skip to main content
10.1145/3627106.3627195acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesacsacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Enhanced In-air Signature Verification via Hand Skeleton Tracking to Defeat Robot-level Replays

Published: 04 December 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Behavioral biometrics has emerged as an important security factor for user authentication. Compared to static biometrics (e.g., faces, irises, and fingerprints), using human motion behaviors for authentication causes lower concern about privacy abuse, and behavior biometrics are shown hard to be replicated by humans. In-air 3D signature is one representative of behavioral biometrics. Specifically, a user’s hand movements can be tracked by visual or wireless sensors for contact-free signature authentication, where both the fingertip trajectory and the dynamic motion features are verified to provide enhanced security. However, with the advancement of 3D printing and robot technology, we find that 1) existing hand-tracking interfaces (e.g., Leap Motion and Google MediaPipe) are easily tricked by a fake hand, and 2) a robotic arm can reproduce a user’s in-air 3D signature with high similarity regarding both trajectory and motion behaviors. Thus, this work investigates the security of in-air signatures under robot-level replays and proposes to extend the signature verification from a single-point fingertip to multiple hand joints for enhanced security. We develop the hand skeleton-based 3D signature verification system, which can be deployed on any single camera devices (2D or 3D). The key insight is that current robots could hardly replicate the minute and unique inter-joint motions of a user. In particular, we track the hand skeleton using a single camera and reconstruct/draw the trajectories of its joints in a virtual 3D space, using the color gradients to represent time-lapse and using varying line widths to describe joint significance. Based on that, we extract the three-view skeleton signatures and inter-joint motion features and develop a convolutional neural network for verification. Extensive experiments show that our system not only achieves high authentication performance but also effectively mitigates robot-level replay attacks.

References

[1]
Heba Abdelnasser, Moustafa Youssef, and Khaled A Harras. 2015. Wigest: A ubiquitous wifi-based gesture recognition system. In 2015 IEEE conference on computer communications (INFOCOM). IEEE, 1472–1480.
[2]
Abdulaziz Alzubaidi and Jugal Kalita. 2016. Authentication of smartphone users using behavioral biometrics. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 18, 3 (2016), 1998–2026.
[3]
Athos Antonelli, Raffaele Cappelli, Dario Maio, and Davide Maltoni. 2006. Fake finger detection by skin distortion analysis. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 1, 3 (2006), 360–373.
[4]
Kai Cao and Anil K Jain. 2018. Automated latent fingerprint recognition. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 41, 4 (2018), 788–800.
[5]
Hayreddin Çeker and Shambhu Upadhyaya. 2016. User authentication with keystroke dynamics in long-text data. In 2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS). IEEE, 1–6.
[6]
YU-TZU CHIU. 2013. In-Air Signature Gives Mobile Security to the Password-Challenged. https://spectrum.ieee.org/inair-signature-gives-mobile-security-to-the-passwordchallenged
[7]
Nesli Erdogmus and Sebastien Marcel. 2014. Spoofing face recognition with 3D masks. IEEE transactions on information forensics and security 9, 7 (2014), 1084–1097.
[8]
Yuxun Fang, Wenxiong Kang, Qiuxia Wu, and Lei Tang. 2017. A novel video-based system for in-air signature verification. Computers & Electrical Engineering 57 (2017), 1–14.
[9]
Luca Ghiani, David Yambay, Valerio Mura, Simona Tocco, Gian Luca Marcialis, Fabio Roli, and Stephanie Schuckcrs. 2013. Livdet 2013 fingerprint liveness detection competition 2013. In 2013 International Conference on Biometrics (ICB). IEEE, 1–6.
[10]
Elyoenai Guerra-Segura, Aysse Ortega-Pérez, and Carlos M Travieso. 2021. In-air signature verification system using leap motion. Expert Systems with Applications 165 (2021), 113797.
[11]
Long Huang, Zhen Meng, Zeyu Deng, Chen Wang, Liying Li, and Guodong Zhao. 2021. Towards Verifying the User of Motion-controlled Robotic Arm Systems via the Robot Behavior. IEEE Internet of Things Journal (2021).
[12]
Long Huang and Chen Wang. 2021. Unobtrusive Pedestrian Identification by Leveraging Footstep Sounds with Replay Resistance. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 5, 4 (2021), 1–19.
[13]
Fortune Business Insight. [n. d.]. Virtual Reality Market Size, Share & Covid 19 Impact Analysis. https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/virtual-reality-market-101378
[14]
Anil K Jain, Friederike D Griess, and Scott D Connell. 2002. On-line signature verification. Pattern recognition 35, 12 (2002), 2963–2972.
[15]
Meenakshi K Kalera, Sargur Srihari, and Aihua Xu. 2004. Offline signature verification and identification using distance statistics. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 18, 07 (2004), 1339–1360.
[16]
Alisher Kholmatov and Berrin Yanikoglu. 2005. Identity authentication using improved online signature verification method. Pattern recognition letters 26, 15 (2005), 2400–2408.
[17]
Paweł Kobojek and Khalid Saeed. 2016. Application of recurrent neural networks for user verification based on keystroke dynamics. Journal of telecommunications and information technology3 (2016), 80–90.
[18]
Hao Kong, Li Lu, Jiadi Yu, Yingying Chen, and Feilong Tang. 2020. Continuous authentication through finger gesture interaction for smart homes using WiFi. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 20, 11 (2020), 3148–3162.
[19]
Shih-Hsiung Lee and Hsuan-Chih Ku. 2022. SIAR: Signing in the Air Using Finger Tracking Technology for Authentication on Embedded System. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE). IEEE, 1–2.
[20]
Gen Li and Hiroyuki Sato. 2020. Handwritten signature authentication using smartwatch motion sensors. In 2020 IEEE 44th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC). IEEE, 1589–1596.
[21]
Duo Lu and Dijiang Huang. 2018. Fmcode: A 3d in-the-air finger motion based user login framework for gesture interface. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.00130 (2018).
[22]
Duo Lu, Dijiang Huang, Yuli Deng, and Adel Alshamrani. 2018. Multifactor user authentication with in-air-handwriting and hand geometry. In 2018 International Conference on Biometrics (ICB). IEEE, 255–262.
[23]
Duo Lu, Kai Xu, and Dijiang Huang. 2017. A data driven in-air-handwriting biometric authentication system. In 2017 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB). IEEE, 531–537.
[24]
Jameel Malik, Ahmed Elhayek, Sheraz Ahmed, Faisal Shafait, Muhammad Imran Malik, and Didier Stricker. 2018. 3dairsig: A framework for enabling in-air signatures using a multi-modal depth sensor. Sensors 18, 11 (2018), 3872.
[25]
Pedro Melgarejo, Xinyu Zhang, Parameswaran Ramanathan, and David Chu. 2014. Leveraging directional antenna capabilities for fine-grained gesture recognition. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. 541–551.
[26]
David Menotti, Giovani Chiachia, Allan Pinto, William Robson Schwartz, Helio Pedrini, Alexandre Xavier Falcao, and Anderson Rocha. 2015. Deep representations for iris, face, and fingerprint spoofing detection. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 10, 4 (2015), 864–879.
[27]
Meta. 2022. META QUEST 2. https://store.facebook.com/quest/products/quest-2
[28]
Microsoft. 2022. Kinect for Windows. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/design/devices/kinect-for-windows
[29]
Kien Nguyen, Clinton Fookes, Arun Ross, and Sridha Sridharan. 2017. Iris recognition with off-the-shelf CNN features: A deep learning perspective. IEEE Access 6 (2017), 18848–18855.
[30]
Javier Ortega-Garcia, Joaquin Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Danilo Simon-Zorita, and Santiago Cruz-Llanas. 2002. From biometrics technology to applications regarding face, voice, signature and fingerprint recognition systems. In Biometric Solutions. Springer, 289–337.
[31]
Omkar M Parkhi, Andrea Vedaldi, and Andrew Zisserman. 2015. Deep face recognition. (2015).
[32]
App PKC. 2017. AirSig Vive Sample Code Demo for Unity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ekfjhsNmcM
[33]
ABM Mohaimenur Rahman, Yetong Cao, Xinliang Wei, Pu Wang, Fan Li, and Yu Wang. 2022. On the Feasibility of Handwritten Signature Authentication Using PPG Sensor. In 2022 IEEE 19th Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC). IEEE, 719–720.
[34]
Yanzhi Ren, Yingying Chen, Mooi Choo Chuah, and Jie Yang. 2014. User verification leveraging gait recognition for smartphone enabled mobile healthcare systems. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 14, 9 (2014), 1961–1974.
[35]
Md Sagar Hossen, Tasfia Tabassum, Ashiqul Islam, Rafat Karim, Laila Sultana Rumi, Aysha Akter Kobita, 2021. Digital signature authentication using asymmetric key cryptography with different byte number. In Evolutionary Computing and Mobile Sustainable Networks. Springer, 845–851.
[36]
Abdul Serwadda and Vir V Phoha. 2013. When kids’ toys breach mobile phone security. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGSAC conference on Computer & communications security. 599–610.
[37]
Yubo Shao, Tinghan Yang, He Wang, and Jianzhu Ma. 2020. AirSign: Smartphone Authentication by Signing in the Air. Sensors 21, 1 (2020), 104.
[38]
Akiji Takeuchi, Yusuke Manabe, and Kenji Sugawara. 2013. Multimodal soft biometrie verification by hand shape and handwriting motion in the air. In 2013 International Joint Conference on Awareness Science and Technology & Ubi-Media Computing (iCAST 2013 & UMEDIA 2013). IEEE, 103–109.
[39]
Jing Tian, Chengzhang Qu, Wenyuan Xu, and Song Wang. 2013. KinWrite: Handwriting-Based Authentication Using Kinect. In NDSS, Vol. 93. Citeseer, 94.
[40]
Ultrleap. [n. d.]. Leap Motion Controller. https://www.ultraleap.com/product/leap-motion-controller/
[41]
Ruxin Wang, Kaitlyn Madden, and Chen Wang. 2022. Low-effort User Authentication for Kiosk Systems based on Smartphone User’s Gripping Hand Geometry. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. 1–6.
[42]
Jonathan Wu, Prakash Ishwar, and Janusz Konrad. 2016. Two-stream CNNs for gesture-based verification and identification: Learning user style. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops. 42–50.
[43]
Hang Yin, Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Francisco S Melo, Aude Billard, and Ana Paiva. 2016. Synthesizing robotic handwriting motion by learning from human demonstrations. In Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
[44]
Fan Zhang, Valentin Bazarevsky, Andrey Vakunov, Andrei Tkachenka, George Sung, Chuo-Ling Chang, and Matthias Grundmann. 2020. Mediapipe hands: On-device real-time hand tracking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.10214 (2020).
[45]
Yongtuo Zhang, Wen Hu, Weitao Xu, Chun Tung Chou, and Jiankun Hu. 2018. Continuous authentication using eye movement response of implicit visual stimuli. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 4 (2018), 1–22.
[46]
Nan Zheng, Kun Bai, Hai Huang, and Haining Wang. 2014. You are how you touch: User verification on smartphones via tapping behaviors. In 2014 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Network Protocols. IEEE, 221–232.

Index Terms

  1. Enhanced In-air Signature Verification via Hand Skeleton Tracking to Defeat Robot-level Replays
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ACSAC '23: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference
    December 2023
    836 pages
    ISBN:9798400708862
    DOI:10.1145/3627106
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 04 December 2023

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    ACSAC '23

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 104 of 497 submissions, 21%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 349
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)349
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)121
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media