skip to main content
research-article
Open access

Transportation Mode Detection Technology to Predict Wheelchair Users' Life Satisfaction in Seoul, South Korea

Published: 06 March 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Transportation mode detection (TMD) has been proposed as a computational technology to obtain mobility information. However, previous TMD studies mainly focused on improving detection performance and have not investigated the social implications of mobility information. This is the first study to use TMD to predict the life satisfaction of wheelchair users. Our goal is to develop TMD for wheelchair users (wTMD) utilizing smartphone location data and apply it to determine how transportation behaviors affect the life satisfaction of wheelchair users. First, we propose a wTMD technology by collecting a new dataset from wheelchair and non-wheelchair users. Second, we conduct regression analyses on existing in-the-wild dataset of wheelchair users. The result shows that the portion of subways in an individual's travel time is directly connected to wheelchair users' life satisfaction in Seoul, South Korea. We hope our findings are a good example for future social science studies and ultimately help to design wheelchair-friendly urban planning and accessibility.

References

[1]
J�rn Hetland Anne G. Danielsen, Oddrun Samdal and Bente Wold. 2009. School-Related Social Support and Students' Perceived Life Satisfaction. The Journal of Educational Research 102, 4 (2009), 303--320. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.102.4.303-320 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.102.4.303-320
[2]
David Banister and Ann Bowling. 2004. Quality of life for the elderly: the transport dimension. Transport Policy 11, 2 (2004), 105--115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(03)00052-0
[3]
Thanos Bantis and James Haworth. 2017. Who you are is how you travel: A framework for transportation mode detection using individual and environmental characteristics. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 80 (2017), 286--309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.05.003
[4]
Lisanne Bergefurt, Astrid Kemperman, Pauline van den Berg, Aloys Borgers, Peter van der Waerden, Gert Oosterhuis, and Marco Hommel. 2019. Loneliness and Life Satisfaction Explained by Public-Space Use and Mobility Patterns. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, 21 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214282
[5]
Claudia Carpineti, Vincenzo Lomonaco, Luca Bedogni, Marco Di Felice, and Luciano Bononi. 2018. Custom Dual Transportation Mode Detection By Smartphone Devices Exploiting Sensor Diversity. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops). 367--372. https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMW.2018.8480119
[6]
Ke-Yu Chen, Rahul C. Shah, Jonathan Huang, and Lama Nachman. 2017. Mago: Mode of Transport Inference Using the Hall-Effect Magnetic Sensor and Accelerometer. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 2, Article 8 (jun 2017), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3090054
[7]
Sangeun Cho. 2015. The effects of physical and psychological health on life satisfaction among older adults with a physical disability in South Korea: focus on gender differences. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development 25, 3 (2015), 133--144. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2015.1027951 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2015.1027951
[8]
Sina Dabiri and Kevin Heaslip. 2018. Inferring transportation modes from GPS trajectories using a convolutional neural network. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 86 (2018), 360--371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.11.021
[9]
Margareta Friman, Tommy G�rling, Dick Ettema, and Lars E. Olsson. 2017. How does travel affect emotional well-being and life satisfaction? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 106 (2017), 170--180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.09.024
[10]
Robin Goodwin, Olivia Cook, and Yvonne Yung. 2001. Loneliness and life satisfaction among three cultural groups. Personal Relationships 8, 2 (2001), 225--230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00037.x arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00037.x
[11]
Kotaro Hara, Vicki Le, and Jon Froehlich. 2013. Combining crowdsourcing and google street view to identify street-level accessibility problems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 631--640. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470744
[12]
Samuli Hemminki, Petteri Nurmi, and Sasu Tarkoma. 2013. Accelerometer-based transportation mode detection on smartphones. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (Roma, Italy) (SenSys '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 13, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2517351.2517367
[13]
Jiwoong Heo, Sungjin Hwanga, Jucheol Moon, Jaehwan You, Hansung Kim, Jaehyuk Cha, and Kwanguk Kim. Under Review. A Framework of Transportation Mode Detection for People with Mobility Disability. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems (Under Review).
[14]
Shahla M. Hosseini, Michelle L. Oyster, R. Lee Kirby, Amanda L. Harrington, and Michael L. Boninger. 2012. Manual Wheelchair Skills Capacity Predicts Quality of Life and Community Integration in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 93, 12 (2012), 2237--2243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.021
[15]
Sungjin Hwang, Jiwoong Heo, Jucheol Moon, Jaehwan You, Hansung Kim, Jaehyuk Cha, and Kwanguk Kim. 2023. User and Period Independent Transportation Mode Detection for Wheelchair Users. IEEE Access 11 (2023), 10801--10812. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3241043
[16]
Yoshie Inada, Shinobu Izumi, Motoya Koga, and Shigehito Matsubara. 2014. Development of Planning Support System for Welfare Urban Design -- Optimal Route Finding for Wheelchair Users. Procedia Environmental Sciences 22 (2014), 61--69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2014.11.006
[17]
Kevin Jarrett, Koray Kavukcuoglu, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, and Yann LeCun. 2009. What is the best multi-stage architecture for object recognition?. In 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision. 2146--2153. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2009.5459469
[18]
Seita Kayukawa, Tatsuya Ishihara, Hironobu Takagi, Shigeo Morishima, and Chieko Asakawa. 2020. Guiding Blind Pedestrians in Public Spaces by Understanding Walking Behavior of Nearby Pedestrians. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 4, 3, Article 85 (sep 2020), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411825
[19]
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E. Hinton. 2017. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun. ACM 60, 6 (may 2017), 84--90. https://doi.org/10.1145/3065386
[20]
Yushin Lee, Seongeun Oh, Jaehyuk Cha, Kwanguk (Kenny) Kim, Sun Young Lee, and Hansung Kim. 2022. Mobility and life satisfaction among wheelchair users: A study using mobile phone data in Seoul, South Korea. International Journal of Social Welfare 31, 3 (2022), 368--381. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12529 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ijsw.12529
[21]
Hugh Matthews, Linda Beale, Phil Picton, and David Briggs. 2003. Modelling Access with GIS in Urban Systems (MAGUS): capturing the experiences of wheelchair users. Area 35, 1 (2003), 34--45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4762.00108 arXiv:https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1475-4762.00108
[22]
Thomas Mehnert, Herbert H Krauss, Rosemary Nadler, and Mary Boyd. 1990. Correlates of life satisfaction in those with disabling conditions. Rehabilitation psychology 35, 1 (1990), 3.
[23]
Hugues Moreau, Andrea Vassilev, and Liming Chen. 2022. The Devil is in the Details: An Efficient Convolutional Neural Network for Transport Mode Detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 23, 8 (2022), 12202--12212. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3110949
[24]
Tamanna Motahar and Jason Wiese. 2022. A Review of Personal Informatics Research for People with Motor Disabilities. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 6, 2, Article 66 (jul 2022), 31 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3534614
[25]
Charles Musselwhite and Hebba Haddad. 2010. Mobility, accessibility and quality of later life. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults 11, 1 (2010), 25--37.
[26]
Kalan Nawarathne, Rudi Ball, Francisco C�mara Pereira, Fang Zhao, Atika Diana Rahardjo, Christopher Zegras, Moshe Ben-Akiva, and Change Pereira. 2014. Trade-off between smartphone battery life and stop detection accuracy. In 10th International Conference on Transport Survey Methods.
[27]
Elinor Ostrom. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge university press.
[28]
Donald J. Patterson, Lin Liao, Dieter Fox, and Henry Kautz. 2003. Inferring High-Level Behavior from Low-Level Sensors. In UbiComp 2003: Ubiquitous Computing, Anind K. Dey, Albrecht Schmidt, and Joseph F. McCarthy (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 73--89.
[29]
Melissa S. Riggins, Padmaja Kankipati, Michelle L. Oyster, Rory A. Cooper, and Michael L. Boninger. 2011. The Relationship Between Quality of Life and Change in Mobility 1 Year Postinjury in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 92, 7 (2011), 1027--1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.02.010
[30]
Francois Routhier, Claude Vincent, Johanne Desrosiers, and Sylvie Nadeau. 2003. Mobility of wheelchair users: a proposed performance assessment framework. Disability and Rehabilitation 25, 1 (2003), 19--34. https://doi.org/10.1080/dre.25.1.19.34 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/dre.25.1.19.34 12554389.
[31]
Mirna Safi. 2009. Immigrants' Life Satisfaction in Europe: Between Assimilation and Discrimination. European Sociological Review 26, 2 (03 2009), 159--176. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp013 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/esr/article-pdf/26/2/159/1276248/jcp013.pdf
[32]
Tim Schwanen and Martin Dijst. 2002. Travel-time ratios for visits to the workplace: the relationship between commuting time and work duration. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 36, 7 (2002), 573--592. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(01)00023-4
[33]
Rahul C. Shah, Chieh-yih Wan, Hong Lu, and Lama Nachman. 2014. Classifying the mode of transportation on mobile phones using GIS information. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Seattle, Washington) (UbiComp '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 225--229. https://doi.org/10.1145/2632048.2632109
[34]
M. Joseph Sirgy, P. Stephanes Kruger, Dong-Jin Lee, and Grace B. Yu. 2011. How Does a Travel Trip Affect Tourists' Life Satisfaction? Journal of Travel Research 50, 3 (2011), 261--275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287510362784 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287510362784
[35]
Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2014. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. The journal of machine learning research 15, 1 (2014), 1929--1958.
[36]
Beth T. Stalvey, Cynthia Owsley, Michael E. Sloane, and Karlene Ball. 1999. The Life Space Questionnaire: A Measure of the Extent of Mobility of Older Adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology 18, 4 (1999), 460--478. https://doi.org/10.1177/073346489901800404 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/073346489901800404
[37]
John K. Stanley, David A. Hensher, Janet R. Stanley, and Dianne Vella-Brodrick. 2011. Mobility, social exclusion and well-being: Exploring the links. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 45, 8 (2011), 789--801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.06.007
[38]
Michelle L Tolerico, Dan Ding, Rory A Cooper, Donald M Spaeth, Shirley G Fitzgerald, Rosemarie Cooper, Annmarie Kelleher, and Michael L Boninger. 2007. Assessing mobility characteristics and activity levels of manual wheelchair users. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 44, 4 (2007).
[39]
John W Tukey et al. 1977. Exploratory data analysis. Vol. 2. Reading, MA.
[40]
Ruut Veenhoven. 2011. Happiness: Also known as "life satisfaction" and "subjective well-being". In Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research. Springer, 63--77.
[41]
Raquel Velho. 2019. Transport accessibility for wheelchair users: A qualitative analysis of inclusion and health. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology 8, 2 (2019), 103--115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2018.04.005
[42]
T. Vincenty. 1975. Direct and inverse solutions of geodesics on the ellipsoid with application of nested equations. Survey Review 23, 176 (1975), 88--93. https://doi.org/10.1179/sre.1975.23.176.88 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1179/sre.1975.23.176.88
[43]
Lin Wang, Hristijan Gjoreski, Mathias Ciliberto, Sami Mekki, Stefan Valentin, and Daniel Roggen. 2019. Enabling Reproducible Research in Sensor-Based Transportation Mode Recognition With the Sussex-Huawei Dataset. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 10870--10891. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2890793
[44]
Ali Yazdizadeh, Zachary Patterson, and Bilal Farooq. 2020. Ensemble Convolutional Neural Networks for Mode Inference in Smartphone Travel Survey. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 21, 6 (2020), 2232--2239. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2019.2918923
[45]
Jiangbin Yin, Xinyu (Jason) Cao, and Xiaoyan Huang. 2021. Association between subway and life satisfaction: Evidence from Xi'an, China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 96 (2021), 102869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102869
[46]
James J. Q. Yu. 2021. Travel Mode Identification With GPS Trajectories Using Wavelet Transform and Deep Learning. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 22, 2 (2021), 1093--1103. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2019.2962741
[47]
Yi Zhao, Xu Wang, Jianbo Li, Desheng Zhang, and Zheng Yang. 2019. CellTrans: Private Car or Public Transportation? Infer Users' Main Transportation Modes at Urban Scale with Cellular Data. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 3, 3, Article 125 (sep 2019), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351283
[48]
Yu Zheng, Quannan Li, Yukun Chen, Xing Xie, and Wei-Ying Ma. 2008. Understanding mobility based on GPS data. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (Seoul, Korea) (UbiComp '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 312--321. https://doi.org/10.1145/1409635.1409677

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)More Data for People with Disabilities! Comparing Data Collection Efforts for Wheelchair Transportation Mode DetectionProceedings of the 2024 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers10.1145/3675095.3676617(82-88)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Emotion Recognition on the Go: Utilizing Wearable IMUs for Personalized Emotion RecognitionCompanion of the 2024 on ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing10.1145/3675094.3678452(537-544)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 8, Issue 1
March 2024
1182 pages
EISSN:2474-9567
DOI:10.1145/3651875
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 March 2024
Published in�IMWUT�Volume 8, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Global Positioning System
  2. Life Satisfaction
  3. Mobility Disability
  4. Transportation Mode Detection

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)351
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)89
Reflects downloads up to 22 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)More Data for People with Disabilities! Comparing Data Collection Efforts for Wheelchair Transportation Mode DetectionProceedings of the 2024 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers10.1145/3675095.3676617(82-88)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Emotion Recognition on the Go: Utilizing Wearable IMUs for Personalized Emotion RecognitionCompanion of the 2024 on ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing10.1145/3675094.3678452(537-544)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2024

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media