Argumentation is not always sincere. This is evident in competitive domains like politics or trading but occurs, as well, in domains in which debates are ...

Valeria Carofiglio, Fiorella de Rosis: Exploiting Uncertainty and Incomplete Knowledge in Deceptive Argumentation. International Conference on Computational ...

... Exploiting Uncertainty and Incomplete Knowl- edge in Deceptive Argumentation. V.N. Alexandrov, J.J. Dongarra, B.A.. Juliano, R.S. Renner, C.J.K. Tan (Eds ...

Recognizing people's deceptive intentions when communicating is crucial to detect statements that may drive us to unintended harmful decisions.

The concept of strategic deception is not new in strategy and can be traced to early writings of Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, and Aristotle, among others.

A focus on deception will enrich research that describes the existence of false and misleading information but stops short of identifying their influence.

We propose an argumentation-based reasoner (ABR) as a proof-of-concept tool that can help a forensics analyst during the analysis of forensic evidence and the ...

By contrast, our focus in this paper is uncertainties about facts, numbers and science due to limited knowledge or ignorance—so-called epistemic uncertainty.

This paper examines the treatment of uncertainty in international decision-making in the IB literature and identifies directions for future research.

Missing premises – or the allegation that they are needed – often play a kind of deus ex machina role in deliberations about argument type and structure.