skip to main content
10.1145/1385569.1385590acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaviConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluation of pointing performance on screen edges

Published: 28 May 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Pointing on screen edges is a frequent task in our everyday use of computers. Screen edges can help stop cursor movements, requiring less precise movements from the user. Thus, pointing at elements located on the edges should be faster than pointing in the central screen area. This article presents two experiments to better understand the foundations of "edge pointing". The first study assesses several factors both on completion time and on users' mouse movements. The results highlight some weaknesses in the current design of desktop environments (such as the cursor shape) and reveal that movement direction plays an important role in users' performance. The second study quantifies the gain of edge pointing by comparing it with other models such as regular pointing and crossing. The results not only show that the gain can be up to 44%, but also reveal that movement angle has an effect on performance for all tested models. This leads to a generalization of the 2D Index of Difficulty of Accot and Zhai that takes movement direction into account to predict pointing time using Fitts' law.

References

[1]
J. Accot and S. Zhai. More than dotting the i's --- foundations for crossing-based interfaces. In Proc. CHI '02, pages 73--80. ACM, 2002.
[2]
J. Accot and S. Zhai. Refining Fitts' law models for bivariate pointing. In Proc. CHI '03, pages 193--200. ACM, 2003.
[3]
M. Akamatsu, I. S. Mackenzie, and T. Hasbroucq. A comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual feedback in a pointing task using a mouse-type device. Ergonomics, 38(4):816--827, 1995.
[4]
C. Appert and M. Beaudouin-Lafon. Swingstates: Adding state machines to the swing toolkit. In Proc. UIST '06, pages 319--322. ACM, 2006.
[5]
AskTog. A quiz designed to give you Fitts, 1999. http://www.asktog.com/columns/022DesignedToGiveFitts.html.
[6]
P. Baudisch and R. Rosenholtz. Halo: a technique for visualizing off-screen objects. In Proc. CHI '03, pages 481--488. ACM, 2003.
[7]
J. Boritz, K. S. Booth, and W. B. Cowan. Fitts's Law Studies of Directional Mouse Movement. In Proc. GI '91, pages 216--223. Canadian Hum.-Comp. Comm. Soc., 1991.
[8]
S. K. Card, W. K. English, and B. J. Burr. Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys, for text selection on a crt. Human-computer interaction: a multidisciplinary approach, pages 386--392, 1987.
[9]
P. M. Fitts. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J. Exper. Psych., 47:381--391, 1954.
[10]
T. Grossman and R. Balakrishnan. A probabilistic approach to modeling two-dimensional pointing. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 12(3):435--459, 2005.
[11]
M. S. Hancock and K. S. Booth. Improving menu placement strategies for pen input. In Proc. GI '04, pages 221--230. Canadian Hum.-Comp. Comm. Soc., 2004.
[12]
ISO. 9241--9 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices. Inter. Org. for Standard., 2000.
[13]
W. E. Mackay, C. Appert, M. Beaudouin-Lafon, O. Chapuis, Y. Du, J.-D. Fekete, and Y. Guiard. Touchstone: exploratory design of experiments. In Proc. CHI '07, pages 1425--1434. ACM, 2007.
[14]
I. S. MacKenzie. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Hum.-Comput. Interact., 7:91--139, 1992.
[15]
I. S. MacKenzie and W. Buxton. Extending Fitts' law to two-dimensional tasks. In Proc. CHI '92, 219--226. ACM, 1992.
[16]
I. S. MacKenzie, A. Sellen, and W. Buxton. A comparison of input devices in element pointing and dragging tasks. In Proc. CHI '91, pages 161--166. ACM, 1991.
[17]
B. A. Po, B. D. Fisher, and K. S. Booth. Comparing cursor orientations for mouse, pointer, and pen interaction. In Proc. CHI '05, pages 291--300. ACM, 2005.
[18]
J. Raskin. The Humane Interface: New Directions for Designing Interactive Systems. Addison-Wesley, 2000.
[19]
N. Smyrnis, I. Evdokimidis, T. Constantinidis, and G. Kastrinakis. Speed-accuracy trade-off in the performance of pointing movements in different directions in two-dimensional space. Experimental Brain Research, 134(1):21--31, 2000.
[20]
T. G. Whisenand and H. H. Emurian. Some effects of angle of approach on icon selection. In Proc. CHI '95, pages 298--299. ACM, 1995.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Extending Fitts' Law for Tapping on Surfaces Angled in the Depth DirectionExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650984(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2023)Effects of Footpad Slope, Movement Direction and Contact Part of Foot on Foot-Based InteractionsApplied Sciences10.3390/app1311663613:11(6636)Online publication date: 30-May-2023
  • (2023)Understanding the Effects of Movement Direction on 2D Touch Pointing TasksProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36264827:ISS(444-462)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Evaluation of pointing performance on screen edges

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    AVI '08: Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces
    May 2008
    483 pages
    ISBN:9781605581415
    DOI:10.1145/1385569
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 28 May 2008

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Fitts' law
    2. edge pointing
    3. performance modelling
    4. screen edges

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    AVI '08
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 128 of 490 submissions, 26%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 17 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Extending Fitts' Law for Tapping on Surfaces Angled in the Depth DirectionExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650984(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2023)Effects of Footpad Slope, Movement Direction and Contact Part of Foot on Foot-Based InteractionsApplied Sciences10.3390/app1311663613:11(6636)Online publication date: 30-May-2023
    • (2023)Understanding the Effects of Movement Direction on 2D Touch Pointing TasksProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36264827:ISS(444-462)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
    • (2023)UbiSurface: A Robotic Touch Surface for Supporting Mid-air Planar Interactions in Room-Scale VRProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36264797:ISS(376-397)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
    • (2023)Clarifying the Effect of Edge Targets in Touch Pointing through Crowdsourced ExperimentsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36264697:ISS(156-174)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
    • (2023)Analysis of Product Architectures of Pin Array Technologies for Tactile DisplaysProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36264687:ISS(135-155)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
    • (2023)Effect of a Cursor Warping Left and Right of the NotchExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3585766(1-8)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Shape-Adaptive Ternary-Gaussian Model: Modeling Pointing Uncertainty for Moving Targets of Arbitrary ShapesProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581217(1-18)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2022)Bivariate Effective Width Method to Improve the Normalization Capability for Subjective Speed-accuracy Biases in Rectangular-target PointingProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517466(1-13)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
    • (2021)Comparing Performance Models for Bivariate Pointing Through a Crowdsourced ExperimentHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 202110.1007/978-3-030-85616-8_6(76-92)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media