skip to main content
10.1145/3099023.3099054acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

International Large-Scale Assessments and Culture: Implications for Designing Educational Technology

Published: 09 July 2017 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents principles of designing Educational Assessment Technology (EdAT) that is culturally-appropriate. These principles are based on a study on international large-scale assessments (ILSA) and the relations of their findings with culture. In order to achieve this, we correlate ILSA data with Cultural Dimension data for 81 countries and examine the implications for designing student-centred systems based on cultural dimensions. Cultural dimensions such as long-term orientation are good predictors for achievement and can guide design decisions around adaptation.

References

[1]
Castoriadis, C. The Castoriadis Reader. Trans. and Ed. David Ames Curtis. Blackwell Publishing. 1997.
[2]
French, J. J., French, A., & Li, W. X. 2015. The relationship among cultural dimensions, education expenditure, and PISA performance. International Journal of Educational Development, 42, 25--34.
[3]
Ganimian, A. J. 2016. Why do some school-based management reforms survive while others are reversed? The cases of Honduras and Guatemala, International Journal of Educational Development, 47, 33--46.
[4]
Ganimian, A. J. & Koretz, D. M. 2017. Dataset of International Large-Scale Assessments. Harvard Graduate School of Education. Last updated: February 8, 2017.
[5]
Gruber, N. 2017. {in Hebrew:} Why Are Israel's PISA Achievements so Low? Shoresh Institution.
[6]
Hagedorn, L. S., & Purnamasari, A. V. 2012. The Role of Culture in Predicting Students' Achievement: International Perspectives. International Journal of Global Education, 1(1).
[7]
Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. 2nd Edition, Sage Publications.
[8]
Hu, Y. 2013. Cultural Perspectives on Learning Environments. MA Thesis on Educational Theory and Policy, Penn State University.
[9]
Morony, S., Kleitman, S., Lee, Y. P., & Stankov, L. 2013. Predicting achievement: confidence vs self-efficacy, anxiety, and self-concept in Confucian and European countries. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 79--96.
[10]
Murphy, S. 2010. The pull of PISA: Uncertainty, influence, and ignorance. Inter-American Journal of Education for Democracy, 3(1), pp.27--44.
[11]
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2013. Pisa 2015 Draft Collaborative Problem Solving Framework. OECD.
[12]
Weirich, S., Haag, N., Hecht, M., et al. 2014. Nested multiple imputation in large-scale assessments. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 2(1), 9.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
UMAP '17: Adjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
July 2017
456 pages
ISBN:9781450350679
DOI:10.1145/3099023
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 July 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. cultural design
  2. educational technology
  3. student-centred design

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper

Conference

UMAP '17
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 162 of 633 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

UMAP '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 228
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 17 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media