skip to main content
10.1145/3442442.3451140acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Distributed Fog Computing Based on Improved LT codes for Deep Learning in Web of Things

Published: 03 June 2021 Publication History

Abstract

With the rapid development of the Web of Things, there have been a lot of sensors deployed. Advanced knowledge can be achieved by deep learning method and easier integration with open Web standards. A large number of the data generated by sensors required extra processing resources due to the limited resources of the sensors. Due to the limitation of bandwidth or requirement of low latency, it is impossible to transfer such large amounts of data to cloud servers for processing. Thus, the concept of distributed fog computing has been proposed to process such big data into knowledge in real-time. Large scale fog computing system is built using cheap devices, denotes as fog nodes. Therefore, the resiliency to fog node failures should be considered in design of distributed fog computing. LT codes (LTC) have important applications in the design of modern distributed computing, which can reduce the latency of the computing tasks, such as matrix multiplication in deep learning methods. In this paper, we consider that fog nodes may be failure, and an improved LT codes are applied to matrix multiplication of distributed fog computing process to reduce latency. Numerical results show that the improved LTC based scheme can reduce average overhead and degree simultaneously, which reduce the latency and computation complexity of distributed fog computing.

References

[1]
Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G . The Internet of Things: A survey[J]. Computer Networks, 2010, 54(15):2787-2805.
[2]
Jara A J, Zamora M A, Skarmeta A . Glowbal IP: An adaptive and transparent IPv6 integration in the Internet of Things[J]. Mobile Information Systems, 2012, 8(3):177-197.
[3]
Al-Fuqaha A, Guizani M, Mohammadi M, Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2015, 17(4):2347-2376.
[4]
Raggett D . The Web of Things: Challenges and Opportunities[J]. Computer, 2015, 48(5):26-32.
[5]
Stirbu, V.: ‘Towards a restful plug and play experience in the Web of Things’. 2008 IEEE Int. Conf. Semantic Computing, August 2008, pp. 512–517.
[6]
Tran, N.K., Sheng, Q.Z., Babar, M.A., : ‘Searching the Web OF Things: state of the art, challenges, and solutions’, ACM Comput. Surv., 2017, 50, pp. 55:1–55:34.
[7]
Yao S, Zhao Y, Zhang A, Deep Learning for the Internet of Things[J]. Computer, 2018, 51(5):32-41.
[8]
Li L, Ota K, Dong M . Deep Learning for Smart Industry: Efficient Manufacture Inspection System With Fog Computing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2018, PP(10):1-1.
[9]
J. Cabrera G., D. Lucani R., F. Fitzek, “On network coded distributed storage: How to repair in a fog of unreliable peers,” in Proc. of IEEE ISWCS’16, Poznan, Poland, Sep. 20-23, 2016, pp. 188– 193.
[10]
J. Cabrera G., D. Lucani R., F. Fitzek, “On network coded distributed storage: How to repair in a fog of unreliable peers,” in Proc. of IEEE ISWCS’16, Poznan, Poland, Sep. 20-23, 2016, pp. 188–193.
[11]
C. Huang, R. Lu, and K. Choo, “Vehicular fog computing: Architecture, use case, and security and forensic challenges,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 105–111, Nov., 2017.
[12]
Y. Li, E. Soljanin, and P. Spasojevc, “Effect of the generation size and overlap on throughput and comlexity in randomized linear network coding,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 1111–1123, Feb., 2011.
[13]
Yue J, Xiao M, Pang Z . Distributed Fog Computing Based on Batched Sparse Codes for Industrial Control[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2018, PP(10):1-1.
[14]
S. Li, M. Maddah-Ali, and A. Avestimehr, “Coded distributed computing: Straggling servers and multistage dataflows,” in Proc. of 2016 54th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), Monticello, IL, USA, Sep. 27-30, 2016, pp. 164–171.
[15]
S. Li, M. Maddah-Ali, and A. Avestimehr, “Fundamental tradeoff between computation and communication in distributed computing,” in Proc. of ISIT’16, Barcelona, Spain, Jul. 10-15, 2016, pp. 1814– 1818.
[16]
K. Lee, M. Lam, R. Pedarsani, D. Papailiopoulos, K. Ramchandran, “Speeding up distributed machine learning using codes,” in Proc. of ISIT’16, Barcelona, Spain, Jul. 10-15, 2016, pp. 1143–1147.
[17]
A. Severinson, A. Amat, and E. Rosnes, “Block-diagonal and LT codes for distributed computing with straggling servers,” IEEE Trans. Communications, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 1739–1753, Mar., 2019.
[18]
Q. Yu, M. A. Maddah-Ali, and A. S. Avestimehr, “Straggler mitigation in distributed matrix multiplication: Fundamental limits and optimal coding,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Inf. Theory (ISIT), Jun. 2018, pp. 2022–2026.
[19]
Rensen J H S, Popovski P, Ostergaard J . Design and Analysis of LT Codes with Decreasing Ripple Size[J]. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2012, 60(11):3191-3197.
[20]
Okpotse T, Yousefi S. Systematic fountain codes for massive storage using the truncated Poisson distribution[J]. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2018, 67(2): 943-954.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WWW '21: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021
April 2021
726 pages
ISBN:9781450383134
DOI:10.1145/3442442
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 June 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

WWW '21
Sponsor:
WWW '21: The Web Conference 2021
April 19 - 23, 2021
Ljubljana, Slovenia

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 60
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 19 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media