User talk:Ak ccm

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ak ccm!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Ak ccm!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Erstes Praesidium der Bayerischen Mykologischen Gesellschaft.tif was uncategorized on 23 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Polyporus auricularius.jpg was uncategorized on 18 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Hirsutumsäure Strukturformel.svg was uncategorized on 10 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:2010-12-28 Nidularia deformis (Willd.) Fr 128506 cropped.jpg was uncategorized on 22 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:2010-09-14 Multiclavula vernalis.jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Renames

Did you contact the person listed on the description pages for these files based on your thoughts that they're a different taxon?

Also, they are all listed on galleries matching their current names. – Adrignola talk 17:33, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I couldn't contact the autor for each single photo. A large number of fungi pictures of Lindsey is wrong determined. It's much work to correct this. Although I wrote him in January 2011 regarding a wrong photo and he answers me: "I corrected it a long time ago on my site but do not know how to modify Wiki (someone else put my pictures on Wiki). If you know how to fix it, please do!" So I think the renames are all right. Furthermore we're listing critical photos on a subpage of the german WikiProject Fungi and discussed them if it is necessary before we add the renames. --Ak ccm (talk) 20:17, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Done. – Adrignola talk 20:30, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rename requests

You requested a rename of File:2006-03-10 Stereum hirsutum.jpg to File:Stereum hirsutum - Lindsey.jpg, but the target file name exists. Could you change the request to an alternative target file name. Thanks. Regards, Pmlineditor (t � c � l) 10:49, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. I changed the target file name. --Ak ccm (talk) 11:53, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Exzellente Pilzfotos!

Hi, ich bin grad dabei, die �berf�llung von Category:Fungi ein bi�chen anzugehen. Wie ich deine Fotos konkret rekategorisiere: Bei der Taxonomie/Systematik kenn ich mich nicht so gut aus (sorry, Zoologe hier), deswegen versuch ich erst mal wenn noch alle taxonomischen Kategorien rot sind den Artnamen wegzunehmen. Wenn das nicht hilft la� ich das Bild einfach in "Category:Fungi", damit sich Spezialisten drum k�mmern. Sonst kommt's raus und kriegt die volle Kategorie-Packung. Zb File:2007-03-11 Amylostereum laevigatum.jpg. Ich packe den exakten Fundort in die Beschreibung, und benutze Category:Fungi of Germany. Wir haben aber auch Category:Nature of Bavaria, also nehm ich das auch (wenn der Standort nicht Unterkategorie davon ist, also irgendwelche Schutzgebiete oder anderweitig bemerkenswertes Habitat).

Die Mykorrhizapartner nehm ich aus den Kategorien raus wenn sie auf dem Bild nicht drauf sind, aber ich pack sie in die Beschreibung wenn das sinnig ist (also bei Habitusfotos, zB File:2010-08-25 Boletus subappendiculatus.jpg). Man k�nnte sich �berlegen, die Artkategorie zumindest bei (quasi-)obligater Symbiose als Unterkategorie der Partnerpflanze einzusortieren, also wenn der �bliche Partner von Boletus subappendiculatus die Picea abies w�re (ich wei� nicht ob das so ist), die "Boletus subappendiculatus"-Kategorie, wenn es sie dann irgendwann gibt, auch unter "Picea abies" einzusortieren. Das k�nnte man auf jede Art von starkem Mutualismus ausdehnen; macht zwar noch keiner, aber nach einer �hnlichen Logik ("verwandte" - konzeptionell, nicht taxonomisch - Kategorien zusammen) wird anderweitig schon umfangreich sortiert.

Au�erdem siehe COM:CFD#Category:Mushrooms_by_country, auf Basis eines landesbasierten Systems kann man dann parallel ein biogeographisches (also l�ndergrenzen�bergreifendes) System bauen. Aber das ist Zukunftsmusik. Bei einigen Fotos war gar keine Ortsangabe dabei, ich hab die nicht in "Fungi of Germany" sortiert aber ich nehm mal an da� sie dort (und in "Nature of Bavaria") geh�ren, kannst das ja evtl nachtragen (bislang sind die nur taxonomisch sortiert). Damit die Landeskategorien nicht �berlaufen, kann man als ersten Schritt schon mal f�r Landesendemiten die taxonomische Kategorie in "Fungi of [Land]" packen; ich hab das mit der neotropischen Avifauna ausprobiert, und es funktioniert sehr gut.

Bilder ohne Identifikation pack ich in Category:Unidentified fungi. Da sind ein paar pr�chtige Exemplare dabei (Fotos von Ralf Roletschek), vermutlich alle aus Deutschland, aber bislang keine Angaben. Kannst ja mal schauen, ob du irgendwas identifiziert kriegst.

Ach ja, Category:Mushrooms of Germany ist ja strenggenommen nur f�r "Hutpilze" jetzt wo wir "Fungi of Germany" haben. Ich hab den anderen Kram (Becherlinge etc) rausgemacht zur�ck in "Fungi", aber noch nix von "Fungi" in "Mushrooms" verschoben weil ich erst mal nur alles in ersterer sammeln wollte. M�glicherweise w�re die erste Unterkategorie von "Fungi" die man anlegen wollen w�rde "Fungi of Bavaria", damit man "Nature of Bavaria" und "Fungi of Germany" bei deinen Bildern als eine Kategorie zusammenfassen kann. Prinzipell aber w�rde ich bei "Fungi of [Land]" 3 Gruppen von Unterkategorien sehen: 1. regional, 2. analog Category:Fungi by shape, 3. endemische Taxa. Das kann man dann durchaus gruppieren, zB mit "| [Region]" und "|*[Morphologie]" und "|[Taxon]" (oder halt "| [Taxon]" und "|[Region]", wenn es mehr Regionen als Endemiten gibt) w�rde man alle 3 Gruppen in "Fungi of [Land]" sch�n sauber untergebracht kriegen ohne da� man unn�tig Kram wie "Fungi of Germany by shape" einf�hren mu�. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 13:16, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Danke f�r die M�he. Vielleicht w�re die Diskussion zentral auf der Diskussionsseite des WikiProjekts Pilze besser aufgehoben? Denn ich vermute, dass wir Pilzler ein mehr oder weniger eigenes System verwenden. So k�nnte man wahrscheinlich am schnellsten Ordnung reinbringen. --Ak ccm (talk) 14:01, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:2011-12-04 Mucronella bresadolae (Qu�l.) Corner 187670.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2011-12-04 Mucronella bresadolae (Qu�l.) Corner 187670.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:2011-12-04 Mucronella bresadolae (Qu�l.) Corner 187670.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Common Good (talk) 17:14, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing

never seen this fungi before, File:2012-02-16 Coccomyces dentatus (J.C. Schmidt & Kunze) Sacc 199890.jpg. i would support it being nominated for valued, featured, or quality image, esp. as something most people have never seen before.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:46, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agaricus arvensis - 3.jpg

Hi Ak ccm,

This sp. could be Chlorophyllum brunneum? Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 08:47, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DenesFeri,

yes, it's possible that the picture is showing C.�brunneum. But without a picture of the stem and especially oft the base (C.�brunneum has a more or less margined-bulbous stem base) I'm not 100% sure. Another possible species is C.�rachodes because much rachodes-collections before Vellinga's paper are truly C.�olivieri. --Ak ccm (talk) 09:00, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for the info! DenesFeri (talk) 09:03, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ziegenlippe

Hallo Ak ccm, entschuldige bitte, dass ich erst jetzt antworte aber meistens komme ich leider nur 1 bis 2 mal die Woche dazu, auf meinen Wikiaccount zu sehen. Vielen Dank f�r die Anmerkung! Das ist wirklich super, dass sich jemand die Bilder genauer ansieht und sich Gedanken dar�ber macht! Bei dem gezeigten Exemplar habe ich leider nicht nach dem Basalmyzel geschaut, jedoch fand ich in diesem Gebiet stets Xerocomus subtomentosus. Der Wald dort besteht aus verschiedenen Parzellen mit unterschiedlichen Baumarten und macht ihn deshalb mycologisch sehr interessant. Der Standort des gezeigten Exemplares befand sich genau zwischen einem Buchen-Eichen Bestand und einer j�ngeren Fichtenschonung (alter Forstweg bedeckt mit Fichtenreisig). Nun w�re es durchaus interessant, ob der gezeigte Geselle wirklich die Variet�t ferrugineus zeigt, denn es w�re meines Wissens nach ein Erstfund in diesem Gebiet (dies muss ich im kommenden Herbst unbedingt �berpr�fen:-)). Nun zu der Beschriftung des Fotos. Nach meinem Kenntnisstand wird aktuell Xerocomus ferrugineus nicht als eigene Art, sondern als eine Variet�t von Xerocomus subtomentosus angesehen: Xerocomus subtomentosus var. ferrugineus (Schaeffer) Krieglsteiner 1991, Krieglsteiner: Die Gro�pilze Baden W�rttembergs, Band 2, Eugen Ulmer Verlag (2000), Seite: 329 oder auch MycoBank [1]. Da ich bei meinen Pilzfotografien grunds�tzlich auf die Variet�tsangaben verzichte (die Zuordnungen �ndern sich mir pers�nlich in letzten Jahren ein wenig zu h�ufig:-)), w�rde ich Xerocomus subtomentosus durchaus als legitim ansehen oder was meinst Du? Viele Gr��e aus Ulm und nochmals vielen Dank -- H. Krisp (talk) 17:29, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Surreal Barnstar
	For uploading valuable images from the website Mushroomobserver. Natuur12 (talk) 16:46, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:2014-06-17 Tapinella panuoides (Batsch) E.-J. Gilbert 431811.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2014-06-17 Tapinella panuoides (Batsch) E.-J. Gilbert 431811.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:14, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2008-03-08 Hydnangium carneum crop.jpg

File:2008-03-08 Hydnangium carneum crop.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Revent (talk) 06:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, this is a derivative of an image that has a non-commercial license at the source http://mushroomobserver.org/image/show_image/12126 and so can't be licensed in a manner compatible with Commons. Revent (talk) 06:03, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my late answer, Revent. I always import images from MushroomObserver.org with Flinfo. If I choose an image with a non compatible license the tool shows an error message. I think the owner of the photo has changed the license of his photo after I imported it to Commons. However the photo was deleted. --Ak ccm (talk) 13:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was http://mushroomobserver.org/image/show_image/12126 if that helps. Revent^talk 13:48, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I know. The shown license is not compatible. But as I imported the photo to Commons with Flinfo the license was compatible. Otherwise the import would not work. --Ak ccm (talk) 13:54, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amanita gemmata 2016-06-08.jpg

File:Amanita gemmata 2016-06-08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Basvb (talk) 11:46, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Ak ccm

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images

Renames

Rename requests

Exzellente Pilzfotos!

File source is not properly indicated: File:2011-12-04 Mucronella bresadolae (Qu�l.) Corner 187670.jpg

Amazing

File:Agaricus arvensis - 3.jpg

Ziegenlippe

A barnstar for you!

Copyright status: File:2014-06-17 Tapinella panuoides (Batsch) E.-J. Gilbert 431811.jpg

File:2008-03-08 Hydnangium carneum crop.jpg

File:Amanita gemmata 2016-06-08.jpg

Navigation menu

User talk:Ak ccm

Tip: Categorizing images

Renames

Rename requests

Exzellente Pilzfotos!

File source is not properly indicated: File:2011-12-04 Mucronella bresadolae (Qu�l.) Corner 187670.jpg

Amazing

File:Agaricus arvensis - 3.jpg

Ziegenlippe

A barnstar for you!

Copyright status: File:2014-06-17 Tapinella panuoides (Batsch) E.-J. Gilbert 431811.jpg

File:2008-03-08 Hydnangium carneum crop.jpg

File:Amanita gemmata 2016-06-08.jpg

Navigation menu

Search