Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Philips Series 7000 shaver head.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Philips Series 7000 shaver head.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2017 at 22:15:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
- �Info A new Philips Series 7000 shaver head, photographed in the style of a promotional image. All by me -- Colin (talk) 22:15, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- �Support -- Colin (talk) 22:15, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support 35 frames... great! --Ralf Roleček 22:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support lNeverCry 22:23, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support, but I must point out that there are a few minor blurry spots on edges and overlaps, because I spend some time retouching my recent own stacks correcting these things. – LucasT 22:29, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support ...and sufficiently clean too. This is one piece of machinery you don't want a dirty close-up of! ;) The surface lends itself very nicely to such a photo. --cart-Talk 22:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Just one little thing that could be corrected: Down center there are two places where you can see some flesh-toned reflections, probably from you. It would look nicer if those were in grey tones instead. --cart-Talk 22:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Cart, Lucas: I've updated a new version with the reflection removed and the blurred areas fixed with sharper frames. -- Colin (talk) 21:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support You should work in advertising. Great photo. WClarke 22:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support Very impressive. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support Outstanding shot – although I'm more into handcrafted tools ;-) --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks Frank. I'm a wet shave man myself, though with more modern technology than your link :-). My wife thinks I'm completely bonkers, spending the evening in the kitchen taking dozens of photos of my son's shaver. I showed her the result and she said: "It's a shaver. So?" *sigh* -- Colin (talk) 08:50, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support Great texture. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support Nice shot! I guess I´m gonna have to learn focus stacking :) --Tomascastelazo (talk) 04:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Dey.sandip (talk) 05:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Code (talk) 06:14, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Enthusiastic support Utterly stunning result! Was it really necessary to shoot 36 frames? What's the (average) DoF of each image? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
technical discussion about stacking
|
---|
|
- Support per everyone else - really impressive! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- �Support Very nice shoot and professional and I think that your quality is improving
DiliffColin. Clean and perfect, I added a note to let more space there --The Photographer 12:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- The Photographer, I'll check but I'm pretty sure I have no more of the image at the bottom, to change the crop. I agree I could have included a bit more when I took the photos. -- Colin (talk) 12:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- I understand that you should do it again because the image is already done, however, it's a minor problem --The Photographer 12:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- The Photographer, I'll check but I'm pretty sure I have no more of the image at the bottom, to change the crop. I agree I could have included a bit more when I took the photos. -- Colin (talk) 12:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- �Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 12:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- �Support --El Grafo (talk) 18:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- �Support Well executed. Charles (talk) 23:01, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- �Support --Karelj (talk) 23:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- �Abstain Daniel Case (talk) 07:25, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
:*�Question why, Daniel? I'm really interested because you also had the option not to vote at all. I understand that overly technical pics tend to polarize more than other subjects. Something along that line? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:46, 23 February 2017 (UTC) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Martin, I suspect the reason has nothing to do with this nomination, just me. So would appreciate any comment by Daniel unrelated to this nom, be made on Martin's or Daniel's talk page. -- Colin (talk) 10:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Or maybe he's not sure if support or oppose for some wow raison. --The Photographer 12:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support No doubt FP. --Pugilist (talk) 07:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:09, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Thennicke (talk) 04:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 05:22, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Machines