Jump to content

User talk:Misbah Haider

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Misbah Haider (talk | contribs) at 17:18, 7 April 2024 (April 2024: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

April 2024

Information icon Hello, I'm Binnenstaat. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, White Plum Asanga, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Binnenstaat (talk) 00:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. When free, I will add it again with a notable reference Misbah Haider (talk) 01:59, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It reads like a PR-piece, not like encyclopedic information. The reason that the term asangha is used seems to be lost on you.Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 02:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Information icon

Hello Misbah Haider. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Misbah Haider. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Misbah Haider|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 14:45, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sir, I read your whole review and just wanted to share here that I decided to publish my first biography article on Wikipedia so, found Prof. Sheu got all permissions for the use of any of the resources being used on Wikipedia then wrote the article from a neutral point of view as didn't ever know this person. I also read thoroughly Wikipedia guidelines and tried to prevent any promotional content and just focused on what he has done in the educational sector. Really hard worked for this article sir, please let me know what are your further views on it, and what type type of further edits should I made to get it published.
Really grateful.
Regards, Misbah Haider (talk) 17:18, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Prof. Dr. Chen-Yu (Phillip) Sheu. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs sources able to confirm academic notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 05:46, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, Sir for seeing my article, I want to ask a question The article includes the person who is a member of IEEE, his academic journals, books, and also the notable references behind his career so, what should be edited?
Regards Misbah Haider (talk) 06:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Let's continue the discussion on the draft's talk page. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 06:11, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did some general clean-up, but did not address whether the content establishes notability. Listing and referencing selected publications is OK, but does not contribute to determining notability. The backlog of drafts at AfC is not a queue, so any draft might be reviewed in days, weeks, or sadly, months. David notMD (talk) 13:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]