skip to main content
10.1145/3639701.3663640acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimxConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Socratic AI Against Disinformation: Improving Critical Thinking to Recognize Disinformation Using Socratic AI

Published: 07 June 2024 Publication History

Abstract

This paper explores how the Socratic method, implemented in an AI-chatbot, can be used to stimulate citizens’ critical thinking, and consequently fight disinformation. In the Horizon Europe project TITAN, we are scrutinizing this opportunity. A prototype of the Socratic AI-chatbot was tested in four Co-Creation Labs with citizens. The findings presented in this paper indicate that there is potential and provide guidance to improve the effectiveness of the Socratic AI-chatbot in stimulating critical thinking and recognizing disinformation.

References

[1]
[1] J. Vissenberg, D. De Coninck, G. Mascheroni, W. Joris, and L. d'Haenens, ‘Digital Skills and Digital Knowledge as Buffers Against Online Mis/Disinformation? Findings from a Survey Study Among Young People in Europe’, Soc. Media Soc., vol. 9, no. 4, p. 20563051231207859, Oct. 2023.
[2]
[2] E. Aïmeur, S. Amri, and G. Brassard, ‘Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: a review’, Soc. Netw. Anal. Min., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 30, Feb. 2023.
[3]
[3] E. Pasquinelli and O. Richard, ‘Critical thinking as the ability to sort and qualify the information available, to form one's own judgement’, Eur. J. Educ., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 422–433, Sep. 2023.
[4]
[4] J. J. Koplin, ‘Dual-use implications of AI text generation’, Ethics Inf. Technol., vol. 25, no. 2, p. 32, Jun. 2023.
[5]
[5] J. C. Overholser, ‘Elements of the Socratic method: I. Systematic questioning.’, Psychother. Theory Res. Pract. Train., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 67–74, 1993.
[6]
[6] D. Fallis, ‘What Is Disinformation?’, Libr. Trends, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 401–426, Dec. 2015.
[7]
[7] M. N. O. Sadiku, T. P. Eze, and S. M. Musa, ‘FAKE NEWS AND MISINFORMATION’, International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research and Engineering, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 187–190, 2018.
[8]
[8] X. Zhou and R. Zafarani, ‘A Survey of Fake News: Fundamental Theories, Detection Methods, and Opportunities’, ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1–40, Sep. 2021.
[9]
[9] P. Hernon, ‘Disinformation and misinformation through the internet: Findings of an exploratory study’, Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 133–139, Jan. 1995.
[10]
[10] K. B. Jensen, ‘The Double Hermeneutics of Audience Research’, Telev. New Media, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 142–154, Feb. 2019.
[11]
[11] S. Paulussen, A. Heinonen, D. Domingo, and T. Quandt, ‘Doing It Together: Citizen Participation In The Professional News Making Process’, Obs. OBS, vol. 1, no. 3, Jan. 1970.
[12]
[12] P. Akhtar, ‘Detecting fake news and disinformation using artificial intelligence and machine learning to avoid supply chain disruptions’, Ann. Oper. Res., vol. 327, no. 2, pp. 633–657, Aug. 2023.
[13]
[13] E. Hermann, ‘Artificial intelligence and mass personalization of communication content—An ethical and literacy perspective’, New Media Soc., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1258–1277, May 2022.
[14]
[14] K. Kertysova, ‘Artificial Intelligence and Disinformation: How AI Changes the Way Disinformation is Produced, Disseminated, and Can Be Countered’, Secur. Hum. Rights, vol. 29, no. 1–4, pp. 55–81, Dec. 2018.
[15]
[15] N. Bontridder and Y. Poullet, ‘The role of artificial intelligence in disinformation’, Data Policy, vol. 3, p. e32, 2021.
[16]
[16] L. Faragó, P. Krekó, and G. Orosz, ‘Hungarian, lazy, and biased: the role of analytic thinking and partisanship in fake news discernment on a Hungarian representative sample’, Sci. Rep., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 178, Jan. 2023.
[17]
[17] T. A. Carey and R. J. Mullan, ‘What is Socratic questioning?’, Psychother. Theory Res. Pract. Train., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 217–226, 2004.
[18]
[18] N.-T. Le, ‘How Do Technology-Enhanced Learning Tools Support Critical Thinking?’, Front. Educ., vol. 4, p. 126, Nov. 2019.
[19]
[19] J. C. Overholser, ‘Elements of the Socratic method: II. Inductive reasoning.’, Psychother. Theory Res. Pract. Train., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 75–85, 1993.
[20]
[20] J. C. Overholser, ‘Elements of the Socratic method: III. Universal definitions.’, Psychother. Theory Res. Pract. Train., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 286–293, 1994.
[21]
[21] H. Delic and S. Bećirović, ‘Socratic Method as an Approach to Teaching’, Eur. Res., vol. 111, no. 10, Oct. 2016.
[22]
[22] R. Paul and L. Elder, The Thinker's Guide to Socratic Questioning. Rowman & Littlefield, 2019.
[23]
[23] P. Ballon, M. Van Hoed, and D. Schuurman, ‘The effectiveness of involving users in digital innovation: Measuring the impact of living labs’, Telemat. Inform., vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1201–1214, Aug. 2018.
[24]
[24] D. Schuurman, L. D. Marez, and P. Ballon, ‘The Impact of Living Lab Methodology on Open Innovation Contributions and Outcomes’, Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev., vol. 6, no. 1, 2016.
[25]
[25] B. Hanington and B. Martin, The Pocket Universal Methods of Design, Revised and Expanded: 125 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions. Rockport Publishers, 2022.
[26]
[26] N. Van Buggenhout, W. Van den Broeck, and I. Jennes, ‘The Island Approach (TIA): a suited projective technique for evaluating a bevy of attributes’, presented at the Open Living Lab Days 2018, Geneva, Switzerland: ENoLL - European Network of Living Labs, Sep. 2018, pp. 496–521.
[27]
[27] V. Braun and V. Clarke, ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, Jan. 2006.
[28]
[28] C. Geertz, ‘Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture’, in Knowledge and Postmodernism in Historical Perspective, 1st ed., Routledge, 1996, p. 14.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IMX '24: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences
June 2024
465 pages
ISBN:9798400705038
DOI:10.1145/3639701
  • Editors:
  • Asreen Rostami,
  • Donald McMillan,
  • Jonathan Hook,
  • Irene Viola,
  • Jun Nishida,
  • Hanuma Teja Maddali,
  • Alexis Clay
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 June 2024

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Work in progress
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

IMX '24

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 69 of 245 submissions, 28%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 111
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)111
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)27
Reflects downloads up to 21 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media