skip to main content
10.1145/2642918.2647409acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Expert crowdsourcing with flash teams

Published: 05 October 2014 Publication History

Abstract

We introduce flash teams, a framework for dynamically assembling and managing paid experts from the crowd. Flash teams advance a vision of expert crowd work that accomplishes complex, interdependent goals such as engineering and design. These teams consist of sequences of linked modular tasks and handoffs that can be computationally managed. Interactive systems reason about and manipulate these teams' structures: for example, flash teams can be recombined to form larger organizations and authored automatically in response to a user's request. Flash teams can also hire more people elastically in reaction to task needs, and pipeline intermediate output to accelerate completion times. To enable flash teams, we present Foundry, an end-user authoring platform and runtime manager. Foundry allows users to author modular tasks, then manages teams through handoffs of intermediate work. We demonstrate that Foundry and flash teams enable crowdsourcing of a broad class of goals including design prototyping, course development, and film animation, in half the work time of traditional self-managed teams.

Supplementary Material

suppl.mov (uistf4003-file3.mp4)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
oDesk. URL www.odesk.com.
[2]
Ahmad, S., Battle, A., Malkani, Z., and Kamvar, S. The jabberwocky programming environment for structured social computing. Proc. UIST '11, 2011.
[3]
Antin, J. and Shaw, A. Social desirability bias and self-reports of motivation: a cross-cultural study of Amazon Mechanical Turk in the US and India. Proc. CHI '12, 2012.
[4]
Baldwin, C.Y. and Clark, K.B. Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Business Review, 75(5):84--93, 1997.
[5]
Bechky, B.A. Gaffers, gofers, and grips: role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organization Science, 17(1):3--21, 2006.
[6]
Bernstein, M.S., et al. Soylent: a word processor with a crowd inside. Proc. UIST '10, 2010.
[7]
Bigham, J.P., et al. VizWiz: nearly real-time answers to visual questions. Proc. UIST '10, 2010.
[8]
Bunderson, J.S. and Boumgarden, P. Structure and learning in self-managed teams: why bureaucratic teams can be better learners. Organization Science, 21(3):609--624, 2010.
[9]
Chilton, L.B., et al. Cascade: crowdsourcing taxonomy creation. Proc. CHI '13, 2013.
[10]
Cooper, S., et al. Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game. Nature, 466(7307):756--760, 2010.
[11]
Cramton, C.D. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12(3):346--371, 2001.
[12]
Cranshaw, J. and Kittur, A. The polymath project: lessons from a successful online collaboration in mathematics. Proc. CHI '11, 2011.
[13]
Dai, P., Mausam, and Weld, D. Decision-theoretic control of crowd-sourced workflows. Proc. AAAI '10, 2010.
[14]
Dourish, P. and Bellotti, V. Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. Proc. CSCW '92, 1992.
[15]
Dow, S., Kulkarni, A., Klemmer, S., and Hartmann, B. Shepherding the crowd yields better work. Proc. CSCW '12, 2012.
[16]
Dow, S.P., et al. Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy. TOCHI, 17(4):18, 2010.
[17]
Fikes, R.E. and Nilsson, N.J. STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial intelligence, 2(3):189--208, 1972.
[18]
Heath, C. and Staudenmayer, N. Coordination neglect: how lay theories of organizing complicate coordination in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22:153--191, 2000.
[19]
Hinds, P., Liu, L., and Lyon, J. Putting the global in global work: an intercultural lens on the practice of cross-national collaboration. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1):135--188, 2011.
[20]
Hollan, J. and Stornetta, S. Beyond being there. Proc. CHI '92, 1992.
[21]
Hu, C., Bederson, B.B., Resnik, P., and Kronrod, Y. Monotrans2: A new human computation system to support monolingual translation. Proc. CHI '11, 2011.
[22]
Huckman, R.S., Staats, B.R., and Upton, D.M. Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: evidence from Indian software services. Management Science, 55(1):85--100, 2009.
[23]
Kautz, H.A., Selman, B., and Others. Planning as satisfiability. Proc. ECAI '92, 1992.
[24]
Kittur, A., Khamkar, S., Andre, P., and Kraut, R.E. CrowdWeaver: visually managing complex crowd work. Proc. CSCW '12, 2012.
[25]
Kittur, A., Smus, B., Khamkar, S., and Kraut, R.E. Crowdforge: crowdsourcing complex work. Proc. UIST '11, 2011.
[26]
Kittur, A., et al. The future of crowd work. Proc. CSCW '13, 2013.
[27]
Kulkarni, A., Can, M., and Hartmann, B. Collaboratively crowdsourcing workflows with turkomatic. Proc. CSCW '12, 2011.
[28]
Lasecki, W., et al. Real-time captioning by groups of non-experts. Proc. UIST '12, 2012.
[29]
Lasecki, W.S., et al. Real-time crowd control of existing interfaces. Proc. UIST '11, 2011.
[30]
Lasecki, W.S., et al. Chorus: a crowd-powered conversational assistant. Proc. UIST '13, 2013.
[31]
Lashinsky, A. Inside Apple. Hachette Book Group, New York, 2012.
[32]
Little, G., Chilton, L., Goldman, M., and Miller, R.C. Exploring iterative and parallel human computation processes. Proc. HCOMP '10, 2010.
[33]
Luther, K., Fiesler, C., and Bruckman, A. Redistributing leadership in online creative collaboration. Proc. CSCW '13, 2013.
[34]
Malone, T.W., Crowston, K., and Herman, G.A. Organizing Business Knowledge: The MIT Process Handbook. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2003.
[35]
Mark, G. Extreme collaboration. Communications of the ACM, 45(6):89--93, 2002.
[36]
Mathieu, J.E., et al. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2):273--83, 2000.
[37]
Nardi, B.A. and Whittaker, S. The place of face-to-face communication in distributed work. In P.J. Hinds and S. Kiesler (editors), Distributed Work, pp. 83--113. MIT Press, Cambridge, 2002.
[38]
Noronha, J., Hysen, E., Zhang, H., and Gajos, K.Z. Platemate: crowdsourcing nutritional analysis from food photographs. Proc. UIST '11, 2011.
[39]
Olson, G. and Olson, J. Distance Matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15(2):139--178, 2000.
[40]
Stol, K.J. and Fitzgerald, B. Researching crowdsourcing software development: perspectives and concerns. ICSE '14 Workshop on Crowdsourcing in Software Engineering, 2014.
[41]
Valentine, M. Team scaffolds: how minimal in-group structures support fast-paced teaming. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2012.
[42]
Yu, L. and Nickerson, J.V. Cooks or cobblers? Crowd creativity through combination. Proc. CHI '11, 2011.
[43]
Zhang, H., et al. Human computation tasks with global constraints. Proc. CHI '12, 2012.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Not Just Novelty: A Longitudinal Study on Utility and Customization of an AI WorkflowProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661587(782-803)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Exploring the Future of Informed Consent: Applying a Service Design ApproachProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373308:CSCW1(1-31)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Cooperation in the Gig Economy: Insights from Upwork FreelancersProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373148:CSCW1(1-20)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Expert crowdsourcing with flash teams

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    UIST '14: Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
    October 2014
    722 pages
    ISBN:9781450330695
    DOI:10.1145/2642918
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 October 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. crowdsourcing
    2. expert crowd work
    3. flash teams

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    UIST '14

    Acceptance Rates

    UIST '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 74 of 333 submissions, 22%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 561 of 2,567 submissions, 22%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)131
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)62
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Not Just Novelty: A Longitudinal Study on Utility and Customization of an AI WorkflowProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661587(782-803)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Exploring the Future of Informed Consent: Applying a Service Design ApproachProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373308:CSCW1(1-31)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Cooperation in the Gig Economy: Insights from Upwork FreelancersProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373148:CSCW1(1-20)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Reducing organizational inequalities associated with algorithmic controlsDiscover Artificial Intelligence10.1007/s44163-024-00137-04:1Online publication date: 15-May-2024
    • (2024)Context-Aware Automatic Splitting Method for�Structured Complex Crowdsourcing TasksComputer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1007/978-981-99-9640-7_4(48-61)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2024
    • (2023)Simulating Urban Element Design with Pedestrian Attention: Visual Saliency as Aid for More Visible Wayfinding DesignLand10.3390/land1202039412:2(394)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2023
    • (2023)Conceptual Architectural Design at Scale: A Case Study of Community Participation Using CrowdsourcingBuildings10.3390/buildings1301022213:1(222)Online publication date: 13-Jan-2023
    • (2023)Powering an AI Chatbot with Expert Sourcing to Support Credible Health Information AccessProceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3581641.3584031(2-18)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2023
    • (2023)Tasks of a Different Color: How Crowdsourcing Practices Differ per Complex Task Type and Why This MattersProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581418(1-15)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Fostering Collective Intelligence in Human–AI Collaboration: Laying the Groundwork for COHUMAINTopics in Cognitive Science10.1111/tops.12679Online publication date: 29-Jun-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media