript𝐽𝑃𝐢J^{PC}italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_P italic_C end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1βˆ’βˆ’superscript1absent1^{--}1 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, Xbsubscript𝑋𝑏X_{b}italic_X start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (the bottom counterpart of Ο‡c⁒1⁒(3872)subscriptπœ’π‘13872\chi_{c1}(3872)italic_Ο‡ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 3872 ) (also known as X⁒(3872)𝑋3872X(3872)italic_X ( 3872 ))), and partners of Zbsubscript𝑍𝑏Z_{b}italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT states. In this paper, we give a mini-review on the status and prospects of exotic hadrons at Belle II.

DOI: 10.1088/0256-307X/40/12/121301


1 Introduction

Hadron is a composite subatomic particle made of two or more quarks held together by the strong interaction, which can be described by Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) in the Standard Model. At high energies, the asymptotic freedom guarantees that properties of QCD can be computed in a weak-coupling perturbation theory[1, 2][1, 2]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{1343,1346}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT.Β While, at low energies, the weak-coupling perturbation theory fails to interpret the color confinement[3][3]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{1}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. Therefore, the study of hadrons in charmonium and bottomonium regions offers many opportunities for insight on the nonperturbative behavior of QCD.

Besides the conventional mesons composed with q⁒qΒ―π‘žΒ―π‘žq\bar{q}italic_q overΒ― start_ARG italic_q end_ARG and baryons with q⁒q⁒qπ‘žπ‘žπ‘žqqqitalic_q italic_q italic_q, multiquark states with q⁒q⁒q¯⁒qΒ―π‘žπ‘žΒ―π‘žΒ―π‘žqq\bar{q}\bar{q}italic_q italic_q overΒ― start_ARG italic_q end_ARG overΒ― start_ARG italic_q end_ARG or q⁒q⁒q⁒q⁒qΒ―π‘žπ‘žπ‘žπ‘žΒ―π‘žqqqq\bar{q}italic_q italic_q italic_q italic_q overΒ― start_ARG italic_q end_ARG have been proposed by Gell-Mann in 1964 in one of the first publications on the quark model[4][4]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{214}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. In this paper, we refer to any state which does not coincide with the expectations for an ordinary q⁒qΒ―π‘žΒ―π‘žq\bar{q}italic_q overΒ― start_ARG italic_q end_ARG or q⁒q⁒qπ‘žπ‘žπ‘žqqqitalic_q italic_q italic_q hadron in the quark model as β€˜exotic’. In the charmonium and bottomonium regions, the exotic hadrons are also called charmonium-like and bottomonium-like states.

There is not progress in searching for exotic hadrons until the observation of X⁒(3872)𝑋3872X(3872)italic_X ( 3872 ) in the Ο€+β’Ο€βˆ’β’J/ψsuperscriptπœ‹superscriptπœ‹π½πœ“\pi^{+}\pi^{-}J/\psiitalic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J / italic_ψ final states by Belle in 2003[5][5]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{262001}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. Here, the X⁒(3872)𝑋3872X(3872)italic_X ( 3872 ) denotes the Ο‡c⁒1⁒(3872)subscriptπœ’π‘13872\chi_{c1}(3872)italic_Ο‡ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 3872 ) in particle data group (PDG)[6][6]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{PDG}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. We used the X⁒(3872)𝑋3872X(3872)italic_X ( 3872 ) instead of Ο‡c⁒1⁒(3872)subscriptπœ’π‘13872\chi_{c1}(3872)italic_Ο‡ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 3872 ) thereinafter. The properties of the X⁒(3872)𝑋3872X(3872)italic_X ( 3872 ) did not fit those of an ordinary charmonium. Since then, many new exotic hadrons have been discovered by various experiments[3, 7][3, 7]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{1,026201}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. Among them, Belle experiment contributed a lot. Besides the X⁒(3872)𝑋3872X(3872)italic_X ( 3872 ), the first charged charmonium-like state, Zc⁒(4430)Β±β†’Ο€Β±β’Οˆβ’(2⁒S)β†’subscript𝑍𝑐superscript4430plus-or-minussuperscriptπœ‹plus-or-minusπœ“2𝑆Z_{c}(4430)^{\pm}\to\pi^{\pm}\psi(2S)italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 4430 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Β± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Β± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ψ ( 2 italic_S )[8][8]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{142001}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, was observed by Belle in B𝐡Bitalic_B decays in 2007, which was confirmed by LHCb seven years later[9][9]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{222002}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. Almost at the same time, the Zc⁒(3900)±→π±⁒J/Οˆβ†’subscript𝑍𝑐superscript3900plus-or-minussuperscriptπœ‹plus-or-minusπ½πœ“Z_{c}(3900)^{\pm}\to\pi^{\pm}J/\psiitalic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 3900 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Β± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Β± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J / italic_ψ was discovered by BESIII in direct e+⁒eβˆ’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒e^{+}e^{-}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT annihilations and Belle in the initial state radiation (ISR) process, which is regarded as an alternative tetraquark state[10, 11][10, 11]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{252001,252002}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. Up to now, only two bottomonium-like states, Zb⁒(10610)Β±subscript𝑍𝑏superscript10610plus-or-minusZ_{b}(10610)^{\pm}italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 10610 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Β± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and Zb⁒(10650)Β±subscript𝑍𝑏superscript10650plus-or-minusZ_{b}(10650)^{\pm}italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 10650 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Β± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, were discovered[12][12]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{122001}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. They were first found in π±⁒Ξ₯⁒(n⁒S)superscriptπœ‹plus-or-minusΞ₯𝑛𝑆\pi^{\pm}\Upsilon(nS)italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Β± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ₯ ( italic_n italic_S ) (n=1,2,3)𝑛123(n=1,2,3)( italic_n = 1 , 2 , 3 ) final states by Belle using Ξ₯⁒(5⁒S)Ξ₯5𝑆\Upsilon(5S)roman_Ξ₯ ( 5 italic_S ) data samples.

Belle II experiment has started to collect β€œphysics” data since 2019. In June 2022, the accelerator SuperKEKB achieved the highest instantaneous luminosity of 4.7Γ—1034absentsuperscript1034\times 10^{34}Γ— 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 34 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT cmβˆ’22{}^{-2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTsβˆ’11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT in the world. The data collected at Belle II by the end of 2023 corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 427.79 fbβˆ’11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The integrated luminosity is expected to be increased drastically in the following years, and will ultimately reach 50 abβˆ’11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT around 2034. With large data samples, the experimental studies on exotic hadrons at Belle II should proceed: searches for new exotic hadrons and expected partners of existing exotic hadrons, searches for new decay channels of known states, and detailed measurements of all accessible properties, including spin-parities, absolute branching fractions, line-shapes, etc. We do not discuss the exotic baryons due to the limited condition at Belle II.

2 Achievements at Belle

The Belle experiment ran at the KEKB e+⁒eβˆ’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒e^{+}e^{-}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT asymmetric energy collider at the KEK Laboratory, Tsukuba, Japan between 1999 to 2010[13, 14, 15][13, 14, 15]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{479,499,2013}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. A large part of data samples at Belle were recorded on or near the Ξ₯⁒(4⁒S)Ξ₯4𝑆\Upsilon(4S)roman_Ξ₯ ( 4 italic_S ) resonance, where copious B⁒B¯𝐡¯𝐡B\bar{B}italic_B overΒ― start_ARG italic_B end_ARG pairs used to study the B𝐡Bitalic_B physics are produced. In addition, Belle collected a series of special data sets at Ξ₯⁒(1⁒S)Ξ₯1𝑆\Upsilon(1S)roman_Ξ₯ ( 1 italic_S ), Ξ₯⁒(2⁒S)Ξ₯2𝑆\Upsilon(2S)roman_Ξ₯ ( 2 italic_S ), and Ξ₯⁒(10860)Ξ₯10860\Upsilon(10860)roman_Ξ₯ ( 10860 ) resonances. The data samples recorded at Belle are detailed in TableΒ 1[16][16]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{2012}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The total integrated luminosity reaches approximately 1 abβˆ’11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. All of the data sets were used to explore the hadron spectroscopy, and a large number of new conventional quarkonia and some exotic hadrons were found using these samples.

Table 1: Integrated luminosities of Belle data samples. The scan data were collected with approximately 1 fbβˆ’11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT per point in the Ξ₯⁒(10860)Ξ₯10860\Upsilon(10860)roman_Ξ₯ ( 10860 ) and Ξ₯⁒(11020)Ξ₯11020\Upsilon(11020)roman_Ξ₯ ( 11020 ) energy ranges from 10.63 to 11.02 GeV[16][16]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{2012}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT.
Resonance On-peak Off-peak Number of accumulated events
luminosity (fbβˆ’11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) luminosity (fbβˆ’11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT)
Ξ₯⁒(1⁒S)Ξ₯1𝑆\Upsilon(1S)roman_Ξ₯ ( 1 italic_S ) 5.7 1.8 102Γ—106102superscript106102\times 10^{6}102 Γ— 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
Ξ₯⁒(2⁒S)Ξ₯2𝑆\Upsilon(2S)roman_Ξ₯ ( 2 italic_S ) 24.9 1.7 158Γ—106158superscript106158\times 10^{6}158 Γ— 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
Ξ₯⁒(3⁒S)Ξ₯3𝑆\Upsilon(3S)roman_Ξ₯ ( 3 italic_S ) 2.9 0.25 11Γ—10611superscript10611\times 10^{6}11 Γ— 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
Ξ₯⁒(4⁒S)Ξ₯4𝑆\Upsilon(4S)roman_Ξ₯ ( 4 italic_S ) 711.0 89.4 772Γ—106772superscript106772\times 10^{6}772 Γ— 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT B⁒B¯𝐡¯𝐡B\bar{B}italic_B overΒ― start_ARG italic_B end_ARG
Ξ₯⁒(5⁒S)Ξ₯5𝑆\Upsilon(5S)roman_Ξ₯ ( 5 italic_S ) 121.4 1.7 7Γ—1067superscript1067\times 10^{6}7 Γ— 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Bs⁒BΒ―ssubscript𝐡𝑠subscript¯𝐡𝑠B_{s}\bar{B}_{s}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT overΒ― start_ARG italic_B end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Energy scan - 27.6

Belle is constantly enriching the hadron spectroscopy. As shown in Fig.Β 1[17][17]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{QWG}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, many quarkonium(-like) states were observed at Belle, including long-term missing conventional quarkonia and new exotic hadrons of X𝑋Xitalic_X, Yπ‘ŒYitalic_Y, Zcsubscript𝑍𝑐Z_{c}italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and Zbsubscript𝑍𝑏Z_{b}italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT states. In the following, we introduce three outstanding achievements on exotic hadrons at Belle.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Quarkonium(-like) states observed by Belle as a function of the year of observation[17][17]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{QWG}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT.

In 2003, Belle observed a narrow charmonium-like state decaying into Ο€+β’Ο€βˆ’β’J/ψsuperscriptπœ‹superscriptπœ‹π½πœ“\pi^{+}\pi^{-}J/\psiitalic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J / italic_ψ with a mass of (3872.0Β±0.8)plus-or-minus3872.00.8(3872.0\pm 0.8)( 3872.0 Β± 0.8 ) MeV/c2superscript𝑐2c^{2}italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in BΒ±β†’K±⁒π+β’Ο€βˆ’β’J/Οˆβ†’superscript𝐡plus-or-minussuperscript𝐾plus-or-minussuperscriptπœ‹superscriptπœ‹π½πœ“B^{\pm}\to K^{\pm}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}J/\psiitalic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Β± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Β± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J / italic_ψ[5][5]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{262001}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. This is the first state with unconventional charmonium properties, thus opening a new era for studying of exotic hadrons. The X⁒(3872)𝑋3872X(3872)italic_X ( 3872 ) was subsequently confirmed by several other experiments[18, 19, 20][18, 19, 20]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{072001,162002,071103}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The JP⁒Csuperscript𝐽𝑃𝐢J^{PC}italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_P italic_C end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1++superscript1absent1^{++}1 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT was determined by LHCb by performing a five-dimensional angular correlation analysis in B𝐡Bitalic_B decays[21][21]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{011102}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. So far X⁒(3872)𝑋3872X(3872)italic_X ( 3872 ) is still one of the most interesting exotic meson candidates because of its unexpected properties as follows. The mass of X⁒(3872)𝑋3872X(3872)italic_X ( 3872 ) is close to the D⁒DΒ―(*)𝐷superscript¯𝐷D\bar{D}^{(*)}italic_D overΒ― start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT threshold, and its width is very narrow. Such property is very different from the excited Οˆπœ“\psiitalic_ψ states, such as ψ⁒(3770)πœ“3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ), ψ⁒(4040)πœ“4040\psi(4040)italic_ψ ( 4040 ), and ψ⁒(4160)πœ“4160\psi(4160)italic_ψ ( 4160 ), which decays into D(*)⁒DΒ―(*)superscript𝐷superscript¯𝐷D^{(*)}\bar{D}^{(*)}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT overΒ― start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT with large branching fractions, but their widths are very large. The enhancement of isospin-violating J/Οˆβ’Οπ½πœ“πœŒJ/\psi\rhoitalic_J / italic_ψ italic_ρ decay was observed. Very recently, Belle determined that the lower limit on the D⁒DΒ―*𝐷superscript¯𝐷D\bar{D}^{*}italic_D overΒ― start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT coupling constant is 0.094 at 90% credibility level, which implies the partial width of D⁒DΒ―*𝐷superscript¯𝐷D\bar{D}^{*}italic_D overΒ― start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in X⁒(3872)𝑋3872X(3872)italic_X ( 3872 ) decays is much larger than those of J/Οˆβ’Οπ½πœ“πœŒJ/\psi\rhoitalic_J / italic_ψ italic_ρ, J/Οˆβ’Ο‰π½πœ“πœ”J/\psi\omegaitalic_J / italic_ψ italic_Ο‰, and radiative decay modes[22][22]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{112011}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT.

Searching for charged charmonium-like states is one of the most promising ways in studying exotic hadrons, since such a state must contain at least four quarks and thus cannot be a conventional quark-antiquark meson. The first charged charmonium-like state, Zc⁒(4430)Β±subscript𝑍𝑐superscript4430plus-or-minusZ_{c}(4430)^{\pm}italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 4430 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Β± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, was reported in the Ο€Β±β’Οˆβ’(2⁒S)superscriptπœ‹plus-or-minusπœ“2𝑆\pi^{\pm}\psi(2S)italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Β± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ψ ( 2 italic_S ) mass spectrum in Bβ†’Kβ’Ο€Β±β’Οˆβ’(2⁒S)→𝐡𝐾superscriptπœ‹plus-or-minusπœ“2𝑆B\to K\pi^{\pm}\psi(2S)italic_B β†’ italic_K italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Β± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ψ ( 2 italic_S ) decays at Belle in 2007[8][8]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{142001}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. It was not confirmed by LHCb until seven years later[9][9]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{222002}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. Unlike Zc⁒(4430)Β±subscript𝑍𝑐superscript4430plus-or-minusZ_{c}(4430)^{\pm}italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 4430 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Β± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, Zc⁒(3900)subscript𝑍𝑐3900Z_{c}(3900)italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 3900 ) state decaying into π±⁒J/ψsuperscriptπœ‹plus-or-minusπ½πœ“\pi^{\pm}J/\psiitalic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Β± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J / italic_ψ was observed simultaneously by BESIII and Belle[10, 11][10, 11]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{252001,252002}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The Zc⁒(4200)+β†’Ο€+⁒J/Οˆβ†’subscript𝑍𝑐superscript4200superscriptπœ‹π½πœ“Z_{c}(4200)^{+}\to\pi^{+}J/\psiitalic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 4200 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J / italic_ψ with JP=1+superscript𝐽𝑃superscript1J^{P}=1^{+}italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT was observed by performing an amplitude analysis of BΒ―0β†’J/ψ⁒Kβˆ’β’Ο€+β†’superscript¯𝐡0π½πœ“superscript𝐾superscriptπœ‹\bar{B}^{0}\to J/\psi K^{-}\pi^{+}overΒ― start_ARG italic_B end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_J / italic_ψ italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT decays in four dimensions by Belle[23][23]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{112009}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, which has been confirmed by LHCb[24][24]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{152002}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT.

In comparison with the number of charmonium-like states from PDG[6][6]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{PDG}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, the number of bottomonium-like states is smaller due to lower production rates and limited experimental conditions. Up to now, only two bottomonium-like states were observed: Zb⁒(10610)subscript𝑍𝑏10610Z_{b}(10610)italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 10610 ) and Zb⁒(10650)subscript𝑍𝑏10650Z_{b}(10650)italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 10650 ).Β They were discovered by Belle only using Ξ₯⁒(5⁒S)Ξ₯5𝑆\Upsilon(5S)roman_Ξ₯ ( 5 italic_S ) on-resonance and scan data samples[12, 25, 26, 27, 28][12, 25, 26, 27, 28]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{122001,072003,Zb142001,212001,052016}{}{}% ]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The Zb⁒(10610)+subscript𝑍𝑏superscript10610Z_{b}(10610)^{+}italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 10610 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and Zb⁒(10650)+subscript𝑍𝑏superscript10650Z_{b}(10650)^{+}italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 10650 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT can decay into Ο€+⁒Ξ₯⁒(n⁒S)superscriptπœ‹Ξ₯𝑛𝑆\pi^{+}\Upsilon(nS)italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ₯ ( italic_n italic_S ) (n𝑛nitalic_n = 1, 2, 3), Ο€+⁒hb⁒(m⁒P)superscriptπœ‹subscriptβ„Žπ‘π‘šπ‘ƒ\pi^{+}h_{b}(mP)italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_m italic_P ) (mπ‘šmitalic_m = 1, 2), and B(*)+⁒BΒ―*0superscript𝐡limit-fromsuperscript¯𝐡absent0B^{(*)+}\bar{B}^{*0}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT overΒ― start_ARG italic_B end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT[12, 25, 26, 27][12, 25, 26, 27]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{122001,072003,Zb142001,212001}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The decay modes of Zb⁒(10610)+β†’B+⁒BΒ―*0β†’subscript𝑍𝑏superscript10610superscript𝐡superscript¯𝐡absent0Z_{b}(10610)^{+}\to B^{+}\bar{B}^{*0}italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 10610 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT overΒ― start_ARG italic_B end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and Zb⁒(10650)+β†’B*+⁒BΒ―*0β†’subscript𝑍𝑏superscript10650superscript𝐡absentsuperscript¯𝐡absent0Z_{b}(10650)^{+}\to B^{*+}\bar{B}^{*0}italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 10650 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT overΒ― start_ARG italic_B end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT are dominant[27][27]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{212001}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The neutral partner of the Zb⁒(10610)+subscript𝑍𝑏superscript10610Z_{b}(10610)^{+}italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 10610 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT was observed as well in its Ο€0⁒Ξ₯⁒(2⁒S)superscriptπœ‹0Ξ₯2𝑆\pi^{0}\Upsilon(2S)italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ₯ ( 2 italic_S ) and Ο€0⁒Ξ₯⁒(3⁒S)superscriptπœ‹0Ξ₯3𝑆\pi^{0}\Upsilon(3S)italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ₯ ( 3 italic_S ) decay modes[28][28]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{052016}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT.

3 Belle II experiment and data taking

Belle II, the first super B𝐡Bitalic_B-factory experiment, is operating at the asymmetric-energy e+⁒eβˆ’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒e^{+}e^{-}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT SuperKEKB collider[29][29]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{188}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. Two beams with energies of 7.0 GeV and 4.0 GeV collide at an angle of 83 mrad (22 mrad in KEKB). It presents several Belle subdetectors in an upgraded version together with other ones newly developed for Belle II[30][30]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{1011.0352}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The vertex detector consists of pixel sensors and double-sided silicon vertex detectors. The central drift chamber is surrounded by two types of Cherenkov light counters: an azimuthal array of time-of-propagation detector for the barrel region and an aerogel ring-imaging Cherenkov detector for the forward endcap region to the electron beam. The Belle electromagnetic CsI(Tl) crystal calorimeter, with upgraded electronics, is reused in Belle II along with the solenoid and the iron flux return yoke. The muon and KL0subscriptsuperscript𝐾0𝐿K^{0}_{L}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT identification system with upgraded glass-electrode resistive plate chambers and scintillator is the outermost and only sub-detector outside the magnet.

Taking a β€œnano-beam” scheme of reduction in the beam size and increase in the currents, the luminosity at SuperKEKB is expected to increase drastically[29][29]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{188}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. FigureΒ 2 shows the data taking plan at Belle II[31][31]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{2207.06307}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. Belle II’s goal is to accumulate 50 abβˆ’11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT of data until 2035[32, 31][32, 31]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{123C01,2207.06307}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. This schedule includes two long shutdowns (LS1 and LS2) for detector upgrades. During LS1, Belle II will complete the installation of the second layer of the pixel-based inner vertex detector. For LS2, major upgrades to the detector are being considered, along with extensive upgrades to the accelerator. After 2023, the size of data collected at Belle II will increase sharply with the completion of LS1. Although the data will be recorded at Ξ₯⁒(4⁒S)Ξ₯4𝑆\Upsilon(4S)roman_Ξ₯ ( 4 italic_S ) resonance mainly, data taking at other energy points with substantial statistics can be guaranteed. It is worth mentioning that all of the data at Belle II can be used to probe exotic hadrons discussed below.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Data taking plan at Belle II[31][31]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{2207.06307}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The red line shows the instantaneous luminosity, and the blue line shows the integrated luminosity.

4 Prospects for charmonium-like states at Belle II

There are four ways to explore the charmonium-like states at Belle II: B𝐡Bitalic_B meson decays, ISR processes, two-photon collisions, and double charmonium productions. Charmonium(-like) states (Xc⁒cΒ―subscript𝑋𝑐¯𝑐X_{c\bar{c}}italic_X start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c overΒ― start_ARG italic_c end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) are produced in B𝐡Bitalic_B meson decays in association with a kaon: Bβ†’K⁒Xc⁒c¯→𝐡𝐾subscript𝑋𝑐¯𝑐B\to KX_{c\bar{c}}italic_B β†’ italic_K italic_X start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c overΒ― start_ARG italic_c end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, which is a Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa favoured process with a relatively large branching fraction of 10βˆ’4superscript10410^{-4}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT – 10βˆ’3superscript10310^{-3}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT[6][6]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{PDG}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. Using an ISR technique, the charmonium-like states with JP⁒C=1βˆ’βˆ’superscript𝐽𝑃𝐢superscript1absentJ^{PC}=1^{--}italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_P italic_C end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT below e+⁒eβˆ’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒e^{+}e^{-}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT center-of-mass (C.M.) energy can be explored and a continuous mass spectrum in a wide region can be studied[33][33]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{181}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The two-photon interaction at Belle II via e+⁒eβˆ’β†’e+⁒eβˆ’β’Ξ³*⁒γ*β†’e+⁒eβˆ’β’Xc⁒cΒ―β†’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒superscript𝑒superscript𝑒superscript𝛾superscript𝛾→superscript𝑒superscript𝑒subscript𝑋𝑐¯𝑐e^{+}e^{-}\to e^{+}e^{-}\gamma^{*}\gamma^{*}\to e^{+}e^{-}X_{c\bar{c}}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ξ³ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ξ³ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_X start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c overΒ― start_ARG italic_c end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a typical and effective tool to study the charmonium-like states with various JPsuperscript𝐽𝑃J^{P}italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT quantum numbers. The double charmonium productions, such as e+⁒eβˆ’β†’J/ψ⁒Xc⁒cΒ―β†’superscript𝑒superscriptπ‘’π½πœ“subscript𝑋𝑐¯𝑐e^{+}e^{-}\to J/\psi X_{c\bar{c}}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_J / italic_ψ italic_X start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c overΒ― start_ARG italic_c end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT[34][34]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{cc142001}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, provides a good platform for understanding the perturbative and non-perturbative effects in QCD. In the subsections below, we show four promising measurements related to charmonium-like states at Belle II in the near future.

4.1 The absolute branching fraction of X⁒(3872)𝑋3872X(3872)italic_X ( 3872 ) decay

The measurement of absolute branching fraction of X⁒(3872)𝑋3872X(3872)italic_X ( 3872 ) decay can provide key information to identify the nature of X⁒(3872)𝑋3872X(3872)italic_X ( 3872 ). The original tetraquark model predicted the branching fraction of X⁒(3872)β†’Ο€+β’Ο€βˆ’β’J/Οˆβ†’π‘‹3872superscriptπœ‹superscriptπœ‹π½πœ“X(3872)\to\pi^{+}\pi^{-}J/\psiitalic_X ( 3872 ) β†’ italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J / italic_ψ to be about 50%[35][35]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{014028}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. By contrast, various molecular models predicted this branching fraction to be ≀\leq≀10%[36, 37, 38, 39, 40][36, 37, 38, 39, 40]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{054022,054008,124107,091401,021301}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT.

Measurement of absolute branching fractions for X⁒(3872)𝑋3872X(3872)italic_X ( 3872 ) via Bβ†’K⁒X⁒(3872)→𝐡𝐾𝑋3872B\to KX(3872)italic_B β†’ italic_K italic_X ( 3872 ) is unique at B𝐡Bitalic_B factories. By exclusively reconstructing one B𝐡Bitalic_B meson (Btagsubscript𝐡tagB_{\rm tag}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_tag end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) and identifying the K𝐾Kitalic_K in the decay of the other B𝐡Bitalic_B meson, the missing mass technique can be used to identify X⁒(3872)𝑋3872X(3872)italic_X ( 3872 ). Then one can obtain the branching fraction for Bβ†’K⁒X⁒(3872)→𝐡𝐾𝑋3872B\to KX(3872)italic_B β†’ italic_K italic_X ( 3872 ), and further calculate the absolute branching fractions of X⁒(3872)𝑋3872X(3872)italic_X ( 3872 ) decaying into different final states. No significant X⁒(3872)𝑋3872X(3872)italic_X ( 3872 ) signal was observed in the recoil mass distribution of K𝐾Kitalic_K at Belle[41][41]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{012005}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. Evidence is found by the BaBar Collaboration for the decay Bβ†’K⁒X⁒(3872)→𝐡𝐾𝑋3872B\to KX(3872)italic_B β†’ italic_K italic_X ( 3872 ) at a 3⁒σ3𝜎3\sigma3 italic_Οƒ level by allowing all B𝐡Bitalic_B combinations in an event and performing two layers of neural networks to suppress backgrounds[42][42]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{152001}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The branching fraction of B+β†’K+⁒X⁒(3872)β†’superscript𝐡superscript𝐾𝑋3872B^{+}\to K^{+}X(3872)italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_X ( 3872 ) was measured to be (2.1Β±0.8)Γ—10βˆ’4plus-or-minus2.10.8superscript104(2.1\pm 0.8)\times 10^{-4}( 2.1 Β± 0.8 ) Γ— 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for the first time. In addition, the branching fraction of X⁒(3872)β†’Ο€+β’Ο€βˆ’β’J/Οˆβ†’π‘‹3872superscriptπœ‹superscriptπœ‹π½πœ“X(3872)\to\pi^{+}\pi^{-}J/\psiitalic_X ( 3872 ) β†’ italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J / italic_ψ was calculated to be (4.1Β±1.3)%percentplus-or-minus4.11.3(4.1\pm 1.3)\%( 4.1 Β± 1.3 ) %.

Two improvements are achieved at Belle II: (1) an upgraded Full Event Interpretation (an exclusive reconstruction algorithm)[43][43]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{6}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT is used to reconstruct thousands of final states for Btagsubscript𝐡tagB_{\rm tag}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_tag end_POSTSUBSCRIPT candidates to increase the efficiency; (2) a unique multiple variable analysis of DeepSets based on the neural network[44][44]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{1703.06114}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT is applied to suppress continuum backgrounds and reject the secondary kaons produced in B𝐡Bitalic_B-daughter D𝐷Ditalic_D meson decays. The above method may reject about 95% of backgrounds in the X⁒(3872)𝑋3872X(3872)italic_X ( 3872 ) signal region (81% at BaBar[42][42]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{152001}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT). We expect about 600 X⁒(3872)𝑋3872X(3872)italic_X ( 3872 ) candidates from the Bβ†’K⁒X⁒(3872)→𝐡𝐾𝑋3872B\to KX(3872)italic_B β†’ italic_K italic_X ( 3872 ) decays per 1 abβˆ’11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT can be observed at Belle II. Therefore, measurements of absolute branching fractions of X⁒(3872)𝑋3872X(3872)italic_X ( 3872 ) at Belle II with much larger data samples in the near future are promising. Surely, the measurements of absolute branching fractions for other charmonium(-like) states are also feasible at Belle II.

4.2 Search for new Yπ‘ŒYitalic_Y states in e+⁒eβˆ’β†’K+⁒Kβˆ’β’J/Οˆβ†’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒superscript𝐾superscriptπΎπ½πœ“e^{+}e^{-}\to K^{+}K^{-}J/\psiitalic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J / italic_ψ via ISR

The Yπ‘ŒYitalic_Y states with specific quantum number JP⁒Csuperscript𝐽𝑃𝐢J^{PC}italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_P italic_C end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1βˆ’βˆ’superscript1absent1^{--}1 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT always attract much attention among charmonium-like states. The cross sections for e+⁒eβˆ’β†’K+⁒Kβˆ’β’J/Οˆβ†’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒superscript𝐾superscriptπΎπ½πœ“e^{+}e^{-}\to K^{+}K^{-}J/\psiitalic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J / italic_ψ (σ⁒(e+⁒eβˆ’β†’K+⁒Kβˆ’β’J/ψ)πœŽβ†’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒superscript𝐾superscriptπΎπ½πœ“\sigma(e^{+}e^{-}\to K^{+}K^{-}J/\psi)italic_Οƒ ( italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J / italic_ψ )) were measured via ISR using the full Belle data, as shown by the dots with error bars in Fig.Β 3[45][45]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{072015}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. From Fig.Β 3, there seems to be abundant structures, although the statistics is limited. Recently, BESIII studied the cross sections for e+⁒eβˆ’β†’K+⁒Kβˆ’β’J/Οˆβ†’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒superscript𝐾superscriptπΎπ½πœ“e^{+}e^{-}\to K^{+}K^{-}J/\psiitalic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J / italic_ψ and e+⁒eβˆ’β†’KS0⁒KS0⁒J/Οˆβ†’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒subscriptsuperscript𝐾0𝑆subscriptsuperscript𝐾0π‘†π½πœ“e^{+}e^{-}\to K^{0}_{S}K^{0}_{S}J/\psiitalic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J / italic_ψ, and found the Y⁒(4220)π‘Œ4220Y(4220)italic_Y ( 4220 ), Y⁒(4500)π‘Œ4500Y(4500)italic_Y ( 4500 ), and Y⁒(4710)π‘Œ4710Y(4710)italic_Y ( 4710 ) states[46, 47][46, 47]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{092005,111002}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. To describe the energy dependency of σ⁒(e+⁒eβˆ’β†’K+⁒Kβˆ’β’J/ψ)πœŽβ†’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒superscript𝐾superscriptπΎπ½πœ“\sigma(e^{+}e^{-}\to K^{+}K^{-}J/\psi)italic_Οƒ ( italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J / italic_ψ ) in Fig.Β 3, we include the Y⁒(4220)π‘Œ4220Y(4220)italic_Y ( 4220 ), Y⁒(4500)π‘Œ4500Y(4500)italic_Y ( 4500 ), and Y⁒(4710)π‘Œ4710Y(4710)italic_Y ( 4710 ) components with their masses and widths fixed according to Refs.Β [46, 47], as shown by the blue, black, and red dashed curves in Fig.Β 3. In addition, an extra resonance around 5 GeV, called the Y⁒(5000)π‘Œ5000Y(5000)italic_Y ( 5000 ), needs to be included to coincide the higher side of the σ⁒(e+⁒eβˆ’β†’K+⁒Kβˆ’β’J/ψ)πœŽβ†’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒superscript𝐾superscriptπΎπ½πœ“\sigma(e^{+}e^{-}\to K^{+}K^{-}J/\psi)italic_Οƒ ( italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J / italic_ψ ) distribution. At Belle II with much larger data samples, one should measure the Y⁒(4220),Y⁒(4500),Y⁒(4710)π‘Œ4220π‘Œ4500π‘Œ4710Y(4220),~{}Y(4500),~{}Y(4710)italic_Y ( 4220 ) , italic_Y ( 4500 ) , italic_Y ( 4710 ) decaying into K+⁒Kβˆ’β’J/ψsuperscript𝐾superscriptπΎπ½πœ“K^{+}K^{-}J/\psiitalic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J / italic_ψ with higher precision and verify whether there are new resonances with higher masses.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: The measured e+⁒eβˆ’β†’K+⁒Kβˆ’β’J/Οˆβ†’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒superscript𝐾superscriptπΎπ½πœ“e^{+}e^{-}\to K^{+}K^{-}J/\psiitalic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J / italic_ψ cross sections by Belle (dots with error bars)[45][45]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{072015}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The Y⁒(4220)π‘Œ4220Y(4220)italic_Y ( 4220 ), Y⁒(4500)π‘Œ4500Y(4500)italic_Y ( 4500 ), Y⁒(4710)π‘Œ4710Y(4710)italic_Y ( 4710 ), and Y⁒(5000)π‘Œ5000Y(5000)italic_Y ( 5000 ) components are indicated with dashed curves.

In the ISR process, the effective integrated luminosity is decreased with the C.M.Β energy decreasing, as indicated in Fig.Β 4.Β The detection efficiency is also smaller compared to that in direct e+⁒eβˆ’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒e^{+}e^{-}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT annihilations at BESIII. However, Belle II can provide a continuous mass spectrum instead of a point-by-point one, which helps extract the mass and width for the charmonium-like state precisely. At Belle II, one can focus on the higher mass region to search for possible Yπ‘ŒYitalic_Y states decaying into K⁒DΒ―s(*)⁒D(*)𝐾subscriptsuperscript¯𝐷𝑠superscript𝐷K\bar{D}^{(*)}_{s}D^{(*)}italic_K overΒ― start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, DΒ―s(*)⁒Ds⁒1⁒(2460)subscriptsuperscript¯𝐷𝑠subscript𝐷𝑠12460\bar{D}^{(*)}_{s}D_{s1}(2460)overΒ― start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 2460 ), DΒ―s(*)⁒Ds⁒1⁒(2536)subscriptsuperscript¯𝐷𝑠subscript𝐷𝑠12536\bar{D}^{(*)}_{s}D_{s1}(2536)overΒ― start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 2536 ), DΒ―s(*)⁒Ds⁒2*⁒(2573)subscriptsuperscript¯𝐷𝑠subscriptsuperscript𝐷𝑠22573\bar{D}^{(*)}_{s}D^{*}_{s2}(2573)overΒ― start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 2573 ), DΒ―s*⁒Ds⁒0*⁒(2317)subscriptsuperscript¯𝐷𝑠subscriptsuperscript𝐷𝑠02317\bar{D}^{*}_{s}D^{*}_{s0}(2317)overΒ― start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 2317 ), Λ¯c⁒Λcsubscript¯Λ𝑐subscriptΛ𝑐\bar{\Lambda}_{c}\Lambda_{c}overΒ― start_ARG roman_Ξ› end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ› start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, Λ¯c⁒Σcsubscript¯Λ𝑐subscriptΣ𝑐\bar{\Lambda}_{c}\Sigma_{c}overΒ― start_ARG roman_Ξ› end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ£ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, Σ¯c⁒Σcsubscript¯Σ𝑐subscriptΣ𝑐\bar{\Sigma}_{c}\Sigma_{c}overΒ― start_ARG roman_Ξ£ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ£ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, Ξ¯c⁒ΞcsubscriptΒ―Ξžπ‘subscriptΞžπ‘\bar{\Xi}_{c}\Xi_{c}overΒ― start_ARG roman_Ξ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, etc. The intermediate states Zc⁒sβ†’K⁒J/Οˆβ†’subscriptπ‘π‘π‘ πΎπ½πœ“Z_{cs}\to KJ/\psiitalic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT β†’ italic_K italic_J / italic_ψ and Zc⁒sβ†’DΒ―s(*)⁒D(*)β†’subscript𝑍𝑐𝑠subscriptsuperscript¯𝐷𝑠superscript𝐷Z_{cs}\to\bar{D}^{(*)}_{s}D^{(*)}italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT β†’ overΒ― start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT can be also searched for in above processes.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: The effective integrated luminosities at BESIII, Belle, and Belle II.

4.3 Confirmation of X⁒(4350)𝑋4350X(4350)italic_X ( 4350 ) and determination of JPsuperscript𝐽𝑃J^{P}italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for X⁒(3915)𝑋3915X(3915)italic_X ( 3915 ) in two-photon collisions

The X⁒(4140)→ϕ⁒J/Οˆβ†’π‘‹4140italic-Ο•π½πœ“X(4140)\to\phi J/\psiitalic_X ( 4140 ) β†’ italic_Ο• italic_J / italic_ψ was first reported by CDF in B+β†’K+⁒ϕ⁒J/Οˆβ†’superscript𝐡superscript𝐾italic-Ο•π½πœ“B^{+}\to K^{+}\phi J/\psiitalic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ο• italic_J / italic_ψ[48, 49][48, 49]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{242002,1750139}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. Then, Belle and BaBar searched for such state in the same B𝐡Bitalic_B decay, but did not confirm its presence[50, 51][50, 51]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{615,012003}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. CMS, D0, and LHCb also searched for the X⁒(4140)𝑋4140X(4140)italic_X ( 4140 ), and found its signal significance larger than 3⁒σ3𝜎3\sigma3 italic_Οƒ (D0[52][52]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{012004}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT) or 5⁒σ5𝜎5\sigma5 italic_Οƒ (CMS and LHCb[53, 54][53, 54]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{261,022003}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT). In the full amplitude analysis from LHCb, the X⁒(4140)𝑋4140X(4140)italic_X ( 4140 ), X⁒(4274)𝑋4274X(4274)italic_X ( 4274 ), X⁒(4500)𝑋4500X(4500)italic_X ( 4500 ), and X⁒(4700)𝑋4700X(4700)italic_X ( 4700 ) were observed[54][54]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{022003}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The structures in the ϕ⁒J/ψitalic-Ο•π½πœ“\phi J/\psiitalic_Ο• italic_J / italic_ψ mass spectrum seem very rich. Therefore, it is worth studying the ϕ⁒J/ψitalic-Ο•π½πœ“\phi J/\psiitalic_Ο• italic_J / italic_ψ mass spectrum in other processes.

The γ⁒γ→ϕ⁒J/Οˆβ†’π›Ύπ›Ύitalic-Ο•π½πœ“\gamma\gamma\to\phi J/\psiitalic_Ξ³ italic_Ξ³ β†’ italic_Ο• italic_J / italic_ψ process was measured between the threshold to 5 GeV/c2superscript𝑐2c^{2}italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT using a data sample of 825 fbβˆ’11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT at Belle[55][55]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{112004}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. A narrow peak was observed around 4.530 GeV, named as X⁒(4350)𝑋4350X(4350)italic_X ( 4350 ). The signal yield is 8.8βˆ’3.2+4.2subscriptsuperscript8.84.23.28.8^{+4.2}_{-3.2}8.8 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 4.2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 3.2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with a significance of 3.2ΟƒπœŽ\sigmaitalic_Οƒ including systematic uncertainty. This state has not been yet confirmed by other experiments. It should be noted that the productions of the X⁒(4140)𝑋4140X(4140)italic_X ( 4140 ) and X⁒(4274)𝑋4274X(4274)italic_X ( 4274 ) with JPsuperscript𝐽𝑃J^{P}italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1+superscript11^{+}1 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT observed by LHCb[54][54]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{022003}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT in two-photon fusions are forbidden according to the Landau-Yang theorem. When the data collected at Belle II reaches 1Β abβˆ’11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, together with all of the Belle data, the significance of X⁒(4350)𝑋4350X(4350)italic_X ( 4350 ) is expected to exceed 5⁒σ5𝜎5\sigma5 italic_Οƒ as an observation.

The X⁒(3915)𝑋3915X(3915)italic_X ( 3915 ) was originally seen by Belle in its ω⁒J/Οˆπœ”π½πœ“\omega J/\psiitalic_Ο‰ italic_J / italic_ψ decay mode and was produced in both B𝐡Bitalic_B decays and two-photon collisions[56, 57][56, 57]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{182002,092001}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The mass and width of X⁒(3915)𝑋3915X(3915)italic_X ( 3915 ) in γ⁒γ→ω⁒J/Οˆβ†’π›Ύπ›Ύπœ”π½πœ“\gamma\gamma\to\omega J/\psiitalic_Ξ³ italic_Ξ³ β†’ italic_Ο‰ italic_J / italic_ψ were measured to be (3915Β±4)plus-or-minus39154(3915\pm 4)( 3915 Β± 4 ) MeV/c2superscript𝑐2c^{2}italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and (17Β±11)plus-or-minus1711(17\pm 11)( 17 Β± 11 ) MeV[57][57]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{092001}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. Subsequently, BaBar confirmed its existence and supported the assignment JPsuperscript𝐽𝑃J^{P}italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0+superscript00^{+}0 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT based on a spin-parity analysis, thus identifying X⁒(3915)𝑋3915X(3915)italic_X ( 3915 ) as a Ο‡c⁒0⁒(2⁒P)subscriptπœ’π‘02𝑃\chi_{c0}(2P)italic_Ο‡ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 2 italic_P ) state[58][58]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{072002}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. However, the properties of X⁒(3915)𝑋3915X(3915)italic_X ( 3915 ) do not fit expectations for the Ο‡c⁒0⁒(2⁒P)subscriptπœ’π‘02𝑃\chi_{c0}(2P)italic_Ο‡ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 2 italic_P ) since it has a mass 190 MeV/c2superscript𝑐2c^{2}italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT above the S𝑆Sitalic_S-wave D⁒D¯𝐷¯𝐷D\bar{D}italic_D overΒ― start_ARG italic_D end_ARG threshold but only has a width of 20 MeV[59, 60][59, 60]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{091501,057501}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. Moreover, in Ref.Β [61], the authors proposed that the spin-parity of X⁒(3915)𝑋3915X(3915)italic_X ( 3915 ) should be 2++superscript2absent2^{++}2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, if the X⁒(3915)𝑋3915X(3915)italic_X ( 3915 ) has a non-c⁒c¯𝑐¯𝑐c\bar{c}italic_c overΒ― start_ARG italic_c end_ARG admixture. Recently, LHCb performed an amplitude analysis of the B+β†’D+⁒Dβˆ’β’K+β†’superscript𝐡superscript𝐷superscript𝐷superscript𝐾B^{+}\to D^{+}D^{-}K^{+}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT decay and found a new spin-0 charmonium resonance around 3.92 GeV/c2superscript𝑐2c^{2}italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT[62][62]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{112003}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. If it is the same state as observed in the ω⁒J/Οˆπœ”π½πœ“\omega J/\psiitalic_Ο‰ italic_J / italic_ψ decay, X⁒(3915)𝑋3915X(3915)italic_X ( 3915 ) can be regarded as a Ο‡c⁒0⁒(2⁒P)subscriptπœ’π‘02𝑃\chi_{c0}(2P)italic_Ο‡ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 2 italic_P ) state. To figure out this long-term unsolved issue on the JPsuperscript𝐽𝑃J^{P}italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT of X⁒(3915)𝑋3915X(3915)italic_X ( 3915 ), the angular distribution in γ⁒γ→ω⁒J/Οˆβ†’π›Ύπ›Ύπœ”π½πœ“\gamma\gamma\to\omega J/\psiitalic_Ξ³ italic_Ξ³ β†’ italic_Ο‰ italic_J / italic_ψ at Belle II with high precision can provide effective experimental information.

5 Prospects for bottomonium-like states at Belle II

There are at least four ways to explore the bottomonium-like states at Belle II: direct e+⁒eβˆ’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒e^{+}e^{-}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT annihilations, ISR processes, hadronic transitions, and radiative transitions. In e+⁒eβˆ’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒e^{+}e^{-}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT collisions, the C.M.Β energy can be set at some specific energy points to precisely measure the masses and widths of known resonances, and search for possible new states.Β The Ξ₯⁒(10753)Ξ₯10753\Upsilon(10753)roman_Ξ₯ ( 10753 ) was discovered using the direct e+⁒eβˆ’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒e^{+}e^{-}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT collision data and ISR process from 10.52 to 11.02 GeV at Belle[63][63]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{220}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The hadronic and radiative transitions are effective ways to search for new bottomonium-like states. The hb⁒(1⁒P)subscriptβ„Žπ‘1𝑃h_{b}(1P)italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 italic_P ) and hb⁒(2⁒P)subscriptβ„Žπ‘2𝑃h_{b}(2P)italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 2 italic_P ) were observed in the Ο€+β’Ο€βˆ’superscriptπœ‹superscriptπœ‹\pi^{+}\pi^{-}italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT transitions from Ξ₯⁒(10860)Ξ₯10860\Upsilon(10860)roman_Ξ₯ ( 10860 ) at Belle[26, 64][26, 64]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{Zb142001,032001}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The Zc⁒(10610)subscript𝑍𝑐10610Z_{c}(10610)italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 10610 ) and Zc⁒(10650)subscript𝑍𝑐10650Z_{c}(10650)italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 10650 ) were observed in the pion transitions from Ξ₯⁒(10860)Ξ₯10860\Upsilon(10860)roman_Ξ₯ ( 10860 ) and Ξ₯⁒(11020)Ξ₯11020\Upsilon(11020)roman_Ξ₯ ( 11020 ) at Belle[12, 25, 26, 28][12, 25, 26, 28]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{122001,072003,Zb142001,052016}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The Ξ·b⁒(2⁒S)subscriptπœ‚π‘2𝑆\eta_{b}(2S)italic_Ξ· start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 2 italic_S ) was evident via the radiative decay of hb⁒(2⁒P)subscriptβ„Žπ‘2𝑃h_{b}(2P)italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 2 italic_P ) in e+eβˆ’β†’Ξ₯(5S)β†’hb(2P)(β†’Ξ³Ξ·b(2S))Ο€+Ο€βˆ’e^{+}e^{-}\to\Upsilon(5S)\to h_{b}(2P)(\to\gamma\eta_{b}(2S))\pi^{+}\pi^{-}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ roman_Ξ₯ ( 5 italic_S ) β†’ italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 2 italic_P ) ( β†’ italic_Ξ³ italic_Ξ· start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 2 italic_S ) ) italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT at Belle[65][65]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{232002}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT.

5.1 The study of Ξ₯⁒(10753)Ξ₯10753\Upsilon(10753)roman_Ξ₯ ( 10753 )

The Ξ₯⁒(10753)Ξ₯10753\Upsilon(10753)roman_Ξ₯ ( 10753 ) was first observed by Belle in the energy dependence of cross sections for e+⁒eβˆ’β†’Ο€+β’Ο€βˆ’β’Ξ₯⁒(n⁒S)β†’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒superscriptπœ‹superscriptπœ‹Ξ₯𝑛𝑆e^{+}e^{-}\to\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\Upsilon(nS)italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ₯ ( italic_n italic_S ) (n𝑛nitalic_n = 1, 2, 3) with a significance of 5.2⁒σ5.2𝜎5.2\sigma5.2 italic_Οƒ including systematic uncertainties[63][63]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{220}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The mass and width of Ξ₯⁒(10753)Ξ₯10753\Upsilon(10753)roman_Ξ₯ ( 10753 ) are (10752.7βˆ’6.0+5.9)subscriptsuperscript10752.75.96.0(10752.7^{+5.9}_{-6.0})( 10752.7 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 5.9 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 6.0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) MeV/c2superscript𝑐2c^{2}italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and (35.5βˆ’11.8+18.0)subscriptsuperscript35.518.011.8(35.5^{+18.0}_{-11.8})( 35.5 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 18.0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 11.8 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) MeV. Its existence is further supported by a fit to the β€˜dressed’ cross sections σ⁒(e+⁒eβˆ’β†’b⁒bΒ―)πœŽβ†’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒𝑏¯𝑏\sigma(e^{+}e^{-}\to b\bar{b})italic_Οƒ ( italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_b overΒ― start_ARG italic_b end_ARG ) at C.M.Β energies s𝑠\sqrt{s}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG from 10.6 to 11.2 GeV[66][66]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{083001}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The Ξ₯⁒(10753)Ξ₯10753\Upsilon(10753)roman_Ξ₯ ( 10753 ) was interpreted as a conventional bottomonium[67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76][67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{074007,034036,59,014020,014036,357,04049,% 135340,11915,103845}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, hybrid[77, 3][77, 3]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{034019,1}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, or tetraquark state[78, 79, 80, 81, 82][78, 79, 80, 81, 82]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{135217,074507,11475,123102,381}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The nature of Ξ₯⁒(10753)Ξ₯10753\Upsilon(10753)roman_Ξ₯ ( 10753 ) has not been identified yet.

To further understand the nature of Ξ₯⁒(10753)Ξ₯10753\Upsilon(10753)roman_Ξ₯ ( 10753 ), Belle II collected 19 fbβˆ’11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT of unique data at four energy points around 10.75 GeV in November 2021. Using these data, the measurement of e+⁒eβˆ’β†’Ο‰β’Ο‡b⁒J⁒(1⁒P)β†’superscript𝑒superscriptπ‘’πœ”subscriptπœ’π‘π½1𝑃e^{+}e^{-}\to\omega\chi_{bJ}(1P)italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_Ο‰ italic_Ο‡ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b italic_J end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 italic_P ) (J𝐽Jitalic_J = 0, 1, 2) was performed[83][83]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{091902}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT.Β The Born cross sections of e+⁒eβˆ’β†’Ο‰β’Ο‡b⁒1,b⁒2⁒(1⁒P)β†’superscript𝑒superscriptπ‘’πœ”subscriptπœ’π‘1𝑏21𝑃e^{+}e^{-}\to\omega\chi_{b1,b2}(1P)italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_Ο‰ italic_Ο‡ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b 1 , italic_b 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 italic_P ) as a function of s𝑠\sqrt{s}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG are shown in Fig.Β 5, where the Ξ₯⁒(10753)→ω⁒χb⁒1,b⁒2⁒(1⁒P)β†’Ξ₯10753πœ”subscriptπœ’π‘1𝑏21𝑃\Upsilon(10753)\to\omega\chi_{b1,b2}(1P)roman_Ξ₯ ( 10753 ) β†’ italic_Ο‰ italic_Ο‡ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b 1 , italic_b 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 italic_P ) signal is clear. The Born cross section ratio between e+⁒eβˆ’β†’Ο‰β’Ο‡b⁒1,b⁒2⁒(1⁒P)β†’superscript𝑒superscriptπ‘’πœ”subscriptπœ’π‘1𝑏21𝑃e^{+}e^{-}\to\omega\chi_{b1,b2}(1P)italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_Ο‰ italic_Ο‡ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b 1 , italic_b 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 italic_P ) and e+⁒eβˆ’β†’Ο€+β’Ο€βˆ’β’Ξ₯⁒(n⁒S)β†’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒superscriptπœ‹superscriptπœ‹Ξ₯𝑛𝑆e^{+}e^{-}\to\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\Upsilon(nS)italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ₯ ( italic_n italic_S ) (n𝑛nitalic_n = 1, 2, 3) is about 1.5 at s𝑠\sqrt{s}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 10.745 GeV and 0.15 at s𝑠\sqrt{s}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 10.867 GeV[83, 84][83, 84]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{091902,chib142001}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. This indicates different internal structures for the Ξ₯⁒(10753)Ξ₯10753\Upsilon(10753)roman_Ξ₯ ( 10753 ) and Ξ₯⁒(10860)Ξ₯10860\Upsilon(10860)roman_Ξ₯ ( 10860 ), which otherwise have the same quantum numbers and are only 110 MeV/c2superscript𝑐2c^{2}italic_c start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT apart.

Using above data samples, e+⁒eβˆ’β†’B⁒BΒ―β†’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒𝐡¯𝐡e^{+}e^{-}\to B\bar{B}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_B overΒ― start_ARG italic_B end_ARG, B⁒BΒ―*𝐡superscript¯𝐡B\bar{B}^{*}italic_B overΒ― start_ARG italic_B end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and B*⁒BΒ―*superscript𝐡superscript¯𝐡B^{*}\bar{B}^{*}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT overΒ― start_ARG italic_B end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT signals at s𝑠\sqrt{s}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 10.653, 10.701, 10.745, and 10.805 GeV were observed[85][85]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{slides}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. By combining the Belle results at s𝑠\sqrt{s}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG from 10.63 to 11.02 GeV[86][86]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{137}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT and Belle II results at above four energy points[85][85]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{slides}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, the energy dependencies of cross sections for e+⁒eβˆ’β†’B⁒BΒ―β†’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒𝐡¯𝐡e^{+}e^{-}\to B\bar{B}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_B overΒ― start_ARG italic_B end_ARG, B⁒BΒ―*𝐡superscript¯𝐡B\bar{B}^{*}italic_B overΒ― start_ARG italic_B end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and B*⁒BΒ―*superscript𝐡superscript¯𝐡B^{*}\bar{B}^{*}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT overΒ― start_ARG italic_B end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT were obtained. A new and unexpected observation is that the e+⁒eβˆ’β†’B*⁒BΒ―*β†’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒superscript𝐡superscript¯𝐡e^{+}e^{-}\to B^{*}\bar{B}^{*}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT overΒ― start_ARG italic_B end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT cross section increases rapidly just above the threshold, which can be explained by presence of a resonance or a bound state of B*⁒BΒ―*superscript𝐡superscript¯𝐡B^{*}\bar{B}^{*}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT overΒ― start_ARG italic_B end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT near the B*⁒BΒ―*superscript𝐡superscript¯𝐡B^{*}\bar{B}^{*}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT overΒ― start_ARG italic_B end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT threshold[87, 88][87, 88]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{2779,012002}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. Using above data samples, Ξ·b⁒(1⁒S)subscriptπœ‚π‘1𝑆\eta_{b}(1S)italic_Ξ· start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 italic_S ) and Ο‡b⁒0⁒(1⁒P)subscriptπœ’π‘01𝑃\chi_{b0}(1P)italic_Ο‡ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 italic_P ) were searched for in the Ο‰πœ”\omegaitalic_Ο‰ recoil mass distribution. No significant signals were observed, and upper limits at 90% credibility level on the Born cross sections were set to be 2.5 pb and 8.6 pb for e+⁒eβˆ’β†’Ο‰β’Ξ·b⁒(1⁒S)β†’superscript𝑒superscriptπ‘’πœ”subscriptπœ‚π‘1𝑆e^{+}e^{-}\to\omega\eta_{b}(1S)italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_Ο‰ italic_Ξ· start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 italic_S ) and e+⁒eβˆ’β†’Ο‰β’Ο‡b⁒0⁒(1⁒P)β†’superscript𝑒superscriptπ‘’πœ”subscriptπœ’π‘01𝑃e^{+}e^{-}\to\omega\chi_{b0}(1P)italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_Ο‰ italic_Ο‡ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 italic_P ) at s𝑠\sqrt{s}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 10.745 GeV, respectively[85][85]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{slides}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT.

More analyses are ongoing, including the searches for e+⁒eβˆ’β†’Ξ³β’Xbβ†’superscript𝑒superscript𝑒𝛾subscript𝑋𝑏e^{+}e^{-}\to\gamma X_{b}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_Ξ³ italic_X start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (Xbsubscript𝑋𝑏X_{b}italic_X start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the bottom partner of X⁒(3872)𝑋3872X(3872)italic_X ( 3872 )), Ξ₯⁒(10753)→η⁒Ξ₯⁒(n⁒S)β†’Ξ₯10753πœ‚Ξ₯𝑛𝑆\Upsilon(10753)\to\eta\Upsilon(nS)roman_Ξ₯ ( 10753 ) β†’ italic_Ξ· roman_Ξ₯ ( italic_n italic_S ) (n𝑛nitalic_n = 1, 2, 3), Ξ₯⁒(10753)β†’K+⁒Kβˆ’β’Ξ₯⁒(1⁒S)β†’Ξ₯10753superscript𝐾superscript𝐾Ξ₯1𝑆\Upsilon(10753)\to K^{+}K^{-}\Upsilon(1S)roman_Ξ₯ ( 10753 ) β†’ italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ₯ ( 1 italic_S ), and Ξ₯⁒(10753)→γ⁒χb⁒J⁒(1⁒P)β†’Ξ₯10753𝛾subscriptπœ’π‘π½1𝑃\Upsilon(10753)\to\gamma\chi_{bJ}(1P)roman_Ξ₯ ( 10753 ) β†’ italic_Ξ³ italic_Ο‡ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b italic_J end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 italic_P ), etc. These measurements help us understand the internal structure of Ξ₯⁒(10753)Ξ₯10753\Upsilon(10753)roman_Ξ₯ ( 10753 ), and enrich our knowledge of the bottomonium spectroscopy.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: The Born cross sections of (left) e+⁒eβˆ’β†’Ο‰β’Ο‡b⁒1⁒(1⁒P)β†’superscript𝑒superscriptπ‘’πœ”subscriptπœ’π‘11𝑃e^{+}e^{-}\to\omega\chi_{b1}(1P)italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_Ο‰ italic_Ο‡ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 italic_P ) and (right) e+⁒eβˆ’β†’Ο‰β’Ο‡b⁒2⁒(1⁒P)β†’superscript𝑒superscriptπ‘’πœ”subscriptπœ’π‘21𝑃e^{+}e^{-}\to\omega\chi_{b2}(1P)italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β†’ italic_Ο‰ italic_Ο‡ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 italic_P ) as a function of s𝑠\sqrt{s}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG[83][83]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{091902}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The red solid curves show the total fits. The dashed curves show two solution results.

5.2 Bottomonium-like states above B⁒B¯𝐡¯𝐡B\bar{B}italic_B over¯ start_ARG italic_B end_ARG mass threshold

Below B⁒B¯𝐡¯𝐡B\bar{B}italic_B overΒ― start_ARG italic_B end_ARG threshold, bottomonia are described well by the potential models in QCD[89, 90, 91][89, 90, 91]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{1534,2981,074027}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. Above B⁒B¯𝐡¯𝐡B\bar{B}italic_B overΒ― start_ARG italic_B end_ARG threshold, bottomonia demonstrate unexpected properties as follows. There is no position for Zb⁒(10610)subscript𝑍𝑏10610Z_{b}(10610)italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 10610 ) and Zb⁒(10650)subscript𝑍𝑏10650Z_{b}(10650)italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 10650 ) in bottomonium potential model. In comparison with the charmonium-like states, the number of observed bottomonium-like states is much smaller[6][6]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{PDG}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The decay Ξ₯⁒(4⁒S)→η⁒hb⁒(1⁒P)β†’Ξ₯4π‘†πœ‚subscriptβ„Žπ‘1𝑃\Upsilon(4S)\to\eta h_{b}(1P)roman_Ξ₯ ( 4 italic_S ) β†’ italic_Ξ· italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 italic_P ), forbidden in Heavy Quark Effective Theory[92, 93][92, 93]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{19,455}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, has a larger probability than that of Ο€+β’Ο€βˆ’β’Ξ₯⁒(n⁒S)superscriptπœ‹superscriptπœ‹Ξ₯𝑛𝑆\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\Upsilon(nS)italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ₯ ( italic_n italic_S ) (n𝑛nitalic_n = 1, 2, 3)[94][94]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{U142001}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. For Ξ₯⁒(5⁒S)Ξ₯5𝑆\Upsilon(5S)roman_Ξ₯ ( 5 italic_S ) and Ξ₯⁒(6⁒S)Ξ₯6𝑆\Upsilon(6S)roman_Ξ₯ ( 6 italic_S ), their widths to Ο€+β’Ο€βˆ’β’Ξ₯⁒(n⁒S)superscriptπœ‹superscriptπœ‹Ξ₯𝑛𝑆\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\Upsilon(nS)italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ₯ ( italic_n italic_S ) and K+⁒Kβˆ’β’Ξ₯⁒(n⁒S)superscript𝐾superscript𝐾Ξ₯𝑛𝑆K^{+}K^{-}\Upsilon(nS)italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ₯ ( italic_n italic_S ) are several orders of magnitude larger than those of Ξ₯⁒(4⁒S)Ξ₯4𝑆\Upsilon(4S)roman_Ξ₯ ( 4 italic_S )[95][95]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{112001}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. At this point, there is not enough experimental information for a systematic solution to this problem in the case of bottomonia. The relevant measurements with data collected in bottomonium energy region at Belle II will provide additional information.

At Belle II, an energy scan from the B⁒B¯𝐡¯𝐡B\bar{B}italic_B overΒ― start_ARG italic_B end_ARG threshold up to the highest possible energy of 11.24 GeV with ∼similar-to\sim∼10 fbβˆ’11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT per point and ∼similar-to\sim∼10 MeV step is of high interest to search for new excited Ξ₯Ξ₯\Upsilonroman_Ξ₯ and Ybsubscriptπ‘Œπ‘Y_{b}italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (bottomonium-like states with JP⁒Csuperscript𝐽𝑃𝐢J^{PC}italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_P italic_C end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1βˆ’βˆ’superscript1absent1^{--}1 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) states[32][32]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{123C01}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. If the new bottomonium(-like) states are observed, about 500 fbβˆ’11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT data will be collected at corresponding energy point to perform a detailed study of radiative and hadronic transitions, to search for Xbsubscript𝑋𝑏X_{b}italic_X start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and other Zbsubscript𝑍𝑏Z_{b}italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT states. Unlike the X⁒(3872)𝑋3872X(3872)italic_X ( 3872 ) decays, due to negligible isospin-breaking effects, Xbsubscript𝑋𝑏X_{b}italic_X start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT may decay preferentially into Ο€+β’Ο€βˆ’β’Ο€0⁒Ξ₯⁒(n⁒S)superscriptπœ‹superscriptπœ‹superscriptπœ‹0Ξ₯𝑛𝑆\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{0}\Upsilon(nS)italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ₯ ( italic_n italic_S ), Ο€+β’Ο€βˆ’β’Ο‡b⁒J⁒(1⁒P)superscriptπœ‹superscriptπœ‹subscriptπœ’π‘π½1𝑃\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\chi_{bJ}(1P)italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ο‡ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b italic_J end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 italic_P ), and γ⁒Ξ₯⁒(n⁒S)𝛾Ξ₯𝑛𝑆\gamma\Upsilon(nS)italic_Ξ³ roman_Ξ₯ ( italic_n italic_S ), instead of Ο€+β’Ο€βˆ’β’Ξ₯⁒(1⁒S)superscriptπœ‹superscriptπœ‹Ξ₯1𝑆\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\Upsilon(1S)italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Ο€ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ₯ ( 1 italic_S )[96, 97, 98, 99][96, 97, 98, 99]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{1600,3063,034005,115122001}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. Although open flavour channels dominate the Zbsubscript𝑍𝑏Z_{b}italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT decays, one can still search for more Zbsubscript𝑍𝑏Z_{b}italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT states in π⁒Ξ₯⁒(n⁒S)πœ‹Ξ₯𝑛𝑆\pi\Upsilon(nS)italic_Ο€ roman_Ξ₯ ( italic_n italic_S ), π⁒hb⁒(n⁒P)πœ‹subscriptβ„Žπ‘π‘›π‘ƒ\pi h_{b}(nP)italic_Ο€ italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_n italic_P ), and ρ⁒ηb⁒(n⁒S)𝜌subscriptπœ‚π‘π‘›π‘†\rho\eta_{b}(nS)italic_ρ italic_Ξ· start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_n italic_S ) systems due to a higher reconstruction efficiency and free continuum contribution[100, 101][100, 101]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{7,1610.01102}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. Combined coupled-channel analyses of all exclusive cross sections will allow to determine the pole positions of the Ξ₯⁒(n⁒S)Ξ₯𝑛𝑆\Upsilon(nS)roman_Ξ₯ ( italic_n italic_S ) and Ybsubscriptπ‘Œπ‘Y_{b}italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT states, their electronic widths, and couplings to various channels. Increase of maximal energy of 11.24 GeV by at least 100 MeV will allow to explore the Ξ›b⁒Λ¯bsubscriptΛ𝑏subscript¯Λ𝑏\Lambda_{b}\bar{\Lambda}_{b}roman_Ξ› start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT overΒ― start_ARG roman_Ξ› end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT threshold and to search for baryon-antibaryon molecular states[32][32]\!{}^{\text{\cite[cite]{[\@@bibref{}{123C01}{}{}]}}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. In the Ξ›bsubscriptΛ𝑏\Lambda_{b}roman_Ξ› start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT decays, the exotic baryons Pcsubscript𝑃𝑐P_{c}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT could be investigated at Belle II.

6 Summary

Belle has made great achievements in exotic hadrons. The experimental studies at Belle II will proceed along the same lines as at Belle. Measurements of absolute branching fractions for Xc⁒cΒ―subscript𝑋𝑐¯𝑐X_{c\bar{c}}italic_X start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c overΒ― start_ARG italic_c end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT via Bβ†’K⁒Xc⁒c¯→𝐡𝐾subscript𝑋𝑐¯𝑐B\to KX_{c\bar{c}}italic_B β†’ italic_K italic_X start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c overΒ― start_ARG italic_c end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are unique at Belle II with an advanced multiple variable analysis based on the neural network.Β Besides B𝐡Bitalic_B decays, ISR technique, two-photon collisions, and double charmonium productions are also effective tools to explore the charmonium-like states. Belle II will collect abundant data around Ξ₯⁒(10860)Ξ₯10860\Upsilon(10860)roman_Ξ₯ ( 10860 ) and Ξ₯⁒(11020)Ξ₯11020\Upsilon(11020)roman_Ξ₯ ( 11020 ) resonances, which provide an ideal platform to study the bottomonium-like states above B⁒B¯𝐡¯𝐡B\bar{B}italic_B overΒ― start_ARG italic_B end_ARG threshold. The Ybsubscriptπ‘Œπ‘Y_{b}italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, Xbsubscript𝑋𝑏X_{b}italic_X start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and Zbsubscript𝑍𝑏Z_{b}italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT states can be widely investigated using these data in the near future.

Acknowledgments. β€” This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under contract Nos.Β 12342024, 12135005, 12135005, 11975076, 12005040; and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities Grant RF.Β 1028623046.

References

  • [1] D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1343 (1973).
  • [2] H. D. Politzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1346 (1973).
  • [3] N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C. P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo, and C. Z. Yuan, Phys. Rept. 873, 1 (2020).
  • [4] M. Gell-Mann, Phys. Lett. 8, 214 (1964).
  • [5] S. K. Choi et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262001 (2003).
  • [6] R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022) and 2023 update.
  • [7] H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and Y. R. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Rept. Prog. Phys. 86, 026201 (2023).
  • [8] S. K. Choi et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 142001 (2008).
  • [9] R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 222002 (2014).
  • [10] M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 252001 (2013).
  • [11] Z. Q. Liu et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 252002 (2013).
  • [12] A. Bondar et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 122001 (2012).
  • [13] A. Abashian et al. (Belle Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 479, 117 (2002); also see Section II in J. Brodzicka et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2012, 04D001 (2012).
  • [14] S. Kurokawa and E. Kikutani, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 499, 1 (2003), and other papers included in this Volume.
  • [15] T. Abe et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2013, 03A001 (2013).
  • [16] T. Abe et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2012, 04D001 (2012).
  • [17] From QWG website: https://qwg.ph.nat.tum.de/exoticshub/belle.php.
  • [18] D. Acosta et al. (CDF II Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 072001 (2004).
  • [19] V. M. Abazov et al. (D0 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 162002 (2004).
  • [20] B. Aubert et al. (BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 71, 071103 (2005).
  • [21] R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 92, 011102 (2015).
  • [22] H. Hirata et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 107, 112011 (2023).
  • [23] K. Chilikin et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 90, 112009 (2014).
  • [24] R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 152002 (2019).
  • [25] A. Garmash et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 91, 072003 (2015).
  • [26] A. Abdesselam et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 142001 (2016).
  • [27] A. Garmash et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 212001 (2016).
  • [28] P. Krokovny et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 88, 052016 (2013).
  • [29] K. Akai, K. Furukawa, and H. Koiso (SuperKEKB Accelerator Team), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 907, 188 (2018).
  • [30] T. Abe et al. (Belle II Collaboration), arXiv: 1011.0352.
  • [31] L. Aggarwalar et al. (Belle II Collaboration), arXiv: 2207.06307.
  • [32] E. Kou et al. (Belle II Collaboration), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 123C01 (2019), [Erratum: Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 029201 (2020)].
  • [33] V. M. Budnev et al., Phys. Rept. 15, 181 (1975).
  • [34] K. Abe et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 142001 (2002).
  • [35] L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer, Phys. Rev. D 71, 014028 (2005).
  • [36] E. Braaten and M. Kusunoki, Phys. Rev. D 72, 054022 (2005).
  • [37] T. Barnes and S. Godfrey, Phys. Rev. D 69, 054008 (2004).
  • [38] P. G. Ortega and E. R. Arriola, Chin. Phys. C 43, 124107 (2019).
  • [39] J. He, D. Y. Chen, Z. W. Liu, and X. Liu, Chin. Phys. Lett. 39, 091401 (2022).
  • [40] H. N. Wang, L. S. Geng, Q. Wang, and J. J. Xie, Chin. Phys. Lett. 40, 021301 (2023).
  • [41] Y. Kato et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 97, 012005 (2018).
  • [42] J. P. Lees et al. (BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 152001 (2020).
  • [43] T. Keck et al., Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 3, 6 (2019).
  • [44] M. Zaheer, S. Kottur, S. Ravanbakhsh, B. Poczos, R. Salakhutdinov, and A. Smola, arXiv:1703.06114.
  • [45] C. P. Shen et al. (Belle II Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 89, 072015 (2014).
  • [46] M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 107, 092005 (2023).
  • [47] M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Chin. Phys. C 46, 111002 (2022).
  • [48] T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 242002 (2009).
  • [49] T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Mod. Phys. Lett. A 32, 1750139 (2017).
  • [50] C. P. Shen, Chin. Phys. C 34, 615 (2010).
  • [51] J. P. Lees et al. (BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 91, 012003 (2015).
  • [52] V. M. Abazov et al. (D0 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 89, 012004 (2014).
  • [53] S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 734, 261 (2014).
  • [54] R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 022003 (2017).
  • [55] C. P. Shen et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 112004 (2010).
  • [56] K. Abe et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 182002 (2005).
  • [57] S. Uehara et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 092001 (2010).
  • [58] J. P. Lees et al. (BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 86, 072002 (2012).
  • [59] F. K. Guo and U. G. MeiοΏ½ner, Phys. Rev. D 86, 091501 (2012).
  • [60] S. L. Olsen, Phys. Rev. D 91, 057501 (2015).
  • [61] Z. Y. Zhou, Z. Xiao, and H. Q. Zhou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 022001 (2015).
  • [62] R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 102, 112003 (2020).
  • [63] R. Mizuk et al. (Belle Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 10, 220 (2019).
  • [64] I. Adachi et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 032001 (2012).
  • [65] R. Mizuk et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 232002 (2012).
  • [66] X. K. Dong, X. H. Mo, P. Wang, and C. Z. Yuan, Chin. Phys. C 44, 083001 (2020).
  • [67] Z. Y. Bai, Y. S. Li, Q. Huang, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Phys. Rev. D 105, 074007 (2022).
  • [68] Y. S. Li, Z. Y. Bai, Q. Huang, and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 104, 034036 (2021).
  • [69] Q. Li, M. S. Liu, Q. F. LοΏ½, L. C. Gui, and X. H. Zhong, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 59 (2020).
  • [70] B. Chen, A. L. Zhang, and J. He, Phys. Rev. D 101, 014020 (2020).
  • [71] J. F. Giron and R. F. Lebed, Phys. Rev. D 102, 014036 (2020).
  • [72] V. Kher, R. Chaturvedi, N. Devlani, and A. K. Rai, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137, 357 (2022).
  • [73] Y. S. Li, Z. Y. Bai, and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 105, 114041 (2022).
  • [74] W. H. Liang, N. Ikeno, and E. Oset, Phys. Lett. B 803, 135340 (2020).
  • [75] N. HοΏ½sken, R. E. Mitchell, and E. S. Swanson, Phys. Rev. D 106, 094013 (2022).
  • [76] E. V. Beveren and G. Rupp, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 117, 103845 (2021).
  • [77] J. T. CastellΓ  and E. Passemar, Phys. Rev. D 104, 034019 (2021).
  • [78] A. Ali, L. Maiani, A. Y. Parkhomenko, and W. Wang, Phys. Lett. B 802, 135217 (2020).
  • [79] P. Bicudo, N. Cardoso, L. MΓΌller, and M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 103, 074507 (2021).
  • [80] P. Bicudo, N. Cardoso, L. MΓΌller, and M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 107, 094515 (2023).
  • [81] Z. G. Wang, Chin. Phys. C 43, 123102 (2019).
  • [82] A. Y. Parkhomenko and W. Wang, Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 20, 381 (2023).
  • [83] I. Adachi et al. (Belle II Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 091902 (2023).
  • [84] X. H. He et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 142001 (2014).
  • [85] Please see the talk β€œRecent quarkonium results at Belle II” in the 31st International Symposium on Lepton Photon Interactions at High Energies, https://indico.cern.ch/event/1114856/contributions/5423686/attachments/2685798/4659822/LP_Belle2_Quarkonium.pdf.
  • [86] R. Mizuk et al. (Belle Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 06, 137 (2021).
  • [87] S. Dubynskiy and M. B. Voloshin, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 21, 2779 (2006).
  • [88] V. Zhukova et al. (Belle II Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 97, 012002 (2018).
  • [89] N. Brambilla et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1534 (2011).
  • [90] N. Brambilla et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2981 (2014).
  • [91] J. Segovia, P. G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, and F. FernΓ‘ndez, Phys. Rev. D 93, 074027 (2016).
  • [92] Y. P. Kuang, Front. Phys. China 1, 19 (2006).
  • [93] M. B. Voloshin, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 61, 455 (2008).
  • [94] U. Tamponi et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 142001 (2015).
  • [95] K. F. Chen et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 112001 (2008).
  • [96] P. G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, and F. FernΓ‘ndez, Symmetry 13, 1600 (2021).
  • [97] F. K. Guo, U. G. Meißner, and W. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 3063 (2014).
  • [98] Z. Y. Zhou, D. Y. Chen, and Z. G. Xiao, Phys. Rev. D 99, 034005 (2019).
  • [99] M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 122001 (2015).
  • [100] A. G. Drutskoy, F. K. Guo, F. J. Llanes-Estrada, A. V. Nefediev, and J. M. Torres-Rincon, Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 7 (2013).
  • [101] A. E. Bondar, R. V. Mizuk, and M. B. Voloshin, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 32, 1750025 (2017).