• Tan L, Zhu Z and Zhang J. (2025). Reduced meet over labelling-based semantics in abstract argumentation. Information Processing Letters. 187:C. Online publication date: 1-Jan-2025.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipl.2024.106514

  • Esterhuyse C and van Binsbergen L. Cooperative Specification via Composition Control. Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Software Language Engineering. (2-15).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3687997.3695635

  • Governatori G and Olivieri F. Ambiguities in Defeasible Logic: A Computational Efficient Framework and Algorithm. Rules and Reasoning. (217-233).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72407-7_16

  • Chen W and Ju S. (2024). Dynamic collective argumentation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 172:C. Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2024.109234

  • Sounchio S, Geneste L and Foguem B. (2024). A hypotheses-driven framework for human–machine expertise process. Cognitive Systems Research. 87:C. Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2024.101255

  • Monte-Alto H, Morveli-Espinoza M and Tacla C. (2024). Argumentation-based multi-agent distributed reasoning in dynamic and open environments. Knowledge and Information Systems. 66:8. (4631-4666). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-024-02101-x

  • Keshavarzi Zafarghandi A, Qi J, Hollink L, Tjong Kim Sang E and Ceolin D. Investigating the Usefulness of Product Reviews Through Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks. Web Engineering. (296-308).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62362-2_21

  • Bengel L, Bl�mel L, Rienstra T and Thimm M. Argumentation-Based Probabilistic Causal Reasoning. Robust Argumentation Machines. (221-236).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63536-6_13

  • Hoffmann S, Kuhlmann I and Thimm M. Enhancing Abstract Argumentation Solvers with Machine Learning-Guided Heuristics: A Feasibility Study. Robust Argumentation Machines. (185-201).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63536-6_11

  • Apostolakis I. Abstraction in Non-Monotonic Reasoning. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. (2722-2724).

    /doi/10.5555/3635637.3663266

  • Lagniez J, Lonca E and Mailly J. A SAT-based Approach for Argumentation Dynamics. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. (2351-2353).

    /doi/10.5555/3635637.3663157

  • Apostolakis I, Saribatur Z and Wallner J. Abstracting Assumptions in Structured Argumentation. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. (2132-2134).

    /doi/10.5555/3635637.3663084

  • Alfano G, Greco S, Parisi F and Trubitsyna I. On General Epistemic Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. (2117-2119).

    /doi/10.5555/3635637.3663079

  • Jiang J, Leofante F, Rago A and Toni F. Recourse under Model Multiplicity via Argumentative Ensembling. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. (954-963).

    /doi/10.5555/3635637.3662950

  • Bernreiter M, Maly J, Nardi O and Woltran S. Combining Voting and Abstract Argumentation to Understand Online Discussions. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. (170-179).

    /doi/10.5555/3635637.3662864

  • Borg A and Bex F. (2024). Minimality, necessity and sufficiency for argumentation and explanation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 168:C. Online publication date: 1-May-2024.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2024.109143

  • Maiti A and Dey P. (2024). Query complexity of tournament solutions. Theoretical Computer Science. 991:C. Online publication date: 12-Apr-2024.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2024.114422

  • Dvorak W, Gressler A and Woltran S. Equipping Abstract Argumentation Solvers for Verifying Negative Results. Proceedings of the 39th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing. (762-769).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3605098.3636073

  • Arieli O and Heyninck J. Collective Attacks in Assumption-Based Argumentation. Proceedings of the 39th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing. (746-753).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3605098.3635916

  • Baumann R and Heine A. On Naive Labellings – Realizability, Construction and Patterns of Redundancy. Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems. (125-143).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56940-1_7

  • Mahmood Y, Virtema J, Barlag T and Ngomo A. Computing Repairs Under Functional and Inclusion Dependencies via Argumentation. Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems. (23-42).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56940-1_2

  • Lagasquie-Schiex M, Mailly J and Yuste-Ginel A. How to Manage Supports in Incomplete Argumentation. Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems. (319-339).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56940-1_18

  • Ruiz-Dolz R, Taverner J, Heras Barberá S and García-Fornes A. (2024). Persuasion-enhanced computational argumentative reasoning through argumentation-based persuasive frameworks. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. 34:1. (229-258). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-023-09370-1

  • Agarwal V, Young A, Joglekar S and Sastry N. (2023). A Graph-Based Context-Aware Model to Understand Online Conversations. ACM Transactions on the Web. 18:1. (1-27). Online publication date: 29-Feb-2024.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3624579

  • Lieber J, Mailly J, Marquis P, Prade H, Rollin F, Bouraoui Z and Wilczynski A. (2024). Some thoughts about artificial stupidity and artificial dumbness. AI Communications. 37:3. (377-391). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024.

    https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-220322

  • Leturc C, Bonnet G, Bouraoui Z and Wilczynski A. (2024). Using n-ary multi-modal logics in argumentation frameworks to reason about ethics. AI Communications. 37:3. (323-355). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024.

    https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-220301

  • Mailly J, Bouraoui Z and Wilczynski A. (2024). Constrained incomplete argumentation frameworks. AI Communications. 37:3. (299-322). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024.

    https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-220298

  • Kampik T, Čyras K and Ruiz Alarcón J. (2024). Change in quantitative bipolar argumentation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 164:C. Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2023.109066

  • Baumann R and Penndorf C. (2023). Static and dynamic orderings on Dungean argumentation frameworks - An overview. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 163:C. Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2023.109036

  • Arisaka R and Ito T. Relational Acceptability Semantics of Abstract Argumentation. PRICAI 2023: Trends in Artificial Intelligence. (487-493).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7019-3_44

  • Morveli-Espinoza M, Nieves J and Tacla C. An Argumentation-Based Approach for Generating Explanations in Activity Reasoning. Advances in Computational Intelligence. (229-240).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47765-2_17

  • Bistarelli S and Taticchi C. Deriving Dependency Graphs from Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. AIxIA 2023 – Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (17-29).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47546-7_2

  • Dvořák W, Rapberger A and Woltran S. (2023). A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics. Artificial Intelligence. 324:C. Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2023.104011

  • Mahesar Q and Parsons S. (2023). Argument Schemes and a Dialogue System for Explainable Planning. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology. 14:5. (1-25). Online publication date: 31-Oct-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3610301

  • Buron Brarda M, Tamargo L and García A. (2023). Multi-agent multi-criteria decision framework with interactive explanation tools. Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal. 228:C. Online publication date: 15-Oct-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120360

  • Flouris G, Patkos T, Bikakis A, Vassiliades A, Bassiliades N and Plexousakis D. (2023). Theoretical analysis and implementation of abstract argumentation frameworks with domain assignments. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 161:C. Online publication date: 1-Oct-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2023.108992

  • Alfano G, Calautti M, Greco S, Parisi F and Trubitsyna I. (2023). Explainable acceptance in probabilistic and incomplete abstract argumentation frameworks. Artificial Intelligence. 323:C. Online publication date: 1-Oct-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2023.103967

  • Elaroussi M, Nourine L and Radjef M. (2023). Lattice point of view for argumentation framework. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 91:5. (691-711). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-023-09873-y

  • Wyner A and Zurek T. Towards a Formalisation of Motivated Reasoning and the Roots of Conflict. Value Engineering in Artificial Intelligence. (28-45).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58202-8_3

  • Kuhlmann I, Niskanen A and J�rvisalo M. Computing MUS-Based Inconsistency Measures. Logics in Artificial Intelligence. (745-755).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43619-2_50

  • Yu L, Al Anaissy C, Vesic S, Li X and van der Torre L. A Principle-Based Analysis of Bipolar Argumentation Semantics. Logics in Artificial Intelligence. (209-224).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43619-2_15

  • Popescu A and Wallner J. Reasoning in Assumption-Based Argumentation Using Tree-Decompositions. Logics in Artificial Intelligence. (192-208).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43619-2_14

  • Dyrkolbotn S. Weak Argumentation Semantics and Unsafe Odd Cycles: Results and a Conjecture. Logics in Artificial Intelligence. (161-175).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43619-2_12

  • Berthold M, Rapberger A and Ulbricht M. On the Expressive Power of Assumption-Based Argumentation. Logics in Artificial Intelligence. (145-160).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43619-2_11

  • Gebhardt S and Doder D. Determining Preferences over Extensions: A Cautious Approach to Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (109-120).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45608-4_9

  • Amgoud L and Beuselinck V. An Equivalence Class of Gradual Semantics. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (95-108).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45608-4_8

  • Mailly J. Extension-Based Semantics for Incomplete Argumentation Frameworks: Grounded Semantics and Principles. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (84-94).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45608-4_7

  • Delobelle J, Mailly J and Rossit J. Revisiting Approximate Reasoning Based on Grounded Semantics. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (71-83).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45608-4_6

  • Tang L and Ishikawa R. Audience Irrelevance in Strategic Argumentation Games. Logic and Argumentation. (138-156).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40875-5_9

  • Takahashi K and Miwa H. Topological Conditions and Solutions for Repairing Argumentation Frameworks. Logic and Argumentation. (101-118).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40875-5_7

  • Mailly J. A Logical Encoding for k-m-Realization of Extensions in Abstract Argumentation. Logic and Argumentation. (84-100).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40875-5_6

  • Chen C, Pardo P, van der Torre L and Yu L. Weakest Link in Formal Argumentation: Lookahead and Principle-Based Analysis. Logic and Argumentation. (61-83).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40875-5_5

  • Wang Z and Shen Y. Fuzzy Labeling Semantics for Quantitative Argumentation. Logic and Argumentation. (193-210).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40875-5_12

  • Chi X. A Filtering-Based General Approach to Learning Rational Constraints of Epistemic Graphs. Logic and Argumentation. (175-192).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40875-5_11

  • Yu Z and Lu Y. A Structured Bipolar Argumentation Theory for Providing Explanations in Practical Reasoning. Logic and Argumentation. (157-171).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40875-5_10

  • Berthold M, Rapberger A and Ulbricht M. Forgetting aspects in assumption-based argumentation. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (86-96).

    https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2023/9

  • Bernreiter M and König M. From qualitative choice logic to abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (737-741).

    https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2023/73

  • Bengel L and Thimm M. Towards parallelising extension construction for serialisable semantics in abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (732-736).

    https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2023/72

  • Baumann R and Heine A. On conflict-free labellings – realizability, construction and patterns of redundancy. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (721-725).

    https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2023/70

  • Arieli O and Heyninck J. Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation with partially-ordered preferences. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (55-64).

    https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2023/6

  • Rago A, Li H and Toni F. Interactive explanations by conflict resolution via argumentative exchanges. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (582-592).

    https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2023/57

  • Prakken H. Relating abstract and structured accounts of argumentation dynamics. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (562-571).

    https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2023/55

  • Otero C, Craandijk D and Bex F. ORLA. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (542-551).

    https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2023/53

  • Odekerken D, Lehtonen T, Borg A, Wallner J and J�rvisalo M. Argumentative reasoning in ASPIC+ under incomplete information. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (531-541).

    https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2023/52

  • Lehtonen T, Rapberger A, Ulbricht M and Wallner J. Argumentation frameworks induced by assumption-based argumentation. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (440-450).

    https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2023/43

  • Bl�mel L and Thimm M. Approximating weakly preferred semantics in abstract argumentation through vacuous reduct semantics. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (107-116).

    https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2023/11

  • Mikheyenkova M and Finn V. (2023). On the Role of Argumentation in Opinion Analysis. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis. 33:3. (407-412). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1134/S105466182303029X

  • Arieli O, Borg A and Stra�er C. (2023). A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation. Artificial Intelligence. 322:C. Online publication date: 1-Sep-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2023.103966

  • Nourine L and Vilmin S. (2023). Hierarchical decompositions of implicational bases for the enumeration of meet-irreducible elements. Theoretical Computer Science. 969:C. Online publication date: 21-Aug-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2023.114030

  • Heyninck J, Raddaoui B and Straßer C. Ranking-based argumentation semantics applied to logical argumentation. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (3268-3276).

    https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2023/364

  • Fichte J, Hecher M, Mahmood Y and Meier A. Quantitative reasoning and structural complexity for claim-centric argumentation. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (3212-3220).

    https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2023/358

  • Doder D, Amgoud L and Vesic S. Parameterised gradual semantics dealing with varied degrees of compensation. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (3176-3183).

    https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2023/354

  • Baumann R and Heinrich M. Bipolar abstract dialectical frameworks are covered by Kleene's three-valued logic. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (3123-3131).

    https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2023/348

  • Amgoud L, Muller P and Trenquier H. Leveraging argumentation for generating robust sample-based explanations. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (3104-3111).

    https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2023/346

  • Alfano G, Greco S, Parisi F and Trubitsyna I. Preferences and constraints in abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (3095-3103).

    https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2023/345

  • Nguyen Duy H and Huynh V. (2023). Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 159:C. Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2023.108938

  • Hunter A and Potyka N. (2023). Syntactic reasoning with conditional probabilities in deductive argumentation. Artificial Intelligence. 321:C. Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2023.103934

  • Bodanza G. (2023). On -Systems: A Graph-Theoretic Model for Paradoxes Involving a Falsity Predicate and Its Application to Argumentation Frameworks. Journal of Logic, Language and Information. 32:3. (373-393). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-023-09394-1

  • Morveli-Espinoza M, Nieves J and Tacla C. (2023). Probabilistic causal bipolar abstract argumentation: an approach based on credal networks. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 91:4. (517-536). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-023-09851-4

  • Mahmood Y, Meier A and Schmidt J. (2023). Parameterized Complexity of Logic-based Argumentation in Schaefer’s Framework. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic. 24:3. (1-25). Online publication date: 31-Jul-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3582499

  • Lenz M and Bergmann R. Case-Based Adaptation of Argument Graphs with WordNet and Large Language Models. Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. (263-278).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40177-0_17

  • Peters J, Bex F and Prakken H. Model- and data-agnostic justifications with A Fortiori Case-Based Argumentation. Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. (207-216).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3594536.3595164

  • Prakken H and Sartor G. A Formal Framework for Combining Legal Reasoning Methods. Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. (227-236).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3594536.3595129

  • Fungwacharakorn W, Satoh K and Verheij B. Constructing and Explaining Case Models: A Case-Based Argumentation Perspective. New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. (100-114).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60511-6_7

  • Lindqvist J. Logics for Information Aggregation. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. (2967-2969).

    /doi/10.5555/3545946.3599140

  • Alcaraz B, Boissier O, Chaput R and Leturc C. AJAR: An Argumentation-based Judging Agents Framework for Ethical Reinforcement Learning. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. (2427-2429).

    /doi/10.5555/3545946.3598956

  • Amgoud L, Muller P and Trenquier H. Argument-based Explanation Functions. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. (2373-2375).

    /doi/10.5555/3545946.3598938

  • Abchiche-Mimouni N, Amgoud L and Zehraoui F. Explainable Ensemble Classification Model based on Argumentation. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. (2367-2369).

    /doi/10.5555/3545946.3598936

  • Fan X. Probabilistic Deduction as a Probabilistic Extension of Assumption-based Argumentation. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. (2352-2354).

    /doi/10.5555/3545946.3598931

  • Doutre S, Duchatelle T and Lagasquie-Schiex M. Visual Explanations for Defence in Abstract Argumentation. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. (2346-2348).

    /doi/10.5555/3545946.3598929

  • Alfano G, Greco S, Parisi F and Trubitsyna I. Epistemic Abstract Argumentation Framework: Formal Foundations, Computation and Complexity. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. (409-417).

    /doi/10.5555/3545946.3598664

  • Kolker S, Dennis L, Fraga Pereira R and Xu M. Uncertain Machine Ethical Decisions Using Hypothetical Retrospection. Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, Norms, and Ethics for Governance of Multi-Agent Systems XVI. (161-181).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49133-7_9

  • Al Anaissy C, Vesic S and Nevejans N. Towards Ethical Argumentative Persuasive Chatbots. Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, Norms, and Ethics for Governance of Multi-Agent Systems XVI. (141-160).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49133-7_8

  • Alfano G, Greco S, Parisi F and Trubitsyna I. (2023). On acceptance conditions in abstract argumentation frameworks. Information Sciences: an International Journal. 625:C. (757-779). Online publication date: 1-May-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.12.116

  • Francia M, Giovanelli J and Pisano G. (2023). HAMLET. Future Generation Computer Systems. 142:C. (182-194). Online publication date: 1-May-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2022.12.035

  • Fazzinga B, Flesca S and Furfaro F. (2023). Taking into account “who said what” in abstract argumentation. Artificial Intelligence. 318:C. Online publication date: 1-May-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2023.103885

  • Brauwers G and Frasincar F. (2022). A Survey on Aspect-Based Sentiment Classification. ACM Computing Surveys. 55:4. (1-37). Online publication date: 30-Apr-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3503044

  • Krings K, Bohn N, Hille N and Ludwig T. “What if everyone is able to program?” – Exploring the Role of Software Development in Science Fiction. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (1-13).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581436

  • Heyninck J, Kern-Isberner G, Rienstra T, Skiba K and Thimm M. (2023). Revision, defeasible conditionals and non-monotonic inference for abstract dialectical frameworks. Artificial Intelligence. 317:C. Online publication date: 1-Apr-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2023.103876

  • Dvořák W, Greßler A, Rapberger A and Woltran S. (2023). The complexity landscape of claim-augmented argumentation frameworks. Artificial Intelligence. 317:C. Online publication date: 1-Apr-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2023.103873

  • Collenette J, Atkinson K and Bench-Capon T. (2023). Explainable AI tools for legal reasoning about cases. Artificial Intelligence. 317:C. Online publication date: 1-Apr-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2023.103861

  • Rodrigues O. Representing and Manipulating Large Sequences of Argumentation Labellings. Proceedings of the 38th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing. (995-1002).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3555776.3577756

  • Elaroussi M, Nourine L, Radjef M and Vilmin S. (2023). On the preferred extensions of argumentation frameworks. Information Processing Letters. 181:C. Online publication date: 1-Mar-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipl.2022.106354

  • Thimm M. On undisputed sets in abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-Fifth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Thirteenth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (6550-6557).

    https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v37i5.25805

  • Bernreiter M, Dvořák W, Rapberger A and Woltran S. The effect of preferences in abstract argumentation under a claim-centric view. Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-Fifth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Thirteenth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (6253-6261).

    https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v37i5.25770

  • Alfano G, Greco S, Parisi F and Trubitsyna I. Abstract argumentation framework with conditional preferences. Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-Fifth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Thirteenth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (6218-6227).

    https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v37i5.25766

  • Tan L, Zhu Z and Zhang J. (2023). A general approach to extension-based semantics in abstract argumentation. Artificial Intelligence. 315:C. Online publication date: 1-Feb-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2022.103836

  • Yu Z. (2022). Beishui Liao, Thomas Ågotnes, Yi N. Wang, (eds.), Dynamics, Uncertainty and Reasoning, vol. 4 of Logic in Asia: Studia Logica Library, Springer, Singapore, 2019, pp. 207+xii; ISBN: 978-981-13-7793-8 (Softcover) 117,69 €, ISBN: 978-981-13-7790-7 (Hardcover) 160,49 €, ISBN: 978-981-13-7791-4 (eBook) 93,08 €.. Studia Logica. 111:1. (139-143). Online publication date: 1-Feb-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-022-09996-z

  • Rizzo L and Longo L. (2023). Comparing and extending the use of defeasible argumentation with quantitative data in real-world contexts. Information Fusion. 89:C. (537-566). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2022.08.025

  • Tan L, Zhu Z, Wang F and Zhang J. (2023). Graded labellings for abstract argumentation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 152:C. (59-93). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2022.10.009

  • Baroni P, Fermé E, Giacomin M and Simari G. (2022). Belief Revision and Computational Argumentation: A Critical Comparison. Journal of Logic, Language and Information. 31:4. (555-589). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-022-09369-8

  • Governatori G, Bench-Capon T, Verheij B, Araszkiewicz M, Francesconi E and Grabmair M. (2022). Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the first decade. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 30:4. (481-519). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09329-4

  • Sartor G, Araszkiewicz M, Atkinson K, Bex F, van Engers T, Francesconi E, Prakken H, Sileno G, Schilder F, Wyner A and Bench-Capon T. (2022). Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the second decade. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 30:4. (521-557). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09326-7

  • Araszkiewicz M, Bench-Capon T, Francesconi E, Lauritsen M and Rotolo A. (2022). Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: overviews. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 30:4. (593-610). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09324-9

  • Croitoru C and Croitoru M. (2022). Indepth combinatorial analysis of admissible sets for abstract argumentation. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 90:11-12. (1139-1158). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-022-09785-3

  • Pisano G, Calegari R and Omicini A. Multi-agent Cooperative Argumentation in Arg2P. AIxIA 2022 – Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (140-153).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27181-6_10

  • Cordeiro R and Alcântara J. Generalising Semantics to Weighted Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks. Intelligent Systems. (520-534).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21686-2_36

  • Silva R and Alcântara J. Dealing with Inconsistencies in . Intelligent Systems. (488-503).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21686-2_34

  • Zhang H and Zhang S. Identifying Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for the Enforcement Problem of Argumentation Frameworks. PRIMA 2022: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. (659-668).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21203-1_44

  • Mariani S, Ferrari D and Zambonelli F. Cooperative Driving at Intersections Through Agent-Based Argumentation. PRIMA 2022: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. (37-53).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21203-1_3

  • Baioletti M and Santini F. Abstract Argumentation Goes Quantum: An Encoding to QUBO Problems. PRICAI 2022: Trends in Artificial Intelligence. (46-60).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20862-1_4

  • Mailly J. On Incompleteness in Abstract Argumentation: Complexity and Expressiveness. Scalable Uncertainty Management. (19-33).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18843-5_2

  • Proietti M and Toni F. Learning Assumption-Based Argumentation Frameworks. Inductive Logic Programming. (100-116).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55630-2_8

  • Bistarelli S and Santini F. A Definition of Sceptical Semantics in the Constellations Approach. Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. (62-74).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15707-3_6

  • Dewoprabowo R, Fichte J, Gorczyca P and Hecher M. A Practical Account into Counting Dung’s Extensions by Dynamic Programming. Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. (387-400).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15707-3_30

  • Amendola G, Cuteri B, Ricca F and Truszczynski M. Solving Problems in the Polynomial Hierarchy with ASP(Q). Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. (373-386).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15707-3_29

  • Sakama C and Son T. Interlinking Logic Programs and Argumentation Frameworks. Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. (322-335).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15707-3_25

  • Niskanen A, Mustonen J, Berg J and Järvisalo M. Computing Smallest MUSes of Quantified Boolean Formulas. Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. (301-314).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15707-3_23

  • Ellmauthaler S, Gaggl S, Rusovac D and Wallner J. Representing Abstract Dialectical Frameworks with Binary Decision Diagrams. Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. (177-189).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15707-3_14

  • Baumann R, Brewka G and Ulbricht M. (2022). Shedding new light on the foundations of abstract argumentation. Artificial Intelligence. 310:C. Online publication date: 1-Sep-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2022.103742

  • Liu K, Reddivari S and Reddivari K. Artificial Intelligence in Software Requirements Engineering: State-of-the-Art. 2022 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration for Data Science (IRI). (106-111).

    https://doi.org/10.1109/IRI54793.2022.00034

  • Wang C, Li Y, Fei C and Huang X. Labeled Knowledge-Based Decision Making with Assumption-Based Argumentation. Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. (450-465).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10983-6_35

  • Lindqvist J, Vel�zquez-Quesada F and �gotnes T. Cautious Distributed Belief. Dynamic Logic. New Trends and Applications. (106-124).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26622-5_7

  • Helm P, Michael L and Schelenz L. Diversity by Design?. Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. (324-334).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3514094.3534149

  • Speith T. A Review of Taxonomies of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Methods. Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. (2239-2250).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3534639

  • Wakaki T. Assumption-Based Argumentation for Extended Disjunctive Logic Programming. Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems. (35-54).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11321-5_3

  • Nofal S, Abu Jabal A, Alfarrarjeh A and Hababeh I. Validation of Labelling Algorithms for Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: The Case of Listing Stable Extensions. Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing. (423-435).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23492-7_36

  • Zhang G, Nulty P and Lillis D. A Decade of Legal Argumentation Mining: Datasets and Approaches. Natural Language Processing and Information Systems. (240-252).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08473-7_22

  • Guerrero E and Kalmi P. (2022). Gamification Strategies: A Characterization Using Formal Argumentation Theory. SN Computer Science. 3:4. Online publication date: 8-Jun-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01164-3

  • Linsbichler T, Maratea M, Niskanen A, Wallner J and Woltran S. (2022). Advanced algorithms for abstract dialectical frameworks based on complexity analysis of subclasses and SAT solving. Artificial Intelligence. 307:C. Online publication date: 1-Jun-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2022.103697

  • Marcondes F, Almeida J and Novais P. Automation of Social Media Interactions. Bio-inspired Systems and Applications: from Robotics to Ambient Intelligence. (24-33).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06527-9_3

  • Young A, Joglekar S, Agarwal V and Sastry N. (2022). Modelling online debates with argumentation theory. ACM SIGWEB Newsletter. 2022:Spring. (1-9). Online publication date: 12-May-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3533274.3533278

  • Borg A and Bex F. Contrastive Explanations for Argumentation-Based Conclusions. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. (1551-1553).

    /doi/10.5555/3535850.3536031

  • Vesic S, Yun B and Teovanovic P. Graphical Representation Enhances Human Compliance with Principles for Graded Argumentation Semantics. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. (1319-1327).

    /doi/10.5555/3535850.3535997

  • Dupuis de Tarl� L, Bonzon E and Maudet N. Multiagent Dynamics of Gradual Argumentation Semantics. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. (363-371).

    /doi/10.5555/3535850.3535892

  • Quemy A and Wrembel R. (2022). ECHR-OD. Information Systems. 106:C. Online publication date: 1-May-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2021.101822

  • Wang X, Song N, Zhou H and Cheng H. (2022). The representation of argumentation in scientific papers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73:6. (863-878). Online publication date: 26-Apr-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24590

  • Agarwal V, Joglekar S, Young A and Sastry N. GraphNLI: A Graph-based Natural Language Inference Model for Polarity Prediction in Online Debates. Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022. (2729-2737).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3485447.3512144

  • Kaci S and Salhi Y. Belief selection through argumentation. Proceedings of the 37th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing. (889-896).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3477314.3507038

  • Chi H and Liao B. (2022). A quantitative argumentation-based Automated eXplainable Decision System for fake news detection on social media. Knowledge-Based Systems. 242:C. Online publication date: 22-Apr-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108378

  • Baumann R and Strass H. (2022). An abstract, logical approach to characterizing strong equivalence in non-monotonic knowledge representation formalisms. Artificial Intelligence. 305:C. Online publication date: 1-Apr-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2022.103680

  • Fungwacharakorn W, Tsushima K and Satoh K. (2022). Diagnosing and Treating Effect of Legal Rule-Based Revision. New Generation Computing. 40:1. (25-45). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00354-022-00157-3

  • Martinez M and Simari G. Explanation-Friendly Query Answering Under Uncertainty. Reasoning Web. Explainable Artificial Intelligence. (65-103).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31423-1_2

  • Pandžić S. (2022). Structured argumentation dynamics. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 90:2-3. (297-337). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-021-09765-z

  • Bistarelli S, Meo M and Taticchi C. Timed Concurrent Language for Argumentation: An Interleaving Approach. Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages. (101-116).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94479-7_7

  • Morveli-Espinoza M, Nieves J, Tacla C, Pinto D, Beltrán B and Singh V. (2022). Handling temporality in human activity reasoning. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology. 42:5. (4387-4398). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-219229

  • Cardoso R, Logan B, Meneguzzi F, Oren N, Yun B, Albrecht S and Woolridge M. (2022). Resilience, reliability, and coordination in autonomous multi-agent systems. AI Communications. 35:4. (339-356). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-220136

  • Black E, Brand�o M, Cocarascu O, De Keijzer B, Du Y, Long D, Luck M, McBurney P, Meroño-Peñuela A, Miles S, Modgil S, Moreau L, Polukarov M, Rodrigues O, Ventre C, Albrecht S and Woolridge M. (2022). Reasoning and interaction for social artificial intelligence. AI Communications. 35:4. (309-325). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-220133

  • Divband Soorati M, Gerding E, Marchioni E, Naumov P, Norman T, Ramchurn S, Rastegari B, Sobey A, Stein S, Tarpore D, Yazdanpanah V, Zhang J, Albrecht S and Woolridge M. (2022). From intelligent agents to trustworthy human-centred multiagent systems. AI Communications. 35:4. (443-457). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-220127

  • Ho L, Arch-int S, Acar E, Schlobach S and Arch-int N. (2022). An argumentative approach for handling inconsistency in prioritized Datalog ± ontologies. AI Communications. 35:3. (243-267). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-220087

  • Yamaguchi K, Matsuda Y and Morinaga Y. (2022). Averaging Solution of Differential Equations as Value for Argumentation Graph with Similarity. Procedia Computer Science. 207:C. (614-623). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.116

  • Kampik T, Nieves J and Gabbay D. (2022). Ensuring reference independence and cautious monotony in abstract argumentation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 140:C. (173-210). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2021.10.007

  • Jing X and Luo X. A Two-Step Method for Dynamics of Abstract Argumentation. Distributed Artificial Intelligence. (235-246).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94662-3_15

  • Arieli O and Heyninck J. (2021). Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation part II. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 139:C. (28-53). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2021.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2021.08.008

  • Yuan Y. (2021). Bayesian Belief Revision Based on Agent’s Criteria. Studia Logica. 109:6. (1311-1346). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2021.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-021-09951-4

  • Fungwacharakorn W, Tsushima K and Satoh K. (2021). Resolving counterintuitive consequences in law using legal debugging. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 29:4. (541-557). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2021.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-021-09283-7

  • Calegari R, Contissa G, Pisano G, Sartor G and Sartor G. Modular Logic Argumentation in Arg-tuProlog. AIxIA 2021 – Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (91-103).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08421-8_7

  • Sukpanichnant P, Rago A, Lertvittayakumjorn P and Toni F. Neural QBAFs: Explaining Neural Networks Under LRP-Based Argumentation Frameworks. AIxIA 2021 – Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (429-444).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08421-8_30

  • Silva R and Alcântara J. and the Postulates of Non-interference and Crash-Resistance. Intelligent Systems. (328-343).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91702-9_22

  • Morveli-Espinoza M, Possebom A and Tacla C. A Protocol for Argumentation-Based Persuasive Negotiation Dialogues. Intelligent Systems. (18-32).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91702-9_2

  • Alfano G, Greco S, Parisi F, Simari G and Simari G. (2021). Incremental computation for structured argumentation over dynamic DeLP knowledge bases. Artificial Intelligence. 300:C. Online publication date: 1-Nov-2021.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2021.103553

  • Diller M, Gaggl S and Gorczyca P. Flexible Dispute Derivations with Forward and Backward Arguments for Assumption-Based Argumentation. Logic and Argumentation. (147-168).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_9

  • Beuselinck V, Delobelle J and Vesic S. On Restricting the Impact of Self-attacking Arguments in Gradual Semantics. Logic and Argumentation. (127-146).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_8

  • Dauphin J, Rienstra T and van der Torre L. New Weak Admissibility Semantics for Abstract Argumentation. Logic and Argumentation. (112-126).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_7

  • Cramer M and Sp�rl Y. The Choice-Preferred Semantics for Relevance-Oriented Acceptance of Admissible Sets of Arguments. Logic and Argumentation. (94-111).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_6

  • Chen W. Collective Argumentation with Topological Restrictions. Logic and Argumentation. (79-93).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_5

  • Fazzinga B, Galassi A and Torroni P. An Argumentative Dialogue System for COVID-19 Vaccine Information. Logic and Argumentation. (477-485).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_27

  • Chen J, Liao B and van der Torre L. Base Argumentation as an Abstraction of Deductive Argumentation. Logic and Argumentation. (468-476).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_26

  • Xydis A, Hampson C, Modgil S and Black E. Towards a Sound and Complete Dialogue System for Handling Enthymemes. Logic and Argumentation. (437-456).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_24

  • Vassiliades A, Flouris G, Patkos T, Bikakis A, Bassiliades N and Plexousakis D. A Multi Attack Argumentation Framework. Logic and Argumentation. (417-436).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_23

  • Takahashi K and Okubo T. How Can You Resolve a Trilemma? - A Topological Approach -. Logic and Argumentation. (397-416).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_22

  • Spaans J. Intrinsic Argument Strength in Structured Argumentation: A Principled Approach. Logic and Argumentation. (377-396).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_21

  • Escañuela Gonzalez M, Budán M, Martínez D, Cobo M and Simari G. Focusing the Argumentative Process: Neighborhood-Based Semantics in Abstract Argumentation. Logic and Argumentation. (20-39).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_2

  • Mailly J. Extension-Based Semantics for Incomplete Argumentation Frameworks. Logic and Argumentation. (322-341).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_18

  • Li C and Liao B. Integrating Individual Preferences into Collective Argumentation. Logic and Argumentation. (284-301).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_16

  • Lagasquie-Schiex M. Handling Support Cycles and Collective Interactions in the Logical Encoding of Higher-Order Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks. Logic and Argumentation. (244-265).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_14

  • Kampik T, Gabbay D and Sartor G. The Burden of Persuasion in Abstract Argumentation. Logic and Argumentation. (224-243).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_13

  • Kampik T and Čyras K. Explanations of Non-monotonic Inference in Admissibility-Based Abstract Argumentation. Logic and Argumentation. (209-223).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_12

  • Herzig A and Yuste-Ginel A. Abstract Argumentation with Qualitative Uncertainty: An Analysis in Dynamic Logic. Logic and Argumentation. (190-208).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_11

  • Giacomin M, Baroni P and Cerutti F. Towards a General Theory of Decomposability in Abstract Argumentation. Logic and Argumentation. (169-189).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_10

  • Fazzinga B and Mellema R. Argumentation in AI. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. (347-362).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24349-3_18

  • Guerrero E and Lindgren H. Typologies of Persuasive Strategies and Content: A Formalization Using Argumentation. Advances in Practical Applications of Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Social Good. The PAAMS Collection. (101-113).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85739-4_9

  • Dimopoulos Y, Mailly J and Moraitis P. (2021). Arguing and negotiating using incomplete negotiators profiles. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 35:2. Online publication date: 1-Oct-2021.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-021-09493-y

  • Neugebauer D, Rothe J and Skiba K. Complexity of Nonemptiness in Control Argumentation Frameworks. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (117-129).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86772-0_9

  • Mailly J. Constrained Incomplete Argumentation Frameworks. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (103-116).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86772-0_8

  • Kampik T and Gabbay D. The Degrees of Monotony-Dilemma in Abstract Argumentation. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (89-102).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86772-0_7

  • Hunter A. Argument Strength in Probabilistic Argumentation Using Confirmation Theory. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (74-88).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86772-0_6

  • Chalaguine L and Hunter A. Addressing Popular Concerns Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination with Natural Language Argumentation Dialogues. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (59-73).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86772-0_5

  • Borg A and Bex F. Necessary and Sufficient Explanations for Argumentation-Based Conclusions. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (45-58).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86772-0_4

  • Amgoud L. Non-monotonic Explanation Functions. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (19-31).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86772-0_2

  • Silva R and Alcântara J. A Paraconsistent Approach to Deal with Epistemic Inconsistencies in Argumentation. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (187-200).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86772-0_14

  • Sá S and Alcântara J. An Abstract Argumentation and Logic Programming Comparison Based on 5-Valued Labellings. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (159-172).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86772-0_12

  • Prakken H. Philosophical Reflections on Argument Strength and Gradual Acceptability. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (144-158).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86772-0_11

  • Potyka N. Generalizing Complete Semantics to Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (130-143).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86772-0_10

  • Bistarelli S, Kotthof L, Santini F and Taticchi C. (2021). Summary report for the third international competition on computational models of argumentation. AI Magazine. 42:3. (70-73). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2021.

    https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v42i3.15109

  • Wieten R, Bex F, Prakken H and Renooij S. (2021). Information graphs and their use for Bayesian network graph construction. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 136:C. (249-280). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2021.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2021.06.007

  • Moguillansky M and Tamargo L. (2021). On argument acceptability change towards legal interpretation dynamics. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 29:3. (311-350). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2021.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-020-09277-x

  • Aydoğan R, Kafali Ö, Arslan F, Jonker C and Singh M. (2021). Nova: Value-based Negotiation of Norms. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology. 12:4. (1-29). Online publication date: 31-Aug-2021.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3465054

  • Boschi G, Young A, Joglekar S, Cammarota C and Sastry N. (2021). Who Has the Last Word? Understanding How to Sample Online Discussions. ACM Transactions on the Web. 15:3. (1-25). Online publication date: 31-Aug-2021.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3452936

  • Spanaki K, Karafili E and Despoudi S. (2021). AI applications of data sharing in agriculture 4.0. International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals. 59:C. Online publication date: 1-Aug-2021.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102350

  • Hannay J, Stolpe A and Yamin M. Toward AI-Based Scenario Management for Cyber Range Training. HCI International 2021 - Late Breaking Papers: Multimodality, eXtended Reality, and Artificial Intelligence. (423-436).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90963-5_32

  • Brenneis M and Mauve M. How Intuitive Is It? Comparing Metrics for Attitudes in Argumentation with a Human Baseline. Artificial Intelligence in HCI. (125-138).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77772-2_9

  • Xue X, Wu X and Chen J. (2021). Optimizing Ontology Alignment Through an Interactive Compact Genetic Algorithm. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems. 12:2. (1-17). Online publication date: 30-Jun-2021.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3439772

  • Nourine L and Vilmin S. Enumerating Maximal Consistent Closed Sets in Closure Systems. Formal Concept Analysis. (57-73).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77867-5_4

  • Hung N and Huynh V. Revealed Preference Argumentation and Applications in Consumer Behaviour Analyses. Multi-Agent Systems. (55-71).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82254-5_4

  • Liu X and Chen W. Solid Semantics for Abstract Argumentation Frameworks and the Preservation of Solid Semantic Properties. Multi-Agent Systems. (178-193).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82254-5_11

  • Dellunde P, Godo L and Vidal A. Probabilistic Argumentation: An Approach Based on Conditional Probability –A Preliminary Report–. Logics in Artificial Intelligence. (25-32).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75775-5_3

  • Bistarelli S and Taticchi C. Introducing a Tool for Concurrent Argumentation. Logics in Artificial Intelligence. (18-24).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75775-5_2

  • Dvořák W, König M and Woltran S. Graph-Classes of Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks. Logics in Artificial Intelligence. (3-17).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75775-5_1

  • Taticchi C. A Concurrent Language for Negotiation and Debate with Argumentation. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1840-1841).

    /doi/10.5555/3463952.3464258

  • Lauren S, Belardinelli F and Toni F. Aggregating Bipolar Opinions. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (746-754).

    /doi/10.5555/3463952.3464042

  • Gaignier F, Dimopoulos Y, Mailly J and Moraitis P. Probabilistic Control Argumentation Frameworks. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (519-527).

    /doi/10.5555/3463952.3464017

  • Aler Tubella A, Theodorou A and Nieves J. Interrogating the Black Box: Transparency through Information-Seeking Dialogues. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (106-114).

    /doi/10.5555/3463952.3463971

  • Panisson A, Engelmann D and Bordini R. Engineering Explainable Agents: An Argumentation-Based Approach. Engineering Multi-Agent Systems. (273-291).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97457-2_16

  • Kampik T and Gabbay D. Explainable Reasoning in Face of Contradictions: From Humans to Machines. Explainable and Transparent AI and Multi-Agent Systems. (280-295).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82017-6_17

  • Čyras K, Lee M and Letsios D. Schedule Explainer: An Argumentation-Supported Tool for Interactive Explanations in Makespan Scheduling. Explainable and Transparent AI and Multi-Agent Systems. (243-259).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82017-6_15

  • Escañuela Gonzalez M, Budán M, Simari G and Simari G. (2021). Labeled Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 70. (1557-1636). Online publication date: 1-May-2021.

    https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.12394

  • Gaggl S, Rudolph S and Straß H. (2021). On the Decomposition of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks and the Complexity of Naive-based Semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 70. (1-64). Online publication date: 1-May-2021.

    https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.11348

  • Hung N and Huynh V. (2021). Revealed preference in argumentation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 131:C. (214-251). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2021.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2021.01.004

  • Calegari R, Ciatto G, Mascardi V and Omicini A. (2021). Logic-based technologies for multi-agent systems: a systematic literature review. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 35:1. Online publication date: 1-Apr-2021.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-020-09478-3

  • Zafarghandi A, Verbrugge R and Verheij B. Strong admissibility for abstract dialectical frameworks. Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. (873-880).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3412841.3441962

  • Racharak T and Tojo S. On the Relationship with Toulmin Method to Logic-Based Argumentation. Agents and Artificial Intelligence. (197-207).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10161-8_10

  • Borg A, Straßer C and Arieli O. (2021). A Generalized Proof-Theoretic Approach to Logical Argumentation Based on Hypersequents. Studia Logica. 109:1. (167-238). Online publication date: 1-Feb-2021.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-020-09906-1

  • Cayrol C, Fandinno J, Fariñas del Cerro L and Lagasquie-Schiex M. (2021). Valid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 89:1-2. (53-101). Online publication date: 1-Feb-2021.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-020-09693-4

  • Oussalah M. AI Explainability. A Bridge Between Machine Vision and Natural Language Processing. Pattern Recognition. ICPR International Workshops and Challenges. (257-273).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68796-0_19

  • Xue X, Wu X, Jiang C, Mao G, Zhu H and Chen C. (2021). Integrating Sensor Ontologies with Global and Local Alignment Extractions. Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing. 2021. Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021.

    https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6625184

  • Borg A and Bex F. Explaining Arguments at the Dutch National Police. AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems XI-XII. (183-197).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89811-3_13

  • Ferilli S. Introducing General Argumentation Frameworks and Their Use. AIxIA 2020 – Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (136-153).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77091-4_9

  • Cerutti F, Giacomin M, Vallati M and Zanetti T. An Efficient Algorithm for Semi-stable Extensions. AIxIA 2020 – Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (117-135).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77091-4_8

  • Bistarelli S and Taticchi C. Towards an Implementation of a Concurrent Language for Argumentation. AIxIA 2020 – Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (154-171).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77091-4_10

  • Morveli-Espinoza M, Tacla C and Jasinski H. An Argumentation-Based Approach for Explaining Goals Selection in Intelligent Agents. Intelligent Systems. (47-62).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61380-8_4

  • Zagorulko Y, Domanov O, Sery A, Sidorova E and Borovikova O. Analysis of the Persuasiveness of Argumentation in Popular Science Texts. Artificial Intelligence. (351-367).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59535-7_26

  • Santini F. Multi-dimensional Stable Matching Problems in Abstract Argumentation. Scalable Uncertainty Management. (251-260).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58449-8_19

  • Shaheen Q, Toniolo A and Bowles J. Dialogue Games for Explaining Medication Choices. Rules and Reasoning. (97-111).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57977-7_7

  • Cocarascu O, Rago A and Toni F. Explanation via Machine Arguing. Reasoning Web. Declarative Artificial Intelligence. (53-84).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60067-9_3

  • Al Manir S, Niestroy J, Levinson M and Clark T. Evidence Graphs: Supporting Transparent and FAIR Computation, with Defeasible Reasoning on Data, Methods, and Results. Provenance and Annotation of Data and Processes. (39-50).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80960-7_3

  • Gabbay D, Horne R, Mauw S and van der Torre L. Attack-Defence Frameworks: Argumentation-Based Semantics for Attack-Defence Trees. Graphical Models for Security. (143-165).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62230-5_8

  • Qiu H and Yao Y. Rule-based Distribute Topology Optimization. Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on Robot Systems and Applications. (45-49).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3402597.3402599

  • Rizzo L and Longo L. (2020). An empirical evaluation of the inferential capacity of defeasible argumentation, non-monotonic fuzzy reasoning and expert systems. Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal. 147:C. Online publication date: 1-Jun-2020.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113220

  • Verheij B. (2020). Artificial intelligence as law. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 28:2. (181-206). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2020.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-020-09266-0

  • Cyras K, Karamlou A, Lee M, Letsios D, Misener R and Toni F. AI-assisted Schedule Explainer for Nurse Rostering. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (2101-2103).

    /doi/10.5555/3398761.3399089

  • Chen W. Aggregation of Support-Relations of Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1804-1806).

    /doi/10.5555/3398761.3398988

  • Baumeister D, Hogrebe T and Rothe J. Towards Reality: Smoothed Analysis in Computational Social Choice. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1691-1695).

    /doi/10.5555/3398761.3398955

  • Kökciyan N, Parsons S, Sassoon I, Sklar E and Modgil S. An Argumentation-Based Approach to Generate Domain-Specific Explanations. Multi-Agent Systems and Agreement Technologies. (319-337).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66412-1_20

  • Bench-Capon T. (2020). Ethical approaches and autonomous systems. Artificial Intelligence. 281:C. Online publication date: 1-Apr-2020.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2020.103239

  • Hunter A, Polberg S and Thimm M. (2020). Epistemic graphs for representing and reasoning with positive and negative influences of arguments. Artificial Intelligence. 281:C. Online publication date: 1-Apr-2020.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2020.103236

  • Dutta S, Das D and Chakraborty T. (2020). Changing views. Information Processing and Management: an International Journal. 57:2. Online publication date: 1-Mar-2020.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102085

  • Dvořák W, Rapberger A, Wallner J and Woltran S. ASPARTIX-V19 - An Answer-Set Programming Based System for Abstract Argumentation. Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems. (79-89).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39951-1_5

  • Pandžić S. On the Dynamics of Structured Argumentation: Modeling Changes in Default Justification Logic. Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems. (222-241).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39951-1_14

  • Teze J, Gottifredi S, Garc�a A and Simari G. (2020). An approach to generalizing the handling of preferences in argumentation-based decision-making systems. Knowledge-Based Systems. 189:C. Online publication date: 15-Feb-2020.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105112

  • Gaggl S, Linsbichler T, Maratea M and Woltran S. (2020). Design and results of the Second International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation. Artificial Intelligence. 279:C. Online publication date: 1-Feb-2020.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2019.103193

  • P�hrer J. (2020). Realizability of three-valued semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks. Artificial Intelligence. 278:C. Online publication date: 1-Jan-2020.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2019.103198

  • Potyka N. (2019). A polynomial-time fragment of epistemic probabilistic argumentation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 115:C. (265-289). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2019.10.005

  • Jabal A, Davari M, Bertino E, Makaya C, Calo S, Verma D, Russo A and Williams C. (2019). Methods and Tools for Policy Analysis. ACM Computing Surveys. 51:6. (1-35). Online publication date: 30-Nov-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3295749

  • Lytos A, Lagkas T, Sarigiannidis P and Bontcheva K. (2019). The evolution of argumentation mining. Information Processing and Management: an International Journal. 56:6. Online publication date: 1-Nov-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102055

  • Doutre S, Lafages M and Lagasquie-Schiex M. A Distributed and Clustering-Based Algorithm for the Enumeration Problem in Abstract Argumentation. PRIMA 2019: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. (87-105).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33792-6_6

  • Arisaka R, Santini F and Bistarelli S. Block Argumentation. PRIMA 2019: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. (618-626).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33792-6_48

  • Li H and Wu J. Semantics of Extended Argumentation Frameworks Defined by Renovation Sets. PRIMA 2019: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. (532-540).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33792-6_38

  • Arisaka R, Hagiwara M and Ito T. Deception/Honesty Detection and (Mis)trust Building in Manipulable Multi-Agent Argumentation: An Insight. PRIMA 2019: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. (443-451).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33792-6_28

  • Boixel A, Bisquert P and Croitoru M. Deliberation Towards Transitivity with Unshared Features. PRIMA 2019: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. (3-18).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33792-6_1

  • van Berkel K, Ciabattoni A, Freschi E and Modgil S. Evaluating Networks of Arguments: A Case Study in Mīmāṃsā Dialectics. Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. (355-369).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60292-8_26

  • Shi C. Knowledge in Topological Argumentation Models. Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. (286-296).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60292-8_21

  • Proietti C, Grossi D, Smets S and Velázquez-Quesada F. Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks, Modal Logic and Semantic Paradoxes. Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. (214-229).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60292-8_16

  • Proietti C and Yuste-Ginel A. Persuasive Argumentation and Epistemic Attitudes. Dynamic Logic. New Trends and Applications. (104-123).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38808-9_7

  • Hunter A, Polberg S and Potyka N. (2019). Delegated updates in epistemic graphs for opponent modelling. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 113:C. (207-244). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2019.07.006

  • Baumann R, Dvořák W, Linsbichler T and Woltran S. (2019). A general notion of equivalence for abstract argumentation. Artificial Intelligence. 275:C. (379-410). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2019.06.006

  • Grossi D and Modgil S. (2019). On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation. Artificial Intelligence. 275:C. (138-173). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2019.05.001

  • Amgoud L and Besnard P. (2019). A formal characterization of the outcomes of rule-based argumentation systems. Knowledge and Information Systems. 61:1. (543-588). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-018-1227-5

  • Shams Z, Vos M, Oren N and Padget J. (2020). Argumentation-Based Reasoning about Plans, Maintenance Goals, and Norms. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems. 14:3. (1-39). Online publication date: 30-Sep-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3364220

  • Block K, Trumm S, Sahitaj P, Ollinger S and Bergmann R. Clustering of Argument Graphs Using Semantic Similarity Measures. KI 2019: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (101-114).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30179-8_8

  • Dvořák W, Rapberger A and Woltran S. Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks. KI 2019: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (131-145).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30179-8_11

  • Sakama C and Inoue K. Ordering Argumentation Frameworks. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (87-98).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_8

  • Potyka N, Polberg S and Hunter A. Polynomial-Time Updates of Epistemic States in a Fragment of Probabilistic Epistemic Argumentation. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (74-86).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_7

  • Keshavarzi Zafarghandi A, Verbrugge R and Verheij B. Discussion Games for Preferred Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (62-73).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_6

  • Morveli-Espinoza M, Nieves J and Tacla C. An Imprecise Probability Approach for Abstract Argumentation Based on Credal Sets. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (39-49).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_4

  • Delobelle J and Villata S. Interpretability of Gradual Semantics in Abstract Argumentation. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (27-38).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_3

  • Heyninck J and Arieli O. An Argumentative Characterization of Disjunctive Logic Programming. Progress in Artificial Intelligence. (526-538).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30244-3_44

  • Wachsmuth H. (2019). . Computational Linguistics. 45:3. (603-606). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_r_00358

  • Strass H, Wyner A and Diller M. (2019). EMIL. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 112:C. (55-84). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2019.04.010

  • Sakama C and Son T. Epistemic Argumentation Framework. PRICAI 2019: Trends in Artificial Intelligence. (718-732).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29908-8_56

  • Hung N and Huynh V. Learning Individual and Group Preferences in Abstract Argumentation. PRICAI 2019: Trends in Artificial Intelligence. (704-717).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29908-8_55

  • Arisaka R and Ito T. Semantics of Opinion Transitions in Multi-Agent Forum Argumentation. PRICAI 2019: Trends in Artificial Intelligence. (688-703).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29908-8_54

  • Ayoobi H, Cao M, Verbrugge R and Verheij B. Handling Unforeseen Failures Using Argumentation-Based Learning. 2019 IEEE 15th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE). (1699-1704).

    https://doi.org/10.1109/COASE.2019.8843207

  • Arieli O and Stra�er C. (2019). Logical argumentation by dynamic proof systems. Theoretical Computer Science. 781:C. (63-91). Online publication date: 16-Aug-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2019.02.019

  • Alc�ntara J and S� S. (2019). On Three-Valued Acceptance Conditions of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science (ENTCS). 344:C. (3-23). Online publication date: 16-Aug-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2019.07.002

  • Amgoud L and Doder D. Compilation of logical arguments. Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1502-1508).

    /doi/10.5555/3367243.3367247

  • Alfano G, Greco S and Parisi F. An efficient algorithm for skeptical preferred acceptance in dynamic argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (18-24).

    /doi/10.5555/3367032.3367036

  • Nofal S, Atkinson K and Dunne P. (2019). On checking skeptical and ideal admissibility in abstract argumentation frameworks. Information Processing Letters. 148:C. (7-12). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipl.2019.03.013

  • Cerutti F and Thimm M. (2019). A general approach to reasoning with probabilities. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 111:C. (35-50). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2019.05.003

  • Čyras K, Birch D, Guo Y, Toni F, Dulay R, Turvey S, Greenberg D and Hapuarachchi T. (2019). Explanations by arbitrated argumentative dispute. Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal. 127:C. (141-156). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.03.012

  • Buron Brarda M, Tamargo L and García A. (2019). An approach to enhance argument-based multi-criteria decision systems with conditional preferences and explainable answers. Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal. 126:C. (171-186). Online publication date: 15-Jul-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.02.021

  • Wakaki T. Extended Abduction in Assumption-Based Argumentation. Advances and Trends in Artificial Intelligence. From Theory to Practice. (593-607).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22999-3_51

  • Kantharaju R, Pease A, Reidsma D, Pelachaud C, Snaith M, Bruijnes M, Klaassen R, Beinema T, Huizing G, Simonetti D, Heylen D and op den Akker H. Integrating Argumentation with Social Conversation between Multiple Virtual Coaches. Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. (203-205).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3308532.3329450

  • Wieten R, Bex F, Prakken H and Renooij S. Supporting Discussions About Forensic Bayesian Networks Using Argumentation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. (143-152).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3322640.3326710

  • Prakken H. Modelling Accrual of Arguments in ASPIC+. Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. (103-112).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3322640.3326703

  • Liepiņa R, Sartor G and Wyner A. Evaluation of Causal Arguments in Law. Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. (214-218).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3322640.3326698

  • Thimm M. Algorithmic Approaches to Computational Models of Argumentation. Flexible Query Answering Systems. (18-21).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27629-4_4

  • Alfano G. An Efficient Algorithm for Computing the Set of Semi-stable Extensions. Flexible Query Answering Systems. (139-151).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27629-4_15

  • Leiva M, Simari G, Gottifredi S, García A and Simari G. DAQAP: Defeasible Argumentation Query Answering Platform. Flexible Query Answering Systems. (126-138).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27629-4_14

  • Testerink B, Odekerken D and Bex F. A Method for Efficient Argument-Based Inquiry. Flexible Query Answering Systems. (114-125).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27629-4_13

  • Cohen A, Gottifredi S and García A. A Heuristic Pruning Technique for Dialectical Trees on Argumentation-Based Query-Answering Systems. Flexible Query Answering Systems. (101-113).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27629-4_12

  • Flouris G and Bikakis A. (2019). A comprehensive study of argumentation frameworks with sets of attacking arguments. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 109:C. (55-86). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2019.03.006

  • Butler G, Pigozzi G and Rouchier J. An Opinion Diffusion Model with Vigilant Agents and Deliberation. Multi-Agent-Based Simulation XX. (81-99).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60843-9_7

  • Sassoon I, Kökciyan N, Sklar E and Parsons S. Explainable Argumentation for Wellness Consultation. Explainable, Transparent Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. (186-202).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30391-4_11

  • Sendi N, Abchiche-Mimouni N and Zehraoui F. Towards a Transparent Deep Ensemble Method Based on Multiagent Argumentation. Explainable, Transparent Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. (3-21).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30391-4_1

  • Yun B, Croitoru M, Vesic S and Bisquert P. NAKED. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (2390-2392).

    /doi/10.5555/3306127.3332122

  • Karamlou A, Čyras K and Toni F. Deciding the Winner of a Debate Using Bipolar Argumentation. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (2366-2368).

    /doi/10.5555/3306127.3332114

  • Chapman M, Balatsoukas P, Ashworth M, Curcin V, K�kciyan N, Essers K, Sassoon I, Modgil S, Parsons S and Sklar E. Computational Argumentation-based Clinical Decision Support. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (2345-2347).

    /doi/10.5555/3306127.3332107

  • Potyka N. A Polynomial-time Fragment of Epistemic Probabilistic Argumentation. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (2165-2167).

    /doi/10.5555/3306127.3332045

  • Heyninck J and Arieli O. Simple Contrapositive Assumption-Based Frameworks. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (2018-2020).

    /doi/10.5555/3306127.3331996

  • Grossi D and Rey S. Credulous Acceptability, Poison Games and Modal Logic. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1994-1996).

    /doi/10.5555/3306127.3331988

  • Potyka N. Extending Modular Semantics for Bipolar Weighted Argumentation. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1722-1730).

    /doi/10.5555/3306127.3331903

  • Karamlou A, Čyras K and Toni F. Complexity Results and Algorithms for Bipolar Argumentation. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1713-1721).

    /doi/10.5555/3306127.3331902

  • Heyninck J and Straßer C. A Fully Rational Argumentation System for Preordered Defeasible Rules. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1704-1712).

    /doi/10.5555/3306127.3331901

  • Salhi Y. On an Argument-centric Persuasion Framework. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1279-1287).

    /doi/10.5555/3306127.3331832

  • Amgoud L and Doder D. Gradual Semantics Accounting for Varied-Strength Attacks. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1270-1278).

    /doi/10.5555/3306127.3331831

  • Cocarascu O, Rago A and Toni F. Extracting Dialogical Explanations for Review Aggregations with Argumentative Dialogical Agents. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1261-1269).

    /doi/10.5555/3306127.3331830

  • Dimopoulos Y, Mailly J and Moraitis P. Argumentation-based Negotiation with Incomplete Opponent Profiles. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1252-1260).

    /doi/10.5555/3306127.3331829

  • Rodrigues O. Representing and comparing large sets of extensions of abstract argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing. (1154-1161).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3297280.3297394

  • Alfano G, Greco S and Parisi F. On scaling the enumeration of the preferred extensions of abstract argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing. (1147-1153).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3297280.3297393

  • Sá S and Alcântara J. Interpretations and models for assumption-based argumentation. Proceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing. (1139-1146).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3297280.3297392

  • Le T. A Framework for Merging Possibilistic Knowledge Bases. Intelligent Information and Database Systems. (65-76).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14802-7_6

  • Chen W and Endriss U. (2019). Preservation of semantic properties in collective argumentation. Artificial Intelligence. 269:C. (27-48). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.10.003

  • Corsi E and Fermüller C. (2019). Connecting fuzzy logic and argumentation frames via logical attack principles. Soft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications. 23:7. (2255-2270). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3513-2

  • Alsinet T, Argelich J, Béjar R and Cemeli J. (2019). A distributed argumentation algorithm for mining consistent opinions in weighted Twitter discussions. Soft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications. 23:7. (2147-2166). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3380-x

  • Riveret R, Gao Y, Governatori G, Rotolo A, Pitt J and Sartor G. (2019). A probabilistic argumentation framework for reinforcement learning agents. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 33:1-2. (216-274). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-019-09404-2

  • Lehtonen T, Wallner J and Jarvisalo M. Reasoning over assumption-based argumentation frameworks via direct answer set programming encodings. Proceedings of the Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference and Ninth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (2938-2945).

    https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33012938

  • Fichte J, Hecher M and Meier A. Counting complexity for reasoning in abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference and Ninth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (2827-2834).

    https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33012827

  • Dvořák W and Woltran S. Complexity of abstract argumentation under a claim-centric view. Proceedings of the Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference and Ninth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (2801-2808).

    https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33012801

  • Dung P, Thang P and Son T. On structured argumentation with conditional preferences. Proceedings of the Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference and Ninth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (2792-2800).

    https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33012792

  • Čyras K, Letsios D, Misener R and Toni F. Argumentation for explainable scheduling. Proceedings of the Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference and Ninth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (2752-2759).

    https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33012752

  • Baumann R and Brewka G. Extension removal in abstract argumentation - an axiomatic approach. Proceedings of the Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference and Ninth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (2670-2677).

    https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33012670

  • Liao B, Slavkovik M and van der Torre L. Building Jiminy Cricket. Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. (147-153).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314257

  • Nieves J. (2019). Approximating agreements in formal argumentation dialogues. AI Communications. 32:4. (335-346). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-190622

  • Butler G, Pigozzi G, Rouchier J and Galán J. (2019). Mixing Dyadic and Deliberative Opinion Dynamics in an Agent-Based Model of Group Decision-Making. Complexity. 2019. Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3758159

  • Sendi N, Abchiche-Mimouni N and Zehraoui F. (2019). A new Transparent Ensemble Method based on Deep learning. Procedia Computer Science. 159:C. (271-280). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.182

  • Essers K, Rogers R, Sturt J, Sklar E and Black E. Assessing the POSTURE Prototype. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction. (344-346).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3284432.3287181

  • Essers K, Chapman M, Kokciyan N, Sassoon I, Porat T, Balatsoukas P, Young P, Ashworth M, Curcin V, Modgil S, Parsons S and Sklar E. The CONSULT System. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction. (385-386).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3284432.3287170

  • Gaggl S, Linsbichler T, Maratea M and Woltran S. (2018). Summary Report of the Second International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation. AI Magazine. 39:4. (73-76). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v39i4.2795

  • Cocarascu O and Toni F. (2018). Combining deep learning and argumentative reasoning for the analysis of social media textual content using small data sets. Computational Linguistics. 44:4. (833-858). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00338

  • Kawasaki T, Moriguchi S and Takahashi K. Reasoning by a Bipolar Argumentation Framework for PROLEG. New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. (115-130).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31605-1_10

  • Fox J. (2018). Evidence and Argument. Computing in Science and Engineering. 20:6. (43-53). Online publication date: 1-Nov-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2018.2885412

  • Delgrande J, Peppas P and Woltran S. (2018). General Belief Revision. Journal of the ACM. 65:5. (1-34). Online publication date: 31-Oct-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3203409

  • Ogunniye G, Toniolo A and Oren N. Meta-Argumentation Frameworks for Multi-party Dialogues. PRIMA 2018: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. (585-593).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03098-8_45

  • Governatori G, Rotolo A and Riveret R. A Deontic Argumentation Framework Based on Deontic Defeasible Logic. PRIMA 2018: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. (484-492).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03098-8_33

  • Dauphin J and Satoh K. Dialogue Games for Enforcement of Argument Acceptance and Rejection via Attack Removal. PRIMA 2018: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. (449-457).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03098-8_29

  • Mahesar Q, Oren N and Vasconcelos W. Computing Preferences in Abstract Argumentation. PRIMA 2018: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. (387-402).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03098-8_24

  • Hung N. Progressive Inference Algorithms for Probabilistic Argumentation. PRIMA 2018: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. (371-386).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03098-8_23

  • Arisaka R and Satoh K. Abstract Argumentation / Persuasion / Dynamics. PRIMA 2018: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. (331-343).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03098-8_20

  • Lewis R, Mello C, Zhuang Y, Yeh M, Yan Y and Gopstein D. Rough Sets: Visually Discerning Neurological Functionality During Thought Processes. Foundations of Intelligent Systems. (32-41).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01851-1_4

  • Zhang D. From One-off Machine Learning to Perpetual Learning: A STEP Perspective. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). (17-23).

    https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2018.00012

  • Governatori G. Practical Normative Reasoning with Defeasible Deontic Logic. Reasoning Web. Learning, Uncertainty, Streaming, and Scalability. (1-25).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00338-8_1

  • Schulz C and Toni F. (2018). On the responsibility for undecisiveness in preferred and stable labellings in abstract argumentation. Artificial Intelligence. 262:C. (301-335). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.001

  • Gottifredi S, Cohen A, Garc�a A and Simari G. (2018). Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations. Artificial Intelligence. 262:C. (336-368). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.06.008

  • D'Agostino M and Modgil S. (2018). Classical logic, argument and dialectic. Artificial Intelligence. 262:C. (15-51). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.05.003

  • Bench-Capon T. (2018). Eveline T. Feteris. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 26:3. (307-314). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-018-9226-0

  • Jirakunkanok P, Sano K and Tojo S. (2018). Dynamic epistemic logic of belief change in legal judgments. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 26:3. (201-249). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-017-9202-0

  • Bishop M, Gates C and Levitt K. Augmenting Machine Learning with Argumentation. Proceedings of the New Security Paradigms Workshop. (1-11).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3285002.3285005

  • Rago A, Cocarascu O and Toni F. Argumentation-based recommendations. Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1949-1955).

    /doi/10.5555/3304889.3304929

  • Linsbichler T, Maratea M, Niskanen A, Wallner J and Woltran S. Novel algorithms for abstract dialectical frameworks based on complexity analysis of subclasses and SAT solving. Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1905-1911).

    /doi/10.5555/3304889.3304923

  • Haret A, Wallner J and Woltran S. Two sides of the same coin. Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1854-1860).

    /doi/10.5555/3304889.3304916

  • Fazzinga B, Flesca S and Furfaro F. Probabilistic bipolar abstract argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1803-1809).

    /doi/10.5555/3304889.3304909

  • D'Agostino M and Modgil S. A study of argumentative characterisations of preferred subtheories. Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1788-1794).

    /doi/10.5555/3304889.3304907

  • Borg A and Stra�er C. Relevance in structured argumentation. Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1753-1759).

    /doi/10.5555/3304889.3304902

  • Villata S. Artificial argumentation for humans. Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (5729-5733).

    /doi/10.5555/3304652.3304834

  • Caminada M and Schulz C. On the equivalence between assumption-based argumentation and logic programming (extended abstract). Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (5578-5582).

    /doi/10.5555/3304652.3304803

  • Amgoud L and Ben-Naim J. Weighted bipolar argumentation graphs. Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (5194-5198).

    /doi/10.5555/3304652.3304733

  • Oliveira T, Dauphin J, Satoh K, Tsumoto S and Novais P. Argumentation with Goals for Clinical Decision Support in Multimorbidity. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (2031-2033).

    /doi/10.5555/3237383.3238061

  • Yun B, Croitoru M, Vesic S and Bisquert P. DAGGER. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1841-1843).

    /doi/10.5555/3237383.3237996

  • Daub T. Generating Policies for Persuasion Dialogues. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1738-1739).

    /doi/10.5555/3237383.3237959

  • Brill M. Interactive Democracy. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1183-1187).

    /doi/10.5555/3237383.3237873

  • Hadoux E and Hunter A. Learning and Updating User Models for Subpopulations in Persuasive Argumentation Using Beta Distributions. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1141-1149).

    /doi/10.5555/3237383.3237865

  • Dondio P. Ranking Semantics Based on Subgraphs Analysis. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1132-1140).

    /doi/10.5555/3237383.3237864

  • Hecham A, Bisquert P and Croitoru M. On a Flexible Representation for Defeasible Reasoning Variants. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1123-1131).

    /doi/10.5555/3237383.3237863

  • Zeng Z, Fan X, Miao C, Leung C, Jih C and Soon O. Context-based and Explainable Decision Making with Argumentation. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1114-1122).

    /doi/10.5555/3237383.3237862

  • Arieli O, Borg A and Stra�er C. Prioritized Sequent-Based Argumentation. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1105-1113).

    /doi/10.5555/3237383.3237861

  • Borg A and Arieli O. Hypersequential Argumentation Frameworks. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1097-1104).

    /doi/10.5555/3237383.3237860

  • Lampis M, Mengel S and Mitsou V. QBF as an Alternative to Courcelle’s Theorem. Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2018. (235-252).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94144-8_15

  • Abdelhadi M, Hamdadou D and Menni N. (2018). A Communication Platform for Group Decision Support System. International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications. 10:3. (19-41). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.4018/IJESMA.2018070102

  • Xiong C, Li X, Li Y and Liu G. (2018). Multi-Documents Summarization Based on TextRank and its Application in Online Argumentation Platform. International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining. 14:3. (69-89). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDWM.2018070104

  • Alfano G, Greco S and Parisi F. Computing Extensions of Dynamic Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Second-Order Attacks. Proceedings of the 22nd International Database Engineering & Applications Symposium. (183-192).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3216122.3216162

  • Carneiro J, Martinho D, Marreiros G, Jimenez A and Novais P. (2018). Dynamic argumentation in UbiGDSS. Knowledge and Information Systems. 55:3. (633-669). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-017-1093-6

  • Riveret R, Baroni P, Gao Y, Governatori G, Rotolo A and Sartor G. (2018). A labelling framework for probabilistic argumentation. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 83:1. (21-71). Online publication date: 1-May-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-018-9574-1

  • Endriss U and Grandi U. Graph Aggregation. Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018. (447-450).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3186231

  • Alfano G, Greco S, Parisi F, Simari G and Simari G. Incremental computation of warranted arguments in dynamic defeasible argumentation. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. (911-917).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3167132.3167232

  • Alcântara J and Sá S. An infinite-valued grounded labelling for abstract argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. (903-910).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3167132.3167231

  • Previti A and Järvisalo M. A preference-based approach to backbone computation with application to argumentation. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. (896-902).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3167132.3167230

  • Alsinet T, Argelich J, Bjar R, Fernndez C, Mateu C and Planes J. (2018). An argumentative approach for discovering relevant opinions in Twitter with probabilistic valued relationships. Pattern Recognition Letters. 105:C. (191-199). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2017.07.004

  • Doumbouya M, Kamsu-Foguem B, Kenfack H and Foguem C. (2018). Argumentation graphs with constraint-based reasoning for collaborative expertise. Future Generation Computer Systems. 81:C. (16-29). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.09.081

  • Kakas A, Mancarella P and Toni F. (2018). On Argumentation Logic and Propositional Logic. Studia Logica. 106:2. (237-279). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-017-9736-x

  • Dymitruk M, Markovich R, LiepiźA R, Ghosh M, Doesburg R, Governatori G and Verheij B. (2018). Research in progress. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 26:1. (49-97). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-018-9220-6

  • Deagustini C, Martinez M, Falappa M and Simari G. (2018). How does incoherence affect inconsistency-tolerant semantics for Datalog±?. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 82:1-3. (43-68). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-016-9519-5

  • Guerrero E, Nieves J, Sandlund M and Lindgren H. (2018). Activity qualifiers using an argument-based construction. Knowledge and Information Systems. 54:3. (633-658). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-017-1112-7

  • Menini S, Cabrio E, Tonelli S and Villata S. Never retreat, never retract. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirtieth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference and Eighth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (4889-4896).

    /doi/10.5555/3504035.3504634

  • Dimopoulos Y, Mailly J and Moraitis P. Control argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirtieth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference and Eighth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (4678-4685).

    /doi/10.5555/3504035.3504608

  • Ulbricht M, Thimm M and Brewka G. Measuring strong inconsistency. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirtieth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference and Eighth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (1989-1996).

    /doi/10.5555/3504035.3504277

  • Brewka G, Strass H, Wallner J and Woltran S. Weighted abstract dialectical frameworks. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirtieth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference and Eighth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (1779-1786).

    /doi/10.5555/3504035.3504252

  • Baumeister D, Neugebauer D, Rothe J and Schadrack H. Complexity of verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirtieth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference and Eighth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (1753-1760).

    /doi/10.5555/3504035.3504249

  • Baroni P, Rago A and Toni F. How many properties do we need for gradual argumentation?. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirtieth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference and Eighth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (1736-1743).

    /doi/10.5555/3504035.3504247

  • Diller M, Haret A, Linsbichler T, Rümmele S and Woltran S. (2018). An extension-based approach to belief revision in abstract argumentation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 93:C. (395-423). Online publication date: 1-Feb-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2017.11.013

  • Polberg S and Hunter A. (2018). Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 93:C. (487-543). Online publication date: 1-Feb-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2017.11.009

  • Leuzzi F and Ferilli S. (2018). A multi-strategy approach to structural analogy making. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems. 50:1. (1-28). Online publication date: 1-Feb-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-017-0447-6

  • Niu D, Liu L and Lü S. (2018). New stochastic local search approaches for computing preferred extensions of abstract argumentation. AI Communications. 31:4. (369-382). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-180769

  • Dragoni M, da Costa Pereira C, Tettamanzi A, Villata S and Linares López C. (2018). Combining argumentation and aspect-based opinion mining. AI Communications. 31:1. (75-95). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-180752

  • Nieves J and Osorio M. (2018). Extending Well-Founded Semantics with Clark’s Completion for Disjunctive Logic Programs. Scientific Programming. 2018. (4). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4157030

  • Bistarelli S, Rossi F and Santini F. (2018). A novel weighted defence and its relaxation in abstract argumentation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 92:C. (66-86). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2017.10.006

  • Karafili E, Spanaki K and Lupu E. (2018). An argumentation reasoning approach for data processing. Computers in Industry. 94:C. (52-61). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2017.09.002

  • Atkinson K and Bench-Capon T. (2018). Taking account of the actions of others in value-based reasoning. Artificial Intelligence. 254:C. (1-20). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2017.09.002

  • Baumeister D. (2017). Guest Column. ACM SIGACT News. 48:4. (43-56). Online publication date: 13-Dec-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3173127.3173137

  • Bao T, Xie X, Long P and Wei Z. (2017). MADM method based on prospect theory and evidential reasoning approach with unknown attribute weights under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal. 88:C. (305-317). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.07.012

  • Hung N. (2017). Inference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 90:C. (163-191). Online publication date: 1-Nov-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2017.07.008

  • Arioua A, Croitoru M and Vesic S. (2017). Logic-based argumentation with existential rules. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 90:C. (76-106). Online publication date: 1-Nov-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2017.07.004

  • Santos J, Zahn J, Silvestre E, Silva V and Vasconcelos W. (2017). Detection and resolution of normative conflicts in multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 31:6. (1236-1282). Online publication date: 1-Nov-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-017-9362-z

  • Cesari G, Lucchetti R and Moretti S. (2022). Generalized additive games. International Journal of Game Theory. 46:4. (919-939). Online publication date: 1-Nov-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-016-0561-7

  • Yun B, Vesic S, Croitoru M, Bisquert P and Thomopoulos R. A Structural Benchmark for Logical Argumentation Frameworks. Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis XVI. (334-346).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68765-0_28

  • Bisquert P, Croitoru M and Karanikolas N. A Qualitative Decision-Making Approach Overlapping Argumentation and Social Choice. Algorithmic Decision Theory. (344-349).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67504-6_25

  • Caminada M and Schulz C. (2017). On the equivalence between assumption-based argumentation and logic programming. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 60:1. (779-825). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2017.

    /doi/10.5555/3207692.3207710

  • Eiter T and Weinzierl A. (2017). Preference-based inconsistency management in multi-context systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 60:1. (347-424). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2017.

    /doi/10.5555/3207692.3207701

  • Airiau S, Bonzon E, Endriss U, Maudet N and Rossit J. (2017). Rationalisation of profiles of abstract argumentation frameworks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 60:1. (149-177). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2017.

    /doi/10.5555/3207692.3207696

  • Wallner J, Niskanen A and J�rvisalo M. (2017). Complexity results and algorithms for extension enforcement in abstract argumentation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 60:1. (1-40). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2017.

    /doi/10.5555/3207692.3207693

  • Atkinson K, Baroni P, Giacomin M, Hunter A, Prakken H, Reed C, Simari G, Thimm M and Villata S. (2017). Toward Artificial Argumentation. AI Magazine. 38:3. (25-36). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i3.2704

  • Arioua A, Buche P and Croitoru M. (2017). Explanatory dialogues with argumentative faculties over inconsistent knowledge bases. Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal. 80:C. (244-262). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.03.009

  • Awad E, Bonnefon J, Caminada M, Malone T and Rahwan I. (2017). Experimental Assessment of Aggregation Principles in Argumentation-Enabled Collective Intelligence. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology. 17:3. (1-21). Online publication date: 31-Aug-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3053371

  • Lawrence J, Snaith M, Konat B, Budzynska K and Reed C. (2017). Debating Technology for Dialogical Argument. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology. 17:3. (1-23). Online publication date: 31-Aug-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3007210

  • Kökciyan N, Yaglikci N and Yolum P. (2017). An Argumentation Approach for Resolving Privacy Disputes in Online Social Networks. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology. 17:3. (1-22). Online publication date: 31-Aug-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3003434

  • Bouzeghoub A, Jabbour S, Ma Y and Raddaoui B. Handling conflicts in uncertain ontologies using deductive argumentation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence. (65-72).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3106426.3106454

  • Airiau S, Bonzon E, Endriss U, Maudet N and Rossit J. Rationalisation of profiles of abstract argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (4776-4780).

    /doi/10.5555/3171837.3171956

  • Kökciyan N and Yolum P. Context-based reasoning on privacy in internet of things. Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (4738-4744).

    /doi/10.5555/3171837.3171950

  • Kröll M, Pichler R and Woltran S. On the complexity of enumerating the extensions of abstract argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1145-1152).

    /doi/10.5555/3171642.3171805

  • Heyninck J and Straßer C. Revisiting unrestricted rebut and preferences in structured argumentation. Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1088-1092).

    /doi/10.5555/3171642.3171797

  • Brewka G, Thimm M and Ulbricht M. Strong inconsistency in nonmonotonic reasoning. Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (901-907).

    /doi/10.5555/3171642.3171771

  • Bogaerts B and Cruz-Filipe L. Semantics for active integrity constraints using approximation fixpoint theory. Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (866-872).

    /doi/10.5555/3171642.3171766

  • Bogaerts B, Vennekens J and Denecker M. Safe inductions. Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (859-865).

    /doi/10.5555/3171642.3171765

  • Belahcene K, Labreuche C, Maudet N, Mousseau V and Ouerdane W. A model for accountable ordinal sorting. Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (814-820).

    /doi/10.5555/3171642.3171759

  • Baumann R and Spanring C. A study of unrestricted abstract argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (807-813).

    /doi/10.5555/3171642.3171758

  • Baumann R, Dvořák W, Linsbichler T and Woltran S. A general notion of equivalence for abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (800-806).

    /doi/10.5555/3171642.3171757

  • Gao Y. A random model for argumentation framework. Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (503-509).

    /doi/10.5555/3171642.3171715

  • Kido H and Okamoto K. A Bayesian approach to argument-based reasoning for attack estimation. Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (249-255).

    /doi/10.5555/3171642.3171679

  • Amgoud L, Ben-Naim J and Vesic S. Measuring the intensity of attacks in argumentation graphs with shapley value. Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (63-69).

    /doi/10.5555/3171642.3171653

  • Amgoud L, Ben-Naim J, Doder D and Vesic S. Acceptability semantics for weighted argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (56-62).

    /doi/10.5555/3171642.3171652

  • Alfano G, Greco S and Parisi F. Efficient computation of extensions for dynamic abstract argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (49-55).

    /doi/10.5555/3171642.3171651

  • Eshragh F, Shahbazi M and Far B. Automated Dynamic Negotiation over Environmental Issues. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI). (92-99).

    https://doi.org/10.1109/IRI.2017.34

  • Nguyen Q, Duong C, Nguyen T, Weidlich M, Aberer K, Yin H and Zhou X. (2017). Argument discovery via crowdsourcing. The VLDB Journal — The International Journal on Very Large Data Bases. 26:4. (511-535). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2017.

    /doi/10.5555/3128489.3128560

  • Koster A, Bazzan A and Souza M. (2017). Liar liar, pants on fire; or how to use subjective logic and argumentation to evaluate information from untrustworthy sources. Artificial Intelligence Review. 48:2. (219-235). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-016-9499-1

  • Zhang X, Xie X, Pan Y, Niu D and Lü S. A New Method for Computing Preferred Extensions. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Information Processing. (1-6).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3144789.3144796

  • Carstens L and Toni F. (2017). Using Argumentation to Improve Classification in Natural Language Problems. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology. 17:3. (1-23). Online publication date: 14-Jul-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3017679

  • Verheij B. Formalizing arguments, rules and cases. Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law. (199-208).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3086512.3086533

  • Karafili E and Lupu E. Enabling Data Sharing in Contextual Environments. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM on Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies. (231-238).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3078861.3078876

  • Amgoud L and Nouioua F. (2017). An argumentation system for defeasible reasoning. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 85:C. (1-20). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2017.02.009

  • Alsinet T, Argelich J, Bjar R, Fernndez C, Mateu C and Planes J. (2017). Weighted argumentation for analysis of discussions in Twitter. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 85:C. (21-35). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2017.02.004

  • Morveli Espinoza M, Possebom A, Puyol-Gruart J and Tacla C. Dealing with Incompatibilities among Goals. Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1649-1651).

    /doi/10.5555/3091125.3091392

  • Hecham A, Croitoru M and Bisquert P. Argumentation-Based Defeasible Reasoning For Existential Rules. Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1568-1569).

    /doi/10.5555/3091125.3091364

  • Fan X, Liu S, Zhang H, Miao C and Leung C. Two Forms of Explanations in Computational Assumption-based Argumentation. Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1532-1534).

    /doi/10.5555/3091125.3091352

  • Arisaka R and Satoh K. Coalition Formability Semantics with Conflict-Eliminable Sets of Arguments. Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (1469-1471).

    /doi/10.5555/3091125.3091332

  • Yun B, Croitoru M and Bisquert P. Are Ranking Semantics Sensitive to the Notion of Core?. Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (943-951).

    /doi/10.5555/3091125.3091260

  • Black E, Coles A and Hampson C. Planning for Persuasion. Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. (933-942).

    /doi/10.5555/3091125.3091259

  • Hunter A and Thimm M. (2017). Probabilistic reasoning with abstract argumentation frameworks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 59:1. (565-611). Online publication date: 1-May-2017.

    /doi/10.5555/3176788.3176802

  • (2017). Labellings for assumption-based and abstract argumentation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 84:C. (110-149). Online publication date: 1-May-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2017.02.005

  • Budn M, Cobo M, Martinez D and Simari G. (2017). Bipolarity in temporal argumentation frameworks. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 84:C. (1-22). Online publication date: 1-May-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2017.01.013

  • Dondio P. Propagating degrees of truth on an argumentation framework. Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Computing. (995-1002).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3019612.3019717

  • Beirlaen M, Heyninck J and Straßer C. Reasoning by cases in structured argumentation.. Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Computing. (989-994).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3019612.3019716

  • (2017). Goals, values, and reasoning. Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal. 71:C. (442-456). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.11.008

  • Thiel M, Ludwig P, Mossakowski T, Neuhaus F and N�rnberger A. Web-Retrieval Supported Argument Space Exploration. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. (309-312).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3020165.3022140

  • Budn M, Simari G, Viglizzo I and Simari G. (2017). An approach to characterize graded entailment of arguments through a label-based framework. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 82:C. (242-269). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2016.12.016

  • Bisquert P, Croitoru M, Dupin De Saint-Cyr F and Hecham A. (2017). Formalizing Cognitive Acceptance of Arguments. Minds and Machines. 27:1. (233-252). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-017-9424-7

  • Ragni M, Eichhorn C, Bock T, Kern-Isberner G and Tse A. (2017). Formal Nonmonotonic Theories and Properties of Human Defeasible Reasoning. Minds and Machines. 27:1. (79-117). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-016-9414-1

  • Bench-Capon T and Modgil S. (2017). Norms and value based reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 25:1. (29-64). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-017-9194-9

  • Dey P. Query complexity of tournament solutions. Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (2992-2998).

    /doi/10.5555/3298483.3298669

  • Hadoux E and Hunter A. Strategic sequences of arguments for persuasion using decision trees. Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1128-1134).

    /doi/10.5555/3298239.3298405

  • Brewka G, Diller M, Heissenberger G, Linsbichler T and Woltran S. Solving advanced argumentation problems with answer-set programming. Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1077-1083).

    /doi/10.5555/3298239.3298398

  • Xie F. Group-Based Extension and Computation of Argumentation Framework. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Machine Learning and Soft Computing. (82-87).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3036290.3036315

  • Unger C, Ngonga Ngomo A, Cimiano P, Auer S, Paliouras G, Cabrio E, Villata S, Palmero Aprosio A, Unger C, Ngonga Ngomo A, Cimiano P, Auer S and Paliouras G. (2017). A RADAR for information reconciliation in Question Answering systems over Linked Data. Semantic Web. 8:4. (601-617). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-160245

  • Timmer S, Meyer J, Prakken H, Renooij S and Verheij B. (2017). A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 80:C. (475-494). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2016.09.002

  • Ferretti E, Tamargo L, Garc�a A, Errecalde M and Simari G. (2017). An approach to decision making based on dynamic argumentation systems. Artificial Intelligence. 242:C. (107-131). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2016.10.004

  • Rosenfeld A and Kraus S. (2016). Providing Arguments in Discussions on the Basis of the Prediction of Human Argumentative Behavior. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems. 6:4. (1-33). Online publication date: 26-Dec-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2983925

  • Osorio M, Carballido J and Zepeda C. (2016). Defining Stage Argumentation Semantics in Terms of an Abducible Semantics. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science (ENTCS). 328:C. (59-71). Online publication date: 8-Dec-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2016.11.006

  • Maher M. Corrupt Strategic Argumentation: The Ideal and the Naive. AI 2016: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (17-28).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50127-7_2

  • Moguillansky M and Simari G. (2016). A generalized abstract argumentation framework for inconsistency-tolerant ontology reasoning. Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal. 64:C. (141-168). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.07.027

  • Al-Abdulkarim L, Atkinson K and Bench-Capon T. (2016). Accommodating change. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 24:4. (409-427). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-016-9190-5

  • Verheij B. (2016). Formalizing value-guided argumentation for ethical systems design. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 24:4. (387-407). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-016-9189-y

  • Loui R. (2016). From Berman and Hafner's teleological context to Baude and Sachs' interpretive defaults. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 24:4. (371-385). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-016-9186-1

  • Betz G. (2016). Assessing the epistemological relevance of Dung-style argumentation theories. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 78:3-4. (303-321). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-015-9484-4

  • Shakarian P, Simari G, Moores G, Paulo D, Parsons S, Falappa M and Aleali A. (2016). Belief revision in structured probabilistic argumentation. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 78:3-4. (259-301). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-015-9483-5

  • Wirth C and Stolzenburg F. (2016). A series of revisions of David Poole's specificity. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 78:3-4. (205-258). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-015-9471-9

  • Bogaerts B, Vennekens J and Denecker M. (2016). On Well-Founded Set-Inductions and Locally Monotone Operators. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic. 17:4. (1-32). Online publication date: 15-Nov-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2963096

  • Racharak T, Tojo S, Hung N and Boonkwan P. Argument-Based Logic Programming for Analogical Reasoning. New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. (253-269).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61572-1_17

  • Arisaka R and Satoh K. Voluntary Manslaughter? A Case Study with Meta-Argumentation with Supports. New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. (241-252).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61572-1_16

  • Nofal S, Atkinson K and Dunne P. (2016). Looking-ahead in backtracking algorithms for abstract argumentation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 78:C. (265-282). Online publication date: 1-Nov-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2016.07.013

  • Hunter A and Thimm M. (2016). Optimization of dialectical outcomes in dialogical argumentation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 78:C. (73-102). Online publication date: 1-Nov-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2016.06.014

  • Faber W, Vallati M, Cerutti F and Giacomin M. Solving set optimization problems by cardinality optimization with an application to argumentation. Proceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (966-973).

    https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-966

  • Jabbour S, Raddaoui B, Sais L and Salhi Y. On the computation of top-k extensions in abstract argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (913-920).

    https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-913

  • Brewka G, Mailly J and Woltran S. Translation-based revision and merging for minimal horn reasoning. Proceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (734-742).

    https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-734

  • Atkinson K and Bench-Capon T. Value based reasoning and the actions of others. Proceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (680-688).

    https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-680

  • Niskanen A, Wallner J and J�rvisalo M. Synthesizing argumentation frameworks from examples. Proceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (551-559).

    https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-551

  • Arioua A and Croitoru M. A dialectical proof theory for universal acceptance in coherent logic-based argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (55-63).

    https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-55

  • Baroni P, Governatori G and Riveret R. On labelling statements in multi-labelling argumentation. Proceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (489-497).

    https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-489

  • Rosenfeld A and Kraus S. Strategical argumentative agent for human persuasion. Proceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (320-328).

    https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-320

  • Linsbichler T, P�hrer J and Strass H. A uniform account of realizability in abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (252-260).

    https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-252

  • Black E, Coles A and Hampson C. Optimal simple strategies for persuasion. Proceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1736-1737).

    https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-1736

  • Greco S and Parisi F. Efficient computation of deterministic extensions for dynamic abstract argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1668-1669).

    https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-1668

  • Niu D, Liu L and L� S. A new stochastic local search approach for computing preferred extensions of abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1652-1653).

    https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-1652

  • Fazzinga B, Flesca S and Furfaro F. Computing extensions' probabilities in probabilistic abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1588-1589).

    https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-1588

  • Hunter A. Two dimensional uncertainty in persuadee modelling in argumentation. Proceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (150-157).

    https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-150

  • D'Agostino M and Modgil S. A rational account of classical logic argumentation for real-world agents. Proceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (141-149).

    https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-141

  • Cocarascu O and Toni F. Detecting deceptive reviews using Argumentation. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on AI for Privacy and Security. (1-8).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2970030.2970031

  • Hung N. Computing probabilistic assumption-based argumentation. Proceedings of the 14th Pacific Rim International Conference on Trends in Artificial Intelligence. (152-166).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42911-3_13

  • Nunes E, Shakarian P, Simari G and Ruef A. Argumentation models for cyber attribution. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining. (837-844).

    /doi/10.5555/3192424.3192582

  • Dupin de Saint-Cyr F, Bisquert P, Cayrol C and Lagasquie-Schiex M. (2016). Argumentation update in YALLA (Yet Another Logic Language for Argumentation). International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 75:C. (57-92). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2016.04.003

  • Pigozzi G, Tsouki�s A and Viappiani P. (2016). Preferences in artificial intelligence. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 77:3-4. (361-401). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-015-9475-5

  • Arieli O and Stra�er C. (2016). Deductive Argumentation by Enhanced Sequent Calculi and Dynamic Derivations. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science (ENTCS). 323:C. (21-37). Online publication date: 11-Jul-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2016.06.003

  • Shams Z, De Vos M, Oren N and Padget J. Normative practical reasoning via argumentation and dialogue. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1244-1250).

    /doi/10.5555/3060621.3060794

  • Niskanen A, Wallner J and J�rvisalo M. Optimal status enforcement in abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1216-1222).

    /doi/10.5555/3060621.3060790

  • Dunne P, Spanring C, Linsbichler T and Woltran S. Investigating the relationship between argumentation semantics via signatures. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1051-1057).

    /doi/10.5555/3060621.3060767

  • Amgoud L and Ben-Naim J. Evaluation of arguments from support relations. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (900-906).

    /doi/10.5555/3060621.3060746

  • Criado N, Black E and Luck M. (2016). A coherence maximisation process for solving normative inconsistencies. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 30:4. (640-680). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-015-9300-x

  • Beigi A and Mozayani N. (2016). Dialogue strategy for horizontal communication in MAS organization. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory. 22:2. (161-183). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-015-9201-1

  • Liu F, Bi Y, Chowdhury M, You J and Feng Z. Flexible Approximators for Approximating Fixpoint Theory. Proceedings of the 29th Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence on Advances in Artificial Intelligence - Volume 9673. (224-236).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34111-8_28

  • Gao Y, Toni F, Wang H and Xu F. Argumentation-Based Multi-Agent Decision Making with Privacy Preserved. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems. (1153-1161).

    /doi/10.5555/2936924.2937093

  • Riveret R and Governatori G. On Learning Attacks in Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems. (653-661).

    /doi/10.5555/2936924.2937021

  • Young A, Modgil S and Rodrigues O. Prioritised Default Logic as Rational Argumentation. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems. (626-634).

    /doi/10.5555/2936924.2937018

  • Airiau S, Bonzon E, Endriss U, Maudet N and Rossit J. Rationalisation of Profiles of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems. (350-357).

    /doi/10.5555/2936924.2936976

  • Fan X and Toni F. On the Interplay between Games, Argumentation and Dialogues. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems. (260-268).

    /doi/10.5555/2936924.2936964

  • Grooters D and Prakken H. (2016). Two aspects of relevance in structured argumentation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 56:1. (197-245). Online publication date: 1-May-2016.

    /doi/10.5555/3013589.3013595

  • Čyras K, Satoh K and Toni F. Abstract argumentation for case-based reasoning. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (549-552).

    /doi/10.5555/3032027.3032100

  • Baroni P, Governatori G, Lam H and Riveret R. On the justification of statements in argumentation-based reasoning. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (521-524).

    /doi/10.5555/3032027.3032093

  • Arieli O and Straßer C. Argumentative approaches to reasoning with maximal consistency. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (509-512).

    /doi/10.5555/3032027.3032090

  • Rago A, Toni F, Aurisicchio M and Baroni P. Discontinuity-free decision support with quantitative argumentation debates. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (63-72).

    /doi/10.5555/3032027.3032035

  • Lippi M and Torroni P. (2016). Argumentation Mining. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology. 16:2. (1-25). Online publication date: 20-Apr-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2850417

  • Eiter T, Fink M, Krennwallner T and Redl C. (2016). Domain expansion for ASP-programs with external sources. Artificial Intelligence. 233:C. (84-121). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2016.01.003

  • Simari G, Shakarian P and Falappa M. (2016). A quantitative approach to belief revision in structured probabilistic argumentation. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 76:3-4. (375-408). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-015-9476-4

  • Moguillansky M. A Study of Argument Acceptability Dynamics Through Core and Remainder Sets. Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems - Volume 9616. (3-23).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30024-5_1

  • Thimm M, Villata S, Cerutti F, Oren N, Strass H and Vallati M. (2016). Summary Report of the First International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation. AI Magazine. 37:1. (102-104). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v37i1.2640

  • Bilo Doumbouya M, Kamsu-Foguem B and Kenfack H. (2016). Argumentation and graph properties. Information Processing and Management: an International Journal. 52:2. (319-325). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2015.08.003

  • Chai J and Ngai E. (2016). Decision model for complex group argumentation. Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal. 45:C. (223-233). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.09.051

  • Cohen A, García A and Simari G. (2016). A structured argumentation system with backing and undercutting. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 49:C. (149-166). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2015.10.001

  • Walton D, Sartor G and Macagno F. (2016). An argumentation framework for contested cases of statutory interpretation. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 24:1. (51-91). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-016-9179-0

  • Al-Abdulkarim L, Atkinson K and Bench-Capon T. (2016). A methodology for designing systems to reason with legal cases using Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 24:1. (1-49). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-016-9178-1

  • Tang Y, Oren N and Sycara K. Markov Argumentation Random Fields. Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (4397-4398).

    /doi/10.5555/3016387.3016612

  • Wallner J, Niskanen A and Järvisalo M. Complexity results and algorithms for extension enforcement in abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1088-1094).

    /doi/10.5555/3015812.3015973

  • Maher M. Resistance to corruption of strategic argumentation. Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1030-1036).

    /doi/10.5555/3015812.3015965

  • Fazzinga B, Flesca S and Parisi F. (2016). On efficiently estimating the probability of extensions in abstract argumentation frameworks. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 69:C. (106-132). Online publication date: 1-Feb-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2015.11.009

  • Dung P. (2016). An axiomatic analysis of structured argumentation with priorities. Artificial Intelligence. 231:C. (107-150). Online publication date: 1-Feb-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2015.10.005

  • Moguillansky M. (2016). Ontology reasoning and evolution with inconsistency tolerance. AI Communications. 29:2. (405-407). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-150662

  • Sklar E, Parsons S, Li Z, Salvit J, Perumal S, Wall H and Mangels J. (2016). Evaluation of a trust-modulated argumentation-based interactive decision-making tool. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 30:1. (136-173). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-015-9289-1

  • Arieli O. (2015). Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks. Journal of Applied Logic. 13:4. (582-604). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2015.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2015.03.005

  • Budán M, Lucero M, Viglizzo I and Simari G. (2015). A labeled argumentation framework. Journal of Applied Logic. 13:4. (534-553). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2015.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2015.02.005

  • Cohen A, Gottifredi S, García A and Simari G. (2015). An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support. Journal of Applied Logic. 13:4. (509-533). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2015.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2014.12.001

  • Carrera Á and Iglesias C. (2015). A systematic review of argumentation techniques for multi-agent systems research. Artificial Intelligence Review. 44:4. (509-535). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2015.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-015-9435-9

  • Confalonieri R, Yee-King M, Hazelden K, d'Inverno M, de Jonge D, Osman N, Sierra C, Agmoud L and Prade H. (2015). Engineering multiuser museum interactives for shared cultural experiences. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 46:PA. (180-195). Online publication date: 1-Nov-2015.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2015.08.013

  • Doumbouya M, Kamsu-Foguem B, Kenfack H and Foguem C. (2015). Argumentative reasoning and taxonomic analysis for the identification of medical errors. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 46:PA. (166-179). Online publication date: 1-Nov-2015.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2015.08.009

  • Dunne P, Dvořák W, Linsbichler T and Woltran S. (2015). Characteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentation. Artificial Intelligence. 228:C. (153-178). Online publication date: 1-Nov-2015.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2015.07.006

  • Applebaum A, Levitt K, Li Z, Parsons S, Rowe J and Sklar E. Cyber reasoning with argumentation: Abstracting from incomplete and contradictory evidence. MILCOM 2015 - 2015 IEEE Military Communications Conference. (623-628).

    https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.2015.7357513

  • Prakken H and Sartor G. (2015). Law and logic. Artificial Intelligence. 227:C. (214-245). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2015.06.005

  • Baumeister D, Rothe J and Schadrack H. Verification in Argument-Incomplete Argumentation Frameworks. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Algorithmic Decision Theory - Volume 9346. (359-376).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23114-3_22

  • Baumeister D, Neugebauer D and Rothe J. Verification in Attack-Incomplete Argumentation Frameworks. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Algorithmic Decision Theory - Volume 9346. (341-358).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23114-3_21

  • Santini F and Yautsiukhin A. Quantitative Analysis of Network Security with Abstract Argumentation. Revised Selected Papers of the 10th International Workshop on Data Privacy Management, and Security Assurance - Volume 9481. (30-46).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29883-2_3

  • Mocanu A. Envisioning a collaborative smart home solution based on argumentative dialogues. Proceedings of the 7th Balkan Conference on Informatics Conference. (1-6).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2801081.2801098

  • Strass H. (2015). Expressiveness of two-valued semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 54:1. (193-231). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2015.

    /doi/10.5555/2910557.2910563

  • Pilotti P, Casali A and Chesñevar C. (2015). A Belief Revision Approach for Argumentation-Based Negotiation Agents. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science. 25:3. (455-470). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2015.

    https://doi.org/10.1515/amcs-2015-0034

  • Strass H and Wallner J. (2015). Analyzing the computational complexity of abstract dialectical frameworks via approximation fixpoint theory. Artificial Intelligence. 226:C. (34-74). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2015.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2015.05.003

  • Fazzinga B, Flesca S, Parisi F and Pietramala A. PARTY. Proceedings, Part I, of the 26th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications - Volume 9261. (220-235).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22849-5_16

  • Arioua A, Tamani N and Croitoru M. Query Answering Explanation in Inconsistent Datalog$$+/-$$ Knowledge Bases. Proceedings, Part I, of the 26th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications - Volume 9261. (203-219).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22849-5_15

  • Jordán J, Heras S, Valero S and Julián V. (2015). An Infrastructure for Argumentative Agents. Computational Intelligence. 31:3. (418-441). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2015.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/coin.12030

  • Doumbouya M, Kamsu-Foguem B, Kenfack H and Foguem C. (2015). Combining conceptual graphs and argumentation for aiding in the teleexpertise. Computers in Biology and Medicine. 63:C. (157-168). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2015.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.05.012

  • Burgin M and Vey Mestdagh C. (2015). Consistent structuring of inconsistent knowledge. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems. 45:1. (5-28). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2015.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-013-0270-7

  • Heras S, Botti V and Julián V. (2015). An ontological-based knowledge-representation formalism for case-based argumentation. Information Systems Frontiers. 17:4. (779-798). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2015.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9524-3

  • Michael L. Jumping to conclusions. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Defeasible and Ampliative Reasoning - Volume 1423. (43-49).

    /doi/10.5555/2907094.2907102

  • Shams Z. Normative practical reasoning. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (4397-4398).

    /doi/10.5555/2832747.2832891

  • Linsbichler T. Abstract argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (4377-4378).

    /doi/10.5555/2832747.2832881

  • Dvořák W, Järvisalo M, Wallner J and Woltran S. Complexity-sensitive decision procedures for abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (4173-4177).

    /doi/10.5555/2832747.2832835

  • Pührer J. Realizability of three-valued semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (3171-3177).

    /doi/10.5555/2832581.2832691

  • Hunter A. Modelling the persuadee in asymmetric argumentation dialogues for persuasion. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (3055-3061).

    /doi/10.5555/2832581.2832675

  • Gaggl S, Rudolph S and Strass H. On the computational complexity of naive-based semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (2985-2991).

    /doi/10.5555/2832581.2832666

  • Dubois D, Prade H and Rico A. The cube of opposition. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (2933-2939).

    /doi/10.5555/2832581.2832659

  • Diller M, Haret A, Linsbichler T, Rümmele S and Woltran S. An extension-based approach to belief revision in abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (2926-2932).

    /doi/10.5555/2832581.2832658

  • Delobelle J, Konieczny S and Vesic S. On the aggregation of argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (2911-2917).

    /doi/10.5555/2832581.2832656

  • Coste-Marquis S, Konieczny S, Mailly J and Marquis P. Extension enforcement in abstract argumentation as an optimization problem. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (2876-2882).

    /doi/10.5555/2832581.2832651

  • Chhogyal K, Nayak A, Zhuang Z and Sattar A. Probabilistic belief contraction using argumentation. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (2854-2860).

    /doi/10.5555/2832581.2832648

  • Bogaerts B, Vennekens J and Denecker M. Partial grounded fixpoints. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (2784-2790).

    /doi/10.5555/2832581.2832638

  • Baumann R and Brewka G. AGM meets abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (2734-2740).

    /doi/10.5555/2832581.2832631

  • Baroni P, Giacomin M and Liao B. Dealing with generic contrariness in structured argumentation. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (2727-2733).

    /doi/10.5555/2832581.2832630

  • Alviano M and Faber W. Stable model semantics of abstract dialectical frameworks revisited. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (2684-2690).

    /doi/10.5555/2832581.2832624

  • Hadoux E, Beynier A, Maudet N, Weng P and Hunter A. Optimization of probabilistic argumentation with Markov decision models. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (2004-2010).

    /doi/10.5555/2832415.2832527

  • Grossi D and Modgil S. On the graded acceptability of arguments. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (868-874).

    /doi/10.5555/2832249.2832369

  • Belardinelli F, Grossi D and Maudet N. Formal analysis of dialogues on infinite argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (861-867).

    /doi/10.5555/2832249.2832368

  • Benlamine S, Chaouachi M, Villata S, Cabrio E, Frasson C and Gandon F. Emotions in argumentation. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (156-163).

    /doi/10.5555/2832249.2832271

  • Fazzinga B, Flesca S and Parisi F. (2015). On the Complexity of Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic. 16:3. (1-39). Online publication date: 8-Jul-2015.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2749463

  • Bogaerts B, Vennekens J and Denecker M. (2015). Grounded fixpoints and their applications in knowledge representation. Artificial Intelligence. 224:C. (51-71). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2015.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2015.03.006

  • Park J, Blake C and Cardie C. Toward machine-assisted participation in eRulemaking. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. (206-210).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2746090.2746118

  • Al-Abdulkarim L, Atkinson K and Bench-Capon T. Evaluating the use of abstract dialectical frameworks to represent case law. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. (156-160).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2746090.2746111

  • Bex F. An integrated theory of causal stories and evidential arguments. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. (13-22).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2746090.2746094

  • Timmer S, Meyer J, Prakken H, Renooij S and Verheij B. A structure-guided approach to capturing bayesian reasoning about legal evidence in argumentation. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. (109-118).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2746090.2746093

  • Gaciarz M, Aknine S and Bhouri N. A Continuous Negotiation Based Model for Traffic Regulation at an Intersection. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. (1791-1792).

    /doi/10.5555/2772879.2773439

  • Amgoud L and Ben-Naim J. Argumentation-based Ranking Logics. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. (1511-1519).

    /doi/10.5555/2772879.2773344

  • Riveret R, Pitt J, Korkinof D and Draief M. Neuro-Symbolic Agents. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. (1481-1489).

    /doi/10.5555/2772879.2773341

  • Toniolo A, Norman T, Etuk A, Cerutti F, Ouyang R, Srivastava M, Oren N, Dropps T, Allen J and Sullivan P. Supporting Reasoning with Different Types of Evidence in Intelligence Analysis. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. (781-789).

    /doi/10.5555/2772879.2773254

  • Tamani N, Mosse P, Croitoru M, Buche P, Guillard V, Guillaume C and Gontard N. (2015). An argumentation system for eco-efficient packaging material selection. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 113:C. (174-192). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2015.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.02.012

  • Caminada M, Sá S, Alcântara J and Dvořák W. (2015). On the equivalence between logic programming semantics and argumentation semantics. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 58:C. (87-111). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2015.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2014.12.004

  • Charwat G, Dvořák W, Gaggl S, Wallner J and Woltran S. (2015). Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation - A survey. Artificial Intelligence. 220:C. (28-63). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2015.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2014.11.008

  • Ontañón S and Plaza E. (2015). Coordinated inductive learning using argumentation-based communication. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 29:2. (266-304). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2015.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-014-9256-2

  • Nieves J and Lindgren H. Deliberative Argumentation for Service Provision in Smart Environments. Multi-Agent Systems. (388-397).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17130-2_27

  • Governatori G, Maher M, Olivieri F, Rotolo A and Scannnapieco S. Strategic Argumentation Under Grounded Semantics is NP-Complete. Multi-Agent Systems. (379-387).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17130-2_26

  • Baláž M, Frtús J, Flouris G, Homola M and Šefránek J. Conflict Resolution in Assumption-Based Frameworks. Multi-Agent Systems. (360-369).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17130-2_24

  • Maio P and Silva N. (2014). An extensible argument-based ontology matching negotiation approach. Science of Computer Programming. 95:P1. (3-25). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2014.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2014.01.011

  • Kaci S and Labreuche C. (2014). Valued preference-based instantiation of argumentation frameworks with varied strength defeats. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 55:9. (2004-2027). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2014.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2013.12.001

  • Amgoud L. (2014). Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 55:9. (2028-2048). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2014.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2013.10.004

  • Baroni P, Boella G, Cerutti F, Giacomin M, van der Torre L and Villata S. (2014). On the Input/Output behavior of argumentation frameworks. Artificial Intelligence. 217:C. (144-197). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2014.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2014.08.004

  • Budán M, Viglizzo I and Simari G. A Labeled Abstract Bipolar Argumentation Framework. Advances in Artificial Intelligence -- IBERAMIA 2014. (28-40).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12027-0_3

  • Martinez M, Deagustini C, Falappa M and Simari G. Inconsistency-Tolerant Reasoning in Datalog Ontologies via an Argumentative Semantics. Advances in Artificial Intelligence -- IBERAMIA 2014. (15-27).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12027-0_2

  • Gordon T. Still Craving a Porsche. Essays Dedicated to Gerhard Brewka on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday on Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation - Volume 9060. (356-359).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_24

  • Bibel W. Mind the Divide Surrounding Knowledge Representation. Essays Dedicated to Gerhard Brewka on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday on Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation - Volume 9060. (340-355).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_23

  • Baumann R and Strass H. Open Problems in Abstract Argumentation. Essays Dedicated to Gerhard Brewka on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday on Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation - Volume 9060. (325-339).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_22

  • Gaggl S, Rudolph S and Thomazo M. What Is a Reasonable Argumentation Semantics?. Essays Dedicated to Gerhard Brewka on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday on Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation - Volume 9060. (309-324).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_21

  • Booth R. Judgment Aggregation in Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. Essays Dedicated to Gerhard Brewka on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday on Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation - Volume 9060. (296-308).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_20

  • Baumann R and Spanring C. Infinite Argumentation Frameworks. Essays Dedicated to Gerhard Brewka on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday on Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation - Volume 9060. (281-295).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_19

  • Baroni P, Giacomin M and Liao B. I don't care, I don't know ' I know too much! On Incompleteness and Undecidedness in Abstract Argumentation. Essays Dedicated to Gerhard Brewka on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday on Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation - Volume 9060. (265-280).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_18

  • Dvořák W, Gaggl S, Linsbichler T and Wallner J. Reduction-Based Approaches to Implement Modgil's Extended Argumentation Frameworks. Essays Dedicated to Gerhard Brewka on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday on Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation - Volume 9060. (249-264).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_17

  • Eiter T, Strass H, Truszczyński M and Woltran S. A Glimpse on Gerhard Brewka's Contributions to Artificial Intelligence. Essays Dedicated to Gerhard Brewka on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday on Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation - Volume 9060. (1-16).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_1

  • Cabrio E, Aprosio A and Villata S. Reconciling information in DBpedia through a question answering system. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Posters & Demonstrations Track - Volume 1272. (49-52).

    /doi/10.5555/2878453.2878466

  • Croitoru C. Argumentative Aggregation of Individual Opinions. Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence - Volume 8761. (600-608).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_43

  • Polberg S and Doder D. Probabilistic Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence - Volume 8761. (591-599).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_42

  • Hunter A. Opportunities for Argument-Centric Persuasion in Behaviour Change. Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence - Volume 8761. (48-61).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_4

  • Coste-Marquis S, Konieczny S, Mailly J and Marquis P. A Translation-Based Approach for Revision of Argumentation Frameworks. Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence - Volume 8761. (397-411).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_28

  • Ferilli S, Grieco D, Redavid D and Esposito F. Abstract argumentation for reading order detection. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM symposium on Document engineering. (45-48).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2644866.2644883

  • Croitoru C. Polyhedral Labellings for Argumentation Frameworks. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management - Volume 8720. (86-99).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11508-5_8

  • Martinez D, Cobo M and Simari G. A Petri Net Model of Argumentation Dynamics. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management - Volume 8720. (237-250).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11508-5_20

  • Doder D and Woltran S. Probabilistic Argumentation Frameworks --- A Logical Approach. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management - Volume 8720. (134-147).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11508-5_12

  • Bodanza G and Alessio C. Reinstatement and the Requirement of Maximal Specificity in Argument Systems. Proceedings of the 21st International Workshop on Logic, Language, Information, and Computation - Volume 8652. (81-93).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44145-9_6

  • Vallati M, Cerutti F and Giacomin M. Argumentation frameworks features. Proceedings of the Twenty-first European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1117-1118).

    /doi/10.5555/3006652.3006895

  • Kontarinis D, Bonzon E, Maudet N and Moraitis P. On the use of target sets for move selection in multi-agent debates. Proceedings of the Twenty-first European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1047-1048).

    /doi/10.5555/3006652.3006860

  • Hunter A and Thimm M. Probabilistic argumentation with incomplete information. Proceedings of the Twenty-first European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1033-1034).

    /doi/10.5555/3006652.3006853

  • Fan X and Toni F. On computing explanations in abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the Twenty-first European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1005-1006).

    /doi/10.5555/3006652.3006839

  • Bistarelli S, Rossi F and Santini F. A first comparison of abstract argumentation reasoning-tools. Proceedings of the Twenty-first European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (969-970).

    /doi/10.5555/3006652.3006821

  • Qiao W and Roos N. An argumentation system for reasoning with LPm. Proceedings of the Twenty-first European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (753-758).

    /doi/10.5555/3006652.3006779

  • Prakken H. On support relations in abstract argumentation as abstractions of inferential relations. Proceedings of the Twenty-first European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (735-740).

    /doi/10.5555/3006652.3006776

  • Gao Y and Toni F. Argumentation accelerated reinforcement learning for cooperative multi-agent systems. Proceedings of the Twenty-first European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (333-338).

    /doi/10.5555/3006652.3006709

  • Dung P. An axiomatic analysis of structured argumentation for prioritized default reasoning. Proceedings of the Twenty-first European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (267-272).

    /doi/10.5555/3006652.3006698

  • Cerutti F, Tintarev N and Oren N. Formal arguments, preferences, and natural language interfaces to humans. Proceedings of the Twenty-first European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (207-212).

    /doi/10.5555/3006652.3006688

  • Brewka G and Woltran S. GRAPPA. Proceedings of the Twenty-first European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (153-158).

    /doi/10.5555/3006652.3006679

  • Booth R, Gabbay D, Kaci S, Rienstra T and Torre L. Abduction and dialogical proof in argumentation and logic programming. Proceedings of the Twenty-first European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (117-122).

    /doi/10.5555/3006652.3006673

  • Baumann R, Dvořák W, Linsbichler T, Strass H and Woltran S. Compact argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the Twenty-first European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (69-74).

    /doi/10.5555/3006652.3006665

  • Baumann R. Context-free and context-sensitive kernels. Proceedings of the Twenty-first European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (63-68).

    /doi/10.5555/3006652.3006664

  • Introne J and Iandoli L. (2014). Improving decision-making performance through argumentation. Decision Support Systems. 64:C. (79-89). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2014.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.04.005

  • Shen Y, Wang K, Eiter T, Fink M, Krennwallner T and Deng J. (2014). FLP answer set semantics without circular justifications for general logic programs. Artificial Intelligence. 213:1. (1-41). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2014.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2014.05.001

  • Redford C and Agah A. (2014). Evidentialist foundationalist argumentation for multi-agent sensor fusion. Artificial Intelligence Review. 42:2. (211-243). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2014.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-012-9333-3

  • Dyrkolbotn S. How to argue for anything. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (626-629).

    /doi/10.5555/3031929.3032011

  • Diakidoy I, Kakas A, Michael L and Miller R. A psychology-inspired approach to automated narrative text comprehension. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (610-613).

    /doi/10.5555/3031929.3032007

  • Booth R, Awad E and Rahwan I. Interval methods for judgment aggregation in argumentation. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (594-597).

    /doi/10.5555/3031929.3032003

  • Thimm M. Tweety. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (528-537).

    /doi/10.5555/3031929.3031992

  • Wirth C and Stolzenburg F. David Poole's specificity revised. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (168-177).

    /doi/10.5555/3031929.3031951

  • Grossi D and van der Hoek W. Justified beliefs by justified arguments. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (131-140).

    /doi/10.5555/3031929.3031947

  • Strass H and Wallner J. Analyzing the computational complexity of abstract dialectical frameworks via approximation fixpoint theory. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (101-110).

    /doi/10.5555/3031929.3031943

  • Dunne P, Dvořák W, Linsbichler T and Woltran S. Characteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (72-81).

    /doi/10.5555/3031929.3031939

  • Doutre S, Herzig A and Perrussel L. A dynamic logic framework for abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (62-71).

    /doi/10.5555/3031929.3031938

  • Coste-Marquis S, Konieczny S, Mailly J and Marquis P. On the revision of argumentation systems. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (52-61).

    /doi/10.5555/3031929.3031937

  • Cerutti F, Giacomin M, Vallati M and Zanella M. A SCC recursive meta-algorithm for computing preferred labellings in abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (42-51).

    /doi/10.5555/3031929.3031936

  • Creignou N, Egly U and Schmidt J. (2014). Complexity Classifications for Logic-Based Argumentation. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic. 15:3. (1-20). Online publication date: 8-Jul-2014.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2629421

  • Paglieri F, Castelfranchi C, Costa Pereira C, Falcone R, Tettamanzi A and Villata S. (2014). Trusting the messenger because of the message. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory. 20:2. (176-194). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2014.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-013-9166-x

  • Caminada M, Kutlak R, Oren N and Vasconcelos W. Scrutable plan enactment via argumentation and natural language generation. Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. (1625-1626).

    /doi/10.5555/2615731.2616095

  • Tamani N, Croitoru M and Buche P. Conflicting viewpoint relational database querying. Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. (1553-1554).

    /doi/10.5555/2615731.2616058

  • Payne T and Tamma V. Negotiating over ontological correspondences with asymmetric and incomplete knowledge. Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. (517-524).

    /doi/10.5555/2615731.2615816

  • Morales-Ramirez I and Perini A. Argumentation-Based Discussion for User Forum. Proceedings of the 20th International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality - Volume 8396. (232-238).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05843-6_17

  • Besnard P, Cordier M and Moinard Y. Arguments Using Ontological and Causal Knowledge. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems - Volume 8367. (79-96).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04939-7_3

  • Shakarian P, Simari G and Falappa M. Belief Revision in Structured Probabilistic Argumentation. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems - Volume 8367. (324-343).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04939-7_16

  • Nofal S, Atkinson K and Dunne P. (2014). Algorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semantics. Artificial Intelligence. 207:C. (23-51). Online publication date: 1-Feb-2014.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2013.11.001

  • Saptawijaya A and Pereira L. Towards Modeling Morality Computationally with Logic Programming. Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages - Volume 8324. (104-119).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04132-2_8

  • Nofal S, Atkinson K and Dunne P. (2014). Algorithms for argumentation semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 49:1. (635-668). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2014.

    /doi/10.5555/2655713.2655731

  • Eiter T, Fink M, Krennwallner T, Redl C and Sch�ller P. (2014). Efficient HEX-program evaluation based on unfounded sets. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 49:1. (269-269). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2014.

    /doi/10.5555/2655713.2655722

  • Dung P and Thang P. (2014). Closure and consistency in logic-associated argumentation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 49:1. (79-109). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2014.

    /doi/10.5555/2655713.2655716

  • G�rkan A and Iandoli L. (2014). Argument Mapping and Content Fusion to Support the Analysis and Synthesis of Information in Online Discussions. International Journal of Decision Support System Technology. 6:1. (14-33). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2014.

    https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdsst.2014010102

  • Amgoud L and Vesic S. (2014). Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 55:2. (585-606). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2014.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2013.10.010

  • Cabrio E, Tonelli S and Villata S. A Natural Language Account for Argumentation Schemes. Proceeding of the XIIIth International Conference on AI*IA 2013: Advances in Artificial Intelligence - Volume 8249. (181-192).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03524-6_16

  • Maher M. Relative Expressiveness of Well-Founded Defeasible Logics. Proceedings of the 26th Australasian Joint Conference on AI 2013: Advances in Artificial Intelligence - Volume 8272. (338-349).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03680-9_35

  • Wannous R and Trojahn C. Explaining Argumentation over Alignment Agreements. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT) - Volume 02. (80-85).

    https://doi.org/10.1109/WI-IAT.2013.94

  • Booth R, Kaci S and Rienstra T. Property-Based Preferences in Abstract Argumentation. Algorithmic Decision Theory. (86-100).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41575-3_7

  • Ohsawa Y, Kido H, Hayashi T, Akimoto M, Fujimoto M and Tamada M. Strategies for Creative Argumentation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Brain and Health Informatics - Volume 8211. (369-378).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02753-1_37

  • Longo L and Hederman L. Argumentation Theory for Decision Support in Health-Care. Proceedings of the International Conference on Brain and Health Informatics - Volume 8211. (168-180).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02753-1_17

  • Rushby J. Mechanized Support for Assurance Case Argumentation. New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. (304-318).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10061-6_20

  • Sakama C. Abduction in Argumentation Frameworks and Its Use in Debate Games. New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. (285-303).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10061-6_19

  • Shams Z, De Vos M and Satoh K. ArgPROLEG: A Normative Framework for the JUF Theory. New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. (183-198).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10061-6_13

  • Cabrio E, Cojan J, Villata S and Gandon F. Argumentation-based inconsistencies detection for question-answering over DBpedia. Proceedings of the 2013th International Conference on NLP & DBpedia - Volume 1064. (32-43).

    /doi/10.5555/2874479.2874483

  • Bistarelli S and Santini F. (2013). Coalitions of Arguments. Fundamenta Informaticae. 124:4. (383-401). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2013.

    /doi/10.5555/2594914.2594917

  • Bex F, Lawrence J, Snaith M and Reed C. (2013). Implementing the argument web. Communications of the ACM. 56:10. (66-73). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2013.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2500891

  • Wallner J, Weissenbacher G and Woltran S. Advanced SAT Techniques for Abstract Argumentation. Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems - Volume 8143. (138-154).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_9

  • Dondio P. Computing the Grounded Semantics in all the Subgraphs of an Argumentation Framework. Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems - Volume 8143. (119-137).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_8

  • Polberg S, Wallner J and Woltran S. Admissibility in the Abstract Dialectical Framework. Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems - Volume 8143. (102-118).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_7

  • Strass H. Instantiating Knowledge Bases in Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems - Volume 8143. (86-101).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_6

  • Arieli O. A Sequent-Based Representation of Logical Argumentation. Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems - Volume 8143. (69-85).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_5

  • Kontarinis D, Bonzon E, Maudet N, Perotti A, Torre L and Villata S. Rewriting Rules for the Computation of Goal-Oriented Changes in an Argumentation System. Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems - Volume 8143. (51-68).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_4

  • Wyner A, Bench-Capon T and Dunne P. On the Instantiation of Knowledge Bases in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems - Volume 8143. (34-50).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_3

  • Prakken H, Ionita D and Wieringa R. Risk Assessment as an Argumentation Game. Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems - Volume 8143. (357-373).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_22

  • Baroni P, Romano M, Toni F, Aurisicchio M and Bertanza G. An Argumentation-Based Approach for Automatic Evaluation of Design Debates. Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems - Volume 8143. (340-356).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_21

  • Nov�k P and Witteveen C. Reconfiguration of Large-Scale Surveillance Systems. Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems - Volume 8143. (325-339).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_20

  • Baumann R and Brewka G. Analyzing the Equivalence Zoo in Abstract Argumentation. Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems - Volume 8143. (18-33).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_2

  • Pardo P and Godo L. A Temporal Argumentation Approach to Cooperative Planning Using Dialogues. Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems - Volume 8143. (307-324).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_19

  • Cabrio E, Tonelli S and Villata S. From Discourse Analysis to Argumentation Schemes and Back. Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems - Volume 8143. (1-17).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_1

  • Baumann R and Brewka G. Spectra in Abstract Argumentation. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning - Volume 8148. (174-186).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40564-8_18

  • Brewka G. Towards Reactive Multi-Context Systems. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning - Volume 8148. (1-10).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40564-8_1

  • Bourguet J, Thomopoulos R, Mugnier M and Ab�Cassis J. (2013). An artificial intelligence-based approach to deal with argumentation applied to food quality in a public health policy. Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal. 40:11. (4539-4546). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2013.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.01.059

  • Bex F and Verheij B. (2013). Legal stories and the process of proof. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 21:3. (253-278). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2013.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-012-9137-4

  • Amgoud L and Devred C. (2013). Argumentation frameworks as constraint satisfaction problems. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 69:1. (131-148). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2013.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-013-9343-0

  • Gottifredi S, Rotstein N, Garc�a A and Simari G. (2013). Using argument strength for building dialectical bonsai. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 69:1. (103-129). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2013.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-013-9338-x

  • Pardo P and Godo L. (2013). t-DeLP. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 69:1. (3-35). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2013.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-013-9334-1

  • van Gijzel B and Nilsson H. Towards a framework for the implementation and verification of translations between argumentation models. Proceedings of the 25th symposium on Implementation and Application of Functional Languages. (93-103).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2620678.2620688

  • Dyrkolbotn S. The Same, Similar, or Just Completely Different? Equivalence for Argumentation in Light of Logic. Proceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Logic, Language, Information, and Computation - Volume 8071. (96-110).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39992-3_11

  • Mailly J. Dynamic of argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence. (3233-3234).

    /doi/10.5555/2540128.2540625

  • Fazzinga B, Flesca S and Parisi F. On the complexity of probabilistic abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence. (898-904).

    /doi/10.5555/2540128.2540258

  • Brewka G, Ellmauthaler S, Strass H, Wallner J and Woltran S. Abstract dialectical frameworks revisited. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence. (803-809).

    /doi/10.5555/2540128.2540245

  • Rienstra T, Thimm M and Oren N. Opponent models with uncertainty for strategic argumentation. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence. (332-338).

    /doi/10.5555/2540128.2540177

  • Hadjinikolis C, Siantos Y, Modgil S, Black E and McBurney P. Opponent modelling in persuasion dialogues. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence. (164-170).

    /doi/10.5555/2540128.2540154

  • Grossi D and Van Der Hoek W. Audience-based uncertainty in abstract argument games. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence. (143-149).

    /doi/10.5555/2540128.2540151

  • Heras S, Botti V and Juli�n V. ArgCBROnto. Proceedings of the Second international conference on Agreement Technologies. (105-119).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39860-5_9

  • Caire P, van der Torre L and Villata S. Argumentation theoretic foundations for abstract dependence networks. Proceedings of the Second international conference on Agreement Technologies. (180-194).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39860-5_14

  • Ceci M. Representing Judicial Argumentation in the Semantic Web. Revised Selected Papers of the AICOL 2013 International Workshops on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems - Volume 8929. (172-187).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45960-7_13

  • Caminada M, S� S and Alc�ntara J. On the equivalence between logic programming semantics and argumentation semantics. Proceedings of the 12th European conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (97-108).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39091-3_9

  • Weydert E. On the plausibility of abstract arguments. Proceedings of the 12th European conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (522-533).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39091-3_44

  • Kaci S and Labreuche C. Representing synergy among arguments with choquet integral. Proceedings of the 12th European conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (302-314).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39091-3_26

  • Hunter A and Woltran S. Structural properties for deductive argument systems. Proceedings of the 12th European conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (278-289).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39091-3_24

  • Amgoud L and Prade H. A formal concept view of abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the 12th European conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (1-12).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39091-3_1

  • Kubosawa S, Nishina K, Sugimoto M, Okada S and Nitta K. A discussion training support system and its evaluation. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. (197-201).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2514601.2514626

  • Bench-Capon T, Prakken H, Wyner A and Atkinson K. Argument schemes for reasoning with legal cases using values. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. (13-22).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2514601.2514604

  • Villata S, Guido Boella , Gabbay D and Van Der Torre L. (2013). A socio-cognitive model of trust using argumentation theory. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 54:4. (541-559). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2013.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2012.09.001

  • Garc�A A, Ches�Evar C, Rotstein N and Simari G. (2013). Formalizing dialectical explanation support for argument-based reasoning in knowledge-based systems. Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal. 40:8. (3233-3247). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2013.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.036

  • Zhang X and Lin Z. (2013). An argumentation framework for description logic ontology reasoning and management. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems. 40:3. (375-403). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2013.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-012-0230-7

  • Nguyen H, Luong X, Mikl�s Z, Thanh T and Aberer K. An MAS negotiation support tool for schema matching. Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. (1391-1392).

    /doi/10.5555/2484920.2485240

  • Gabbriellini S and Torroni P. Arguments in social networks. Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. (1119-1120).

    /doi/10.5555/2484920.2485100

  • Vesic S. (2013). Identifying the class of maxi-consistent operators in argumentation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 47:1. (71-93). Online publication date: 1-May-2013.

    /doi/10.5555/2566972.2566975

  • Schneider J, Groza T and Passant A. (2013). A review of argumentation for the Social Semantic Web. Semantic Web. 4:2. (159-218). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2013.

    /doi/10.5555/2590215.2590218

  • G�Mez Lucero M, Ches�Evar C and Simari G. (2013). Modelling argument accrual with possibilistic uncertainty in a logic programming setting. Information Sciences: an International Journal. 228. (1-25). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2013.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.11.025

  • Modgil S and Prakken H. (2013). A general account of argumentation with preferences. Artificial Intelligence. 195. (361-397). Online publication date: 1-Feb-2013.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2012.10.008

  • Toni F. (2013). A generalised framework for dispute derivations in assumption-based argumentation. Artificial Intelligence. 195. (1-43). Online publication date: 1-Feb-2013.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2012.09.010

  • Peldszus A and Stede M. (2013). From Argument Diagrams to Argumentation Mining in Texts. International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence. 7:1. (1-31). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2013.

    https://doi.org/10.4018/jcini.2013010101

  • Canelas J, Martin Q and Rodriguez J. (2013). Argumentative SOX compliant and quality decision support intelligent expert system over the suppliers selection process. Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing. 2013. (7-7). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2013.

    https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/973704

  • Yao L, Xu J, Li J and Qi X. Evaluating the Valuable Rules from Different Experience Using Multiparty Argument Games. Proceedings of the The 2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 02. (258-265).

    https://doi.org/10.1109/WI-IAT.2012.181

  • Villata S, Boella G, Gabbay D, Torre L and Hulstijn J. (2012). A logic of argumentation for specification and verification of abstract argumentation frameworks. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 66:1-4. (199-230). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2012.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-012-9318-6

  • Villata S, Boella G, Gabbay D and Torre L. (2012). Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 66:1-4. (163-197). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2012.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-012-9317-7

  • Sugimoto M, Ueda T, Okada S, Ohsawa Y, Maeno Y and Nitta K. Discussion Analysis Using Temporal Data Crystallization. New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. (205-216).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39931-2_15

  • Riveret R, Busquets D, Pitt J, Contissa G, Rotolo A and Sartor G. A Study of Ex Ante Law Enforcement in Norm-Governed Learning Agents. New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. (157-173).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39931-2_12

  • Amgoud L, Confalonieri R, de Jonge D, d'Inverno M, Hazelden K, Osman N, Prade H, Sierra C and Yee-King M. Sharing online cultural experiences. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence. (282-293).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34620-0_26

  • Riveret R, Rotolo A and Sartor G. (2012). Probabilistic rule-based argumentation for norm-governed learning agents. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 20:4. (383-420). Online publication date: 1-Nov-2012.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-012-9134-7

  • Schneider J, Davis B and Wyner A. Dimensions of argumentation in social media. Proceedings of the 18th international conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. (21-25).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33876-2_4

  • Vesic S and van der Torre L. Beyond maxi-consistent argumentation operators. Proceedings of the 13th European conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence. (424-436).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33353-8_33

  • Verheij B. Jumping to conclusions. Proceedings of the 13th European conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence. (411-423).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33353-8_32

  • Arieli O. Conflict-Tolerant semantics for argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 13th European conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence. (28-40).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33353-8_3

  • Schwarzentruber F, Vesic S and Rienstra T. Building an epistemic logic for argumentation. Proceedings of the 13th European conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence. (359-371).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33353-8_28

  • Godo L, Marchioni E and Pardo P. Extending a temporal defeasible argumentation framework with possibilistic weights. Proceedings of the 13th European conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence. (242-254).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33353-8_19

  • Eiter T, Fink M, Krennwallner T, Redl C and Sch�ller P. Exploiting unfounded sets for HEX-Program evaluation. Proceedings of the 13th European conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence. (160-175).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33353-8_13

  • Rowe J, Levitt K, Parsons S, Sklar E, Applebaum A and Jalal S. Argumentation logic to assist in security administration. Proceedings of the 2012 New Security Paradigms Workshop. (43-52).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2413296.2413301

  • Budán M, Lucero M, Chesñevar C and Simari G. An approach to argumentation considering attacks through time. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management. (99-112).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33362-0_8

  • Dvořák W, Szeider S and Woltran S. Abstract argumentation via monadic second order logic. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management. (85-98).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33362-0_7

  • Amgoud L. The outcomes of logic-based argumentation systems under preferred semantics. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management. (72-84).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33362-0_6

  • Amgoud L. Stable semantics in logic-based argumentation. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management. (58-71).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33362-0_5

  • Nouioua F. Generalizing naive and stable semantics in argumentation frameworks with necessities and preferences. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management. (44-57).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33362-0_4

  • Brewka G. Multi-context systems. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Web Reasoning and Rule Systems. (1-4).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33203-6_1

  • Bench-Capon T, Araszkiewicz M, Ashley K, Atkinson K, Bex F, Borges F, Bourcier D, Bourgine P, Conrad J, Francesconi E, Gordon T, Governatori G, Leidner J, Lewis D, Loui R, Mccarty L, Prakken H, Schilder F, Schweighofer E, Thompson P, Tyrrell A, Verheij B, Walton D and Wyner A. (2012). A history of AI and Law in 50 papers. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 20:3. (215-319). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2012.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-012-9131-x

  • Tolchinsky P, Modgil S, Atkinson K, Mcburney P and Cortés U. (2012). Deliberation dialogues for reasoning about safety critical actions. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 25:2. (209-259). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2012.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-011-9174-5

  • (2012). Kernels in digraphs that are not kernel perfect. Discrete Mathematics. 312:16. (2498-2505). Online publication date: 28-Aug-2012.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2012.05.004

  • Boella G and van der Torre L. Reasoning for agreement technologies. Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (895-896).

    /doi/10.5555/3007337.3007494

  • Vesic S. Maxi-consistent operators in argumentation. Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (810-815).

    /doi/10.5555/3007337.3007478

  • Thimm M. A probabilistic semantics for abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (750-755).

    /doi/10.5555/3007337.3007468

  • Gao Y, Toni F and Craven R. Argumentation-based reinforcement learning for RoboCup soccer Keepaway. Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (342-347).

    /doi/10.5555/3007337.3007400

  • Cabrio E and Villata S. Natural language arguments. Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (205-210).

    /doi/10.5555/3007337.3007377

  • Baumann R. What does it take to enforce an argument? minimal change in abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (127-132).

    /doi/10.5555/3007337.3007364

  • Black E and Hunter A. Executable logic for dialogical argumentation. Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (15-20).

    /doi/10.5555/3007337.3007344

  • Riveret R, Rotolo A and Sartor G. Norms and learning in probabilistic logic-based agents. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Deontic Logic in Computer Science. (123-138).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31570-1_9

  • Tosatto S, Boella G, van der Torre L and Villata S. Visualizing normative systems. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Deontic Logic in Computer Science. (16-30).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31570-1_2

  • Longo L. Formalising human mental workload as non-monotonic concept for adaptive and personalised web-design. Proceedings of the 20th international conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. (369-373).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31454-4_38

  • Cabrio E and Villata S. Combining textual entailment and argumentation theory for supporting online debates interactions. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Short Papers - Volume 2. (208-212).

    /doi/10.5555/2390665.2390717

  • Amgoud L and Prade H. (2012). Can AI Models Capture Natural Language Argumentation?. International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence. 6:3. (19-32). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2012.

    /doi/10.5555/2441682.2441684

  • Dvořák W, Pichler R and Woltran S. (2012). Towards fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for abstract argumentation. Artificial Intelligence. 186:C. (1-37). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2012.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2012.03.005

  • Dvořák W, Ordyniak S and Szeider S. (2012). Augmenting tractable fragments of abstract argumentation. Artificial Intelligence. 186:C. (157-173). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2012.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2012.03.002

  • Zhang Z and Lin Z. (2012). Minimal hypotheses. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 65:2-3. (245-283). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2012.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-012-9308-8

  • Bench-Capon T, Atkinson K and Mcburney P. (2012). Using argumentation to model agent decision making in economic experiments. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 25:1. (183-208). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2012.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-011-9173-6

  • Ermolayev V and Davidovsky M. Agent-based ontology alignment. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics. (1-12).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2254129.2254136

  • Gijzel B and Nilsson H. Haskell Gets Argumentative. Proceedings of the 2012 Conference on Trends in Functional Programming - Volume 7829. (215-230).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40447-4_14

  • Coste-Marquis S, Konieczny S, Marquis P and Ouali M. Weighted attacks in argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (593-597).

    /doi/10.5555/3031843.3031917

  • Budán M, Lucero M, Chesñevar C and Simari G. Modelling time and reliability in structured argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (578-582).

    /doi/10.5555/3031843.3031914

  • Tosatto S, Boella G, van der Torre L and Villata S. Abstract normative systems. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (358-368).

    /doi/10.5555/3031843.3031885

  • Grossi D. Fixpoints and iterated updates in abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (65-74).

    /doi/10.5555/3031843.3031852

  • Dvořák W, Järvisalo M, Wallner J and Woltran S. Complexity-sensitive decision procedures for abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (54-64).

    /doi/10.5555/3031843.3031851

  • Wyner A, Atkinson K and Bench-Capon T. Opinion gathering using a multi-agent systems approach to policy selection. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 3. (1171-1172).

    /doi/10.5555/2343896.2343904

  • Vo Q and Li M. From axiomatic to strategic models of bargaining with logical beliefs and goals. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1. (525-532).

    /doi/10.5555/2343576.2343651

  • Koster A, Sabater-Mir J and Schorlemmer M. Personalizing communication about trust. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1. (517-524).

    /doi/10.5555/2343576.2343650

  • Sá S and Alcântara J. Cooperative dialogues with conditional arguments. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1. (501-508).

    /doi/10.5555/2343576.2343648

  • Booth R, Caminada M, Podlaszewski M and Rahwan I. Quantifying disagreement in argument-based reasoning. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1. (493-500).

    /doi/10.5555/2343576.2343647

  • Keppens J. (2012). Argument diagram extraction from evidential Bayesian networks. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 20:2. (109-143). Online publication date: 1-May-2012.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-012-9121-z

  • Cohen A, García A and Simari G. Backing and undercutting in abstract argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems. (107-123).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28472-4_7

  • Gordon T and Walton D. (2012). A Carneades reconstruction of Popov v Hayashi. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 20:1. (37-56). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2012.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-012-9120-0

  • Prakken H. (2012). Reconstructing Popov v. Hayashi in a framework for argumentation with structured arguments and Dungean semantics. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 20:1. (57-82). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2012.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-012-9117-8

  • Burato E and Cristani M. The process of reaching agreement in meaning negotiation. Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence VII. (1-42).

    /doi/10.5555/2363384.2363385

  • Baumann R, Brewka G, Dvořák W and Woltran S. Parameterized splitting. Correct Reasoning. (57-71).

    /doi/10.5555/2363344.2363349

  • Gaspers S and Szeider S. Backdoors to satisfaction. The Multivariate Algorithmic Revolution and Beyond. (287-317).

    /doi/10.5555/2344236.2344253

  • Prakken H. Some reflections on two current trends in formal argumentation. Logic Programs, Norms and Action. (249-272).

    /doi/10.5555/2340883.2340901

  • Dunne P. Irrationality in persuasive argumentation. Logic Programs, Norms and Action. (234-248).

    /doi/10.5555/2340883.2340900

  • Bench-Capon T. Open texture and argumentation. Logic Programs, Norms and Action. (220-233).

    /doi/10.5555/2340883.2340899

  • Hadjisoteriou E and Kakas A. Argumentation and the event calculus. Logic Programs, Norms and Action. (103-122).

    /doi/10.5555/2340883.2340893

  • Baroni P, Caminada M and Giacomin M. (2011). Review: an introduction to argumentation semantics. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 26:4. (365-410). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2011.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888911000166

  • Kido H and Nitta K. Toward justifying actions with logically and socially acceptable reasons. Proceedings of the 10th Mexican international conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence - Volume Part I. (52-64).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25324-9_5

  • Osorio M, Carballido J, Zepeda C and Cruz Z. Characterization of argumentation semantics in terms of the MM semantics. Proceedings of the 10th Mexican international conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence - Volume Part I. (16-27).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25324-9_2

  • Wakaki T. Preference-Based argumentation handling dynamic preferences built on prioritized logic programming. Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Agents in Principle, Agents in Practice. (336-348).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25044-6_27

  • Ferrando S, Onaindia E and Torre�o A. An architecture for defeasible-reasoning-based cooperative distributed planning. Proceedings of the 2011th Confederated international conference on On the move to meaningful internet systems - Volume Part I. (200-217).

    /doi/10.5555/2074356.2074375

  • Jamroga W and Melissen M. Doubtful deviations and farsighted play. Proceedings of the 15th Portugese conference on Progress in artificial intelligence. (506-520).

    /doi/10.5555/2051115.2051162

  • Liao B and Huang H. Partial semantics of argumentation. Proceedings of the Third international conference on Logic, rationality, and interaction. (151-164).

    /doi/10.5555/2050423.2050434

  • Grossi D. An application of model checking games to abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the Third international conference on Logic, rationality, and interaction. (74-86).

    /doi/10.5555/2050423.2050428

  • Pardo P and Godo L. t-DeLP. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management. (489-503).

    /doi/10.5555/2050266.2050313

  • Bisquert P, Cayrol C, De Saint-Cyr F and Lagasquie-Schiex M. Change in argumentation systems. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management. (275-288).

    /doi/10.5555/2050266.2050293

  • Yahi S. On warranted inference in argument trees based framework. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management. (191-204).

    /doi/10.5555/2050266.2050285

  • Rotstein N, Gottifredi S, Garc�a A and Simari G. A heuristics-based pruning technique for argumentation trees. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management. (177-190).

    /doi/10.5555/2050266.2050284

  • Nouioua F and Risch V. Argumentation frameworks with necessities. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management. (163-176).

    /doi/10.5555/2050266.2050283

  • Cayrol C and Lagasquie-Schiex M. Bipolarity in argumentation graphs. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management. (137-148).

    /doi/10.5555/2050266.2050281

  • Amgoud L and Vesic S. On the equivalence of logic-based argumentation systems. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management. (123-136).

    /doi/10.5555/2050266.2050280

  • Amgoud L and Devred C. Argumentation frameworks as constraint satisfaction problems. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management. (110-122).

    /doi/10.5555/2050266.2050279

  • Alsinet T, B�jar R, Godo L and Guitart F. Maximal ideal recursive semantics for defeasible argumentation. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management. (96-109).

    /doi/10.5555/2050266.2050278

  • Simari G. A brief overview of research in argumentation systems. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management. (81-95).

    /doi/10.5555/2050266.2050276

  • Konieczny S. Dynamics of beliefs. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management. (61-74).

    /doi/10.5555/2050266.2050274

  • Amgoud L and Vesic S. (2011). A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 63:2. (149-183). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2011.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-011-9271-9

  • Wyner A, Atkinson K and Bench-Capon T. Towards a structured online consultation tool. Proceedings of the Third IFIP WG 8.5 international conference on Electronic participation. (286-297).

    /doi/10.5555/2035220.2035251

  • Pereira C, Tettamanzi A and Villata S. Graded Reinstatement in Belief Revision. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 02. (58-61).

    https://doi.org/10.1109/WI-IAT.2011.185

  • Yuan J, Yao L, Hao Z, Liu F and Yuan T. Multi-party Dialogue Games for Distributed Argumentation System. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 02. (329-332).

    https://doi.org/10.1109/WI-IAT.2011.14

  • Boer A and van Engers T. Application of model-based diagnosis to multi-agent systems representing public administration. Proceedings of the 25th IVR Congress conference on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems: models and ethical challenges for legal systems, legal language and legal ontologies, argumentation and software agents. (235-244).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35731-2_16

  • Dung P and Sartor G. (2011). The modular logic of private international law. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 19:2-3. (233-261). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2011.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-011-9112-5

  • Lundström J, Aceto G and Hamfelt A. A dynamic metalogic argumentation framework implementation. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Rule-based reasoning, programming, and applications. (83-98).

    /doi/10.5555/2032787.2032798

  • Parsons S, Tang Y, Cai K, Sklar E and McBurney P. Some thoughts on using argumentation to handle trust. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Computational logic in multi-agent systems. (1-12).

    /doi/10.5555/2044543.2044545

  • Cerutti F. Decision support through argumentation-based practical reasoning. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume Three. (2786-2787).

    /doi/10.5555/2283696.2283860

  • Leite J and Martins J. Social abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume Three. (2287-2292).

    /doi/10.5555/2283696.2283779

  • Van Gijzel B and Prakken H. Relating Carneades with abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume Two. (1113-1119).

    /doi/10.5555/2283516.2283583

  • Ordyniak S and Szeider S. Augmenting tractable fragments of abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume Two. (1033-1038).

    /doi/10.5555/2283516.2283570

  • Modgil S and Prakken H. Revisiting preferences and argumentation. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume Two. (1021-1026).

    /doi/10.5555/2283516.2283568

  • Dvořák W, Dunne P and Woltran S. Parametric properties of ideal semantics. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume Two. (851-856).

    /doi/10.5555/2283516.2283541

  • Brewka G, Dunne P and Woltran S. Relating the semantics of abstract dialectical frameworks and standard AFs. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume Two. (780-785).

    /doi/10.5555/2283516.2283530

  • Villata S, Boella G and Van Der Torre L. Attack semantics for abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume One. (406-413).

    /doi/10.5555/2283396.2283463

  • Da Costa Pereira C, Tettamanzi A and Villata S. Changing one's mind. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume One. (164-171).

    /doi/10.5555/2283396.2283425

  • Caminada M, Pigozzi G and Podlaszewski M. Manipulation in group argument evaluation. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume One. (121-126).

    /doi/10.5555/2283396.2283418

  • Fortin J, Thomopoulos R, Bourguet J and Mugnier M. Supporting argumentation systems by graph representation and computation. Proceedings of the Second international conference on Graph Structures for Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (119-136).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29449-5_5

  • Black E and Bentley K. An empirical study of a deliberation dialogue system. Proceedings of the First international conference on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation. (132-146).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_9

  • Rotstein N, Oren N and Norman T. Resource boundedness and argumentation. Proceedings of the First international conference on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation. (117-131).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_8

  • Bistarelli S and Santini F. Modeling and solving AFs with a constraint-based tool. Proceedings of the First international conference on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation. (99-116).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_7

  • Visser W, Hindriks K and Jonker C. An argumentation framework for qualitative multi-criteria preferences. Proceedings of the First international conference on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation. (85-98).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_6

  • Riley L, Atkinson K, Payne T and Black E. An implemented dialogue system for inquiry and persuasion. Proceedings of the First international conference on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation. (67-84).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_5

  • Dvořák W. On the complexity of computing the justification status of an argument. Proceedings of the First international conference on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation. (32-49).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_3

  • Baumann R, Brewka G and Wong R. Splitting argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the First international conference on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation. (17-31).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_2

  • Toni F and Torroni P. Bottom-Up argumentation. Proceedings of the First international conference on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation. (249-262).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_16

  • Boella G, Perotti A, van der Torre L and Villata S. Conditional labelling for abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the First international conference on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation. (232-248).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_15

  • Rienstra T, Perotti A, Villata S and van der Torre L. Multi-sorted argumentation. Proceedings of the First international conference on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation. (215-231).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_14

  • Baroni P, Cerutti F, Dunne P and Giacomin M. Computing with infinite argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the First international conference on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation. (197-214).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_13

  • Cobo M, Martinez D and Simari G. Stable extensions in timed argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the First international conference on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation. (181-196).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_12

  • Maio P and Silva N. A three-layer argumentation framework. Proceedings of the First international conference on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation. (163-180).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_11

  • Kr�mpelmann P, Thimm M, Falappa M, Garc�a A, Kern-Isberner G and Simari G. Selective revision by deductive argumentation. Proceedings of the First international conference on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation. (147-162).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_10

  • Li H, Oren N and Norman T. Probabilistic argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the First international conference on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation. (1-16).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_1

  • Feinberg Y. Strategic communication. Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge. (1-11).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2000378.2000379

  • Grando M, Moss L, Glasspool D, Sleeman D, Sim M, Gilhooly C and Kinsella J. Argumentation-logic for explaining anomalous patient responses to treatments. Proceedings of the 13th conference on Artificial intelligence in medicine. (35-44).

    /doi/10.5555/2040981.2040988

  • Liao B, Jin L and Koons R. (2011). Dynamics of argumentation systems. Artificial Intelligence. 175:11. (1790-1814). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2011.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2011.03.006

  • Amgoud L and Vesic S. Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty. (86-97).

    /doi/10.5555/2026067.2026077

  • Villata S, Boella G, Gabbay D and Van Der Torre L. Arguing about the trustworthiness of the information sources. Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty. (74-85).

    /doi/10.5555/2026067.2026076

  • Kaci S and Labreuche C. Arguing with valued preference relations. Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty. (62-73).

    /doi/10.5555/2026067.2026075

  • Cohen A, Garc�a A and Simari G. Backing and undercutting in defeasible logic programming. Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty. (50-61).

    /doi/10.5555/2026067.2026074

  • Gaggl S and Woltran S. Strong equivalence for argumentation semantics based on conflict-free sets. Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty. (38-49).

    /doi/10.5555/2026067.2026073

  • Gabbay D. Introducing equational semantics for argumentation networks. Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty. (19-35).

    /doi/10.5555/2026067.2026070

  • Boella G, Gabbay D, Perotti A, Van Der Torre L and Villata S. Argumentative agents negotiating on potential attacks. Proceedings of the 5th KES international conference on Agent and multi-agent systems: technologies and applications. (280-290).

    /doi/10.5555/2023144.2023181

  • Visser W, Hindriks K and Jonker C. An argumentation framework for deriving qualitative risk sensitive preferences. Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Industrial engineering and other applications of applied intelligent systems conference on Modern approaches in applied intelligence - Volume Part II. (556-565).

    /doi/10.5555/2025816.2025872

  • Georgila K, Artstein R, Nazarian A, Rushforth M, Traum D and Sycara K. An annotation scheme for cross-cultural argumentation and persuasion dialogues. Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2011 Conference. (272-278).

    /doi/10.5555/2132890.2132920

  • Riveret R, Rotolo A, Contissa G, Sartor G and Vasconcelos W. Temporal accommodation of legal argumentation. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. (71-80).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2018358.2018368

  • Governatori G. On the relationship between Carneades and Defeasible Logic. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. (31-40).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2018358.2018362

  • Bench-Capon T, Prakken H and Visser W. Argument schemes for two-phase democratic deliberation. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. (21-30).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2018358.2018361

  • Bex F and Verheij B. Legal shifts in the process of proof. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. (11-20).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2018358.2018360

  • Wyner A, Bench-Capon T and Atkinson K. Towards formalising argumentation about legal cases. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. (1-10).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2018358.2018359

  • Baumann R. Splitting an argumentation framework. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Logic programming and nonmonotonic reasoning. (40-53).

    /doi/10.5555/2010192.2010200

  • Yuan T, Moore D, Reed C, Ravenscroft A and Maudet N. (2011). Review: informal logic dialogue games in human-computer dialogue. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 26:2. (159-174). Online publication date: 12-May-2011.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026988891100004X

  • van der Weide T, Dignum F, Meyer J, Prakken H and Vreeswijk G. Multi-criteria argument selection in persuasion dialogues. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (136-153).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33152-7_9

  • van der Weide T and Dignum F. Reasoning about and discussing preferences between arguments. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (117-135).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33152-7_8

  • Letia I and Groza A. Arguing with justifications between collaborating agents. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (102-116).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33152-7_7

  • Bonzon E and Maudet N. On the outcomes of multiparty persuasion. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (86-101).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33152-7_6

  • Takahashi K and Nambu Y. A semantics for dynamic argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (66-85).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33152-7_5

  • Kido H. Practical argumentation semantics for pareto optimality and its relationships with values. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (28-45).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33152-7_3

  • Kakas A, Amgoud L, Kern-Isberner G, Maudet N and Moraitis P. ABA. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (9-27).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33152-7_2

  • Parsons S, Sklar E and McBurney P. Using argumentation to reason with and about trust. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (194-212).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33152-7_12

  • Pardo P, Ferrando S, Onaindia E, Godo L and Dellunde P. Cooperative dialogues for defeasible argumentation-based planning. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (174-193).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33152-7_11

  • Gratie C and Florea A. Fuzzy labeling for argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (1-8).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33152-7_1

  • Erriquez E. Dealing with trust and distrust in agents societies. The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 3. (1353-1354).

    /doi/10.5555/2034396.2034562

  • Podlaszewski M, Caminada M and Pigozzi G. An implementation of basic argumentation components. The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 3. (1307-1308).

    /doi/10.5555/2034396.2034539

  • Amgoud L and Vesic S. A formal analysis of the outcomes of argumentation-based negotiations. The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 3. (1237-1238).

    /doi/10.5555/2034396.2034504

  • Erriquez E, van der Hoek W and Wooldridge M. An abstract framework for reasoning about trust. The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 3. (1085-1086).

    /doi/10.5555/2034396.2034430

  • Pardo P, Pajares S, Onaindia E, Godo L and Dellunde P. Multiagent argumentation for cooperative planning in DeLP-POP. The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 3. (971-978).

    /doi/10.5555/2034396.2034407

  • van der Weide T, Dignum F, Meyer J, Prakken H and Vreeswijk G. Multi-criteria argument selection in persuasion dialogues. The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 3. (921-928).

    /doi/10.5555/2034396.2034400

  • Black E and Atkinson K. Choosing persuasive arguments for action. The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 3. (905-912).

    /doi/10.5555/2034396.2034398

  • Kido H and Nitta K. Practical argumentation semantics for socially efficient defeasible consequence. The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1. (267-274).

    /doi/10.5555/2030470.2030509

  • Bonzon E and Maudet N. On the outcomes of multiparty persuasion. The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1. (47-54).

    /doi/10.5555/2030470.2030478

  • Dvořák W and Woltran S. (2011). On the intertranslatability of argumentation semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 41:2. (445-475). Online publication date: 1-May-2011.

    /doi/10.5555/2051237.2051251

  • Labreuche C. (2011). A general framework for explaining the results of a multi-attribute preference model. Artificial Intelligence. 175:7-8. (1410-1448). Online publication date: 1-May-2011.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2010.11.008

  • Nieves J, Osorio M and Zepeda C. (2011). A Schema for Generating Relevant Logic Programming Semantics and its Applications in Argumentation Theory. Fundamenta Informaticae. 106:2-4. (295-319). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2011.

    /doi/10.5555/2351776.2351786

  • Bistarelli S, Campli P and Santini F. Finding partitions of arguments with Dung's properties via SCSPs. Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. (913-919).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1982185.1982384

  • Bagheri E and Ensan F. Consolidating multiple requirement specifications through argumentation. Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. (659-666).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1982185.1982332

  • Ontaòón S and Plaza E. (2011). An argumentation framework for learning, information exchange, and joint-deliberation in multi-agent systems. Multiagent and Grid Systems. 7:2,3. (95-108). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2011.

    https://doi.org/10.3233/MGS-2011-0169

  • Mochales R and Moens M. (2011). Argumentation mining. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 19:1. (1-22). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2011.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-010-9104-x

  • Rahwan I and Larson K. (2011). Review: logical mechanism design. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 26:1. (61-69). Online publication date: 1-Feb-2011.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888910000421

  • Falappa M, Garc??a A, Kern-isberner G and Simari G. (2011). Review: on the evolving relation between belief revision and argumentation. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 26:1. (35-43). Online publication date: 1-Feb-2011.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888910000391

  • Nieves J and Confalonieri R. (2011). A Possibilistic Argumentation Decision Making Framework with Default Reasoning. Fundamenta Informaticae. 113:1. (41-61). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011.

    /doi/10.5555/2362076.2362080

  • Brewka G, Eiter T and Fink M. Nonmonotonic multi-context systems. Logic programming, knowledge representation, and nonmonotonic reasoning. (233-258).

    /doi/10.5555/2001078.2001095

  • Toni F and Sergot M. Argumentation and answer set programming. Logic programming, knowledge representation, and nonmonotonic reasoning. (164-180).

    /doi/10.5555/2001078.2001089

  • Faber W and Woltran S. Manifold answer-set programs and their applications. Logic programming, knowledge representation, and nonmonotonic reasoning. (44-63).

    /doi/10.5555/2001078.2001082

  • Dung P and Thang P. Closure and consistency rationalities in logic-based argumentation. Logic programming, knowledge representation, and nonmonotonic reasoning. (33-43).

    /doi/10.5555/2001078.2001081

  • Caminada M and Pigozzi G. (2011). On judgment aggregation in abstract argumentation. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 22:1. (64-102). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-009-9116-7

  • Satoh K, Asai K, Kogawa T, Kubota M, Nakamura M, Nishigai Y, Shirakawa K and Takano C. PROLEG. Proceedings of the 2010 international conference on New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. (153-164).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25655-4_14

  • Hunter A and Williams M. Using clinical preferences in argumentation about evidence from clinical trials. Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium. (118-127).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1882992.1883011

  • Trojahn C and Euzenat J. Consistency-driven argumentation for alignment agreement. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Ontology Matching - Volume 689. (37-48).

    /doi/10.5555/2878593.2878597

  • Doran P, Payne T, Tamma V and Palmisano I. Deciding agent orientation on ontology mappings. Proceedings of the 9th international semantic web conference on The semantic web - Volume Part I. (161-176).

    /doi/10.5555/1940281.1940293

  • Moguillansky M, Wassermann R and Falappa M. An argumentation machinery to reason over inconsistent ontologies. Proceedings of the 12th Ibero-American conference on Advances in artificial intelligence. (100-109).

    /doi/10.5555/1948131.1948148

  • Alsinet T, Béjar R and Godo L. A computational method for defeasible argumentation based on a recursive warrant semantics. Proceedings of the 12th Ibero-American conference on Advances in artificial intelligence. (40-49).

    /doi/10.5555/1948131.1948139

  • Billington D, Antoniou G, Governatori G and Maher M. (2010). An inclusion theorem for defeasible logics. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic. 12:1. (1-27). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2010.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1838552.1838558

  • Gürkan A, Iandoli L, Klein M and Zollo G. (2010). Mediating debate through on-line large-scale argumentation. Information Sciences: an International Journal. 180:19. (3686-3702). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2010.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2010.06.011

  • Amgoud L and Vesic S. Handling inconsistency with preference-based argumentation. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management. (56-69).

    /doi/10.5555/1926791.1926805

  • Amgoud L and Besnard P. A formal analysis of logic-based argumentation systems. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management. (42-55).

    /doi/10.5555/1926791.1926804

  • Sprado J, Gottfried B and Herzog O. Flexible concept-based argumentation in dynamic scenes. Proceedings of the 33rd annual German conference on Advances in artificial intelligence. (116-125).

    /doi/10.5555/1882150.1882166

  • Antoniou G, Bikakis A and Papatheodorou C. Reasoning with imperfect context and preference information in multi-context systems. Proceedings of the 14th east European conference on Advances in databases and information systems. (1-12).

    /doi/10.5555/1885872.1885874

  • Creignou N, Schmidt J, Thomas M and Woltran S. Sets of boolean connectives that make argumentation easier. Proceedings of the 12th European conference on Logics in artificial intelligence. (117-129).

    /doi/10.5555/1888743.1888757

  • Brewka G. Nonmonotonic tools for argumentation. Proceedings of the 12th European conference on Logics in artificial intelligence. (1-6).

    /doi/10.5555/1888743.1888745

  • Liao B and Huang H. (2010). ANGLE. Information Sciences: an International Journal. 180:17. (3117-3139). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2010.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2010.03.017

  • Doder D, Rašković M, Marković Z and Ognjanović Z. (2010). Measures of inconsistency and defaults. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 51:7. (832-845). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2010.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2010.05.007

  • Bex F and Walton D. Burdens and Standards of Proof for Inference to the Best Explanation. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2010: The Twenty-Third Annual Conference. (37-46).

    /doi/10.5555/1940559.1940568

  • Bench-Capon T and Prakken H. A lightweight formal model of two-phase democratic deliberation. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2010: The Twenty-Third Annual Conference. (27-36).

    /doi/10.5555/1940559.1940567

  • Ouerdane W, Maudet N and Tsoukias A. Dealing with the dynamics of proof-standard in argumentation-based decision aiding. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on STAIRS 2010: Proceedings of the Fifth Starting AI Researchers' Symposium. (225-237).

    /doi/10.5555/1940526.1940546

  • Ontaòón S, Dellunde P, Godo L and Plaza E. Towards a Logical Model of Induction from Examples and Communication. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Artificial Intelligence Research and Development: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of the Catalan Association for Artificial Intelligence. (259-268).

    /doi/10.5555/1893268.1893302

  • Gómez-Sebastià I and Nieves J. WizArg. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Artificial Intelligence Research and Development: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of the Catalan Association for Artificial Intelligence. (249-258).

    /doi/10.5555/1893268.1893301

  • Vreeswijk G. Lower Bounds on Argument Verification in Computational Dialectic. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (463-474).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860872

  • Verheij B. Argumentation and rules with exceptions. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (455-462).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860871

  • Snaith M, Devereux J, Lawrence J and Reed C. Pipelining Argumentation Technologies. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (447-453).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860870

  • Rotstein N, Moguillansky M, García A and Simari G. A Dynamic Argumentation Framework. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (427-438).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860868

  • Reed C, Wells S, Budzyńska K and Devereux J. Building arguments with argumentation. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (415-426).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860867

  • Pan S, Larson K and Rahwan I. Argumentation Mechanism Design for Preferred Semantics. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (403-414).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860866

  • Osorio M, Nieves J and Gómez-Sebastià I. CF2-extensions as Answer-set Models. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (391-402).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860865

  • Oren N, Reed C and Luck M. Moving Between Argumentation Frameworks. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (379-390).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860864

  • Moguillansky M, Rotstein N, Falappa M, García A and Simari G. Argument Theory Change Through Defeater Activation. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (359-366).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860862

  • Modgil S and Prakken H. Reasoning about Preferences in Structured Extended Argumentation Frameworks. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (347-358).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860861

  • Modgil S and Bench-Capon T. Integrating Dialectical and Accrual Modes of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (335-346).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860860

  • Kim E, Ordyniak S and Szeider S. Algorithms and Complexity Results for Persuasive Argumentation. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (311-322).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860858

  • Kaci S. Refined Preference-based Argumentation Frameworks. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (299-310).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860857

  • Hunter A and Williams M. Qualitative Evidence Aggregation using Argumentation. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (287-298).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860856

  • Gaggl S and Woltran S. cf2 Semantics Revisited. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (243-254).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860852

  • Dvořák W, Szeider S and Woltran S. Reasoning in Argumentation Frameworks of Bounded Clique-Width. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (219-230).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860850

  • Dunne P, Martínez D, García A and Simari G. Computation with varied-strength attacks in abstract argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (207-218).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860849

  • Dunne P. Tractability in Value-based Argumentation. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (195-206).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860848

  • Dung P, Toni F and Mancarella P. Some design guidelines for practical argumentation systems. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (183-194).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860847

  • Dung P and Thang P. Towards (Probabilistic) Argumentation for Jury-based Dispute Resolution. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (171-182).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860846

  • Devred C, Doutre S, Lefèvre C and Nicolas P. Dialectical Proofs for Constrained Argumentation. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (159-170).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860845

  • Caminada M. An Algorithm for Stage Semantics. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (147-158).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860844

  • Budzynska K. Argument Analysis. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (135-146).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860843

  • Boella G, Gabbay D, van der Torre L and Villata S. Support in Abstract Argumentation. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (111-122).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860841

  • Bex F, Prakken H and Reed C. A formal analysis of the AIF in terms of the ASPIC framework. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (99-110).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860840

  • Baumann R and Brewka G. Expanding Argumentation Frameworks. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (75-86).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860838

  • Baroni P, Dunne P and Giacomin M. On Extension Counting Problems in Argumentation Frameworks. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (63-74).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860837

  • Amgoud L and Vesic S. Generalizing stable semantics by preferences. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (39-50).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860835

  • Brewka G and Gordon T. Carneades and Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010. (3-12).

    /doi/10.5555/1860828.1860831

  • Cobo M, Martínez D and Simari G. On Admissibility in Timed Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on ECAI 2010: 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1007-1008).

    /doi/10.5555/1860967.1861178

  • Kaci S and Labreuche C. Preference-Based Argumentation Framework with Varied-Preference Intensity. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on ECAI 2010: 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1003-1004).

    /doi/10.5555/1860967.1861176

  • Ouerdane W, Maudet N and Tsoukias A. Dealing with the dynamics of proof-standard in argumentation-based decision aiding. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on ECAI 2010: 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (999-1000).

    /doi/10.5555/1860967.1861174

  • Pinyol I and Sabater-Mir J. An Argumentation-Based Dialog for Social Evaluations Exchange. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on ECAI 2010: 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (997-998).

    /doi/10.5555/1860967.1861173

  • Claudette C, Caroline D and Marie-Christine L. Acceptability semantics accounting for strength of attacks in argumentation. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on ECAI 2010: 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (995-996).

    /doi/10.5555/1860967.1861172

  • Bistarelli S and Santini F. A Common Computational Framework for Semiring-based Argumentation Systems. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on ECAI 2010: 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (131-136).

    /doi/10.5555/1860967.1860994

  • Dunne P, Modgil S and Bench-Capon T. Computation in Extended Argumentation Frameworks. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on ECAI 2010: 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (119-124).

    /doi/10.5555/1860967.1860992

  • Grossi D and Pigozzi G. Introduction to judgment aggregation. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on ESSLLI 2010, and ESSLLI 2011 conference on Lectures on Logic and Computation. (160-209).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31485-8_5

  • Brewka G, Truszczyński M and Woltran S. Representing preferences among sets. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (273-278).

    /doi/10.5555/2898607.2898651

  • Dung P and Sartor G. A logical model of private international law. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Deontic logic in computer science. (229-246).

    /doi/10.5555/1876014.1876031

  • Kaci S and Labreuche C. Argumentation framework with fuzzy preference relations. Proceedings of the Computational intelligence for knowledge-based systems design, and 13th international conference on Information processing and management of uncertainty. (554-563).

    /doi/10.5555/1876326.1876395

  • Kośmicki P. A platform for the evaluation of automated argumentation strategies. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Rough sets and current trends in computing. (494-503).

    /doi/10.5555/1876210.1876272

  • Heras S, Botti V and Julián V. An abstract argumentation framework for supporting agreements in agent societies. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems - Volume Part II. (177-184).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13803-4_22

  • Ontañón S and Plaza E. Multiagent inductive learning. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning. (839-846).

    /doi/10.5555/3104322.3104429

  • Rahati A and Kabanza F. Persuasive dialogues in an intelligent tutoring system for medical diagnosis. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems - Volume Part II. (51-61).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13437-1_6

  • Schlesinger F, Ferretti E, Errecalde M and Aguirre G. An argumentation-based BDI personal assistant. Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Industrial engineering and other applications of applied intelligent systems - Volume Part I. (701-710).

    /doi/10.5555/1945758.1945840

  • Hunter A and Liu W. (2010). Review:. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 25:2. (199-222). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2010.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888910000019

  • Huang S and Lin C. (2010). The search for potentially interesting products in an e-marketplace. Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal. 37:6. (4468-4478). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2010.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.12.064

  • Bench-Capon T and Prakken H. (2010). Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 18:2. (153-174). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2010.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-010-9094-8

  • Bex F, Van Koppen P, Prakken H and Verheij B. (2010). A hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 18:2. (123-152). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2010.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-010-9092-x

  • Zhang X, Zhang Z, Xu D and Lin Z. Argumentation-Based reasoning with inconsistent knowledge bases. Proceedings of the 23rd Canadian conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (87-99).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13059-5_11

  • Staab E and Caminada M. On the profitability of incompetence. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Multi-agent-based simulation. (76-92).

    /doi/10.5555/1946224.1946233

  • Hasegawa T and Sawamura H. Syncretic argumentation by lattice homomorphism and fusion. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1. (1595-1596).

    /doi/10.5555/1838206.1838498

  • Thimm M and Garc�a A. Classification and strategical issues of argumentation games on structured argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1. (1247-1254).

    /doi/10.5555/1838206.1838368

  • Belesiotis A, Rovatsos M and Rahwan I. Agreeing on plans through iterated disputes. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1. (765-772).

    /doi/10.5555/1838206.1838308

  • Hadidi N, Dimopoulos Y and Moraitis P. Argumentative alternating offers. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1. (441-448).

    /doi/10.5555/1838206.1838268

  • Martin P, Robertson D and Rovatsos M. Opportunistic belief reconciliation during distributed interactions. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1. (433-440).

    /doi/10.5555/1838206.1838267

  • Rahwan I and Tohm� F. Collective argument evaluation as judgement aggregation. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1. (417-424).

    /doi/10.5555/1838206.1838265

  • Grossi D. On the logic of argumentation theory. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1. (409-416).

    /doi/10.5555/1838206.1838264

  • Matt P, Morge M and Toni F. Combining statistics and arguments to compute trust. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1. (209-216).

    /doi/10.5555/1838206.1838236

  • Brandt F, Brill M, Fischer F and Harrenstein P. Minimal retentive sets in tournaments. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1. (47-58).

    /doi/10.5555/1838206.1838213

  • Morge M, Abdel-Naby S and Beaufils B. Towards a dialectical approach for conversational agents in selling situations. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (141-158).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_9

  • Heras S, Botti V and Juli$#225;n V. On a computational argumentation framework for agent societies. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (123-140).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_8

  • Hadidi N, Dimopoulos Y and Moraitis P. Argumentative alternating offers. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (105-122).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_7

  • van der Weide T, Dignum F, Meyer J, Prakken H and Vreeswijk G. Arguing about preferences and decisions. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (68-85).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_5

  • Onta��n S and Plaza E. Empirical argumentation. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (49-67).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_4

  • Kok E, Meyer J, Prakken H and Vreeswijk G. A formal argumentation framework for deliberation dialogues. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (31-48).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_3

  • Black E and Atkinson K. Agreeing what to do. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (12-30).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_2

  • Wakaki T. Preference-Based argumentation capturing prioritized logic programming. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (306-325).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_18

  • Thimm M and García A. On strategic argument selection in structured argumentation systems. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (286-305).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_17

  • Tang Y, Norman T and Parsons S. Computing argumentation in polynomial number of BDD operations. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (268-285).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_16

  • Okuno K and Takahashi K. Argumentation system allowing suspend/resume of an argumentation line. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (248-267).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_15

  • Marcos M, Falappa M and Simari G. Dynamic argumentation in abstract dialogue frameworks. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (228-247).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_14

  • Letia I and Groza A. Towards pragmatic argumentative agents within a fuzzy description logic framework. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (209-227).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_13

  • Grossi D. Argumentation in the view of modal logic. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (190-208).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_12

  • Capobianco M and Simari G. An argument-based multi-agent system for information integration. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (171-189).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_11

  • Parsons S, McBurney P and Sklar E. Reasoning about trust using argumentation. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (159-170).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_10

  • Oikarinen E and Woltran S. Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (123-133).

    /doi/10.5555/3031748.3031767

  • Dvořák W, Pichler R and Woltran S. Towards fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for argumentation. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (112-122).

    /doi/10.5555/3031748.3031766

  • Brewka G and Woltran S. Abstract dialectical frameworks. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (102-111).

    /doi/10.5555/3031748.3031765

  • Cayrol C, de Saint-Cyr F and Lagasquie-Schiex M. (2010). Change in abstract argumentation frameworks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 38:1. (49-84). Online publication date: 1-May-2010.

    /doi/10.5555/1892211.1892213

  • Bentahar J, Moulin B and Bélanger M. (2010). A taxonomy of argumentation models used for knowledge representation. Artificial Intelligence Review. 33:3. (211-259). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2010.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-010-9154-1

  • Bourguet J, Amgoud L and Thomopoulos R. Towards a Unified Model of Preference-Based Argumentation. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems - Volume 5956. (326-344).

    /doi/10.5555/2961313.2961336

  • Zhang Z and Lin Z. Enhancing Dung's Preferred Semantics. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems - Volume 5956. (58-75).

    /doi/10.5555/2961313.2961322

  • Zhang Z and Lin Z. Enhancing dung's preferred semantics. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems. (58-75).

    /doi/10.5555/2174889.2174898

  • Wyner A, Mochales-Palau R, Moens M and Milward D. Approaches to text mining arguments from legal cases. Semantic Processing of Legal Texts. (60-79).

    /doi/10.5555/2167945.2167950

  • Baldoni M, Baroglio C, Mascardi V, Omicini A and Torroni P. Agents, multi-agent systems and declarative programming. A 25-year perspective on logic programming. (204-230).

    /doi/10.5555/1880413.1880424

  • Giordano L and Toni F. Knowledge representation and non-monotonic reasoning. A 25-year perspective on logic programming. (87-111).

    /doi/10.5555/1880413.1880419

  • Hasegawa T, Abbas S and Sawamura H. Syncretic Argumentation by Means of Lattice Homomorphism. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Principles of Practice in Multi-Agent Systems. (159-174).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11161-7_11

  • Heras S, Botti V and Julián V. (2009). Review:. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 24:4. (327-352). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2009.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888909990178

  • Pereira L and Pinto A. Adaptive reasoning for cooperative agents. Proceedings of the 18th international conference on Applications of declarative programming and knowledge management. (102-116).

    /doi/10.5555/2008383.2008392

  • Dimopoulos Y, Moraitis P and Amgoud L. Extending Argumentation to Make Good Decisions. Algorithmic Decision Theory. (225-236).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04428-1_20

  • Besnard P, Hunter A and Woltran S. (2009). Encoding deductive argumentation in quantified Boolean formulae. Artificial Intelligence. 173:15. (1406-1423). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2009.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2009.06.006

  • Viglizzo I, Tohm� F and Simari G. (2009). The foundations of DeLP. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 57:2. (181-204). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2009.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-010-9184-z

  • Black E and Hunter A. (2009). An inquiry dialogue system. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 19:2. (173-209). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2009.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-008-9074-5

  • Vasconcelos W, Kollingbaum M and Norman T. (2009). Normative conflict resolution in multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 19:2. (124-152). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2009.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-008-9070-9

  • Eiter T, Brewka G, Dao-Tran M, Fink M, Ianni G and Krennwallner T. Combining nonmonotonic knowledge bases with external sources. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Frontiers of combining systems. (18-42).

    /doi/10.5555/1807707.1807710

  • Zhang X and Lin Z. An argumentation-based approach to handling inconsistencies in DL-Lite. Proceedings of the 32nd annual German conference on Advances in artificial intelligence. (615-622).

    /doi/10.5555/1814110.1814202

  • Visser W, Hindriks K and Jonker C. Argumentation-based preference modelling with incomplete information. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Computational logic in multi-agent systems. (141-157).

    /doi/10.5555/1927368.1927376

  • Dung P and Thang P. (2009). Modular argumentation for modelling legal doctrines in common law of contract. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 17:3. (167-182). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2009.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-009-9076-x

  • Dung P, Thang P and Hung N. Argument-Based Decision Making and Negotiation in E-Business. Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems. (154-172).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02734-5_10

  • Gorogiannis N, Hunter A, Patkar V and Williams M. Argumentation about treatment efficacy. Proceedings of the 2009 AIME international conference on Knowledge Representation for Health-Care: data, Processes and Guidelines. (169-179).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11808-1_14

  • Modgil S. Labellings and games for extended argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (873-878).

    /doi/10.5555/1661445.1661584

  • Lucero M, Ches�evar C and Simari G. On the accrual of arguments in defeasible logic programming. Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (804-809).

    /doi/10.5555/1661445.1661573

  • Dung P and Thang P. A unified framework for representation and development of dialectical proof procedures in argumentation. Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (746-751).

    /doi/10.5555/1661445.1661564

  • Baroni P, Dunne P and Giacomin M. Computational properties of resolution-based grounded semantics. Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (683-689).

    /doi/10.5555/1661445.1661554

  • Amgoud L and Vesic S. Repairing preference-based argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (665-670).

    /doi/10.5555/1661445.1661551

  • Rahwan I, Larson K and Tohm� F. A characterisation of strategy-proofness for grounded argumentation semantics. Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (251-256).

    /doi/10.5555/1661445.1661486

  • Okuno K and Takahashi K. Argumentation system with changes of an agent's knowledge base. Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (226-232).

    /doi/10.5555/1661445.1661482

  • Altman A, Procaccia A and Tennenholtz M. Nonmanipulable selections from a tournament. Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (27-32).

    /doi/10.5555/1661445.1661451

  • Trojahn C, Quaresma P and Vieira R. Matching Law Ontologies using an Extended Argumentation Framework based on Confidence Degrees. Proceedings of the 2009 conference on Law, Ontologies and the Semantic Web: Channelling the Legal Information Flood. (133-144).

    /doi/10.5555/1563987.1563999

  • Broersen J. Issues in Designing Logical Models for Norm Change. Organized Adaption in Multi-Agent Systems. (1-17).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02377-4_1

  • Bistarelli S, Pirolandi D and Santini F. Solving weighted argumentation frameworks with soft constraints. Proceedings of the 14th Annual ERCIM international conference on Constraint solving and constraint logic programming. (1-18).

    /doi/10.5555/1987019.1987020

  • Gordon T and Walton D. Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. (137-146).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1568234.1568250

  • Dung P, Thang P and Hung N. Modular argumentation for modelling legal doctrines of performance relief. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. (128-136).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1568234.1568249

  • Bench-Capon T and Modgil S. Case law in extended argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. (118-127).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1568234.1568248

  • Sartor G, Rudnianski M, Rotolo A, Riveret R and Mayor E. Why lawyers are nice (or nasty). Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. (108-117).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1568234.1568247

  • Joseph S and Prakken H. Coherence-driven argumentation to norm consensus. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. (58-67).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1568234.1568242

  • Baroni P and Giacomin M. (2009). Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 50:6. (854-866). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2009.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2009.02.006

  • Karunatillake N, Jennings N, Rahwan I and McBurney P. (2009). Dialogue games that agents play within a society. Artificial Intelligence. 173:9-10. (935-981). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2009.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2009.02.002

  • Modgil S. (2009). Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks. Artificial Intelligence. 173:9-10. (901-934). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2009.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2009.02.001

  • Bex F, Bench-Capon T and Atkinson K. (2009). Did he jump or was he pushed?. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 17:2. (79-99). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2009.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-009-9074-z

  • Boella G, Kaci S and van der Torre L. Dynamics in argumentation with single extensions. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (150-159).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9_9

  • Morge M and Mancarella P. Assumption-based argumentation for the minimal concession strategy. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (114-133).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9_7

  • Devereux J and Reed C. Strategic argumentation in rigorous persuasion dialogue. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (94-113).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9_6

  • Matt P, Toni F and Vaccari J. Dominant decisions by argumentation agents. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (42-59).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9_3

  • Belesiotis A, Rovatsos M and Rahwan I. A generative dialogue system for arguing about plans in situation calculus. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (23-41).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9_2

  • Trojahn C, Quaresma P, Vieira R and Isaac A. Comparing argumentation frameworks for composite ontology matching. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (305-320).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9_18

  • Nawwab F, Bench-Capon T and Dunne P. Emotions in rational decision making. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (273-291).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9_16

  • Doran P, Tamma V, Payne T and Palmisano I. Using ontology modularization for efficient negotiation over ontology correspondences in MAS. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (236-255).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9_14

  • Wakaki T, Nitta K and Sawamura H. Computing abductive argumentation in answer set programming. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (195-215).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9_12

  • Thimm M. Realizing argumentation in multi-agent systems using defeasible logic programming. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (175-194).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9_11

  • Oren N and Norman T. Arguing using opponent models. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (160-174).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9_10

  • Barbini P, Wu Y and Caminada M. An implementation of argument based discussion. Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2. (1425-1426).

    /doi/10.5555/1558109.1558329

  • Boella G, Kaci S and van der Torre L. Dynamics in argumentation with single extensions. Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2. (1213-1214).

    /doi/10.5555/1558109.1558218

  • Bench-Capon T, Atkinson K and McBurney P. Altruism and agents. Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2. (1073-1080).

    /doi/10.5555/1558109.1558163

  • Black E and Atkinson K. Dialogues that account for different perspectives in collaborative argumentation. Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2. (867-874).

    /doi/10.5555/1558109.1558132

  • Dunne P, Hunter A, McBurney P, Parsons S and Wooldridge M. Inconsistency tolerance in weighted argument systems. Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2. (851-858).

    /doi/10.5555/1558109.1558130

  • Yearwood J and Stranieri A. (2009). Deliberative discourse and reasoning from generic argument structures. AI & Society. 23:3. (353-377). Online publication date: 1-May-2009.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-006-0069-y

  • Suzuki T and Sawamura H. Agent Dialogue as Partial Argumentation and Its Fixpoint Semantics. Agent Computing and Multi-Agent Systems. (434-439).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01639-4_43

  • Eriksson Lundstr�m J, Governatori G, Thakur S and Padmanabhan V. An Asymmetric Protocol for Argumentation Games in Defeasible Logic. Agent Computing and Multi-Agent Systems. (219-231).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01639-4_19

  • Wakaki T and Nitta K. Computing Argumentation Semantics in Answer Set Programming. New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. (254-269).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00609-8_22

  • Moubaiddin A and Obeid N. (2009). Partial information basis for agent-based collaborative dialogue. Applied Intelligence. 30:2. (142-167). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2009.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-007-0108-5

  • Amgoud L and Prade H. (2009). Using arguments for making and explaining decisions. Artificial Intelligence. 173:3-4. (413-436). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2009.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2008.11.006

  • Atkinson K and Bench-Capon T. Co-ordination and Co-operation in Agent Systems. Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (122-140).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00207-6_8

  • Oliva E, Viroli M, Omicini A and Mcburney P. Argumentation and Artifact for Dialogue Support. Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (107-121).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00207-6_7

  • Trojahn C, Quaresma P and Vieira R. An Argumentation Framework Based on Strength for Ontology Mapping. Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (57-71).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00207-6_4

  • Amgoud L, Devred C and Lagasquie-Schiex M. A Constrained Argumentation System for Practical Reasoning. Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (37-56).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00207-6_3

  • Modgil S and Luck M. Argumentation Based Resolution of Conflicts between Desires and Normative Goals. Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (19-36).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00207-6_2

  • Tang Y and Parsons S. A Dialogue Mechanism for Public Argumentation Using Conversation Policies. Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (217-235).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00207-6_13

  • Bulling N, Ches�evar C and Dix J. An Argumentative Approach for Modelling Coalitions Using ATL. Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (197-216).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00207-6_12

  • Dimopoulos Y, Moraitis P and Amgoud L. Characterizing the Outcomes of Argumentation-Based Integrative Negotiation. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 02. (456-460).

    https://doi.org/10.1109/WIIAT.2008.347

  • Toni F. Assumption-Based Argumentation for Selection and Composition of Services. Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems. (231-247).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88833-8_13

  • Hezart A, Nayak A and Orgun M. Towards Context Sensitive Defeasible Rules. Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems. (193-213).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88833-8_11

  • Prakken H. Combining Modes of Reasoning. Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence. (349-361).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87803-2_29

  • Matt P and Toni F. A Game-Theoretic Measure of Argument Strength for Abstract Argumentation. Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence. (285-297).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87803-2_24

  • Dunne P and Caminada M. Computational Complexity of Semi-stable Semantics in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence. (153-165).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87803-2_14

  • Binas A and McIlraith S. Peer-to-peer query answering with inconsistent knowledge. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (329-339).

    /doi/10.5555/3031661.3031701

  • Mart�nez D, Garc�a A and Simari G. An abstract argumentation framework with varied-strength attacks. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (135-143).

    /doi/10.5555/3031661.3031679

  • Cayrol C, de St-Cyr F and Lagasquie-Schiex M. Revision of an argumentation system. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (124-134).

    /doi/10.5555/3031661.3031678

  • Amgoud L, Dimopoulos Y and Moraitis P. Making decisions through preference-based argumentation. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (113-123).

    /doi/10.5555/3031661.3031677

  • Bryant D and Krause P. (2008). A review of current defeasible reasoning implementations. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 23:3. (227-260). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2008.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888908001318

  • Kaci S and van der Torre L. (2008). Preference-based argumentation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 48:3. (730-751). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2008.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2007.07.005

  • Alsinet T, Ches�evar C, Godo L, Sandri S and Simari G. (2008). Formalizing argumentative reasoning in a possibilistic logic programming setting with fuzzy unification. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 48:3. (711-729). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2008.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2007.07.004

  • Rahwan I and Larson K. Pareto optimality in abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the 23rd national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1. (150-155).

    /doi/10.5555/1619995.1620021

  • Hunter A. Reasoning about the appropriateness of proponents for arguments. Proceedings of the 23rd national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1. (89-94).

    /doi/10.5555/1619995.1620011

  • Brandt F, Fischer F, Harrenstein P and Mair M. A computational analysis of the tournament equilibrium set. Proceedings of the 23rd national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1. (38-43).

    /doi/10.5555/1619995.1620003

  • Bex F, Bench-Capon T and Atkinson K. Did He Jump or Was He Pushed? Abductive Practical Reasoning. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2008: The Twenty-First Annual Conference. (138-149).

    /doi/10.5555/1564008.1564024

  • Galitsky B and Kuznetsov S. Scenario Argument Structure vs Individual Claim Defeasibility. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Conceptual Structures: Knowledge Visualization and Reasoning. (282-296).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70596-3_20

  • Panayiotou C and Bennett B. Cognitive Context and Arguments from Ontologies for Learning. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference (FOIS 2008). (65-78).

    /doi/10.5555/1563953.1563962

  • Nieves J, Cort�s U and Osorio M. (2008). Preferred extensions as stable models*. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming. 8:4. (527-543). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2008.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068408003359

  • Dimopoulos Y, Moraitis P and Amgoud L. Theoretical and Computational Properties of Preference-based Argumentation. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on ECAI 2008: 18th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (463-467).

    /doi/10.5555/1567281.1567383

  • Wyner A and Bench-Capon T. Modelling Judicial Context in Argumentation Frameworks. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (417-428).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566172

  • Thimm M and Kern-Isberner G. On the Relationship of Defeasible Argumentation and Answer Set Programming. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (393-404).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566170

  • Thimm M and Kern-Isberner G. A Distributed Argumentation Framework using Defeasible Logic Programming. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (381-392).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566169

  • Suzuki T and Sawamura H. Agent Dialogue as Partial Uncertain Argumentation and its Fixpoint Semantics. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (369-380).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566168

  • South M, Vreeswijk G and Fox J. Dungine. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (360-368).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566167

  • Rotstein N, Moguillansky M, Falappa M, Garc�a A and Simari G. Argument Theory Change. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (336-347).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566165

  • Riveret R, Prakken H, Rotolo A and Sartor G. Heuristics in Argumentation. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (324-335).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566164

  • Reed C, Wells S, Devereux J and Rowe G. AIF+. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (311-323).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566163

  • Oren N and Norman T. Semantics for Evidence-Based Argumentation. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (276-284).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566160

  • Modgil S and Prakken H. Applying Preferences to Dialogue Graphs. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (252-263).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566158

  • Mogdil S and Bench-Capon T. Integrating Object and Meta-Level Value Based Argumentation. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (240-251).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566157

  • Matt P and Toni F. Basic influence diagrams and the liberal stable semantics. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (228-239).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566156

  • Mann N and Hunter A. Argumentation Using Temporal Knowledge. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (204-215).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566154

  • Gaertner D and Toni F. Hybrid argumentation and its properties. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (183-195).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566152

  • Dunne P. The Computational Complexity of Ideal Semantics I. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (147-158).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566149

  • Dung P, Thang P and Toni F. Towards argumentation-based contract negotiation. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (134-146).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566148

  • Dessalles J. A Computational Model of Argumentation in Everyday Conversation. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (128-133).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566147

  • Caminada M. On the Issue of Contraposition of Defeasible Rules. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (109-115).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566145

  • Budzyńska K, Kacprzak M and Rembelski P. Modeling Persuasiveness. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (85-96).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566143

  • Bex F and Prakken H. Investigating Stories in a Formal Dialogue Game. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (73-84).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566142

  • Bench-Capon T, Doutre S and Dunne P. Asking the Right Question. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (49-60).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566140

  • Baroni P and Giacomin M. A Systematic Classification of Argumentation Frameworks where Semantics Agree. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (37-48).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566139

  • Baroni P and Giacomin M. Resolution-Based Argumentation Semantics. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (25-36).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566138

  • Amgoud L and Dupin De Saint Cyr F. Measures for persuasion dialogs. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008. (13-24).

    /doi/10.5555/1566134.1566137

  • Pollock J. OSCAR. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Artificial General Intelligence 2008: Proceedings of the First AGI Conference. (275-286).

    /doi/10.5555/1566174.1566200

  • Andrews P, Manandhar S and De Boni M. Argumentative human computer dialogue for automated persuasion. Proceedings of the 9th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue. (138-147).

    /doi/10.5555/1622064.1622093

  • Tang Y and Parsons S. A dialogue mechanism for public argumentation using conversation policies. Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 1. (445-452).

    /doi/10.5555/1402383.1402448

  • Amgoud L, Devred C and Lagasquie-Schiex M. A constrained argumentation system for practical reasoning. Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 1. (429-436).

    /doi/10.5555/1402383.1402446

  • Rahwan I and Larson K. Mechanism design for abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 2. (1031-1038).

    /doi/10.5555/1402298.1402365

  • Trojahn C, Quaresma P and Vieira R. Conjunctive queries for ontology based agent communication in MAS. Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 2. (829-836).

    /doi/10.5555/1402298.1402339

  • Bulling N, Dix J and Ches�evar C. Modelling coalitions. Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 2. (681-688).

    /doi/10.5555/1402298.1402319

  • Alsinet T, Ches�evar C, Godo L and Simari G. (2008). A logic programming framework for possibilistic argumentation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 159:10. (1208-1228). Online publication date: 1-May-2008.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2007.12.013

  • Modgil S. An Argumentation Based Semantics for Agent Reasoning. Languages, Methodologies and Development Tools for Multi-Agent Systems. (37-53).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85058-8_3

  • Trojahn C, Quaresma P and Vieira R. (2008). An argumentation framework based on confidence degrees to combine ontology mapping approaches. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies. 3:2. (142-150). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2008.

    https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSO.2008.021892

  • Amgoud L and Serrurier M. (2008). Agents that argue and explain classifications. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 16:2. (187-209). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2008.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-007-9025-6

  • Riveret R and Rotolo A. Temporal Deontic Defeasible Logic. Computable Models of the Law. (239-253).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9_15

  • Rudnianski M and Bestougeff H. Deterrence and Defeasibility in Argumentation Process for ALIS Project. Computable Models of the Law. (219-238).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9_14

  • Morge M. Computing Argumentation for Decision Making in Legal Disputes. Computable Models of the Law. (203-218).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9_13

  • Toni F. Assumption-Based Argumentation for Epistemic and Practical Reasoning. Computable Models of the Law. (185-202).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9_12

  • Wyner A, Bench-Capon T and Atkinson K. Three Senses of "Argument". Computable Models of the Law. (146-161).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9_10

  • Viglizzo I, Tohm� F and Simari G. An alternative foundation for DeLP. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Foundations of information and knowledge systems. (42-57).

    /doi/10.5555/1786094.1786102

  • Tohm� F, Bodanza G and Simari G. Aggregation of attack relations. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Foundations of information and knowledge systems. (8-23).

    /doi/10.5555/1786094.1786100

  • Trojahn C, Moraes M, Quaresma P and Vieira R. A cooperative approach for composite ontology mapping. Journal on data semantics X. (237-263).

    /doi/10.5555/1793934.1793942

  • Thakur S, Governatori G, Padmanabhan V and Lundstr�m J. Dialogue games in defeasible logic. Proceedings of the 20th Australian joint conference on Advances in artificial intelligence. (497-506).

    /doi/10.5555/1781238.1781302

  • Amgoud L and Prade H. Formalizing Practical Reasoning Under Uncertainty. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology. (189-195).

    https://doi.org/10.1109/IAT.2007.55

  • Gaertner D and Toni F. (2007). Computing Arguments and Attacks in Assumption-Based Argumentation. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 22:6. (24-33). Online publication date: 1-Nov-2007.

    https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2007.105

  • Fox J, Glasspool D, Grecu D, Modgil S, South M and Patkar V. (2007). Argumentation-Based Inference and Decision Making--A Medical Perspective. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 22:6. (34-41). Online publication date: 1-Nov-2007.

    https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2007.102

  • Torroni P, Gavanelli M and Chesani F. (2007). Argumentation in the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 22:6. (66-74). Online publication date: 1-Nov-2007.

    https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2007.100

  • Modgil S. An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (648-659).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_57

  • Ouerdane W, Maudet N and Tsoukias A. Arguing over Actions That Involve Multiple Criteria. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (308-319).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_29

  • Wyner A and Bench-Capon T. Towards an Extensible Argumentation System. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (283-294).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_27

  • Kaci S, Torre L and Weydert E. On the Acceptability of Incompatible Arguments. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (247-258).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_24

  • Amgoud L, Bonnefon J and Prade H. The Logical Handling of Threats, Rewards, Tips, and Warnings. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (235-246).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_23

  • Caminada M. An Algorithm for Computing Semi-stable Semantics. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (222-234).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_22

  • Baroni P and Giacomin M. Comparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (210-221).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_21

  • Pereira L and Pinto A. Approved models for normal logic programs. Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Logic for programming, artificial intelligence and reasoning. (454-468).

    /doi/10.5555/1779419.1779452

  • Pereira L and Pinto A. Approved Models for Normal Logic Programs. Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning. (454-468).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75560-9_33

  • Huang S and Lin F. (2007). The design and evaluation of an intelligent sales agent for online persuasion and negotiation. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 6:3. (285-296). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2007.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2006.06.001

  • Morge M and Routier J. (2007). Debating over heterogeneous descriptions. Applied Ontology. 2:3-4. (333-349). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2007.

    /doi/10.5555/2351583.2351585

  • Morge M and Routier J. (2007). Debating over heterogeneous descriptions. Applied Ontology. 2:3-4. (333-349). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2007.

    /doi/10.5555/1412408.1412412

  • Dung P, Mancarella P and Toni F. (2007). Computing ideal sceptical argumentation. Artificial Intelligence. 171:10-15. (642-674). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2007.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.05.003

  • Bench-Capon T and Dunne P. (2007). Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence. 171:10-15. (619-641). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2007.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.05.001

  • Rahwan I, Zablith F and Reed C. (2007). Laying the foundations for a World Wide Argument Web. Artificial Intelligence. 171:10-15. (897-921). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2007.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.015

  • Coste-Marquis S, Devred C, Konieczny S, Lagasquie-Schiex M and Marquis P. (2007). On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems. Artificial Intelligence. 171:10-15. (730-753). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2007.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.012

  • Gordon T, Prakken H and Walton D. (2007). The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artificial Intelligence. 171:10-15. (875-896). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2007.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.010

  • Atkinson K and Bench-Capon T. (2007). Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems. Artificial Intelligence. 171:10-15. (855-874). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2007.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.009

  • Artikis A, Sergot M and Pitt J. (2007). An executable specification of a formal argumentation protocol. Artificial Intelligence. 171:10-15. (776-804). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2007.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.008

  • Oren N, Norman T and Preece A. (2007). Subjective logic and arguing with evidence. Artificial Intelligence. 171:10-15. (838-854). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2007.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.006

  • Nielsen S and Parsons S. (2007). An application of formal argumentation. Artificial Intelligence. 171:10-15. (754-775). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2007.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.005

  • Baroni P and Giacomin M. (2007). On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics. Artificial Intelligence. 171:10-15. (675-700). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2007.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.004

  • Dunne P. (2007). Computational properties of argument systems satisfying graph-theoretic constraints. Artificial Intelligence. 171:10-15. (701-729). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2007.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.03.006

  • Tolchinsky P, Cort�s U, Modgil S, Caballero F and L�pez-Navidad A. Using CARREL+ to increase availability of human organs for transplantation. Proceedings of the 9th international work conference on Artificial neural networks. (1082-1089).

    /doi/10.5555/1768409.1768559

  • Toni F. Assumption-based argumentation for closed and consistent defeasible reasoning. Proceedings of the 2007 conference on New frontiers in artificial intelligence. (390-402).

    /doi/10.5555/1788314.1788355

  • Wyner A, Bench-Capon T and Atkinson K. Arguments, Values and Baseballs. Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2007: The Twentieth Annual Conference. (151-160).

    /doi/10.5555/1565610.1565630

  • Riveret R, Rotolo A, Sartor G, Prakken H and Roth B. Success chances in argument games. Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2007: The Twentieth Annual Conference. (99-108).

    /doi/10.5555/1565610.1565625

  • Aulinas M, Tolchinsky P, Turon C, Poch M and Cort�s U. An Argument-Based Approach to Deal with Wastewater Discharges. Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Artificial Intelligence Research and Development. (400-407).

    /doi/10.5555/1566803.1566859

  • Dijkstra P, Prakken H and de Vey Mestdagh K. An implementation of norm-based agent negotiation. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law. (167-175).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1276318.1276350

  • Atkinson K and Bench-Capon T. Argumentation and standards of proof. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law. (107-116).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1276318.1276339

  • Prakken H and Sartor G. Formalising arguments about the burden of persuasion. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law. (97-106).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1276318.1276338

  • Bex F, Prakken H and Verheij B. Formalising argumentative story-based analysis of evidence. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law. (1-10).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1276318.1276320

  • Cabanac G, Chevalier M, Chrisment C and Julien C. Collective annotation. Large Scale Semantic Access to Content (Text, Image, Video, and Sound). (529-548).

    /doi/10.5555/1931390.1931440

  • Makiguchi W and Sawamura H. A hybrid argumentation of symbolic and neural net argumentation (Part II). Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems. (216-233).

    /doi/10.5555/1802494.1802511

  • Makiguchi W and Sawamura H. A hybrid argumentation of symbolic and neural net argumentation (Part I). Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems. (197-215).

    /doi/10.5555/1802494.1802510

  • Amgoud L and Serrurier M. Arguing and explaining classifications. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems. (164-177).

    /doi/10.5555/1802494.1802508

  • Trojahn C, Quaresma P and Vieira R. An extended value-based argumentation framework for ontology mapping with confidence degrees. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems. (132-144).

    /doi/10.5555/1802494.1802505

  • Morge M. The hedgehog and the fox. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems. (114-131).

    /doi/10.5555/1802494.1802504

  • Modgil S and McGinnis J. Towards characterising argumentation based dialogue in the argument interchange format. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems. (80-93).

    /doi/10.5555/1802494.1802501

  • Perrussel L, Doutre S, Th�venin J and McBurney P. A persuasion dialog for gaining access to information. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems. (63-79).

    /doi/10.5555/1802494.1802500

  • Parsons S, McBurney P, Sklar E and Wooldridge M. On the relevance of utterances in formal inter-agent dialogues. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems. (47-62).

    /doi/10.5555/1802494.1802499

  • Oliva E, McBurney P and Omicini A. Co-argumentation artifact for agent societies. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems. (31-46).

    /doi/10.5555/1802494.1802498

  • Amgoud L, Dimopoulos Y and Moraitis P. A general framework for argumentation-based negotiation. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems. (1-17).

    /doi/10.5555/1802494.1802496

  • Parsons S, McBurney P, Sklar E and Wooldridge M. On the relevance of utterances in formal inter-agent dialogues. Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. (1-8).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1329125.1329416

  • Laera L, Blacoe I, Tamma V, Payne T, Euzenat J and Bench-Capon T. Argumentation over ontology correspondences in MAS. Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. (1-8).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1329125.1329400

  • Amgoud L and Serrurier M. Arguing and explaining classifications. Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. (1-7).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1329125.1329319

  • Amgoud L, Dimopoulos Y and Moraitis P. A unified and general framework for argumentation-based negotiation. Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. (1-8).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1329125.1329317

  • Doutre S, McBurney P, Perrussel L and Thevenin J. Arguing for gaining access to information. Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. (1-3).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1329125.1329150

  • Caminada M and Amgoud L. (2007). On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms. Artificial Intelligence. 171:5-6. (286-310). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2007.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.02.003

  • REED C, WALTON D and MACAGNO F. (2007). Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 22:1. (87-109). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2007.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888907001051

  • Oren N, Norman T and Preece A. Argumentation based contract monitoring in uncertain domains. Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence. (1434-1439).

    /doi/10.5555/1625275.1625507

  • Verheij B. A labeling approach to the computation of credulous acceptance in argumentation. Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence. (623-628).

    /doi/10.5555/1625275.1625375

  • Subrahmanian V and Amgoud L. A general framework for reasoning about inconsistency. Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence. (599-604).

    /doi/10.5555/1625275.1625371

  • Ches�evar C and Simari G. A lattice-based approach to computing warranted beliefs in skeptical argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence. (280-285).

    /doi/10.5555/1625275.1625319

  • Billington D. Entailment semantics for rules with priorities. Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence. (256-261).

    /doi/10.5555/1625275.1625315

  • Bench-Capon T, Doutre S and Dunne P. (2007). Audiences in argumentation frameworks. Artificial Intelligence. 171:1. (42-71). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2007.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2006.10.013

  • Ches�evar C, McGinnis J, Modgil S, Rahwan I, Reed C, Simari G, South M, Vreeswijk G and Willmott S. (2006). Towards an argument interchange format. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 21:4. (293-316). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2006.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888906001044

  • Delgrande J. (2006). On a rule-based interpretation of default conditionals. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 48:3-4. (135-167). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2006.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-007-9044-7

  • Laera L, Tamma V, Euzenat J, Bench-Capon T and Payne T. Reaching agreement over ontology alignments. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on The Semantic Web. (371-384).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11926078_27

  • Ches�evar C, Maguitman A and Simari G. (2006). Argument-based critics and recommenders. Data & Knowledge Engineering. 59:2. (293-319). Online publication date: 1-Nov-2006.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2005.09.005

  • Bandara A, Kakas A, Lupu E and Russo A. Using argumentation logic for firewall policy specification and analysis. Proceedings of the 17th IFIP/IEEE international conference on Distributed Systems: operations and management. (185-196).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11907466_16

  • Modgil S. Hierarchical argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence. (319-332).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11853886_27

  • Caminada M. On the issue of reinstatement in argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence. (111-123).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11853886_11

  • Amgoud L, Belabb�s S and Prade H. A formal general setting for dialogue protocols. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Artificial Intelligence: methodology, Systems, and Applications. (13-23).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11861461_4

  • Oren N, Preece A and Norman T. A simple argumentation based contract enforcement mechanism. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Cooperative Information Agents. (347-359).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11839354_25

  • Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T and Modgil S. Argumentation for decision support. Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications. (822-831).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11827405_80

  • Wooldridge M, Dunne P and Parsons S. On the complexity of linking deductive and abstract argument systems. Proceedings of the 21st national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1. (299-304).

    /doi/10.5555/1597538.1597587

  • Atkinson K and Bench-Capon T. Addressing moral problems through practical reasoning. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Deontic Logic and Artificial Normative Systems. (8-23).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11786849_4

  • Lindgren H and Eklund P. (2006). Differential diagnosis of dementia in an argumentation framework. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology. 17:4. (387-394). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2006.

    /doi/10.5555/2656137.2656143

  • Atkinson K and Bench-Capon T. Zeno Revisited. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference. (1-10).

    /doi/10.5555/1563577.1563579

  • Prakken H. (2006). Formal systems for persuasion dialogue. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 21:2. (163-188). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2006.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888906000865

  • Torroni P. Multi-agent agreements about actions through argumentation. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006. (323-328).

    /doi/10.5555/1565233.1565270

  • Prakken H. Combining sceptical epistemic reasoning with credulous practical reasoning. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006. (311-322).

    /doi/10.5555/1565233.1565269

  • Modgil S. Value Based Argumentation in Hierarchical Argumentation Frameworks. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006. (297-308).

    /doi/10.5555/1565233.1565267

  • Cayrol C, Devred C and Lagasquie-Schiex M. Handling controversial arguments in bipolar argumentation systems. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006. (261-272).

    /doi/10.5555/1565233.1565263

  • Bench-Capon T and Prakken H. Justifying Actions by Accruing Arguments. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006. (247-258).

    /doi/10.5555/1565233.1565261

  • Pasquier P, Rahwan I, Dignum F and Sonenberg L. Argumentation and Persuasion in the Cognitive Coherence Theory. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006. (223-234).

    /doi/10.5555/1565233.1565259

  • Gordon T and Walton D. The Carneades Argumentation FrameworkUsing Presumptions and Exceptions to Model Critical Questions. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006. (195-207).

    /doi/10.5555/1565233.1565256

  • Baroni P and Giacomin M. Evaluation and comparison criteria for extension-based argumentation semantics. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006. (157-168).

    /doi/10.5555/1565233.1565252

  • Dung P, Mancarella P and Toni F. A dialectic procedure for sceptical, assumption-based argumentation. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006. (145-156).

    /doi/10.5555/1565233.1565251

  • Egly U and Woltran S. Reasoning in Argumentation Frameworks Using Quantified Boolean Formulas. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006. (133-144).

    /doi/10.5555/1565233.1565250

  • Caminada M. Semi-Stable Semantics. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006. (121-130).

    /doi/10.5555/1565233.1565248

  • Vreeswijk G. An algorithm to compute minimally grounded and admissible defence sets in argument systems. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006. (109-120).

    /doi/10.5555/1565233.1565247

  • Nielsen S and Parsons S. Computing Preferred Extensions for Argumentation Systems with Sets of Attacking Arguments. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006. (97-108).

    /doi/10.5555/1565233.1565246

  • Dunne P. Complexity Properties of Restricted Abstract Argument Systems. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006. (85-96).

    /doi/10.5555/1565233.1565245

  • Tolchinsky P, Modgil S, Cort�s U and S�nchez-Marr� M. CBR and Argument Schemes for Collaborative Decision Making. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006. (71-82).

    /doi/10.5555/1565233.1565243

  • Atkinson K. Value-Based Argumentation for Democratic Decision Support. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006. (47-58).

    /doi/10.5555/1565233.1565241

  • Nielsen S and Parsons S. An Application of Formal Argumentation. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006. (33-44).

    /doi/10.5555/1565233.1565239

  • Song I and Governatori G. A Compact Argumentation System for Agent System Specification. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on STAIRS 2006: Proceedings of the Third Starting AI Researchers' Symposium. (26-37).

    /doi/10.5555/1565192.1565197

  • Kaci S, van der Torre L and Weydert E. Acyclic Argumentation. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on ECAI 2006: 17th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence August 29 -- September 1, 2006, Riva del Garda, Italy. (725-726).

    /doi/10.5555/1567016.1567183

  • Oren N, Norman T and Preece A. Arguing with Confidential Information. Proceedings of the 2006 conference on ECAI 2006: 17th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence August 29 -- September 1, 2006, Riva del Garda, Italy. (280-284).

    /doi/10.5555/1567016.1567080

  • De Almeida I and Alferes J. An argumentation-based negotiation for distributed extended logic programs. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Computational logic in multi-agent systems. (191-210).

    /doi/10.5555/1758663.1758675

  • Bentahar J, Moulin B, Meyer J and Lesp�rance Y. A new logical semantics for agent communication. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Computational logic in multi-agent systems. (151-170).

    /doi/10.5555/1758663.1758673

  • Suzuki Y. Dialogue game tree with nondeterministic additive consolidation. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Computational logic in multi-agent systems. (115-133).

    /doi/10.5555/1758663.1758671

  • Rahwan I and Amgoud L. An argumentation based approach for practical reasoning. Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. (347-354).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1160633.1160696

  • Yearwood J and Stranieri A. (2006). The generic/actual argument model of practical reasoning. Decision Support Systems. 41:2. (358-379). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2006.

    /doi/10.5555/1138885.1700932

  • Alonso-Jimenez J, Borrego-Diaz J, Chavez-Gonzalez A and Martin-Mateos F. (2006). Foundational Challenges in Automated Semantic Web Data and Ontology Cleaning. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 21:1. (42-52). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2006.

    https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2006.7

  • Coste-Marquis S, Devred C and Marquis P. Inference from controversial arguments. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning. (606-620).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11591191_42

  • Modgil S, Tolchinsky P and Cort�s U. Towards formalising agent argumentation over the viability of human organs for transplantation. Proceedings of the 4th Mexican international conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (928-938).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11579427_95

  • Osorio M, Zepeda C, Nieves J and Cortes U. Inferring acceptable arguments with Answer Set Programming. Proceedings of the Sixth Mexican International Conference on Computer Science. (198-205).

    https://doi.org/10.1109/ENC.2005.26

  • Doutre S, Bench-Capon T and Dunne P. Determining preferences through argumentation. Proceedings of the 9th conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (98-109).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11558590_11

  • Boella G, Hulstijn J and van der Torre L. Argumentation for access control. Proceedings of the 9th conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (86-97).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11558590_10

  • Boella G, Hulstijn J and van der Torre L. Argument Games for Interactive Access Control. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence. (751-754).

    https://doi.org/10.1109/WI.2005.35

  • Rahwan I. (2005). Guest Editorial. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 11:2. (115-125). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2005.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-005-3079-0

  • Reed C and Walton D. (2005). Towards a Formal and Implemented Model of Argumentation Schemes in Agent Communication. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 11:2. (173-188). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2005.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-005-1729-x

  • Capobianco M, Ches�evar C and Simari G. (2005). Argumentation and the Dynamics of Warranted Beliefs in Changing Environments. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 11:2. (127-151). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2005.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-005-1354-8

  • Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T and Mcburney P. (2005). A Dialogue Game Protocol for Multi-Agent Argument over Proposals for Action. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 11:2. (153-171). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2005.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-005-1166-x

  • Huang S and Lin F. Designing intelligent sales-agent for online selling. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Electronic commerce. (279-286).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1089551.1089605

  • Dunne P, Doutre S and Bench-Capon T. Discovering inconsistency through examination dialogues. Proceedings of the 19th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence. (1680-1681).

    /doi/10.5555/1642293.1642607

  • Doutre S, Bench-Capon T and Dunne P. Explaining preferences with argument positions. Proceedings of the 19th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence. (1560-1561).

    /doi/10.5555/1642293.1642555

  • Bochman A. Propositional argumentation and causal reasoning. Proceedings of the 19th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence. (388-393).

    /doi/10.5555/1642293.1642355

  • Amgoud L. A unified setting for inference and decision. Proceedings of the Twenty-First Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. (26-33).

    /doi/10.5555/3020336.3020340

  • van Veenen J and Prakken H. A protocol for arguing about rejections in negotiation. Proceedings of the Second international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (138-153).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11794578_9

  • Amgoud L and Prade H. Formal handling of threats and rewards in a negotiation dialogue. Proceedings of the Second international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (88-103).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11794578_6

  • Modgil S. Nested argumentation and its application to decision making over actions. Proceedings of the Second international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (57-73).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11794578_4

  • Wooldridge M, McBurney P and Parsons S. On the meta-logic of arguments. Proceedings of the Second international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (42-56).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11794578_3

  • Boella G, Hulstijn J and van der Torre L. A logic of abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the Second international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (29-41).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11794578_2

  • Parsons S and Sklar E. How agents alter their beliefs after an argumentation-based dialogue. Proceedings of the Second international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (297-312).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11794578_19

  • Amgoud L. An argumentation-based model for reasoning about coalition structures. Proceedings of the Second international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (217-228).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11794578_14

  • Cogan E, Parsons S and McBurney P. New types of inter-agent dialogues. Proceedings of the Second international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (154-168).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11794578_10

  • Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T and McBurney P. Generating intentions through argumentation. Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. (1261-1262).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1082473.1082723

  • Amgoud L. Towards a formal model for task allocation via coalition formation. Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. (1185-1186).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1082473.1082685

  • Wooldridge M, McBurney P and Parsons S. On the meta-logic of arguments. Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. (560-567).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1082473.1082558

  • Cogan E, Parsons S and McBurney P. What kind of argument are we going to have today?. Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. (544-551).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1082473.1082556

  • Amgoud L and Prade H. Formal handling of threats and rewards in a negotiation dialogue. Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. (529-536).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1082473.1082554

  • Coste-Marquis S, Devred C, Konieczny S, Lagasquie-Schiex M and Marquis P. Merging argumentation systems. Proceedings of the 20th national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2. (614-619).

    /doi/10.5555/1619410.1619431

  • Caminada M and Amgoud L. An axiomatic account of formal argumentation. Proceedings of the 20th national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2. (608-613).

    /doi/10.5555/1619410.1619430

  • Amgoud L and Kaci S. An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases. Proceedings of the 8th European conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (527-538).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11518655_45

  • Cayrol C and Lagasquie-Schiex M. Gradual valuation for bipolar argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 8th European conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (366-377).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11518655_32

  • Baroni P and Giacomin M. Evaluating argumentation semantics with respect to skepticism adequacy. Proceedings of the 8th European conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (329-340).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11518655_29

  • Coste-Marquis S, Devred C and Marquis P. Symmetric argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 8th European conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. (317-328).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11518655_28

  • Suzuki Y and Tojo S. Additive consolidation for dialogue game. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law. (105-114).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1165485.1165502

  • Prakken H. A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law. (85-94).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1165485.1165500

  • Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T and McBurney P. Arguing about cases as practical reasoning. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law. (35-44).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1165485.1165492

  • Vo Q, Foo N and Thurbon J. (2005). Semantics for a theory of defeasible reasoning. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 44:1-2. (87-119). Online publication date: 1-May-2005.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-005-1807-4

  • Morge M. (2005). Collective decision-making process to compose divergent interests and perspectives. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 13:1. (75-92). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2005.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-006-9008-y

  • Bench-Capon T and Dunne P. (2005). Argumentation in AI and law. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 13:1. (1-8). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2005.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-006-9007-z

  • Dunne P. (2005). A value-based argument model of convention degradation. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 13:1. (153-188). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2005.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-006-9006-0

  • Atkinson K and Bench-Capon T. (2005). Legal case-based reasoning as practical reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 13:1. (93-131). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2005.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-006-9003-3

  • Cayrol C and Lagasquie-Schiex M. (2005). Graduality in argumentation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 23:1. (245-297). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2005.

    /doi/10.5555/1622503.1622509

  • Schweimeier R and Schroeder M. (2005). A parameterised hierarchy of argumentation semantics for extended logic programming and its application to the well-founded semantics. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming. 5:1-2. (207-242). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2005.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S147106840400225X

  • Bodanza G and Tohm� F. (2004). Local logics, non-monotonicity and defeasible argumentation. Journal of Logic, Language and Information. 14:1. (1-12). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2004.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-004-4510-7

  • Dunne P. Context Dependence in multiagent resource allocation. Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1001-1002).

    /doi/10.5555/3000001.3000228

  • Baroni P and Giacomin M. A general recursive schema for argumentation semantics. Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (783-787).

    /doi/10.5555/3000001.3000166

  • Sawamura H and Mares E. How agents should exploit tetralemma with an eastern mind in argumentation. Proceedings of the 7th Pacific Rim international conference on Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. (259-278).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32128-6_20

  • Vreeswijk G. Argumentation in bayesian belief networks. Proceedings of the First international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (111-129).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32261-0_8

  • Reed C and Walton D. Towards a formal and implemented model of argumentation schemes in agent communication. Proceedings of the First international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (19-30).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32261-0_2

  • Tohm� F and Simari G. Negotiation among DDeLP agents. Proceedings of the First international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (223-233).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32261-0_15

  • Amgoud L and Kaci S. On the generation of bipolar goals in argumentation-based negotiation. Proceedings of the First international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (192-207).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32261-0_13

  • Parsons S, McBurney P and Wooldridge M. Some preliminary steps towards a meta-theory for formal inter-agent dialogues. Proceedings of the First international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. (1-18).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32261-0_1

  • Hulstijn J, Dignum F and Dastani M. Coherence constraints for agent interaction. Proceedings of the 2004 international conference on Agent Communication. (134-152).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32258-0_10

  • Willmott S, Pujol J and Cort�s U. On exploiting agent technology in the design of peer-to-peer applications. Proceedings of the Third international conference on Agents and Peer-to-Peer Computing. (98-107).

    https://doi.org/10.1007/11574781_9

  • Amgoud L and Prade H. Using arguments for making decisions. Proceedings of the 20th conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence. (10-17).

    /doi/10.5555/1036843.1036845

  • Bracciali A, Demetriou N, Endriss U, Kakas A, Lu W, Mancarella P, Sadri F, Stathis K, Terreni G and Toni F. The KGP Model of Agency for Global Computing. IST/FET International Workshop on Global Computing - Volume 3267. (340-367).

    /doi/10.5555/3127123.3127141

  • Coste-Marquis S and Marquis P. On the complexity of paraconsistent inference relations. Inconsistency Tolerance. (151-190).

    /doi/10.5555/2137582.2137588

  • Bertossi L, Hunter A and Schaub T. Introduction to inconsistency tolerance. Inconsistency Tolerance. (1-14).

    /doi/10.5555/2137582.2137583

  • Garc�a A and Simari G. (2004). Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming. 4:2. (95-138). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2004.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068403001674

  • Marquis P and Porquet N. (2003). Resource-Bounded Paraconsistent Inference. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 39:4. (349-384). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2003.

    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026088710874

  • Rahwan I, Ramchurn S, Jennings N, Mcburney P, Parsons S and Sonenberg L. (2003). Argumentation-based negotiation. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 18:4. (343-375). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2003.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888904000098

  • Gupta A, Lud�scher B, Grethe J and Martone M. (2003). Towards a formalization of disease-specific ontologies for neuroinformatics. Neural Networks. 16:9. (1277-1292). Online publication date: 1-Nov-2003.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2003.07.008

  • Bench-Capon T and Sartor G. (2003). A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values. Artificial Intelligence. 150:1-2. (97-143). Online publication date: 1-Nov-2003.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00108-5

  • Verheij B. (2003). Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation. Artificial Intelligence. 150:1-2. (291-324). Online publication date: 1-Nov-2003.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00107-3

  • Kakas A and Moraitis P. Argumentation based decision making for autonomous agents. Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. (883-890).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/860575.860717

  • Rahwan I, Sonenberg L and Dignum F. Towards interest-based negotiation. Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. (773-780).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/860575.860699

  • Parsons S, Wooldridge M and Amgoud L. On the outcomes of formal inter-agent dialogues. Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. (616-623).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/860575.860674

  • Dunne P. Prevarication in dispute protocols. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law. (12-21).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1047788.1047791

  • Raghu T, Ramesh R and Whinston A. Addressing the homeland security problem. Proceedings of the 1st NSF/NIJ conference on Intelligence and security informatics. (249-265).

    /doi/10.5555/1792094.1792119

  • Kohlas J. (2003). Probabilistic argumentation systems a new way to combine logic with probability. Journal of Applied Logic. 1:3-4. (225-253). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2003.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-8683(03)00014-4

  • Bench-Capon T. (2003). Try to see it my way. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 11:4. (271-287). Online publication date: 30-Jan-2003.

    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ARTI.0000045997.45038.8f

  • Bex F, Prakken H, Reed C and Walton D. (2003). Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 11:2-3. (125-165). Online publication date: 10-Jan-2003.

    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ARTI.0000046007.11806.9a

  • Amgoud L and Cayrol C. (2002). Inferring from Inconsistency in Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks. Journal of Automated Reasoning. 29:2. (125-169). Online publication date: 23-Oct-2002.

    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021603608656

  • Dunne P and Bench-Capon T. (2002). Coherence in finite argument systems. Artificial Intelligence. 141:1-2. (187-203). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2002.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(02)00261-8

  • Schweimeier R and Schroeder M. Notions of attack and justified arguments for extended logic programs. Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (536-540).

    /doi/10.5555/3000905.3001019

  • Parsons S, Wooldridge M and Amgoud L. An analysis of formal inter-agent dialogues. Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems: part 1. (394-401).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/544741.544835

  • Moulin B, Irandoust H, B�langer M and Desbordes G. (2002). Explanation and Argumentation Capabilities. Artificial Intelligence Review. 17:3. (169-222). Online publication date: 1-May-2002.

    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015023512975

  • Amgoud L and Cayrol C. (2002). A Reasoning Model Based on the Production of Acceptable Arguments. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 34:1-3. (197-215). Online publication date: 21-Mar-2002.

    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014490210693

  • Dung P and Mancarella P. (2002). Production Systems with Negation as Failure. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 14:2. (336-352). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2002.

    https://doi.org/10.1109/69.991720

  • Prakken H and Sartor G. The Role of Logic in Computational Models of Legal Argument. Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond, Essays in Honour of Robert A. Kowalski, Part II. (342-381).

    /doi/10.5555/646002.675924

  • Giacomin M. Self-Stabilizing Distributed Algorithms for Defeat Status Computation in Argumentation. Proceedings of the 9th ECCAI-ACAI/EASSS 2001, AEMAS 2001, HoloMAS 2001 on Multi-Agent-Systems and Applications II-Selected Revised Papers. (137-147).

    /doi/10.5555/645699.665743

  • Stranieri A, Zeleznikow J and Yearwood J. (2001). Argumentation structures that integrate dialectical and non-dialectical reasoning. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 16:4. (331-348). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2001.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888901000248

  • Pollock J. (2001). Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification. Artificial Intelligence. 133:1-2. (233-282). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2001.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(01)00145-X

  • Dung P and Son T. (2001). An argument-based approach to reasoning with specificity. Artificial Intelligence. 133:1-2. (35-85). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2001.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(01)00134-5

  • Prakken H. (2001). Modelling Defeasibility in Law: Logic or Procedure?. Fundamenta Informaticae. 48:2-3. (253-271). Online publication date: 1-Nov-2001.

    /doi/10.5555/1220075.1220084

  • You J, Wang X and Yuan L. (2001). Nonmonotonic Reasoning as Prioritized Argumentation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 13:6. (968-979). Online publication date: 1-Nov-2001.

    https://doi.org/10.1109/69.971190

  • Lowrance J, Harrison I and Rodriguez A. Capturing analytic thought. Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Knowledge capture. (84-91).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/500737.500753

  • Pradhan S. Connecting databases with argumentation. Proceedings of the Applications of prolog 14th international conference on Web knowledge management and decision support. (170-185).

    /doi/10.5555/1767370.1767387

  • Doutre S and Mengin J. Preferred Extensions of Argumentation Frameworks. Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning. (272-288).

    /doi/10.5555/648237.753950

  • Prakken H. (2001). Modelling Defeasibility in Law: Logic or Procedure?. Fundamenta Informaticae. 48:2-3. (253-271). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2001.

    /doi/10.5555/2372214.2372222

  • Horty J. (2001). Argument construction and reinstatement in logics for defeasible reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 9:1. (1-28). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2001.

    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011288805074

  • Ches�evar C, Maguitman A and Loui R. (2000). Logical models of argument. ACM Computing Surveys. 32:4. (337-383). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2000.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/371578.371581

  • Verheij B. (2000). Henry Prakken (1997). Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument. A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 8:1. (35-65). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2000.

    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008318016098

  • Hunter A. (2000). Reasoning with inconsistency in structured text. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 15:4. (317-337). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2000.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888900002046

  • Hage J. (2000). Dialectical models in artificial intelligence and law. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 8:2-3. (137-172). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2000.

    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008348321016

  • Vreeswijk G. (2000). Representation of formal dispute with astanding order. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 8:2-3. (205-231). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2000.

    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008304521924

  • Governatori G, Maher M, Antoniou G and Billington D. Argumentation semantics for defeasible logics. Proceedings of the 6th Pacific Rim international conference on Artificial intelligence. (27-37).

    /doi/10.5555/1764967.1764976

  • Governatori G and Maher M. An argumentation-theoretic characterization of defeasible logic. Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (469-473).

    /doi/10.5555/3006433.3006532

  • Amgoud L, Parsons S and Maudet N. Arguments, dialogue, and negotiation. Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (338-342).

    /doi/10.5555/3006433.3006505

  • Carbogim D, Robertson D and Lee J. (2000). Argument-based applications to knowledge engineering. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 15:2. (119-149). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2000.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888900002058

  • Stranieri A, Zeleznikow J, Gawler M and Lewis B. (1999). A hybrid rule --- neural approach for the automation of legal reasoning in the discretionary domain of family law in Australia. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 7:2-3. (153-183). Online publication date: 1-Sep-1999.

    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008325826599

  • Jakobovits H and Vermeir D. Dialectic semantics for argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law. (53-62).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/323706.323715

  • Prakken H and Sartor G. A system for defeasible argumentation, with defeasible priorities. Artificial intelligence today. (365-379).

    /doi/10.5555/1805750.1805765

  • Ng B, Wong K and Low B. Resolving conflicting arguments under uncertainties. Proceedings of the Fourteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence. (414-421).

    /doi/10.5555/2074094.2074143

  • Amgoud L and Cayrol C. On the acceptability of arguments in preference-based argumentation. Proceedings of the Fourteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence. (1-7).

    /doi/10.5555/2074094.2074095

  • (1998). Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue Game. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 6:2-4. (231-287). Online publication date: 1-Jun-1998.

    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008278309945

  • Schroeder M, Plewe D and Raab A. Ultima ratio (poster). Proceedings of the second international conference on Autonomous agents. (467-468).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/280765.280906

  • McCarty L. Some arguments about legal arguments. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law. (215-224).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/261618.261656

  • Prakken H and Sartor G. Reasoning with precedents in a dialogue game. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law. (1-9).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/261618.261621

  • Vianu V. (1997). Rule-based languages. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 19:1-2. (215-259). Online publication date: 1-Jan-1997.

    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018907806177

  • Prakken H and Sartor G. (1996). A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 4:3-4. (331-368). Online publication date: 1-Sep-1996.

    /doi/10.5555/2698621.2698942

  • Dung P and Mancarella P. Production systems need negation as failure. Proceedings of the thirteenth national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2. (1242-1247).

    /doi/10.5555/1864519.1864571