Identifying Questions & Requests in Conversation
Authors: 
Kevin Quinn, 
Osmar ZaianeAuthors Info & Claims
Kevin Quinn, Osmar ZaianeAuthors Info & ClaimsArticle No.: 10, Pages 1 - 6
Abstract
In building an automated conversation agent, that attempts to converse with a human with as human-like as possible manner, we require the agent to identify which dialogue act, or class, the sentence belongs to. Determining the sentence class of a spoken phrase is helpful in building an intelligent companion, because without it the response may seem out of place. In written language, sentences can be classified into three classes: Declarative, Interrogative, and Imperative. These classes indicate which dialogue act the sentence belongs to. What our system does is take spoken text, which contains no punctuation, and classify the text into the three aforementioned classes. In conversation, the type of spoken text can indicate the type of required response. Our system is able to classify spoken text with 82% accuracy on our semi-automatically constructed dataset.
References
[1]
J. Allen, G. Ferguson, N. Blaylock, D. Byron, N. Chambers, M. Dzikovska, L. Galescu, and M. Swift. Chester: towards a personal medication advisor. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 39(5):500--513, 2006.
[2]
P. D. Census Bureau. Projections of the Population by Selected Age Groups and Sex for the United States. http://www.census.gov/population/projections/data/national/2012/summarytables.html, 2012. {Online; accessed 30-January-2013}.
[3]
W. W. Cohen, V. R. Carvalho, and T. M. Mitchell. Learning to classify email into "speech acts". In EMNLP, pages 309--316, 2004.
[4]
G. Cong, L. Wang, C.-Y. Lin, Y.-I. Song, and Y. Sun. Finding question-answer pairs from online forums. In Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 467--474. ACM, 2008.
[5]
B. J. Copeland. The essential turing. the ideas that gave birth to the computer age. AMC, 10:12, 2004.
[6]
M. Jeong, C.-Y. Lin, and G. G. Lee. Semi-supervised speech act recognition in emails and forums. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Volume 3-Volume 3, pages 1250--1259. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009.
[7]
T. Joachims. Making large scale svm learning practical. 1999.
[8]
A. Lampert, R. Dale, and C. Paris. Detecting emails containing requests for action. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 984--992. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010.
[9]
B. Li, X. Si, M. R. Lyu, I. King, and E. Y. Chang. Question identification on twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, pages 2477--2480. ACM, 2011.
[10]
A. Qadir and E. Riloff. Classifying sentences as speech acts in message board posts. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 748--758. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011.
[11]
P. Raina, D. Waltner-Toews, B. Bonnett, C. Woodward, and T. Abernathy. Influence of companion animals on the physical and psychological health of older people: an analysis of a one-year longitudinal study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1999.
[12]
J. R. Searle. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language, volume 626. Cambridge university press, 1969.
[13]
J. R. Searle, F. Kiefer, and M. Bierwisch. Speech act theory and pragmatics, volume 10. D. Reidel Dordrecht, 1980.
[14]
L. Shrestha and K. McKeown. Detection of question-answer pairs in email conversations. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING '04, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2004. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[15]
C. Statistics. Living arrangements of Seniors. http://www12.statcan.ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/98-312-x/98-312-x2011003_4-eng.cfm, 2013. {Online; accessed 30-January-2013}.
[16]
A. Stolcke, E. Shriberg, R. Bates, N. Coccaro, D. Jurafsky, R. Martin, M. Meteer, K. Ries, P. Taylor, C. Van Ess-Dykema, et al. Dialog act modeling for conversational speech. In AAAI Spring Symposium on Applying Machine Learning to Discourse Processing, pages 98--105, 1998.
[17]
M. Theobald. SVMLight Java Layer. http://adrem.ua.ac.be/~tmartin/, 1999. {Online; accessed 30-January-2013}.
[18]
J. Turian, L. Ratinov, and Y. Bengio. Word representations: a simple and general method for semi-supervised learning. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 384--394. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010.
Index Terms
- Identifying Questions & Requests in Conversation
Recommendations
Conversation space: visualising multi-threaded conversation
AVI '00: Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfacesThis paper explicates the metaphors used to conceive of asynchronous text-based communication (ATBC) software, such as email and newsgroups. Design of such software has been guided by an understanding of ATBC as essentially a text communication (textual ...
Conversation votes: enabling anonymous cues
CHI EA '07: CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn this work we describe Conversation Votes, a visualization to create new backchannels in conversation and augment collocated interaction. We expand the idea of a social mirror, a reflection of interaction, to incorporate direct user feedback in the ...
Evaluation of spoken multimodal conversation
ICMI '04: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Multimodal interfacesSpoken multimodal dialogue systems in which users address face-only or embodied interface agents have been gaining ground in research for some time. Although most systems are still strictly task-oriented, the field is now moving towards domain-oriented ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright � 2014 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 03 August 2014
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
C3S2E '14
C3S2E '14: International C* Conference on Computer Science & Software Engineering
August 3 - 5, 2014
QC, Montreal, Canada
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 12 of 42 submissions, 29%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 188Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)16
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View allView Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in