APTNESS: Incorporating Appraisal Theory and Emotion Support Strategies for Empathetic Response Generation
Pages 900 - 909
Abstract
Empathetic response generation is designed to comprehend the emotions of others and select the most appropriate strategies to assist them in resolving emotional challenges. Empathy can be categorized into cognitive empathy and affective empathy. The former pertains to the ability to understand and discern the emotional issues and situations of others, while the latter involves the capacity to provide comfort. To enhance one's empathetic abilities, it is essential to develop both these aspects. Therefore, we develop an innovative framework that combines retrieval augmentation and emotional support strategy integration. Our framework starts with the introduction of a comprehensive emotional palette for empathy. We then apply appraisal theory to decompose this palette and create a database of empathetic responses. This database serves as an external resource and enhances the LLM's empathy by integrating semantic retrieval mechanisms. Moreover, our framework places a strong emphasis on the proper articulation of response strategies. By incorporating emotional support strategies, we aim to enrich the model's capabilities in both cognitive and affective empathy, leading to a more nuanced and comprehensive empathetic response. Finally, we extract datasets ED and ET from the empathetic dialogue dataset EmpatheticDialogues and ExTES based on dialogue length. Experiments demonstrate that our framework can enhance the empathy ability of LLMs from both cognitive and affective empathy perspectives. Our code is released at https://github.com/CAS-SIAT-XinHai/APTNESS.
References
[1]
Israel Cohen, Yiteng Huang, Jingdong Chen, Jacob Benesty, Jacob Benesty, Jingdong Chen, Yiteng Huang, and Israel Cohen. 2009. Pearson correlation coefficient. Noise reduction in speech processing (2009), 1--4.
[2]
Paul Ekman. 1993. Facial expression and emotion. American psychologist, Vol. 48, 4 (1993), 384.
[3]
Yunfan Gao, Yun Xiong, Xinyu Gao, Kangxiang Jia, Jinliu Pan, Yuxi Bi, Yi Dai, Jiawei Sun, and Haofen Wang. 2023. Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10997 (2023).
[4]
Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. 2021. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685 (2021).
[5]
Jen-tse Huang, Man Ho Lam, Eric John Li, Shujie Ren, Wenxuan Wang, Wenxiang Jiao, Zhaopeng Tu, and Michael R. Lyu. 2023. Emotionally Numb or Empathetic? Evaluating How LLMs Feel Using EmotionBench. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03656 (2023).
[6]
Jena D Hwang, Chandra Bhagavatula, Ronan Le Bras, Jeff Da, Keisuke Sakaguchi, Antoine Bosselut, and Yejin Choi. 2021. (comet-) atomic 2020: On symbolic and neural commonsense knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 35. 6384--6392.
[7]
Gautier Izacard, Mathilde Caron, Lucas Hosseini, Sebastian Riedel, Piotr Bojanowski, Armand Joulin, and Edouard Grave. 2021. Unsupervised dense information retrieval with contrastive learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.09118 (2021).
[8]
Gautier Izacard and Edouard Grave. 2021. Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answering. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume, Paola Merlo, Jorg Tiedemann, and Reut Tsarfaty (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 874--880. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.74
[9]
Vladimir Karpukhin, Barlas Oguz, Sewon Min, Patrick Lewis, Ledell Wu, Sergey Edunov, Danqi Chen, and Wen-tau Yih. 2020. Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answering. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Bonnie Webber, Trevor Cohn, Yulan He, and Yang Liu (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 6769--6781. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.550
[10]
Sevgi Cocskun Keskin. 2014. From what isn't empathy to empathic learning process. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 116 (2014), 4932--4938.
[11]
Gangwoo Kim, Sungdong Kim, Byeongguk Jeon, Joonsuk Park, and Jaewoo Kang. 2023. Tree of Clarifications: Answering Ambiguous Questions with Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Houda Bouamor, Juan Pino, and Kalika Bali (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Singapore, 996--1009. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.63
[12]
Samuel S Komorita and William K Graham. 1965. Number of scale points and the reliability of scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 25, 4 (1965), 987--995.
[13]
Emma J Lawrence, Philip Shaw, Dawn Baker, Simon Baron-Cohen, and Anthony S David. 2004. Measuring empathy: reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient. Psychological medicine, Vol. 34, 5 (2004), 911--920.
[14]
Siyang Liu, Chujie Zheng, Orianna Demasi, Sahand Sabour, Yu Li, Zhou Yu, Yong Jiang, and Minlie Huang. 2021. Towards Emotional Support Dialog Systems. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), Chengqing Zong, Fei Xia, Wenjie Li, and Roberto Navigli (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 3469--3483. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.269
[15]
Xinbei Ma, Yeyun Gong, Pengcheng He, Hai Zhao, and Nan Duan. 2023. Query rewriting for retrieval-augmented large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14283 (2023).
[16]
Iain Mackie, Shubham Chatterjee, and Jeffrey Dalton. 2023. Generative relevance feedback with large language models. In Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2026--2031.
[17]
Zach Nussbaum, John X Morris, Brandon Duderstadt, and Andriy Mulyar. 2024. Nomic Embed: Training a Reproducible Long Context Text Embedder. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01613 (2024).
[18]
Wei Peng, Yue Hu, Luxi Xing, Yuqiang Xie, Yajing Sun, and Yunpeng Li. 2022. Control globally, understand locally: A global-to-local hierarchical graph network for emotional support conversation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.12749 (2022).
[19]
Yushan Qian, Weinan Zhang, and Ting Liu. 2023. Harnessing the Power of Large Language Models for Empathetic Response Generation: Empirical Investigations and Improvements. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, Houda Bouamor, Juan Pino, and Kalika Bali (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Singapore, 6516--6528. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.433
[20]
Hannah Rashkin, Eric Michael Smith, Margaret Li, and Y-Lan Boureau. 2019. Towards Empathetic Open-domain Conversation Models: A New Benchmark and Dataset. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Anna Korhonen, David Traum, and Llu�s M�rquez (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Florence, Italy, 5370--5381. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19--1534
[21]
Renate LEP Reniers, Rhiannon Corcoran, Richard Drake, Nick M Shryane, and Birgit A V�llm. 2011. The QCAE: A questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. Journal of personality assessment, Vol. 93, 1 (2011), 84--95.
[22]
Sahand Sabour, Chujie Zheng, and Minlie Huang. 2022. Cem: Commonsense-aware empathetic response generation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 36. 11229--11237.
[23]
Adam Smith. 2006. Cognitive empathy and emotional empathy in human behavior and evolution. The Psychological Record, Vol. 56, 1 (2006), 3--21.
[24]
Robyn Speer, Joshua Chin, and Catherine Havasi. 2017. Conceptnet 5.5: An open multilingual graph of general knowledge. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vol. 31.
[25]
Linzhuang Sun, Nan Xu, Jingxuan Wei, Bihui Yu, Liping Bu, and Yin Luo. 2024. Rational Sensibility: LLM Enhanced Empathetic Response Generation Guided by Self-presentation Theory. arxiv: 2312.08702 [cs.AI]
[26]
Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timoth�e Lacroix, Baptiste Rozi�re, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, et al. 2023. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971 (2023).
[27]
Quan Tu, Yanran Li, Jianwei Cui, Bin Wang, Ji-Rong Wen, and Rui Yan. 2022. MISC: A Mixed Strategy-Aware Model integrating COMET for Emotional Support Conversation. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Smaranda Muresan, Preslav Nakov, and Aline Villavicencio (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Dublin, Ireland, 308--319. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.25
[28]
Liang Wang, Nan Yang, and Furu Wei. 2023. Query2doc: Query expansion with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07678 (2023).
[29]
L. Xu, Hongfei Lin, Y. Pan, H. Ren, and J. Chen. 2008. Constructing the affective lexicon ontology. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, Vol. 27 (01 2008), 180--185.
[30]
Wenhao Yu, Dan Iter, Shuohang Wang, Yichong Xu, Mingxuan Ju, Soumya Sanyal, Chenguang Zhu, Michael Zeng, and Meng Jiang. 2022. Generate rather than retrieve: Large language models are strong context generators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.10063 (2022).
[31]
Yunxiang Zhang, Muhammad Khalifa, Lajanugen Logeswaran, Moontae Lee, Honglak Lee, and Lu Wang. 2023. Merging generated and retrieved knowledge for open-domain QA. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.14393 (2023).
[32]
Zhonghua Zheng, Lizi Liao, Yang Deng, and Liqiang Nie. 2023. Building emotional support chatbots in the era of llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.11584 (2023).
[33]
Jinfeng Zhou, Zhuang Chen, Bo Wang, and Minlie Huang. 2023. Facilitating Multi-turn Emotional Support Conversation with Positive Emotion Elicitation: A Reinforcement Learning Approach. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Anna Rogers, Jordan Boyd-Graber, and Naoaki Okazaki (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Toronto, Canada, 1714--1729. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.96
[34]
Jinfeng Zhou, Chujie Zheng, Bo Wang, Zheng Zhang, and Minlie Huang. 2023. CASE: Aligning Coarse-to-Fine Cognition and Affection for Empathetic Response Generation. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Anna Rogers, Jordan Boyd-Graber, and Naoaki Okazaki (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Toronto, Canada, 8223--8237. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.457
Index Terms
- APTNESS: Incorporating Appraisal Theory and Emotion Support Strategies for Empathetic Response Generation
Recommendations
Empathetic Response Generation through Graph-based Multi-hop Reasoning on Emotional Causality
AbstractEmpathetic response generation aims to comprehend the user emotion and then respond to it appropriately. Most existing works merely focus on what the emotion is and ignore how the emotion is evoked, thus weakening the capacity of the ...
Improving Empathetic Response Generation by Emotion Recognition and Information Filtration
Advanced Intelligent Computing Technology and ApplicationsAbstractEmpathetic response generation is commonly regarded as the result of harmony and interaction between affection and cognition. Thus, it is necessary to identify emotions and consider the situation in empathetic response generation. Although recent ...
Perceptions of Cognitive and Affective Empathetic Statements by Socially Assistive Robots
HRI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionCommunicating empathy is important for building relationships in numerous contexts. Consequently, the failure of robots to be perceived as empathetic by human users could be detrimental to developing effective human-robot interaction. Work on ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2024
5705 pages
Copyright � 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 21 October 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Funding Sources
- Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Program
- China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation
- the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China
Conference
CIKM '24
Sponsor:
CIKM '24: The 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
October 21 - 25, 2024
ID, Boise, USA
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 6Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)6
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 22 Oct 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in