User talk:Thtatithticth: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:29, 14 April 2020

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Thtatithticth! Thank you for your contributions. I am HiLo48 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HiLo48 (talk) 23:58, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Incompressible flow. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. -- φ OnePt618^Talk φ 04:36, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@OnePt618: You misunderstood my intentions; the edit wasn't supposed to introduce my personal commentary. The paragraph was previously part of the article (I just reinstated it after it was removed without explanation), and was presumably intended to be part of the article. It looks to me like a way of mentioning to readers that "by the way, it is common in physics to assume flow to be incompressible, even when that isn't the case" which seems to me relevant enough to be included. If you still think it looks too much like commentary, I can try to rephrase it and/or move it to another section to make it more appropriate. Thtatithticth (talk) 05:39, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do think your edit feels a bit too much like personal commentary, and violates WP:NPOV. I'd be happy to help you edit it to make it more neutral. I appreciate your submission!---- φ OnePt618^Talk φ 05:43, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to fix that before bringing it back. Thanks. Thtatithticth (talk) 05:58, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Helios (spacecraft), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polarization (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:11, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Thtatithticth! You created a thread called Reporting non-immediate spam-only accounts at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

~Swarm~ ^{sting} 02:27, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Thtatithticth. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! qedk (t 心 c) 22:04, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aerodynamic heating, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Insulation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thtatithticth. I wrote this on the Kingston Technology page. Wondering if you could help

Hi Wiki community,

First off, I would like to introduce myself as the Search Engine Marketing Manager at HyperX. I apologize if this is the wrong place to discuss this topic. If it is not please point me in the right direction.

When HyperX was first created, we were a business unit and a product line of memory, but for the past 5 years we are looking to grow our own brand. A crucial part of creating our own brand is separating from the brand that is Kingston. As we all know, Wikipedia is a great resource for finding information on different organizations, and I was wondering if we could tell the story of HyperX outside of the shadows of Kingston.

I saw that a good number of our products and teams we sponsor are on the Kingston page, so I put in a request for HyperX to have it's own page and story. Since then, it looks like the HyperX page redirects to the Kingston page. I was wondering if it were possible to reconsider the redirect and have a page of our own that shows our history as a brand. I think the HyperX pieces of content on the Kingston page are good building blocks and are no longer relevant to Kingston (as a brand).

I appreciate you for reading this request. If there are any questions, or any steps for me to take, please don't hesitate to contact me.

Thank you, Andrew