skip to main content
article

Does contralateral delay activity reflect working memory storage or the current focus of spatial attention within visual working memory?

Published: 01 December 2016 Publication History

Abstract

During the retention of visual information in working memory, event-related brain potentials show a sustained negativity over posterior visual regions contralateral to the side where memorized stimuli were presented. This contralateral delay activity CDA is generally believed to be a neural marker of working memory storage. In two experiments, we contrasted this storage account of the CDA with the alternative hypothesis that the CDA reflects the current focus of spatial attention on a subset of memorized items set up during the most recent encoding episode. We employed a sequential loading procedure where participants memorized four task-relevant items that were presented in two successive memory displays M1 and M2. In both experiments, CDA components were initially elicited contralateral to task-relevant items in M1. Critically, the CDA switched polarity when M2 displays appeared on the opposite side. In line with the attentional activation account, these reversed CDA components exclusively reflected the number of items that were encoded from M2 displays, irrespective of how many M1 items were already held in working memory. On trials where M1 and M2 displays were presented on the same side and on trials where M2 displays appeared nonlaterally, CDA components elicited in the interval after M2 remained sensitive to a residual trace of M1 items, indicating that some activation of previously stored items was maintained across encoding episodes. These results challenge the hypothesis that CDA amplitudes directly reflect the total number of stored objects and suggest that the CDA is primarily sensitive to the activation of a subset of working memory representations within the current focus of spatial attention.

References

[1]
Awh, E., & Jonides, J. (2001). Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 119-126.
[2]
Awh, E., Vogel, E. H., & Oh, S.-H. (2006). Interactions between attention and working memory. Neuroscience, 139, 201-208.
[3]
Chun, M. M., Golomb, J. D., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011). A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 73-101.
[4]
Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York: Oxford University Press.
[5]
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87-114.
[6]
D'Esposito, M. (2007). From cognitive to neural models of working memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 362, 761-772.
[7]
Drew, T., Horowitz, T. S., Wolfe, J. M., & Vogel, E. K. (2011). Delineating the neural signatures of tracking spatial position and working memory during attentive tracking. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 659-668.
[8]
Drew, T., & Vogel, E. K. (2008). Neural measures of individual differences in selecting and tracking multiple moving objects. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 4183-4191.
[9]
Druzgal, T. J., & D'Esposito, M. (2003). Dissecting contributions of prefrontal cortex and fusiform face area to face working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 771-784.
[10]
Emrich, S. M., Riggall, A. C., LaRocque, J. J., & Postle, B. R. (2013). Distributed patterns of activity in sensory cortex reflect the precision of multiple items maintained in visual short-term memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 6516-6523.
[11]
Fuster, J. M., & Alexander, G. E. (1971). Neuron activity related to short-term memory. Science, 173, 652-654.
[12]
Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1990). Cellular and circuit basis of working memory in prefrontal cortex of nonhuman primates. Progress in Brain Research, 85, 325-335.
[13]
Grubert, A., & Eimer, M. (2015). Does visual working memory represent the predicted locations of future target objects? An event-related brain potential study. Brain Research, 1626, 258-266.
[14]
Harrison, S. A., & Tong, F. (2009). Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas. Nature, 458, 632-635.
[15]
Ikkai, A., McCollough, A. W., & Vogel, E. K. (2010). Contralateral delay activity provides a neural measure of the number of representations in visual working memory. Journal of Neurophysiology, 103, 1963-1968.
[16]
Kang, M. S., & Woodman, G. F. (2014). The neurophysiological index of visual working memory maintenance is not due to load dependent eye movements. Neuropsychologia, 56, 63-72.
[17]
Katus, T., & Eimer, M. (2015). Lateralized delay period activity marks the focus of spatial attention in working memory: Evidence from somatosensory event-related brain potentials. Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 6689-6695.
[18]
Katus, T., Grubert, A., & Eimer, M. (2015). Electrophysiological evidence for a sensory recruitment model of somatosensory working memory. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 4697-4703.
[19]
LaRocque, J. J., Lewis-Peacock, J. A., Drysdale, A. T., Oberauer, K., & Postle, B. R. (2013). Decoding attended information in short-term memory: An EEG study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 127-142.
[20]
LaRocque, J. J., Lewis-Peacock, J. A., & Postle, B. R. (2014). Multiple neural states of representation in short-term memory? It's a matter of attention. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 5.
[21]
Leonard, C. J., Kaiser, S. T., Robinson, B. M., Kappenman, E. S., Hahn, B., Gold, J. M., et al. (2013). Toward the neural mechanisms of reduced working memory capacity in schizophrenia. Cerebral Cortex, 23, 1582-1592.
[22]
Lewis-Peacock, J. A., Drysdale, A. T., Oberauer, K., & Postle, B. R. (2012). Neural evidence for a distinction between short-term memory and the focus of attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 61-79.
[23]
McCollough, A. W., Machizawa, M. G., & Vogel, E. K. (2007). Electrophysiological measures of maintaining representations in visual working memory. Cortex, 43, 77-94.
[24]
Mongillo, G., Barak, O., & Tsodyks, M. (2008). Synaptic theory of working memory. Science, 319, 1543-1546.
[25]
Oberauer, K. (2013). The focus of attention in working memory --From metaphors to mechanisms. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 673.
[26]
Postle, B. R. (2005). Delay-period activity in the prefrontal cortex: One function is sensory gating. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1679-1690.
[27]
Postle, B. R. (2006). Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain. Neuroscience, 139, 23-38.
[28]
Qi, S., Chen, J., Hitchman, G., Zeng, Q., Ding, C., Li, H., et al. (2014). Reduced representations capacity in visual working memory in trait anxiety. Biological Psychology, 103, 92-99.
[29]
Ranganath, C., Cohen, M. X., Dam, C., & D'Esposito, M. (2004). Inferior temporal, prefrontal, and hippocampal contributions to visual working memory maintenance and associative memory retrieval. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 3917-3925.
[30]
Rypma, B., Berger, J. S., & D'Esposito, M. (2002). The influence of working-memory demand and subject performance on prefrontal cortical activity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 721-731.
[31]
Sakai, K., Rowe, J. B., & Passingham, R. E. (2002). Active maintenance in prefrontal area 46 creates distractor-resistant memory. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 479-484.
[32]
Sander, M. C., Werkle-Bergner, M., & Lindenberger, U. (2011). Contralateral delay activity reveals life-span age differences in top-down modulation of working memory contents. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 2809-2819.
[33]
Spronk, M., Vogel, E. K., & Jonkman, L. M. (2012). Electrophysiological evidence for immature processing capacity and filtering in visuospatial working memory in adolescents. PLoS One, 7, e42262.
[34]
Spronk, M., Vogel, E. K., & Jonkman, L. M. (2013). No behavioural or ERP evidence for a developmental lag in visual working memory capacity or filtering in adolescents and adults with ADHD. PLoS One, 8, e62673.
[35]
Sreenivasan, K. K., Curtis, C. E., & D'Esposito, M. (2014). Revisiting the role of persistent neural activity during working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 82-89.
[36]
Vogel, E. K., & Machizawa, M. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428, 748-751.
[37]
Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005). Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature, 438, 500-503.
[38]
Woodman, G. F., Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2012). Flexibility in visual working memory: Accurate change detection in the face of irrelevant variations in position. Visual Cognition, 20, 1-28.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Contralateral delay activity indexes working memory storage, not the current focus of spatial attentionJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience10.1162/jocn_a_0127130:8(1185-1196)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2018
  • (2018)Independent attention mechanisms control the activation of tactile and visual working memory representationsJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience10.1162/jocn_a_0123930:5(644-655)Online publication date: 1-May-2018

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience  Volume 28, Issue 12
December 2016
210 pages
ISSN:0898-929X
EISSN:1530-8898
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

MIT Press

Cambridge, MA, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2016

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 19 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Contralateral delay activity indexes working memory storage, not the current focus of spatial attentionJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience10.1162/jocn_a_0127130:8(1185-1196)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2018
  • (2018)Independent attention mechanisms control the activation of tactile and visual working memory representationsJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience10.1162/jocn_a_0123930:5(644-655)Online publication date: 1-May-2018

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media