skip to main content
10.1145/3213586.3213589acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

SUM-IML: Dynamic Scrutable User Modeling utilizing Interactive Machine Learning

Published: 02 July 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Machine learning? is a powerful tool in modeling historic user data and converting it into a computational user model. However, it is nearly impossible for a machine learning process to have access to all data pertaining to a user. This leads to potential gaps in the user model produced. Thus, involving the user in overseeing and controlling the modelling process may be considered as a worthwhile goal. This form of user model control is often referred to as scrutability in the personalization research domain. The approach proposed in this research is to combine the benefits of machine learning driven user modelling and scrutable user control in the modelling process. This PhD is at its midpoint and is currently focused on building the model while taking into consideration how user feedback may be incorporated. This feedback is solicited iteratively, enabling the ML process to retrain with the benefit of the user input. The early results of the experimental work show promising prediction accuracy results.

References

[1]
Amershi, S. et al. 2014. Power to the People: The Role of Humans in Interactive Machine Learning. AI Magazine. 35, 4 (2014), 105.
[2]
Assad, M. et al. 2007. PersonisAD: Distributed, active, scrutable model framework for context-aware services. Pervasive Computing. (2007), 55--72.
[3]
Billsus, D. and Pazzani, M.J. 2000. User modeling for adaptive news access. User modeling and user-adapted interaction. 10, 2--3 (2000), 147--180.
[4]
Enron Dataset: 2015. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~./enron/. Accessed: 2017-06--12.
[5]
Gutzwiller, R.S. and Reeder, J. 2017. Human interactive machine learning for trust in teams of autonomous robots. 2017 IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management, CogSIMA 2017. (2017).
[6]
Harrison, B. and Riedl, M.O. 2016. Towards Learning From Stories?: An Approach to Interactive Machine Learning. Aaai. (2016).
[7]
Holzinger, A. et al. 2017. A glass-box interactive machine learning approach for solving NP-hard problems with the human-in-the-loop. (2017), 1--26.
[8]
Holzinger, A. 2016. Interactive machine learning for health informatics: when do we need the human-in-the-loop? Brain Informatics. 3, 2 (2016), 119--131.
[9]
Kelleher, J.D. et al. 2015. Fundamentals of Machine Learning for Predictive Data Analytics. MIT Press.
[10]
Lum, A.W.K. 2007. Light-weight ontologies for scrutable user modelling. (2007).
[11]
Monk, A.F. and Blom, J.O. 2007. A theory of personalisation of appearance: quantitative evaluation of qualitatively derived data. Behaviour &Information Technology. 26, 3 (2007), 237--246.
[12]
M�ller, M.E. 2004. Can user models be learned at all? Inherent problems in machine learning for user modelling. Knowledge Engineering Review. 19, 1 (2004), 61--88.
[13]
Pedregosa, F. and Varoquaux, G. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. ... of Machine Learning ... 12, (2011), 2825--2830.
[14]
Staikopoulos, A. et al. 2012. AMASE: A framework for composing adaptive and Personalised Learning Activities on the Web. International Conference on Web-Based Learning (2012), 190--199.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
UMAP '18: Adjunct Publication of the 26th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
July 2018
349 pages
ISBN:9781450357845
DOI:10.1145/3213586
  • General Chairs:
  • Tanja Mitrovic,
  • Jie Zhang,
  • Program Chairs:
  • Li Chen,
  • David Chin
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 July 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • Science Foundation Ireland

Conference

UMAP '18
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

UMAP '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 26 of 93 submissions, 28%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 162 of 633 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

UMAP '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 85
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 17 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media