research-article

Guess who's coming to dinner? Surveying Digital Commensality During Covid-19 Outbreak

Authors:

Eleonora Ceccaldi,

Gualtiero Volpe,

Maurizio ManciniAuthors Info & Claims

ICMI '20 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction

Pages 317 - 321

https://doi.org/10.1145/3395035.3425649

Published: 27 December 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Eating together is one of the most treasured human activities. Its benefits range from improving the taste of food to mitigating the feelings of loneliness. In 2020, many countries have adopted lock-down and social distancing policies, forcing people to stay home,often alone and away from families and friends. Although technology can help connecting those that are physically distant, it is not clear whether eating together, at the same moment via video-call,is effective in creating the sense of connectedness that comes with sharing a meal with a friend or a family member in person. In this work, we report the results of an online survey on remote eating practices during Covid-19 lock-down, exploring the psychological motivations behind remote eating and behind deciding not to. Moreover, we sketch how future technologies could help creating digital commensality experiences

References

[1]

Laurensia Anjani, Terrance Mok, Anthony Tang, Lora Oehlberg, and Goh Wooi Boon. 2020. Why do people watch others eat? An empirical study on the motivations and practices of mukbang viewers. In CHI 2020: Proceedings of the 2020 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

Digital Library

[2]

Rick Bell and Patricia L Pliner. 2003. Time to eat: the relationship between the number of people eating and meal duration in three lunch settings. Appetite 41, 2 (2003), 215--218.

[3]

France Bellisle and Anne-Marie Dalix. 2001. Cognitive restraint can be offset by distraction, leading to increased meal intake in women. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 74, 2 (2001), 197--200.

[4]

John A Campbell. 2000. User acceptance of videoconferencing: Perceptions of task characteristics and media traits. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 10--pp.

Digital Library

[5]

Anthony S Chowand RebeccaACroxton. 2014. Ausability evaluation of academic virtual reference services. College & Research Libraries 75, 3 (2014), 309--361.

[6]

Vanessa I Clendenen, C Peter Herman, and Janet Polivy. 1994. Social facilitation of eating among friends and strangers. Appetite 23, 1 (1994), 1--13.

[7]

Tegan Cruwys, Kirsten E Bevelander, and Roel CJ Hermans. 2015. Social modeling of eating: A review of when and why social influence affects food intake and choice. Appetite 86 (2015), 3--18.

[8]

John M De Castro. 1994. Family and friends produce greater social facilitation of food intake than other companions. Physiology & behavior 56, 3 (1994), 445--455.

[9]

Myrte Esther Hamburg, Catrin Finkenauer, and Carlo Schuengel. 2014. Food for love: the role of food offering in empathic emotion regulation. Frontiers in psychology 5 (2014), 32.

[10]

C Peter Herman. 2017. The social facilitation of eating or the facilitation of social eating? Journal of eating disorders 5, 1 (2017), 16.

[11]

Marion M Hetherington, Annie S Anderson, Geraldine NM Norton, and Lisa Newson. 2006. Situational effects on meal intake: A comparison of eating alone and eating with others. Physiology & behavior 88, 4--5 (2006), 498--505.

[12]

Ata Jami. 2015. Healthy Reflections: The Influence of Mirror Induced Self-Awareness on Taste Perceptions. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research 1, 1 (2015), 2016.

[13]

Brent McFerran, Darren W Dahl, Gavan J Fitzsimons, and Andrea C Morales. 2009. I'll have what she's having: Effects of social influence and body type on the food choices of others. Journal of Consumer Research 36, 6 (2009), 915--929.

[14]

Lisa Miller, Paul Rozin, and Alan Page Fiske. 1998. Food sharing and feeding another person suggest intimacy; two studies of American college students. European Journal of Social Psychology 28, 3 (1998), 423--436.

[15]

Robert A Moody and Regi L Wieland. 2010. Using videoconferencing to establish and maintain a social presence in online learning environments. Educational Considerations 37, 2 (2010), 18--21.

[16]

Radoslaw Niewiadomski, Eleonora Ceccaldi, Gijs Huisman, Gualtiero Volpe, and Maurizio Mancini. 2019. Computational Commensality: from theories to computational models for social food preparation and consumption in HCI. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 6 (2019), 1--19.

[17]

Elinor Ochs and Merav Shohet. 2006. The cultural structuring of mealtime socialization. New directions for child and adolescent development 2006, 111 (2006), 35--49.

[18]

Paul Rozin. 1996. Towards a psychology of food and eating: From motivation to module to model to marker, morality, meaning, and metaphor. Current Directions in Psychological Science 5, 1 (1996), 18--24.

[19]

Sarah-Jeanne Salvy, Marlana Howard, Margaret Read, and Erica Mele. 2009. The presence of friends increases food intake in youth. The American journal of clinical nutrition 90, 2 (2009), 282--287.

[20]

Georg Simmel. 1997. The sociology of the meal.

[21]

Charles Spence. 2017. Comfort food: A review. International journal of gastronomy and food science 9 (2017), 105--109.

[22]

Charles Spence, Maurizio Mancini, and Gijs Huisman. 2019. Digital commensality: Eating and drinking in the company of technology. Frontiers in psychology 10 (2019), 2252.

[23]

Jordan D Troisi, Shira Gabriel, Jaye L Derrick, and Alyssa Geisler. 2015. Threatened belonging and preference for comfort food among the securely attached. Appetite 90 (2015), 58--64.

[24]

Jordan D Troisi and Julian WC Wright. 2017. Comfort food: Nourishing our collective stomachs and our collective minds. Teaching of Psychology 44, 1 (2017), 78--84.

[25]

George Ursachi, Ioana Alexandra Horodnic, and Adriana Zait. 2015. How reliable are measurement scales? External factors with indirect influence on reliability estimators. Procedia Economics and Finance 20 (2015), 679--686.

[26]

Kaitlin Woolley and Ayelet Fishbach. 2017. A recipe for friendship: Similar food consumption promotes trust and cooperation. Journal of Consumer Psychology 27, 1 (2017), 1--10.

Cited By

Wang HDeng JMohan ALi YPeng HHe LElvitigala DMueller F(2024)pic2eat: Facilitating Social Ice-breaking through Collaborative Design of 3D Printed AppetizerExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651082(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3651082
Ntouros VVlachokyriakos VEngelbutzeder P(2024)More than Foodsaving Machines: Insights from Communities Fighting Food Waste in the Digital AgeInteracting with Computers10.1093/iwc/iwae043Online publication date: 2-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwae043
Nunez Morales ANunez EHirokawa MImbesi LChatzigiannakis I(2023)A Social Awareness Interface for Helping Immigrants Maintain Connections to Their Families and Cultural Roots: The Case of Venezuelan ImmigrantsProceedings of the 2023 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences10.1145/3573381.3596461(188-193)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3573381.3596461
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Guess who's coming to dinner? Surveying Digital Commensality During Covid-19 Outbreak
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Empirical studies in HCI

Recommendations

The Playful Potential of Digital Commensality: Learning from Spontaneous Playful Remote Dining Practices
CHI PLAY

With one-person households being increasingly common and Covid-19 lockdown policies forcing people to stay home, remote dining has become common practice for many, who take it as an opportunity to connect with others in times of loneliness. Sharing meals ...
Commensality and the Social Use of Technology during Family Mealtime

This article examines familial interactions, which are mediated through information and communication technologies, during domestic mealtimes. We seek to understand how technologies are used and negotiated among family members and the influence of ...
Commensality or Reverie in Eating? Exploring the Solo Dining Experience
ICMI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction

Commensality, the act of eating together, is commonly associated with many benefits. Dining solo, in contrast, is frequently connected to adverse effects on a person. There is a growing interest in human-computer interaction (HCI) and design in how ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

ICMI '20 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction

October 2020

548 pages

ISBN:9781450380027

DOI:10.1145/3395035

General Chairs:
Khiet Truong
University of Twente, the Netherlands
,
Dirk Heylen
University of Twente, the Netherlands
,
Mary Czerwinski
Microsoft Research, USA
,
Program Chairs:
Nadia Berthouze
University College London, United Kingdom
,
Mohamed Chetouani
Sorbonne University, France
,
Mikio Nakano
C4A Research Institute, Japan

Copyright � 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 December 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

ICMI '20

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

ICMI '20: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION

October 25 - 29, 2020

Virtual Event, Netherlands

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 453 of 1,080 submissions, 42%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

14
Total Citations
View Citations
509
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)54
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Wang HDeng JMohan ALi YPeng HHe LElvitigala DMueller F(2024)pic2eat: Facilitating Social Ice-breaking through Collaborative Design of 3D Printed AppetizerExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651082(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3651082
Ntouros VVlachokyriakos VEngelbutzeder P(2024)More than Foodsaving Machines: Insights from Communities Fighting Food Waste in the Digital AgeInteracting with Computers10.1093/iwc/iwae043Online publication date: 2-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwae043
Nunez Morales ANunez EHirokawa MImbesi LChatzigiannakis I(2023)A Social Awareness Interface for Helping Immigrants Maintain Connections to Their Families and Cultural Roots: The Case of Venezuelan ImmigrantsProceedings of the 2023 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences10.1145/3573381.3596461(188-193)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3573381.3596461
Maldoy KPoels KDe Backer C(2023)“Missing ingredients: Digital commensality and its challenges in fostering psychological well-being”Food and Foodways10.1080/07409710.2023.226172231:4(319-338)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1080/07409710.2023.2261722
Wang JInoue T(2023)The Similarity of Virtual Meal of a Co-eating Agent Affects Human ParticipantCollaboration Technologies and Social Computing10.1007/978-3-031-42141-9_8(115-132)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42141-9_8
Neuman NSandvik PLindholm NBömer‐Schulte KLövestam E(2023)Food‐related experiences and behavioral responses among people affected by chemosensory dysfunctions following COVID‐19: A scoping reviewResearch in Nursing & Health10.1002/nur.2231546:4(385-399)Online publication date: 12-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22315
Pereira-Castro MPinto ACaixeta TMonteiro RBermúdez XMendonça A(2022)Digital Forms of Commensality in the 21st Century: A Scoping ReviewInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health10.3390/ijerph19241673419:24(16734)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416734
Ceccaldi ENiewiadomski RMancini MVolpe G(2022)What's on your plate? Collecting multimodal data to understand commensal behaviorFrontiers in Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2022.91100013Online publication date: 30-Sep-2022
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911000
Wang JKubota SInoue T(2022)Effects of Meal Similarity on Interpersonal Synchronization in Three-Party Remote DiningFrontiers in Computer Science10.3389/fcomp.2022.8382294Online publication date: 22-Jun-2022
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2022.838229
Bulsing PSalmon S(2022)Social Modeling of Virtual Healthy Food IntakeFrontiers in Computer Science10.3389/fcomp.2022.8329964Online publication date: 9-Mar-2022
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2022.832996
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents