Abstract. Arrows have been introduced in functional programming as generalisations of monads. They also generalise comonads.

The one-to-one correspondence from Arrows to Freyd categories [3] is identified as the Kleisli construction for Arrows; hence the title “Freyd is Kleisli”.

Arrows have been introduced in functional programming as generalisations of monads. They also generalise comonads. Fundamental structures associated with.

PDF | On Jul 1, 2006, Bart Jacobs and others published Freyd is Kleisli, for Arrows | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate.

Our second main result-from (Jacobs & Hasuo, 2006 )-is that the Kleisli construction for arrows corresponds to Freyd categories (Robinson & Power, 1997), and ...

Freyd is Kleisli, for Arrows.pdf. Latest commit. Mzk-Levi · more ... Freyd is Kleisli, for Arrows.pdf. Top. File metadata and controls. 161 KB. Loading. Viewer ...

Jul 2, 2006 · Freyd is Kleisli, for Arrows. Bart Jacobs. Ichiro Hasuo. Radboud University Nijmegen the Netherlands. July 2, 2006. Page 2. Introduction.

Bibliographic details on Freyd is Kleisli, for Arrows.

Freyd is Kleisli, for Arrows Bart Jacobs1,2 and Ichiro Hasuo2. Institute for Computing and Information Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen

the oft-heard statement “Arrows are Freyd categories” [19]: Freyd categories are claimed to already provide categorical semantics for Arrows. However, this.