Observational Study Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Nephrol. Sep 25, 2024; 13(3): 95739
Published online Sep 25, 2024. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v13.i3.95739
Quality of life and psychological distress in end-stage renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis and transplantation
Emad A Shdaifat, Community Nursing Department, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 1982, Saudi Arabia
Firas T Abu-Sneineh, Abdallah M Ibrahim, Department of Fundamental Nursing, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 1982, Saudi Arabia
ORCID number: Emad A Shdaifat (0000-0003-2723-6710).
Author contributions: Shdaifat EA conceived and designed the study, conducted the research, provided research materials, and collected and organized the data; Shdaifat EA and Abu-Sneineh analyzed and interpreted the data; Shdaifat EA, Sudqi AM, and Abu-Sneineh FT wrote the initial and final drafts of the article; All authors critically reviewed and approved the final draft and were responsible for the content and similarity index of the manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: The study protocol priorities voluntary participant and non-compromised care, as approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (IRB-2017-04-089).
Informed consent statement: Informed consent was obtained from all participants and data privacy was ensured. Data collection took place while waiting for dialysis or clinic appointments, adhering to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki for Human Ethics and the Consent to Participate. Measures were taken to minimize participant discomfort and ensure data confidentiality and security in accordance with the ethical guidelines.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, or publication of this article.
Data sharing statement: The data supporting the findings of this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement—checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement—checklist of items.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: Https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Emad A Shdaifat, PhD, Academic Research, Assistant Professor, Community Nursing, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, King Faisal Ibn Abd Al Aziz, King Faysal University, Dammam 34212, Dammam 1982, Saudi Arabia. [email protected]
Received: April 17, 2024
Revised: June 15, 2024
Accepted: July 15, 2024
Published online: September 25, 2024
Processing time: 154 Days and 22.8 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Among diverse profound impacts on patients’ quality of life (QoL), end-stage renal disease (ESRD) frequently results in increased levels of depression, anxiety, and stress. Renal replacement therapies such as hemodialysis (HD) and transplantation (TX) are intended to enhance QoL, although their ability to alleviate psychological distress remains uncertain. This research posits the existence of a significant correlation between negative emotional states and QoL among ESRD patients, with varying effects observed in HD and TX patients.

AIM

To examine the relationship between QoL and negative emotional states (depression, anxiety, and stress) and predicted QoL in various end-stage renal replacement therapy patients with ESRD.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included HD or TX patients in the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia. The 36-item Short Form Survey and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) was used for data collection, and correlation and regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The HD and TX transplantation groups showed statistically significant inverse relationships between QoL and DASS scores. HD patients with high anxiety levels and less education scored low on the physical component summary (PCS). In addition, the results of the mental component summary (MCS) were associated with reduced depression. Compared with older transplant patients, TX patients’ PCS scores were lower, and depression, stress, and negative working conditions were highly correlated with MCS scores.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study revealed notable connections between well-being and mental turmoil experienced by individuals undergoing HD and TX. The PCS of HD patients is affected by heightened levels of anxiety and lower educational attainment, while the MCS of transplant patients is influenced by advancing age and elevated stress levels. These insights will contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of patient support.

Key Words: Anxiety; Depression; End-stage renal disease; Hemodialysis; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Psychological distress; Quality of life; Renal replacement therapy outcomes; Saudi Arabia; Stress

Core Tip: This study examined the association between quality of life (QoL) and negative emotional states (depression, anxiety, and stress) in patients receiving end-stage renal replacement therapy (hemodialysis [HD] and transplantation [TX]) in Saudi Arabia. Using the 36-item Short Form Survey and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, we discovered significant inverse correlations between QoL and emotional distress. High anxiety and lower educational levels have a negative impact on the physical component of QoL in HD patients, while older age and elevated stress levels affect the mental component in patients with TX.



INTRODUCTION

There has been a recent increase in interest among patients undergoing rehabilitative interventions, such as kidney replacement therapy and transplantation, with the goal of improving their quality of life (QoL) and addressing associated mental stress. Recent data from the Global Burden of Disease Study reveals a growing prevalence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In 2019, approximately 17.3 million individuals worldwide were affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD) caused by glomerulonephritis, and projections suggest that this number will rise to 18.6 million by 2030[1]. Numerous studies have been conducted to assess the impact of these treatments on patients' psychological well-being and emotional health. Lyrakos et al[2] emphasized the significance of psychological support, noting that patients who received such support exhibited lower levels of anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation. Similarly, Ratti et al[3] emphasized the role of social support in reducing psychological distress and depressive symptoms in ESRD patients.

Patients with ESRD experience substantial benefits from renal replacement therapy, which is considered a fundamental medical solution for improving their overall well-being. Nevertheless, the QoL for many individuals with advanced-stage or terminal kidney conditions is noticeably lower compared to the general population or those with other chronic disabilities. This decline in QoL can be attributed to several factors, such as inadequate fluid intake, dietary restrictions, and the daily adherence to prescribed medications[4].

Patients receiving renal replacement therapy, whether through hemodialysis (HD) or TX, often experience psychological distress due to factors such as physical pain, limited treatment options, and concerns about long-term health outcomes. Previous studies have shown that renal TX generally leads to a better QoL compared to HD[5]. However, a significant number of patients undergoing both treatments continue to report feelings of sadness and anxiety[6,7]. It has been recognized that providing psychological support is crucial in reducing anxiety levels among these patients. Both in-person and online counseling sessions have been shown to significantly decrease both trait and state anxiety levels[7,8]. Furthermore, psychosocial factors like somatization and mood disorders have been found to be associated with higher healthcare costs and poorer outcomes in kidney TX recipients. This highlights the importance of addressing the psychological well-being of this patient population[9].

Patients with ESRD have concerns about their overall physical and psychological well-being, as well as the particular effects of dialysis and TX. This research explores the link between ESRD patients’ QoL and psychological health disorders (i.e. depression, anxiety, and stress [DAS]), using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS). The goal is to fill the knowledge gap regarding the intricate mechanisms that impact the health of ESRD patients receiving different renal replacement treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia. The study participants consisted of patients diagnosed with ESRD undergoing renal treatment through either HD or TX. The data were collected using convenience sampling. This study was part of the “Quality of Life, Depression and Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Renal Replacement Therapies” research project[10]. A sample size calculation was conducted using a bivariate normal model with an exact distribution to examine a correlation coefficient of 0.2 in a one-tailed test, with an α error probability of 0.05 and a power of 0.80. The null hypothesis presumed no correlation (ρ = 0). The investigation concluded that 153 participants were necessary to attain adequate statistical power to meet the research objectives. The effect size for the correlation was computed and categorized following the guidelines outlined by[11]. A small effect size is represented by R2 = 0.01, a medium effect size by R2 = 0.09, and a large effect size by R2 = 0.25.

The 36-item Short Form Survey is a widely used questionnaire established as a standard measure for various purposes. It is considered one of the most widely used assessments of health-related QoL and has a validated and reliable Arabic-language version[12]. This comprehensive measure evaluates eight dimensions pertaining to health: physical functionality, limitations caused by physical health issues, physical pain experienced, social capability, overall mental well-being, limitations arising from emotional problems, energy levels and fatigue (vitality), and the general perception of personal health[13].

The adapted Arabic version of the DASS was developed to measure the intensity of negative emotional states including DAS. This self-report questionnaire consists of 42 items and assesses the severity of depression, anxiety, and related symptoms over the past week. Respondents indicated the occurrence of symptoms, with each item rated from 0 (no stress or depression in the last week) to 3 (severe depression and stress in the last week)[14].

Ethical considerations

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board at Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (Dammam, Saudi Arabia), subject to conventional expectations concerning voluntary participation and non-compromised care. All participants provided informed written consent, and data privacy was safeguarded through anonymization and secure storage methods. Data collection occurred during dialysis or clinic appointments, following the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki for Human Ethics and the Consent to Participate. Steps were taken to minimize participant discomfort and guarantee data confidentiality and security, while also addressing potential conflicts of interest or biases in accordance with ethical guidelines.

Statistical analyses

SPSS version 22 was used to conduct the descriptive analysis. Correlations were used to assess the association between the QoL scores and DAS. Regression analysis was used to predict the QoL scores in relation to DAS and demographic characteristics. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Assumptions of normality, linearity, and homoscedasticity were assessed through Shapiro-Wilk tests, Q-Q plots, scatter plots of observed vs predicted values, and residual plots, guaranteeing the suitability of the employed statistical methods. The subscales pertaining to the QoL exhibited a normal distribution. In the TX group, mental component summary (MCS) scores displayed noteworthy linear correlations with DAS, while physical component summary (PCS) scores exhibited a significant linear relationship solely with anxiety. Regarding the HD group, MCS scores consistently exhibited significant linear associations with DAS, whereas PCS scores displayed significant relationships with depression and anxiety.

RESULTS

This study included 105 HD patients and 92 TX patients. Figure 1 summarizes key demographic data for both groups. There was a notably higher proportional of males among HD patients (76.2%) compared to TX patients (63.0%). Both groups had a fairly even distribution of married and unmarried participants. Patients with HD had higher rates of illiteracy (19.0% vs 4.3%) and lower rates of higher education (14.3% vs 26.1%) compared to TX patients. Rates for G1-8 and G9-12 education were similar between the groups, while diploma attainment rates were nearly identical. Non-employment rates were 58.1% for HD patients and 42.4% for TX patients. The majority of TX patients were of Saudi nationality (96.7%).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Demographic characteristics. HD: Hemodialysis; TX: Transplantation.

Table 1 shows the correlations between the QoL and DASS domains. In HD patients, there were noteworthy negative associations observed between scores reflecting QoL and indicators of DAS. Specifically, for the PCS, the correlations were found to be -0.4041 (R� = 0.163), -0.3141 (R� = 0.099), and -0.4121 (R� = 0.170), respectively, denoting medium to large effect sizes. The MCS also exhibited notable correlations: -0.3321 (R� = 0.110) for depression, -0.3681 (R� = 0.135) for anxiety, and -0.2402 (R� = 0.058) for stress. Conversely, in TX patients, significant associations were established for MCS: -0.5441 (R� = 0.295) for depression, -0.3881 (R� = 0.151) for anxiety, and -0.508 (R� = 0.258) for stress, all of which indicated large effect sizes. The correlations pertaining to PCS were comparatively smaller in magnitude, with only anxiety demonstrating significance at -0.2482 (R� = 0.062).

Table 1 Correlation between quality of life and depression anxiety stress scale domains.
DomiansHD
TX
Depression (R2)
Anxiety (R2)
Stress (R2)
Depression (R2)
Anxiety (R2)
Stress (R2)
PCS-0.4041 (0.163)-0.3141 (0.099)-0.4121 (0.170)-0.142 (0.020)-0.2482 (0.062)-0.162 (0.026)
MCS-0.3321 (0.110)-0.3681 (0.135)-0.2402 (0.058)-0.5441 (0.295)-0.3881 (0.151)-0.5081 (0.258)

By analyzing the QoL in different patient groups, the foremost influencers of QoL could be identified. In HD patients, increased anxiety and lower education levels have been found to negatively impact PCS and QoL. The comprehensive model showed statistical significance (F = 6.07, P < 0.05), and explained 47% of the variance in the PCS scores. In a broader patient cohort, depression was found to be a significant factor that negatively affected MCS. The overall model explained 25% of the variance in QoL (R2 = 0.25, F = 2.38, P < 0.05). In TX patients, older age was associated with a lower PCS score, with the model explaining 25% of the QoL variance (R2 = 0.25, F = 2.24, P < 0.05). Ultimately, the mental wellbeing of TX recipients is adversely affected by heightened levels of depression, stress, and negative employment circumstances. MCS is specifically affected by psychological aspects of QoL. Through a comprehensive analysis, it was determined that the developed model could explain 66% of QoL outcomes’ variance (Table 2).

Table 2 Multiple regression analysis predicting of quality of life among patients.
VariableHD
TX
PCS
MCS
PCS
MCS
B
SE B
β
B
SE B
β
B
SE B
β
B
SE B
β
Depression----0.3210.155-0.309a----0.5160.238-0.356a
Anxiety-0.4730.209-0.302a---------
Stress----------0.4650.183-0.416a
Age -------0.1800.080-0.299a---
Employment status----------3.0771.282-0.245a
Education level-1.9040.741-0.220a---------
R20.470.250.250.66
F6.072.382.245.2
Adj R20.390.150.140.36
DISCUSSION

This study investigated the complex relationship between psychological well-being and QoL in patients receiving end-stage renal replacement therapy for ESRD. Poor emotional status revealed a significant negative association between QoL and DAS in HD and TX patients. According to the regression analysis, greater anxiety and lower educational attainment were associated with lower PCS scores in HD patients, whereas depression influenced MCS scores. Older TX patients had lower PCS scores, with sadness, stress, and an unfavorable employment situation all having a substantial impact on MCS scores.

Comparative analysis of existing literature consistently highlights the detrimental impact of psychological distress on QoL in both HD and TX populations. Previous research consistently identifies high prevalence rates of anxiety (20%-45%) and depression (25%-50%) among HD patients, underscoring their vulnerability to mental health challenges[15-18]. Regression analysis further highlighted the negative association between higher anxiety[17,19-21].

The regression findings provide additional evidence of the distinct effects of anxiety, depression, and stress on PCS and MCS scores, underscoring the importance of implementing targeted interventions to enhance psychological well-being among patients undergoing renal replacement therapy[17,21-24]. Effectively addressing these mental health issues is essential for improving QoL and patient outcomes (and also healthcare system efficiency).

Moreover, the comparison between cohorts undergoing HD and TX highlights significant disparities in challenges and outcomes. TX, in contrast to dialysis, presents enhanced health status and potential employment advantages. However, it is crucial to prioritize ongoing care and management to maintain these improvements[25-27]. On the other hand, individuals undergoing HD often face enduring procedural difficulties, financial limitations, and social isolation, all of which contribute to inferior psychological well-being and diminished QoL[28]. Dialysis leads to social loneliness due to loss of independence, financial challenges, and limited daily activities. This persists even though TX improves health status and ongoing care is a priority[29].

This study’s limitations include its lack of a relatively large sample size, which inherently inhibits generalizing the outcomes. Furthermore, the cross-sectional design and reliance on self-reported measures may introduce various forms of bias. It is also important to consider the cultural and regional specificity of the studied context, which further limits the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, there may be unmeasured confounding variables, such as socioeconomic status and comorbidities, that could have an impact on pertinent variables, and thus the results. In future research, it would be beneficial to address these limitations and investigate the longitudinal effects of the variables in question.

CONCLUSION

These results provide important insights into the QoL of patients with ESRD. By examining the impact of dialysis on QoL, this study contributes to the knowledge base for healthcare managers and policymakers, enabling them to identify patient needs and vulnerable populations. The findings also suggest potential improvements that can be undertaken in hospital settings in order to enhance QoL. Additionally, by predicting QoL factors using psychological and demographic variables, this study increases awareness of relevant risk factors and assists administrators in implementing effective interventions. This research enhances our understanding of the QoL of ESRD patients, and emphasizes the need for further longitudinal studies, to comprehensively explore its complexity and changes over time.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Nursing

Country of origin: Saudi Arabia

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade B, Grade B, Grade D

Novelty: Grade B, Grade C, Grade C

Creativity or Innovation: Grade C, Grade C, Grade C

Scientific Significance: Grade B, Grade B, Grade C

P-Reviewer: Salameh E; Varama A S-Editor: Liu JH L-Editor: Filipodia P-Editor: Zhao S

References
1.  Hu J, Ke R, Teixeira W, Dong Y, Ding R, Yang J, Ai X, Ye DW, Shang J. Global, Regional, and National Burden of CKD due to Glomerulonephritis from 1990 to 2019: A Systematic Analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023;18:60-71.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 9.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Lyrakos G, Androutsos D, Aslani E, Spinaris V. The importance of psychological support for end-stage renal disease dialyzed patients. Eur Psychiatry. 2021;64:S726-S726.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Ratti MM, Rossi A, Delli Zotti GB, Sarno L, Spotti D. Social support, psychological distress and depression in hemodialysis patients. Psicol Della Salut. 2017;1:112-122.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Lin CH, Hsu YJ, Hsu PH, Lee YL, Lin CH, Lee MS, Chiang SL. Effects of Intradialytic Exercise on Dialytic Parameters, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Depression Status in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Agarwal DK, Agarwal A, Nag N, Gajway SY, Garanayak S. Psychosocial Impact of Renal Transplantation HIV Positive Patients Living with ESRD. Res Highlights Dis Heal Res. 2023;8: 186-197.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Nurhaeda, Winta MVI, Erlangga E. Gambaran psychological well being pada pasien gagal ginjal kronik yang menjalani terapi Hemodialisa. Psikoislamika J Psikol Dan Psikol Islam. 2023;20:559-567.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Marturano D, Manani SM, Virzi GM, Gechelin C, Tantillo I, Ronco C, Zanella M. #4650 Evaluation Of Psychological Support In Hemodialysis And Peritoneal Dialysis Patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2023;38.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Gechelin C, Milan Manani S, Virz� GM, Marturano D, Mattiotti M, Tantillo I, Ferrara A, Zirino F, Giuliani A, Ronco C, Zanella M. [Psychological support in anxiety management for patients affected by chronic kidney disease and treated by dialysis]. G Ital Nefrol. 2023;40.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Zerbinati L, Guerzoni F, Napoli N, Preti A, Esposito P, Caruso R, Bulighin F, Storari A, Grassi L, Battaglia Y. Psychosocial determinants of healthcare use costs in kidney transplant recipients. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1158387.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Shdaifat EA. Quality of Life, Depression, and Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Renal Replacement Therapies in Saudi Arabia. ScientificWorldJournal. 2022;2022:7756586.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Stat Power Anal Behav Sci. 2013;.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Coons SJ, Alabdulmohsin SA, Draugalis JR, Hays RD. Reliability of an Arabic version of the RAND-36 Health Survey and its equivalence to the US-English version. Med Care. 1998;36:428-432.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 102]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 125]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247-263.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4486]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4590]  [Article Influence: 148.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Parkitny L, McAuley J. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS). J Physiother. 2010;56:204.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 111]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 127]  [Article Influence: 9.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Vasilopoulou C, Bourtsi E, Giaple S, Koutelekos I, Theofilou P, Polikandrioti M. The Impact of Anxiety and Depression on the Quality of Life of Hemodialysis Patients. Glob J Health Sci. 2015;8:45-55.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 31]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 35]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Alshelleh S, Alhawari H, Alhouri A, Abu-Hussein B, Oweis A. Level of Depression and Anxiety on Quality of Life Among Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis. Int J Gen Med. 2023;16:1783-1795.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Nadort E, Rijkers N, Schouten RW, Hoogeveen EK, Bos WJW, Vleming LJ, Westerman M, Schouten M, Dekker MJE, Smets YFC, Shaw PC, Farhat K, Dekker FW, van Oppen P, Siegert CEH, Broekman BFP. Depression, anxiety and quality of life of hemodialysis patients before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Psychosom Res. 2022;158:110917.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Nagy E, Tharwat S, Elsayed AM, Shabaka SAE, Nassar MK. Anxiety and depression in maintenance hemodialysis patients: prevalence and their effects on health-related quality of life. Int Urol Nephrol. 2023;55:2905-2914.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 8.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Cukor D, Coplan J, Brown C, Friedman S, Newville H, Safier M, Spielman LA, Peterson RA, Kimmel PL. Anxiety disorders in adults treated by hemodialysis: a single-center study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;52:128-136.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 134]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 128]  [Article Influence: 8.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Kimmel PL, Peterson RA, Weihs KL, Simmens SJ, Alleyne S, Cruz I, Veis JH. Psychosocial factors, behavioral compliance and survival in urban hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 1998;54:245-254.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 258]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 238]  [Article Influence: 9.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Mohamed NA, Eraslan A, Kose S. The impact of anxiety and depression on the quality of life of hemodialysis patients in a sample from Somalia. BMC Psychiatry. 2023;23:825.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Czyżewski Ł, Frelik P, Wyzgał J, Szarpak Ł. Evaluation of Quality of Life and Severity of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in Patients After Kidney Transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2018;50:1733-1737.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Mittal SK, Ahern L, Flaster E, Maesaka JK, Fishbane S. Self-assessed physical and mental function of haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001;16:1387-1394.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 129]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 134]  [Article Influence: 5.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Alnazly EK, Samara NA. The burdens on caregivers of patients above 65 years old receiving hemodialysis: A qualitative study. Res Alnazly NA Samara Health Care Curr Rev. 2014;2.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Kostro JZ, Hellmann A, Kobiela J, Skóra I, Lichodziejewska-Niemierko M, Dębska-Ślizień A, Śledziński Z. Quality of Life After Kidney Transplantation: A Prospective Study. Transplant Proc. 2016;48:50-54.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 62]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 72]  [Article Influence: 9.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Monárrez-Espino J, Delgado-Valles JA, Ramírez-García G. Quality of life in primary caregivers of patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. J Bras Nefrol. 2021;43:486-494.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Sanchez S, Teelucksingh S, Ali R, Bailey H, Legall G. Quality of Life and Health Status Among Patients Receiving Renal Replacement Therapy in Trinidad and Tobago, West Indies. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2021;14:173-192.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Zhang L, Guo Y, Ming H. Effects of hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and renal transplantation on the quality of life of patients with end-stage renal disease. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2020;66:1229-1234.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Krishnan A, Teixeira-Pinto A, Lim WH, Howard K, Chapman JR, Castells A, Roger SD, Bourke MJ, Macaskill P, Williams G, Lok CE, Diekmann F, Cross N, Sen S, Allen RDM, Chadban SJ, Pollock CA, Turner R, Tong A, Yang JYH, Williams N, Au E, Kieu A, James L, Francis A, Wong G, Craig JC. Health-Related Quality of Life in People Across the Spectrum of CKD. Kidney Int Rep. 2020;5:2264-2274.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27]  [Article Influence: 6.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]