A relation F on a set X defines a function on the power set of X. A subset of X is said to be invariant for F if it is a fixed point for F. An element x of ...
A relation F on a set X defines a function on the power set of X. A subset of X is said to be invariant for F if it is a fixed point for F. An element x of ...
People also ask
Oct 1, 1994 · A relation F on a set X defines a function on the power set of X. A subset of X is said to be invariant for F if it is a fixed point for F.
One essential difference between invariant and inductive sets is that thesubstitution rule is only valid for invariant sets, and thecomposition rule is only ...
A topological invariant of substitution minimal sets. By Teturo KAMAE. (Received June 17, 1971). (Revised Jan. 21, 1972). \S 0. Introduction. In this paper, we ...
Mar 17, 2010 · Abstract:The class of substitutions of some primitive components is introduced. A bilateral subshift arising from a substitution of some ...
Methodically speaking, inductive sets of a system together with the substitution rule are complete for proving all invariant sets of a system. Proposition 3 ...
Invariant sets of dynamic systems ... (t)). Substituting back yields, that r(t) solves ... Construction of Invariant Sets. 5 Construction of Invariant Sets.
Finally, we need the following definition. Definition 1.4. A set E is said to be invariant under R(z) i/R(E)= E, and con~pletely.
Introduction. In this paper, we examine the ergodic properties of a bisequence over some finite set of symbols which is generated by a substitution.