Challenges and opportunities when bringing machines onto the team: : Human-AI teaming and flood evacuation decisions
References
[1]
Aon, Q3 Global Catastrophe Recap, 2022, Available at: https://www.aon.com/getmedia/08b0306f-790c-4f6a-8c0e-883e91ceba04/20221410-if-q3-2022-global-cat-recap.pdf?_gl=1*z1ycld*_ga*MTM3MzI1NzM1LjE2NzMyNzQyMTU.*_ga_S2CXP61BY4*MTY3MzI3NDIxNC4xLjAuMTY3MzI3NDIxNS4wLjAuMA.&_ga=2.265349647.1643888973.1673274215-137325735.1673274215.
[2]
A. Bukvic, J. Harrald, Rural versus urban perspective on coastal flooding: The insights from the U.S. Mid-Atlantic communities, Climate Risk Management 23 (2019) 7–18.
[3]
M.L. Cummings, S. Li, Sources of subjectivity in machine learning models, ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality 13 (2) (2021) 1–9.
[4]
R. Endsley Mica, Designing for Situation Awareness: an Approach to User- Centered Design, second ed. (second ed., CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011.
[5]
E. Glikson, A.W. Woolley, Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Review of Empirical Research, 2020, https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/annals.2018.0057.
[6]
R. Guidotti, A. Monreale, S. Ruggieri, F. Turini, F. Giannotti, D. Pedreschi, A survey of methods for explaining black box models, ACM Comput. Surv. 51 (5) (2018) 1–42.
[7]
S.M. Harding, P. Rajivan, B.I. Bertenthal, C. Gonzalez, Human Decisions on Targeted and Non-targeted Adversarial Samples, 40th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Madison, WI, 2018, CogSci 2018), July 25–28.
[8]
D.B. Kaber, Issues in human-automation interaction modeling: presumptive aspects of frameworks of types and levels of automation. Special Issue on Advancing Models of Human-Automation Interaction, J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Mak. 12 (2018) 7–24.
[9]
Laird John, Ranganath Charan, Gershman Samuel, 2020. Future Directions in Human Machine Teaming Workshop. available at https://basicresearch.defense.gov/Portals/61/Future%20Directions%20in%20Human%20Machine%20Teaming%20Workshop%20report%20%20%28for%20public%20release%29.pdf. Accessed on Feb. 16. 2024.
[10]
P. Maghelal, X. Li, W.G. Peacock, Highway congestion during evacuation: examining the household's choice of number of vehicles to evacuate, Nat. Hazards 87 (3) (2017) 1399–1411.
[11]
H.S. Munawar, M. Mojtahedi, A.W. Hammad, A. Kouzani, M.P. Mahmud, Disruptive Technologies as a Solution for Disaster Risk Management: A Review, 806, Science of the total environment, 2022.
[12]
NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine), Human-AI Teaming: State-Of-The-Art and Research Needs, 2021.
[13]
R.J. Pally, S. Samadi, Application of Image Processing and Convolutional Neural Networks for Flood Image Classification and Semantic Segmentation, 148, Environmental Modelling & Software, 2022.
[14]
S. Peterson, K.K. Stephens, A.L. Hughes, H. Purohit, When official systems overload: a framework for finding social media calls for help during evacuations, Proceedings of the 2019 Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management Conference (ISCRAM 2019), 2019.
[15]
A. Quesada-Román, Flood risk index development at the municipal level in Costa Rica: a methodological framework, Environ. Sci. Pol. 133 (2022) 98–106.
[16]
B.W. Robertson, M. Johnson, D. Murthy, W.R. Smith, K.K. Stephens, Using a combination of human insights and ‘deep learning’ for real-time disaster communication, Progress in Disaster Science 2 (2019),.
[17]
C. Rudin, Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decision making and use interpretable models instead, Nat. Mach. Intell. 1 (2019) 206–215.
[18]
R.J. Shively, J. Lachter, S.L. Brandt, M. Matessa, V. Battiste, W.W. Johnson, Why Human-Autonomy Teaming? International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Springer, Cham, 2017, pp. 3–11.
[19]
K.K. Stephens, A.G. Harris, A. Hughes, C. Montagnolo, K. Nader, S.A. Stevens, T. Tasuji, Y. Xu, H. Purohit, C. Zobel, Human-AI teaming during an ongoing disaster: how scripts around teaching and feedback reveal this is a form of human-machine communication, Human-Machine Communication 6 (1) (2023) 65–85,.
[20]
S.S. Tabas, S. Samadi, Variational Bayesian dropout with a Gaussian prior for recurrent neural networks application in rainfall–runoff modeling, Environ. Res. Lett. 17 (6) (2022).
[21]
Tahvildari, N., Goodall, J., Murray-Tuite, P., Heaslip, K., and Cetin, M., 2019. An integrated dynamic modeling approach for flooding of coastal transportation infrastructure: Assessment of impacts on emergency operations. MATS Final Report, 2019. http://www.matsutc.org/wp.
[22]
W.E. Wagner, E.C. Fischer, P. Pascual, Misunderstanding models in environmental and public health regulation, NYU Environmental Law Journal 18 (2010) Energy Center Research Paper No. 11-10, Available at: SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1711766.
[23]
L. Windheuser, R. Karanjit, R. Pally, S. Samadi, N.C. Hubig, An end‐to‐end flood stage prediction system using deep neural networks, Earth Space Sci. 10 (1) (2023).
[24]
X. Zhao, X. Yan, A. Yu, P. Van Hentenryck, Prediction and Behavioral Analysis of Travel Mode Choice: A Comparison of Machine Learning and Logit Models, 20, Travel behaviour and society, 2020, pp. 22–35.
[25]
G. Zhao, P.D. Bates, J. Neal, D. Yamazaki, Flood defense standard estimation using machine learning and its representation in large‐scale flood hazard modeling, Water Resour. Res. 59 (5) (2023).
Recommendations
Humanitarian Challenges and Opportunities
GHTC '12: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology ConferenceTechnology is a dynamic phenomenon which could experience rapid changes that may gradually lead to advancement in the humanitarian activities. It may become weak or lose its validity as a result of improper changes or attention and the way of thinking ...
Humans as teammates: The signal of human–AI teaming enhances consumer acceptance of chatbots
AbstractHuman–artificial intelligence (AI) teaming is a service system in which AI agents work interdependently toward a common goal alongside human agents. Although many consumer services rely on chatbots working with humans, little is known about the ...
Highlights- The signal of Human–AI teaming can enhance consumer acceptance of chatbots.
- Perceived effectiveness mediates the signaling effect of human–AI teaming.
- Perceived authenticity mediates the signaling effect of human–AI teaming.
- AI ...
Examining the impact of varying levels of AI teammate influence on human-AI teams
AbstractThe implementation of AI teammates is creating a wealth of research that examines how AI teammates impact human-AI teams. However, AI teammates themselves are not static, and their roles and responsibilities in human-AI teams are ...
Highlights- Foundational exploration on the influence AI teammates have on shared work.
- AI ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Elsevier Ltd.
Publisher
Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.
Netherlands
Publication History
Published: 09 July 2024
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Letter
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 21 Oct 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in