skip to main content
10.1145/2696454.2696495acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design and Evaluation of a Peripheral Robotic Conversation Companion

Published: 02 March 2015 Publication History

Abstract

We present the design, implementation, and evaluation of a peripheral empathy-evoking robotic conversation companion, Kip1. The robot's function is to increase people's awareness to the effect of their behavior towards others, potentially leading to behavior change. Specifically, Kip1 is designed to promote non-aggressive conversation between people. It monitors the conversation's nonverbal aspects and maintains an emotional model of its reaction to the conversation. If the conversation seems calm, Kip1 responds by a gesture designed to communicate curious interest. If the conversation seems aggressive, Kip1 responds by a gesture designed to communicate fear. We describe the design process of Kip1, guided by the principles of peripheral and evocative. We detail its hardware and software systems, and a study evaluating the effects of the robot's autonomous behavior on couples' conversations. We find support for our design goals. A conversation companion reacting to the conversation led to more gaze attention, but not more verbal distraction, compared to a robot that moves but does not react to the conversation. This suggests that robotic devices could be designed as companions to human-human interaction without compromising the natural communication flow between people. Participants also rated the reacting robot as having significantly more social human character traits and as being significantly more similar to them. This points to the robot's potential to elicit people's empathy.

References

[1]
Bartneck, C. et al. 2004. In your face, robot! The influence of a character's embodiment on how users perceive its emotional expressions. Proc of the Design and Emotion.
[2]
Beck, A. et al. 2010. Towards an affect space for robots to display emotional body language. RO-MAN 2010 - The 19th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication 464--469.
[3]
Bergstrom, T. and Karahalios, K. 2009. Social mirrors as social signals: transforming audio into graphics. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE. 29, 5, 22--32.
[4]
DiMicco, J.M. et al. 2004. Influencing group participation with a shared display. Proc of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work 614--623.
[5]
Fong, T. et al. 2003. A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 42, 3, 143--166.
[6]
Gielniak, M.J. et al. 2010. Secondary action in robot motion. 19th Int'l Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2010) 310--315.
[7]
Gockley, R. et al. 2005. Designing robots for long-term social interaction. 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.(IROS 2005). 1338--1343.
[8]
Gottman, J. et al. 1977. The Topography of Marital Conflict: A Sequential Analysis of Verbal and Nonverbal Behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 39, 461.
[9]
Gottman, J.M. et al. 1998. Predicting Marital Happiness and Stability from Newlywed Interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 60, 1, 5.
[10]
Guadagno, R.E. and Cialdini, R.B. 2002. Online persuasion: An examination of gender differences in computer-mediated interpersonal influence. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 6, 1, 38--51.
[11]
Hoffman, G. 2012. Dumb Robots, Smart Phones: a Case Study of Music Listening Companionship. RO-MAN 2012 - The IEEE Int'l Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication 358--363.
[12]
Hoffman, G. et al. 2014. Robot responsiveness to human disclosure affects social impression and appeal. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction 1--8.
[13]
Hoffman, G. and Ju, W. 2014. Designing Robots With Movement in Mind. J of Human-Robot Interact. 3, 1, 89.
[14]
Ishii, H. et al. 2012. Radical atoms: beyond tangible bits, toward transformable materials. Interactions. 19, 1, 38--51.
[15]
Ishii, H. and Ullmer, B. 1997. Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. Proc of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems 234--241.
[16]
Karney, B.R. and Bradbury, T.N. 1997. Neuroticism, marital interaction, and the trajectory of marital satisfaction. J of Pers and Soc Psych. 72, 1075--1092.
[17]
Kory, J.M. et al. 2013. Robotic learning companions for early language development. Proc of the 15th ACM on International conference on multimodal interaction 71--72.
[18]
Levenson, R.W. and Gottman, J.M. 1983. Marital interaction: physiological linkage and affective exchange. Journal of personality and social psychology. 45, 587--597.
[19]
Lutkebohle, I. et al. 2010. The bielefeld anthropomorphic robot head "Flobi." 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 3384--3391.
[20]
Mizanoor, R. et al. Dynamic Emotion-Based Human-Robot Collaborative Assembly in Manufacturing: The Preliminary Concepts. hci.cs.wisc.edu.
[21]
Shaer, O. and Hornecker, E. 2010. Tangible user interfaces: past, present, and future directions. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction. 3, 1--2, 1--137.
[22]
Sharma, M. et al. 2013. Communicating affect via flight path Exploring use of the Laban Effort System for designing affective locomotion paths. Proc of the Int'l Conf on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), on 293--300.
[23]
Shaver, P. et al. 1987. Emotion knowledge: further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of personality and social psychology. 52, 1061--1086.
[24]
Zuckerman, O. 2015. Objects for Change: A Case Study of a Tangible User Interface for Behavior Change. Ext Abs of the TEI.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Sustainable Impact of Stance Attribution Design Cues for Robots on Human–Robot Relationships—Evidence from the ERSPSustainability10.3390/su1617725216:17(7252)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Embodied Mediation in Group Ideation – A Gestural Robot Can Facilitate Consensus-BuildingProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660696(2611-2632)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Interaction-Shaping Robotics: Robots That Influence Interactions between Other AgentsACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/364380313:1(1-23)Online publication date: 2-Feb-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Design and Evaluation of a Peripheral Robotic Conversation Companion

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '15: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
      March 2015
      368 pages
      ISBN:9781450328838
      DOI:10.1145/2696454
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 02 March 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. ambient kinetic tangibles
      2. behavior change
      3. design
      4. empathy
      5. human-robot interaction
      6. robotic companions
      7. smartphone robots

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      HRI '15
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      HRI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 43 of 169 submissions, 25%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)176
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)29
      Reflects downloads up to 21 Oct 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Sustainable Impact of Stance Attribution Design Cues for Robots on Human–Robot Relationships—Evidence from the ERSPSustainability10.3390/su1617725216:17(7252)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2024
      • (2024)Embodied Mediation in Group Ideation – A Gestural Robot Can Facilitate Consensus-BuildingProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660696(2611-2632)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
      • (2024)Interaction-Shaping Robotics: Robots That Influence Interactions between Other AgentsACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/364380313:1(1-23)Online publication date: 2-Feb-2024
      • (2024)ROMEO: Towards the Design of Robot with Haptic Mediation for Remote ConflictExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650781(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2024)Embo: A Wearable Robot Transforming Child-Directed Verbal Aggression into Tactile FeedbackCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640616(857-861)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
      • (2024)Bridging HRI Theory and Practice: Design Guidelines for Robot Communication in Dairy FarmingProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634991(137-146)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
      • (2024)Sprout: Designing Expressivity for Robots Using Fiber-Embedded ActuatorProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634983(403-412)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
      • (2024)Understanding Large-Language Model (LLM)-powered Human-Robot InteractionProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634966(371-380)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
      • (2024)"Sorry to Keep You Waiting": Recovering from Negative Consequences Resulting from Service Robot Unintended RejectionProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634959(96-105)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
      • (2024)Integrating Flow Theory and Adaptive Robot Roles: A Conceptual Model of Dynamic Robot Role Adaptation for the Enhanced Flow Experience in Long-term Multi-person Human-Robot InteractionsProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634945(116-126)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media