skip to main content
article

Navigating on handheld displays: Dynamic versus static peephole navigation

Published: 01 December 2006 Publication History

Abstract

Handheld displays leave little space for the visualization and navigation of spatial layouts representing rich information spaces. The most common navigation method for handheld displays is static peephole navigation: The peephole is static and we move the spatial layout behind it (scrolling). A more natural method is dynamic peephole navigation: here, the spatial layout is static and we move the peephole across it. In the experiment reported here, we compared dynamic and static peephole navigation in otherwise similar conditions. Subjects viewed a spatial layout containing two lines on a static display screen. Only a part of the screen---the peephole---was visible. Subjects had to discriminate line length by either moving a dynamic peephole across a static layout of the lines or by moving a dynamic layout behind a static peephole. In both conditions, they used mouse-cursor control to move either the peephole or the lines.Results show significant differences in discrimination performance between conditions when lines are larger than the size of the peephole. Discrimination thresholds for static peephole navigation were 50--75% higher than for dynamic peephole navigation. Furthermore, static peephole navigation took 24% more time than dynamic peephole navigation.

References

[1]
Bakker, N. H., Passenier, P. O., and Werkhoven, P. J. 2003. The effects of head-slaved navigation and the use of teleports on spatial orientation in virtual environments (VE). Human Factors 45, 160--169.
[2]
Cockburn, A. and McKenzie, B. 2001. 3D or not 3D? Evaluating the effect of the third dimension in a document management system. In Proceedings of the Computer-Human Interaction Conference. Seattle, 434--441.
[3]
Fitzmaurice, G. W., Zhai, S., and Chignell, M. H. 1993. Virtual reality for palm computers. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 11, 197--218.
[4]
Green, D. M. and Swets, J. A. 1966. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
[5]
Guiard, Y., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Bastin, J., Pasveer, D., and Zhai, S. 2004. View size and pointing difficulty in multi-scale navigation. In Proceedings of the Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI) Conference, May 25--28.
[6]
Luce, R. D. and Galanter, E. 1963. In Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 1, R. D. Luce et al., Eds. Wiley, New York, 191--243.
[7]
Nguyen, G. P. and Worring, M. 2004. Optimizing similarity-based visualization in content-based image retrieval. In Proceedings of the IEEE ICME Special Session Novel Techniques for Browsing in Large Multimedia Collections Conference. Taipei, Taiwan.
[8]
Norman, J. F., Todd, J. T., Perotti, V. J., and Tittle, J. S. 1996. The visual perception of three-dimensional length. J. Experi. Psych.: Human Perception Perform., 22, 173--186.
[9]
Robertson, G., Czerwinski, M., Larson, K., Robbins, D. C., Thiel, D., and Van Dantzich, M. 1998. Data mountain: Using spatial memory for document management. In Proceedings of Conference UIST, 153--162.
[10]
Sutherland, I. 1968. The ultimate display. In Proceedings of the IFIP Congress 2, 506--508.
[11]
Wagner, M. 1985. The metric of visual space. Perception and Psychophys. 38, 483--495.
[12]
Weber, E. H. 1965. On Weber's law, 1834. In A Source Book in the History of Psychology, R. J. Herrnstem and E. G. Borings, Eds. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 64--66.
[13]
Werkhoven, P. and Snippe, H. P. 1996. An efficient adaptive procedure for psychophysical discrimination experiments. Behav. Res. Meth. Instruments Comput. 28, 556--562.
[14]
Yee, K. 2003. Peephole displays: Pen interaction on spatially aware handheld computers. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Human Interaction.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)PalmGazer: Unimanual Eye-hand Menus in Augmented RealityProceedings of the 2023 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3607822.3614523(1-12)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2023
  • (2023)ARound the Smartphone: Investigating the Effects of Virtually-Extended Display Size on Spatial MemoryProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581438(1-15)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Comparing Gaze, Head and Controller Selection of Dynamically Revealed Targets in Head-Mounted DisplaysIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332023529:11(4740-4750)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 13, Issue 4
December 2006
160 pages
ISSN:1073-0516
EISSN:1557-7325
DOI:10.1145/1188816
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2006
Published in TOCHI Volume 13, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Human-computer interaction
  2. handheld displays
  3. navigation
  4. visual perception

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)26
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 22 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)PalmGazer: Unimanual Eye-hand Menus in Augmented RealityProceedings of the 2023 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3607822.3614523(1-12)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2023
  • (2023)ARound the Smartphone: Investigating the Effects of Virtually-Extended Display Size on Spatial MemoryProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581438(1-15)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Comparing Gaze, Head and Controller Selection of Dynamically Revealed Targets in Head-Mounted DisplaysIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332023529:11(4740-4750)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
  • (2023)A scrolling performance model based on two-dimensional touch peephole interactionsBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2023.222677743:9(1758-1768)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2023
  • (2022)Embodied Interaction and Immersive Film Experiences on SmartphonesMobile Storytelling in an Age of Smartphones10.1007/978-3-030-87247-2_14(205-219)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2021)Visualizing Off-screen Targets: Effects of Response Time and Visual Cue Design on Users’ Wayfinding Performance Using a Dynamic Peephole InterfaceInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2021.187635637:13(1220-1230)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2021
  • (2021)AR Peephole InterfacePervasive and Mobile Computing10.1016/j.pmcj.2021.10148978:COnline publication date: 1-Dec-2021
  • (2021)Towards a Semantic Classification of Possible Human-to-Environment Interactions in IoTDistributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions10.1007/978-3-030-77015-0_10(135-152)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2021
  • (2020)Spatial Knowledge Acquisition with Mobile Maps: Effects of Map Size on Users’ Wayfinding Performance with Interactive InterfacesISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi91106149:11(614)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2020
  • (2020)Modeling Angle-Based Pointing Tasks in Augmented Reality InterfacesIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2020.30319578(192597-192607)Online publication date: 2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media