@Article{info:doi/10.2196/24776,
author="Ngoc Cong Duong, Khanh
and Nguyen Le Bao, Tien
and Thi Lan Nguyen, Phuong
and Vo Van, Thanh
and Phung Lam, Toi
and Pham Gia, Anh
and Anuratpanich, Luerat
and Vo Van, Bay",
title="Psychological Impacts of COVID-19 During the First Nationwide Lockdown in Vietnam: Web-Based, Cross-Sectional Survey Study",
journal="JMIR Form Res",
year="2020",
month="Dec",
day="15",
volume="4",
number="12",
pages="e24776",
keywords="COVID-19; mental health; psychological distress; depression; anxiety; Vietnam; psychology; distress; lockdown; survey",
abstract="Background: The first nationwide lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic was implemented in Vietnam from April 1 to 15, 2020. Nevertheless, there has been limited information on the impact of COVID-19 on the psychological health of the public. Objective: This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of psychological issues and identify the factors associated with the psychological impact of COVID-19 during the first nationwide lockdown among the general population in Vietnam. Methods: We employed a cross-sectional study design with convenience sampling. A self-administered, online survey was used to collect data and assess psychological distress, depression, anxiety, and stress of participants from April 10 to 15, 2020. The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) were utilized to assess psychological distress, depression, anxiety, and stress of participants during social distancing due to COVID-19. Associations across factors were explored using regression analysis. Results: A total of 1385 respondents completed the survey. Of this, 35.9{\%} (n=497) experienced psychological distress, as well as depression (n=325, 23.5{\%}), anxiety (n=195, 14.1{\%}), and stress (n=309, 22.3{\%}). Respondents who evaluated their physical health as average had a higher IES-R score (beta coefficient [B]=9.16, 95{\%} CI 6.43 to 11.89), as well as higher depression (B=5.85, 95{\%} CI 4.49 to 7.21), anxiety (B=3.64, 95{\%} CI 2.64 to 4.63), and stress (B=5.19, 95{\%} CI 3.83 to 6.56) scores for DASS-21 than those who rated their health as good or very good. Those who self-reported their health as bad or very bad experienced more severe depression (B=9.57, 95{\%} CI 4.54 to 14.59), anxiety (B=7.24, 95{\%} CI 3.55 to 10.9), and stress (B=10.60, 95{\%} CI 5.56 to 15.65). Unemployment was more likely to be associated with depression (B=3.34, 95{\%} CI 1.68 to 5.01) and stress (B=2.34, 95{\%} CI 0.84 to 3.85). Regarding worries about COVID-19, more than half (n=755, 54.5{\%}) expressed concern for their children aged <18 years, which increased their IES-R score (B=7.81, 95{\%} CI 4.98 to 10.64) and DASS-21 stress score (B=1.75, 95{\%} CI 0.27 to 3.24). The majority of respondents (n=1335, 96.4{\%}) were confident about their doctor's expertise in terms of COVID-19 diagnosis and treatment, which was positively associated with less distress caused by the outbreak (B=--7.84, 95{\%} CI --14.58 to --1.11). Conclusions: The findings highlight the effect of COVID-19 on mental health during the nationwide lockdown among the general population in Vietnam. The study provides useful evidence for policy decision makers to develop and implement interventions to mitigate these impacts. ",
issn="2561-326X",
doi="10.2196/24776",
url="http://formative.jmir.org/2020/12/e24776/",
url="https://doi.org/10.2196/24776",
url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33284778"
}